Re: 'VIDEO OF THE DAY'

by Clishmaclaver 21.09.24 11:31

Jojo1 wrote:
Nina wrote:Whilst watching a video regarding the recent non custodial sentence of the BBC employee RAINS was mentioned, so googled it. Names on here you will have heard of
https://x.com/SouthernMidLife/status/1799056469238988935
That's one hek of a list

It certainly is a long and shocking list! These lowlifes, who ironically are near the top of the social hierarchy, have plunged to the depths of human depravity.
I thought that one name stood out in relation to the M. McC. topic, albeit in an indirect way. What do you think?

by pablowski 26.09.24 10:35

Practical Linguistics videos

Here is the first of [so far] 10 videos giving a linguistic analysis of the first McCann video.

It is a very detailed analysis with a lot of complicated technical vocabulary related to linguistic analysis. And that might be off-putting for some of us but I think watching the videos is very much worth the effort.

by **crusader** 28.09.24 15:16

by Honesty 03.10.24 8:51

Part X from Crime Knight. And he has since posted Part XI and Part XII.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5889aJaTHoQ

by **crusader** 03.10.24 9:15

I've just watched that ^^^ I'm afraid he has got some facts wrong, there are also things in his other video's that are wrong.

by Honesty 03.10.24 9:21

It's not good if he gets facts wrong, of course, and I'm not keen on his style but imo his videos are generally worth watching.

by Justice for Maddie 03.10.24 9:45

Honesty wrote:It's not good if he gets facts wrong, of course, and I'm not keen on his style but imo his videos are generally worth watching.

Yes, the videos are worth watching, but he gets some facts wrong. He believes that Payne was Smithman and brought Maddie to the Freudvilla etc. (Mr. Smith said that the man had no glasses!).

by **crusader** 03.10.24 9:50

Definitely worth watching!
I watch every video about Madeleine, good and bad, you never know what may be said to trigger a thought.

by Jojo1 03.10.24 18:37

I think the voice is computer generated or disguised by Crimeknight. Like crusader, I will watch every Madeleine video as most tend to refresh my memory and prompt me to take another look at the facts. His theory about Payne being Smithman was quite interesting and compelling but my head was spinning by the end of it. I havn't watched any of his others as yet though as I need my concentration head on

by Justice for Maddie 09.10.24 13:46

According to Crime Knight, Kate pushed Maddie against the wall in a rage and drunk, because Gerry was flirting with the Quiz Girl. So it would be a murder and not an accident. That's a big statement. What do you guys think?

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=crime+knight

by Honesty 09.10.24 13:57

It's an awful thought but, from having read about where the tracers of blood were found, perhaps it cannot be discounted.

by **BerntS** 09.10.24 14:01

Regarding Crime Knight theory.
If Maddie was attacked by Kate, the crying would not be progressively intensified over time. It would fade out.

Maddie calling for daddy is simply because Kate was upset on her call to her friend during her check, which woke Maddie up but she was too scared to leave HER PARENTS BEDROOM because of the aggressive tone in Kate's voice. When Kate returned to tapas or Chaplin's Maddie was scared and went to the living room and cried out for Daddy because of mommy's tone.
That's how deductive reasoning and Occams razor works.
You look at what contradicts the theory, and then start over again.
Anyone with children knows that when they've cried for a while, they simply fall instantly asleep when they get on mommy's lap again.
That Kate would take her anger against Gerry out in her first born is simply contradicting psychology. A mom in Kate's position would rather seek comfort in her children, not lash out on them.
What Crime Knight is doing, is what I call baking air cake. It's built on thoughts in the air, not on the evidence.

And words matter. Kate would not have called the following night (May 2nd), the night of all nights if she died the night before (May 1st) .

by deepeepee 09.10.24 14:20

Yes, he just makes shit up, draws conclusions from zero evidence then makes emotional videos and somehow lots of people seem to fall for it, if we go by the comments...

by pinkgladioli 09.10.24 14:26

deepeepee wrote:Yes, he just makes shit up, draws conclusions from zero evidence then makes emotional videos and somehow lots of people seem to fall for it, if we go by the comments...

Aye and he thinks the street lighting lampposts were cctv cameras.

by Jojo1 09.10.24 18:02

My sentiments exactly. I am convinced that voice is artificial computer generated too. I will watch most videos related to the Madeleine case as it prompts me to fact check against what is in the files but I find myself struggling with crime knights and deception detectives theories. I think everyone's theories and hypotheses have validity to some degree, but based on what I have seen and read I am sticking with Bernt and Petermacs as they make more sense to me

by **AnneCGuedes** 09.10.24 18:38

Justice for Maddie wrote:According to Crime Knight, Kate pushed Maddie against the wall in a rage and drunk, because Gerry was flirting with the Quiz Girl. So it would be a murder and not an accident. That's a big statement. What do you guys think?

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=crime+knight

Kate would never have pushed M against the wall (she might have scolded her for not sleeping), she is a good mum.

by pinkgladioli 09.10.24 20:06

Jojo1 wrote:My sentiments exactly. I am convinced that voice is artificial computer generated too. I will watch most videos related to the Madeleine case as it prompts me to fact check against what is in the files but I find myself struggling with crime knights and deception detectives theories. I think everyone's theories and hypotheses have validity to some degree, but based on what I have seen and read I am sticking with Bernt and Petermacs as they make more sense to me

Yes I think the same that the voice sounds computer generated, same here re Bernt and Petermac

by Justice for Maddie 10.10.24 10:50

AnneCGuedes wrote:
Justice for Maddie wrote:According to Crime Knight, Kate pushed Maddie against the wall in a rage and drunk, because Gerry was flirting with the Quiz Girl. So it would be a murder and not an accident. That's a big statement. What do you guys think?

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=crime+knight
Kate would never have pushed M against the wall (she might have scolded her for not sleeping), she is a good mum.

Kate said several times that she couldn't handle Maddie, because she was too loud and needed a lot of attention. Didn't she have contact with a
social worker and wanted to give Maddie to family members? Leaving 3 small children in the apartment and sedating them with Calpol don't
show them as responsible parents. And last but not least, she mentioned Maddie's genitals in her book (maybe SA). Sorry. I'm not saying the push on the wall is true, but I wouldn't rule it out.

by **CaKeLoveR** 10.10.24 11:00

I understand your view; they have brought this kind of suspicion on themselves.

by Keelafreeze 10.10.24 15:28

The voice is defo A.I. on his videos.
And he isn’t holding back on the paedophile research/angle.
Peter Hyatt agreed that their timeline should be questioned.
If Deception Detective still believes in the timeline the McCanns and their cohorts concocted, without any research and using just statement analysis, then maybe he should go over the interview Rich Hall asked Mr Hyatt to analyse and see where he agrees/disagrees.

by **CaKeLoveR** 10.10.24 16:39

Pablowski's post #362 is fascinating, and the analysist is very perceptive. Kate McCann gives away the fact that she hasn't a clue what it would be like to discover that your child is missing, insulting the parents who do, and whose children are never found, or are discovered dead. Her statements absolutely demonstrate that she is lying, and that she has no empathy with those who are genuine in their claims of having missing children. Horrible.

by Keelafreeze 13.10.24 15:32

Just a quick message with regards to videos on YouTube concerning Maddie’s case.
I first looked into this a few years ago when there were not that many discussing the facts and evidence from the case, with Rich D Hall being the main contributor at the time.
Fast forward to now and I find it incredible the amount of individuals that have researched the case and presented their findings and conclusions.
Now, I don’t agree with most, if not the vast majority of conclusions (opinions vary!), but in terms of getting the basic information out there and highlighting the red flags that surround this sorry episode then…wow!
Instead of slowly being forgotten it would appear more and more people are taking it upon themselves to highlight the injustice surrounding Maddie’s ‘disappearance’.
Especially when the British mainstream media are nothing more than a controlled bunch of shills with not a backbone between them.
Effectively they are all Mr Mitchell’s bitches and have sold their souls for £3.24 and a loaf of bread that goes out of date tomorrow.
Sad, pathetic and worthless.
And this is EXACTLY why so many videos appear on YouTube covering the story…we know the mainstream cannot be trusted to seek truth and justice for Madeleine and so more and more decent humans with a conscience are left to cover the facts and expose the lies.
Hoping one day Maddie will be brought home and returned to a more respectable burial, with those involved facing justice themselves.

by **CaKeLoveR** 13.10.24 15:50

There's no hope for any of us, if a little girl's death can be so inconsequential to so many people. Whatever - or whoever - is being protected by the cover up can't be more important than her, and the fight to give her some justice and dignity. It just can't.

by **Ladyinred** 13.10.24 16:01

I suspect the MSM has been legally gagged from discussing anything related to the case.

by **AnneCGuedes** 13.10.24 16:11

CaKeLoveR wrote:There's no hope for any of us, if a little girl's death can be so inconsequential to so many people. Whatever - or whoever - is being protected by the cover up can't be more important than her, and the fight to give her some justice and dignity. It just can't.

What is so singular in M's death ? What injustice was made to her, assuming she died from what is called a domestic accident (because it you don't think it was an accident, then it is différent) ? Is it the fact she had no funerals ?
In France, boys and girls are tortured, raped, killed and buried or burnt on a regular basis. One case cruelly chases another, but also life has to go on.

by **crusader** 13.10.24 16:37

To me, the mystery of what happened to Madeleine that makes it singular is the more we heard about it, the more it looked suspicious.
I remember first seeing it on the news and couldn't believe how they were still walking about looking relatively normal.
I know people react in different ways to shock but to show no emotion and to attribute it to the fact that they were told not to in case the abductor "got off on it" would have been impossible in my opinion.
They put out the story of Madeleine being abducted by a paedophile, if that is what they thought right from the start, how on earth could they function knowing what their little girl was suffering.
If on the other hand, they knew what had happened to her and they knew she was in no pain or danger, they were only thinking of themselves and would have been able to act like they did in my opinion.
Shannon Mathews mother and her partner put on the very opposite show to Gerry and Kate, I knew immediately they were guilty, same goes for Kate and Gerry, the only difference is proving it.

by **Nina** 13.10.24 16:55

crusader wrote:To me, the mystery of what happened to Madeleine that makes it singular is the more we heard about it, the more it looked suspicious.
I remember first seeing it on the news and couldn't believe how they were still walking about looking relatively normal.
I know people react in different ways to shock but to show no emotion and to attribute it to the fact that they were told not to in case the abductor "got off on it" would have been impossible in my opinion.
They put out the story of Madeleine being abducted by a paedophile, if that is what they thought right from the start, how on earth could they function knowing what their little girl was suffering.
If on the other hand, they knew what had happened to her and they knew she was in no pain or danger, they were only thinking of themselves and would have been able to act like they did in my opinion.
Shannon Mathews mother and her partner put on the very opposite show to Gerry and Kate, I knew immediately they were guilty, same goes for Kate and Gerry, the only difference is proving it.

The not knowing is worse than the knowing. No matter how low the knowing brings your body and mind you have stuff to do, the not knowing all you have to do is dwell on every aspect of the not knowing.

by **Ladyinred** 13.10.24 17:07

AnneCGuedes wrote:
CaKeLoveR wrote:There's no hope for any of us, if a little girl's death can be so inconsequential to so many people. Whatever - or whoever - is being protected by the cover up can't be more important than her, and the fight to give her some justice and dignity. It just can't.

What is so singular in M's death ? What injustice was made to her, assuming she died from what is called a domestic accident (because it you don't think it was an accident, then it is différent) ? Is it the fact she had no funerals ?
In France, boys and girls are tortured, raped, killed and buried or burnt on a regular basis. One case cruelly chases another, but also life has to go on.

Are you being rhetorical?

by Keelafreeze 13.10.24 17:20

Ladyinred wrote:I suspect the MSM has been legally gagged from discussing anything related to the case.

How can the msms be legally gagged if they print the truth?
That’s how courts and the legal system work yes?
Evidence based.
So, if they cover the story with just evidence and facts then what’s the case against them?!
How could anyone win a legal battle against truth?
‘You printed this, this and this did you not?’
‘Yes. And here’s the proof.’
‘Oh.’

by **AnneCGuedes** 13.10.24 18:56

Ladyinred wrote:
AnneCGuedes wrote:
CaKeLoveR wrote:There's no hope for any of us, if a little girl's death can be so inconsequential to so many people. Whatever - or whoever - is being protected by the cover up can't be more important than her, and the fight to give her some justice and dignity. It just can't.

What is so singular in M's death ? What injustice was made to her, assuming she died from what is called a domestic accident (because it you don't think it was an accident, then it is différent) ? Is it the fact she had no funerals ?
In France, boys and girls are tortured, raped, killed and buried or burnt on a regular basis. One case cruelly chases another, but also life has to go on.
Are you being rhetorical?

I just wish to understand what one means with "justice for Madeleine".

Latest topics