SMITHMAN 5: The evidence of the Smith family from Drogheda, Ireland: the TWELVE sets of contradictions
Page 5 of 5 • Share
Page 5 of 5 • 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
After looking at this list of contradictions about the 'Smithman' sighting
Re: SMITHMAN 5: The evidence of the Smith family from Drogheda, Ireland: the TWELVE sets of contradictions
by sharonl 16.05.24 21:28
Another interesting Smithman thread
sharonl- Forum Owner
- Posts : 8636
Activity : 11275
Likes received : 1397
Join date : 2009-12-29 -
Silentscope likes this post
Re: SMITHMAN 5: The evidence of the Smith family from Drogheda, Ireland: the TWELVE sets of contradictions
by sharonl 27.05.24 12:10
Since Smithman is being debated at the moment, I thought this thread may be of interest.
If you type Smith into the search bar there are many other threads on the subject, all very interesting.
If you type Smith into the search bar there are many other threads on the subject, all very interesting.
sharonl- Forum Owner
- Posts : 8636
Activity : 11275
Likes received : 1397
Join date : 2009-12-29 -
Tony Bennett, Ladyinred and crusader like this post
Re: SMITHMAN 5: The evidence of the Smith family from Drogheda, Ireland: the TWELVE sets of contradictions
by Tony Bennett 28.05.24 19:12
1. Bribery i.e. offer of a wad of cashjazega wrote:mad world wrote:Sounds to me like they've been heavily leaned on rather than dishonest. But again their testimony regardless has to be dismissed purely on the basis that it is useless. Either liars or menaced by the people covering up what happened.
What reasons would members of the Smith family lie and make false statements.I cannot think of any.
2. Blackmail - guilty knowledge
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16920
Activity : 24786
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Re: SMITHMAN 5: The evidence of the Smith family from Drogheda, Ireland: the TWELVE sets of contradictions
by Cake Lover 28.05.24 21:00
Wouldn't bribery or blackmail involve only the adults?
Cake Lover- Posts : 2675
Activity : 2730
Likes received : 55
Join date : 2024-02-13
Re: SMITHMAN 5: The evidence of the Smith family from Drogheda, Ireland: the TWELVE sets of contradictions
by Tony Bennett 28.05.24 22:02
Money speaks very loudly in some people's ears.
Look at *everything* the Smiths have said - and nothing makes sense.
There is very strong evidence that Madeleine was dead by Sunday evening or if not, certainly before Thursday 3rd May. In either case the Smith sighting must be concocted, and that's the way it looks when you examine every detail about the Smith sighting (which, regrettably, too few have troubled to do).
Look at *everything* the Smiths have said - and nothing makes sense.
There is very strong evidence that Madeleine was dead by Sunday evening or if not, certainly before Thursday 3rd May. In either case the Smith sighting must be concocted, and that's the way it looks when you examine every detail about the Smith sighting (which, regrettably, too few have troubled to do).
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16920
Activity : 24786
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
sharonl likes this post
Re: SMITHMAN 5: The evidence of the Smith family from Drogheda, Ireland: the TWELVE sets of contradictions
by crusader 28.05.24 22:56
As it turns out, the Smith sighting has done nothing to help or hinder in the search for Madeleine.
They either did see what they said they saw.
They didn't see anyone carrying a child that night
They are part of team McCann and were payed to say they saw a man carrying a child at 10pm or thereabouts.
It does depend on how you interpret the facts as we know them.
I take no notice at all of any mainstream media reports, I go only off what I have read in their statements.
They either did see what they said they saw.
They didn't see anyone carrying a child that night
They are part of team McCann and were payed to say they saw a man carrying a child at 10pm or thereabouts.
It does depend on how you interpret the facts as we know them.
I take no notice at all of any mainstream media reports, I go only off what I have read in their statements.
crusader- Posts : 6471
Activity : 6821
Likes received : 344
Join date : 2019-03-12
Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Similar topics» Rachael Oldfield's Rogatory Interview - Notes from a Potting Shedder
» SMITHMAN 8 - The Nine Phases of Smithman - How the Smiths became part of the McCann Team in January 2008
» SMITHMAN 7: What is the actual evidence that makes people think that ‘Smithman’ was Gerry McCann?
» SMITHMAN 9 - Is Goncalo Amaral sticking to his original conclusions re Smithman?
» SMITHMAN 11 An answer to Carla Spade about evidence that Martin Smith collaborated with the McCann Team since January 2008
» SMITHMAN 8 - The Nine Phases of Smithman - How the Smiths became part of the McCann Team in January 2008
» SMITHMAN 7: What is the actual evidence that makes people think that ‘Smithman’ was Gerry McCann?
» SMITHMAN 9 - Is Goncalo Amaral sticking to his original conclusions re Smithman?
» SMITHMAN 11 An answer to Carla Spade about evidence that Martin Smith collaborated with the McCann Team since January 2008
Page 5 of 5
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
