Re: OPERATION BRICK !

by Silentscope 07.07.24 12:00

I would recommend Bernt sends two more copies out.

Addressed to:

Arul and Katharina Gaspar
Dianne Webster

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 12:04

Is Operation Grange getting a copy?

by GreenTara 07.07.24 12:11

Silentscope wrote:I would recommend Bernt sends two more copies out.

Addressed to:

Arul and Katharina Gaspar
Dianne Webster

I was thinking Nanny Cat more as the Gaspars have already done all they can & he says he didn’t want to bring Dianne Webster into it more than necessary. He speaks directly to Nanny Cat in the book tho.

by crusader 07.07.24 12:32

Wolters and Fulscher are the only two on the above list who don't know the truth about what happened.
I don't think the rest of them will do anything there is nothing they can do.

by Silentscope 07.07.24 12:47

Wolters has either been told to ignore the PJ Files, or never bothered to read them before proceeding.

Fülscher has taken the Time to actually visit Portugal, and has read the PJ Files.

If Bernt believes the Gaspars story is true, and that Webster should be left out of it then that is his decision.

As far as I am concerned, they are all in it together.

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 12:50

When the electronic version of the Brick is released, to be seen world wide, they will be steaming mad, and might try to sue Bernt. I doubt any sensible law firm would take them on. Martin Brunt might door step them. What wonderful irony that would be.

by GreenTara 07.07.24 14:34

Silentscope wrote:Wolters has either been told to ignore the PJ Files, or never bothered to read them before proceeding.

Fülscher has taken the Time to actually visit Portugal, and has read the PJ Files.

If Bernt believes the Gaspars story is true, and that Webster should be left out of it then that is his decision.

As far as I am concerned, they are all in it together.

I’m just going by what’s in the book, he does hold her accountable too but in a more limited way. You make a good point though about the Gaspars statement cos that affects her directly.

by Silentscope 07.07.24 14:52

The Gaspars Statements would only affect Dianne Webster directly how?

by GreenTara 07.07.24 15:22

Silentscope wrote:The Gaspars Statements would only affect Dianne Webster directly how?

Not “only”, just affect her directly because David Payne is her son in law & father to her grandchildren. I thought that was the point you were making. Sorry. I myself had forgotten about her connection to David Payne till you made me think of it.

by AnneCGuedes 07.07.24 16:15

Silentscope wrote:
Fülscher has taken the Time to actually visit Portugal, and has read the PJ Files.

How do you know that FF read the PJ Files, Silentscope ?

by AnneCGuedes 07.07.24 17:01

PeterMac wrote:Operation Brick Phase 2
Completed

The Brick is now in the hands of
* H. Wolters
* H. Fülscher
* Kate Healy / Gerry McCann
* Matt Oldfield / Rachael Oldfield
* David Payne / Fiona Payne
* Russell O'Brien / Jane Tanner
* Clarence Mitchell

And many other people across the world

The Brick is being prepared for electronic release, (using an English speaking proof reader this time) with some minor and ultimately irrelevant errors corrected.

It may include the Executive Summary
She Died
They Lied

HCW won't read the book, he can barely read.
FF won't read the book, he now knows enough about HCW's bluff.
The MCs will not read a book that can only bring back dark memories, but they will send it to Carter Ruck for review.
Carter Ruck might have a look but will remind the MCs of the Met's condition for their protection: no waves.
The others are keen never to think about the case again, will they put the book in a drawer in case their lawyers would need it?
CM will only see it as a way of lighting a fire in the fireplace next winter.

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 17:11

It's very annoying that not even an official review of the case will come from the Brick. But, will the main players and the Nuggets Abroad, have to keep checking the suspected burial place, which some of them have visited because of the secret messages?

by **PeterMac** 07.07.24 17:12

Cake Lover wrote:Excellent. What will the four couples, and Mitchell, mentioned in post #98, do?

What can they do ?

Ignore it and hope it goes away
Issue statements saying it is factually inaccurate on all 4,738 substantive points
Say they were "Acting under orders/ Duress/ coercion", which since 1945-6 has not been a Defence but can still be considered as Mitigation, given a sympathetic judge
Sue for Defamation/ Libel
Throw Gerry under a Bus and make full statements
or what ?

The evidence in the book in the form of Statement analysis shows Kate as the most vulnerable.
She has lost her profession, and we believe her husband.
And she was, and is, a Trustee of what is very clearly a long term Fraud, is involved in an astonishing case of "Wasting Police Time' and "Conspiracy to Pervert"

The twins will now be at University or college, of perhaps on a 'Gap Year' to Portugal cleaning roadsigns on the Algarve of graffiti – so she is very much on her own

A short personal letter was included in her copy of the Brick, which is also annotated
It is likely that Gerry will destroy it before she sees it if he gets the book first.

by **PeterMac** 07.07.24 18:17

Anne Guedes knows that Fülscher has been involved in the book for a long time.
we recommend she buys a copy
H Wolters acknowledged receipt and said he was reading it.
H.Fülscher has had a copy for the past 3 years, in manuscript, and read it thoroughly and critically reviewing it

by Bluebagthepirate 07.07.24 18:23

Any news on the website?

I'm half way through the book now.

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 18:38

The entire ghastly bunch being hassled would be satisfying enough, if anybody has sufficient interest.

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 19:12

It would be interesting to know if Bruckner reads it.

by **PeterMac** 07.07.24 19:18

List amended to include
Jon Clarke

by **PeterMac** 08.07.24 10:05

And now H. Fülscher's 'delphic' utterance makes sense

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
He only has to raise a "reasonable Doubt"
In this case it is Virtual Certainty that Madeleine was NOT abducted between 2118 and 2125 on 3/5/7

by Honesty 08.07.24 13:29

PeterMac wrote:Anne Guedes knows that Fülscher has been involved in the book for a long time.
we recommend she buys a copy
H Wolters acknowledged receipt and said he was reading it.
H.Fülscher has had a copy for the past 3 years, in manuscript, and read it thoroughly and critically reviewing it

Anne, if you are not in possession of a copy yet, would you please allow me to buy you a copy? In gratitude.

by Liz Eagles 08.07.24 13:42

PeterMac wrote:And now H. Fülscher's 'delphic' utterance makes sense

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
He only has to raise a "reasonable Doubt"
In this case it is Virtual Certainty that Madeleine was NOT abducted between 2118 and 2125 on 3/5/7

I like the delphic reference. As I recall Gerry McCann had a damascene moment spurring him into action - action which would make even a cheap public relations company wince.

by Silentscope 08.07.24 16:03

AnneCGuedes wrote:
Silentscope wrote:
Fülscher has taken the Time to actually visit Portugal, and has read the PJ Files.
How do you know that FF read the PJ Files, Silentscope ?

He tells us in the following interview.

https://www.rtl.de/cms/exklusives-interview-christian-b-s-anwalt-glaubt-fest-an-dessen-unschuld-im-fall-maddie-mccann-4630219.html

‘Wenn Sie die Portuguesiche Ermittlungstakten kennen wurden’

When you would know the PJ FILES.

by AnneCGuedes 08.07.24 18:45

PeterMac wrote:Anne Guedes knows that Fülscher has been involved in the book for a long time.
we recommend she buys a copy
H Wolters acknowledged receipt and said he was reading it.
H.Fülscher has had a copy for the past 3 years, in manuscript, and read it thoroughly and critically reviewing it

Excellent, but how would I know that "FF has been involved in the book for a long time" ? I'm not in the secret of the gods like you, Peter Mac! Besides why would FF be interested in the MC case if his client hasn't been charged on that matter ? The only person I know who has been in contact with FF is Isabelle McFadden (who has a lot of followers on X), but she never mentioned BS to me. I know that she contacted DM's daughter, heard DM had Alzheimer and (too bad for CB) dropped the issue. I learnt she at least sent a letter to CB and got an answer (she sent it to me) but unfortunately had to stop at FF's request. I discovered recently on X Isabelle's enthusiasm for BS's book, it lasted a couple of weeks, not a single comment, not a single review (no idea why).
Now please tell me why I should read BS's book (I read many many times the PJFiles, the untranslated parts as well) ?

by crusader 08.07.24 19:22

Sorry, who is DM?

by AnneCGuedes 08.07.24 19:29

The American lady supposed to have been raped by CB but, according to PT gynecologist expert, had not had sexual intercourse for a very long time.

by AnneCGuedes 08.07.24 19:35

By the way, FF seems to have been trying to get the judgement overturned on the basis of dubious evidence and one hair among a hundred others. I would say that, in the interest of CB, should be his priority.

by AnneCGuedes 08.07.24 19:44

Honesty wrote:
PeterMac wrote:Anne Guedes knows that Fülscher has been involved in the book for a long time.
we recommend she buys a copy
H Wolters acknowledged receipt and said he was reading it.
H.Fülscher has had a copy for the past 3 years, in manuscript, and read it thoroughly and critically reviewing it
Anne, if you are not in possession of a copy yet, would you please allow me to buy you a copy? In gratitude.

Many thanks, Honesty, but what gratitude are you talking about ?

by Honesty 08.07.24 20:14

All your hard work and commitment translating rhe documents from Portuguese into English.

by AnneCGuedes 08.07.24 20:37

Honesty, I'm touched and very grateful for your acknowledging this (the hard work was mainly reporting the trial in Lisbon with nothing more than a pad, a pencil and my memory, working in 3 languages (I'm French).
I'm busy writing now (a second book), this time about the MC case as a socio-political phenomenon. There is less mystery in what happened to Madeleine than in the indoctrination that this case has generated.
Once upon a time a simple hypothesis managed, despite (or because of) the lack of evidence, to impose itself as the only reality in the media-social-political echo chamber, under the sway of emotions and the aegis of the powerful confirmation bias. Verifiable facts were compelled to give way to beliefs and feelings. There is the rub !

by Honesty 08.07.24 21:18

Working 'in 3 languages' and under such conditions sounds an amazing achievement to me. Please send me an address to where the book can be sent. (I accept private messages.)

Latest topics