Re: Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be

by **Silentscope** 06.07.24 6:54

Bild 05/07/2024 - 5:54 pm

Braunschweig - The Braunschweig Public Prosecutor's Office considers the three professional judges in the rape trial against Christian Brückner to be biased and wants to have them replaced.

The reason is the decision on Wednesday, which annulled the arrest warrant against the defendant. It is to be feared that the Criminal Chamber has already formed its opinion on the question of crime and guilt, although the taking of evidence is still ongoing and trial dates are scheduled until October, the public prosecutor's office said.

The Defence of Christian Brückner had made the request for the annulment of the arrest warrant. However, the sex offender remains in prison because he is currently serving a prison sentence for the rape of an American American, the crime scene was in Portugal. He had also been sentenced to prison for that offence by the Braunschweig District Court.

In addition to the rejection of the current judges in the rape trial, the Braunschweig Public Prosecutor's Office requested the "re-occupation with impartial judges" because of concerns of partiality. In addition, it is intended to appeal against the decision to cancel the arrest warrant against Christian Brückner.

As the District Court of Braunschweig announced, the competent representative chamber will be until the next day of the hearing on the 5th. August decide on the question of bias if the request for rejection is classified as admissible. (dpa)

Source: https://www.bild.de/news/inland/neue-richter-im-prozess-gegen-maddie-verdaechtigen-6687cebbb491c25127fd7ff9

by **AnneCGuedes** 06.07.24 22:25

In the end HCW has no rabbit to pull out of the hat, he can only be evil.

by **Silentscope** 07.07.24 8:15

This has all been planned since they ignored Helge Buschings first phone call.

Since then, they have carried out Investigations in order to find Evidence to back up their Accusations.

Making the Evidence fit the Suspect.

A badly sewn together Monster as Dr Amaral says.

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 9:09

Could Bruckner sue for this attempt to fit him up? He's scum, but years of being accused of Madeleine's fate may give him grounds for some or other compensation.

by **Silentscope** 07.07.24 10:22

First he would have to prove there was a Conspiracy to set him up.

Even then the Authourities could get out of it by blaming everything on Helge B and Co.

Being officially a Suspect would not entitle him to Statuory compensation as far as I know. Unless he could prove that the State knowing full well that they were wrongly Informed, proceeded with the Case against him anyway.

There would be grounds for Compensation from False informants or Corrupt Officials in that Case maybe?

by **AnneCGuedes** 07.07.24 17:15

The charges were not sufficiently substantiated to formulate an accusation. The fault lies with HCW, who, in an obsession to obtain evidence against CB in the MC case, decided to try him by proxy.

by **Silentscope** 09.07.24 13:07

Only 128 views?

https://x.com/PhilippMarquort/status/1808566381496905879

Arrest Warrant against “Maddie” Suspect annulled.

Originally posted 03 July 24.

by **PeterMac** 10.07.24 9:52

Aide Memoire [Gedächtnishilfe] for H. Wolters when he considers his next move in the various cases against Christian Brückner

Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be - Page 31 Concre10

Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be - Page 31 Bull10

by Cake Lover 10.07.24 9:56

by **Silentscope** 10.07.24 15:55

Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be - Page 31 Canvas10

Hans' Holiday snap from a 'Secret location' known only to a Source 'close to'.

by **PeterMac** 10.07.24 16:36

A "Source" has picked this up from Hrn .Fülscher's. [EDITED 1815 & 1831 10/7/24] WhatsApp status page, as he waxes philosophical on the duties of a prosecutor

"Was bleibt also ? Vielleicht die Erkentnis, wie hoch die Hürden sind, die ein Gericht nehmen muss, um einem Menschen nachzuweisen.
Vielleicht die Erkenntnis, dass diese Hürden ein Glück sind, wenn men den Rechtsstraat ernst nimmt.
Vielleichy sogar die Erkentnis, dass eine Staatanwaltsschaft den Blick für diese Hürden verlieren kann, wenn sie der eigenen Überzeugung im Weg stehen"

So what remains? Perhaps the realisation of how high the hurdles are that a court has to overcome to prove a person guilty.
Perhaps the realisation that these hurdles are a blessing, if you take the law seriously.
Perhaps even the realisation that a public prosecutor can lose sight of these hurdles if they stand in the way of their own beliefs"

Remarkable how that reflects TFD's own reflections of what he was doing, or being dragged into, as he delved ever further into what became "The Brick"
I quote. p. 603
" The biggest mistake an investigator can do is fall in love with his/ her own theory. That can truly make you reach for something that's not there, or even stretch information to fit the theory and, by that, give you tunnel vision."

In the UK we remember The Birmingham 6, The Guildford 5, Operation Midland, Operation Ore, Operation Grange (Oh Sorry, not that one YET), The Post Office 650.

And it is something that Clarke, and none of the pretend Investigators or Private Detectives before him - with the notable exception of Hagland, did not take into account as they each fell into their own private deep trench of their own private deep digging, and in Clarke's case pulled the earth in on top of him by publishing a book with the photo of his own private accused on the front cover

Thus

Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be - Page 31 Screen35

Naming and showing the photo of a private suspect before he has has been questioned, cautioned, charged, arrainged or tried, let alone Convicted, is an act of extreme folly and personal danger, the only defence to which is that everything said was objectively True, and came to pass.
If it does not, then the damages for Libel will be Substantial, Punitive, and might well be Exemplary - pour encourager les autres - à ne pas le faire in future.

More recently H.Wolters has been quoted [in the media, so do not accept this as FACT !] as saying words to the effect "... if there's no more evidence they'll shut it [the case/ investigation] down..."
And then he said [allegedly !] "no one could find any more..... " {Reference needed}. EDITED 1816. Please see reference in next comment below. MANY THANKS
which taken together seem to lay the ground open for an August 5 official conceding that the prosecution's position is no longer tenable.

Whether that has been influenced by his current long vacation and his possession of and reading of The Brick. (excess baggage charge -17 DM. Specially scanned for Explosive content but got past the Notoriously unreliable dogs) is not known

by **Silentscope** 10.07.24 17:00

@ PeterMac courtesy of crusader Post#839 Page 34. wrote:Here is the Reference to that Qoute on Film.

Timestamp 19:38 Wolters says if there is no more Evidence they will close the Case.

by **Silentscope** 10.07.24 18:47

The Farce is going to go on until at least September 24.

Procedure before the 2nd Criminal Chamber in connection with five acts against sexual self-determination - File number 2 KLs 213 Js 52790/18 (15/22) - Two more continuation dates

Regarding the procedure 2 KLs 213 Js 52790/18 (15/22), which was carried out on the 16th February 2024 (see separate press preview for 2 KLs 15/22), further continuation dates have been scheduled for:

Friday, 06. September 2024, 9:00 a.m.

Wednesday, 25. September 2024, 9:00 a.m.

Hall, see notice board

The next continuation date is scheduled for:

Friday, 05. July 2024, 09:00 a.m.

Expected: Hall 141

It is pointed out that the overview of the dates is not binding. Any changes can be found in the notice in the court and will also be announced by the press office by means of a press release.

Source: http://www.landgericht-braunschweig.de/

by **PeterMac** 10.07.24 19:58

Thanks for that Silentscope.
That gives H.Wolters and his team a lot of time to sit down and think about what they Actually have, as opposed to what they hoped and dreamt they might have had.
it gives time for a Devil’s advocate in the group to point out that to oppose the decision to cancel the “Warrant of detention” they need to have something stronger than
a slightly pathetic “she must be biased because she doesn’t agree with me” argument,

by **Silentscope** 16.07.24 19:36

In proceedings 2 KLs 213 Js 52790/18 (15/22) in connection with five offences against sexual self-determination, the Braunschweig public prosecutor's office has filed a motion for recusal against the three professional Judges of the 2nd Criminal Chamber due to concerns about bias.

Should the chamber consider the application to be admissible, the competent deputy chamber will decide on the question of bias by the next day of the trial on 5 August 2024.

The result of the decision will be announced in a press release.

Source: http://www.landgericht-braunschweig.de/

by **Silentscope** 23.07.24 13:21

Proceedings before the 2nd Criminal Chamber in connection with five offences against sexual self-determination - file number 2 KLs 213 Js 52790/18 (15/22) - recusal request against the three professional judges is unfounded.

In proceedings 2 KLs 213 Js 52790/18 (15/22), the competent representatives have rejected the Braunschweig public prosecutor's recusal request against the three professional judges of the chamber as unfounded.

Insofar as the public prosecutor's office has also submitted a further recusal request against a professional judge, a separate decision will be made on this. The result of the decision will be announced in a press release.

Source: http://www.landgericht-braunschweig.de/

by **PeterMac** 23.07.24 13:55

Oh Dear
Jon Clarke is NOT going to be a happy Bunny
But nor are the rest of the Pro-McCanns,

Brace yourselves for some violent and vituperative retaliation.

by **PeterMac** 23.07.24 14:14

And Clarke can brace himself for a spectacular LIBEL suit in the High Court of ENGLAND
Murat got £ 600,000 PLUS COSTS
The libelS against Brückner must be worth a lot more than that.

Poetic Justice ?

by **Silentscope** 23.07.24 15:38

Has Herr Fülscher or Brückner himself brought any Charges against Jon Clarke?

The Evidence of attempted Media interference to Influence the outcome of his Case is too strong to be easily ignored.

by **crusader** 23.07.24 15:49

Does Bruckner know Clarke has written a book with his face on the front tying him to the disappearance of Madeleine.

by **Silentscope** 23.07.24 17:35

Does 'Team McCann' and Operation Grange realise that their attempts to use the German
Legal System to implicate a Citizen of that Republic in a Missing Persons Case has just failed?

This is the first Case I have ever heard of where the Prosecution and not the Defence now accuses the Judges of being Biased.

In short: the Prosecution (Wolters and Op Rechen) are afraid that the Judges believe the Defence so far.

by **PeterMac** 23.07.24 22:23

Silentscope wrote:Does 'Team McCann' and Operation Grange realise that their attempts to use the German
Legal System to implicate a Citizen of that Republic in a Missing Persons Case has just failed?

This is the first Case I have ever heard of where the Prosecution and not the Defence now accuses the Judges of being Biased.

In short: the Prosecution (Wolters and Op Rechen) are afraid that the Judges believe the Defence so far.

I agree.
So far as I am aware the Defence case itself had not even STARTED. The whole case was set to go to the end of the year.
This was a submission towards the end of the Prosecution case that the evidence presented could not in law even
support the charges faced by the accused.

Each prosecution witness had been comprehensively destroyed under the most basic of cross examination,
and each of the alleged supporting ‘FACTS’. [cross-shaped scar, cross-shaped birthmark, EXTENSIVE maxilliary-facial surgery
Piercing blue eyes, . . . and all the rest of the garbage trotted out or INVENTED BY Jon Clarke] . . was shown on examination
of the reality of the situation, in other words by LOOKING at his thigh, his jaw, his eyes, asking dentists and hospitals,. . . to be total garbage.

The Judge and the Schöffen recognised that. And chucked it out.
What this does to the credibility of the Braunschweigerstaatsanwaltsbüro is anyone’s guess

The CHIEF Prosecutor took on this case. He briefed obscure unqualified and foreign journalists with free tabloid advert sheets
in a third country about important details of the investigation [ALLEGEDLY, OBVIOUSLY].
He spoke to the press of the world, he leaked details which should have only been disclosed to the court

and so on and on
This has the potential to be judged as one of the more egregious examples of a modern European legal system’s
failing in its duty of impartiality and seeking to convict and imprison a scapegoat that we have seen for a few years.

as with the UK Post office SCANDAL, it may be a resignation issue. Perhaps SHOULD be
NOTE:
H. WOLTERS is on holiday. He has a copy of the BRICK and has committed to reading it.
We wish him well, during his hours on the sun-lounger under the umbrella on Mallorca.
of perhaps taking the Luft in a StrandKorb on the Baltic Küste somewhere.

by **PeterMac** 25.07.24 11:49

NEWS JUST IN. [No Duff !]

The outstanding "appeal" by the prosecution against the judge for bias
has been ruled as GROUNDLESS
This follows the previous one against the Professional judge and the two Schöffen (lay judges) together, which was ruled GROUNDLESS a couple of weeks ago, (see above)

Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be - Page 31 Ground10

The important word is "unbegrundet". From the stem Grund= ground, soil, base, foundation,
therefore 'ungrounded, without foundation, baseless . . . '

The 5th August is when it will be announced in open Court and entered into the record

WEHN WILL THIS BE REPORTED IN THE OLIVE PRESS ?

[Jon Clarke may consider hiding some of his assets offshore. Robert Murat was awarded £600,000 PLUS COSTS
and no one put him on the front cover of a best-selling book accusing him of Abduction and Murder]

by **AnneCGuedes** 25.07.24 19:26

Silentscope wrote:Has Herr Fülscher or Brückner himself brought any Charges against Jon Clarke?

The Evidence of attempted Media interference to Influence the outcome of his Case is too strong to be easily ignored.

I guess FF is building a file and will ask for financial compensation, hopefully a lot of compensation because CB has been in solitary confinement for several years. The court photographs were eloquent on this point.

by **Silentscope** 25.07.24 19:59

His change of appearance over the period of his Incarceration was not due to ‘Face changing Surgery’.

Definitely.

by **PeterMac** 26.07.24 19:55

She also said he had several marks (or scars) on his body and had, she estimated, four wonky teeth, with his top jaw protruding his bottom jaw (something he would fix that autumn [2007] when he flew from Lisbon to Germany for expensive maxillofacial surgery).

Clarke, Jon. MY SEARCH FOR MADELEINE: One Reporter’s 14-Year Hunt To Solve Europe’s Most Harrowing Crime (p. 347). OP Books. Kindle Edition.
****
Where Jon ? Which hospital ? which Clinic ? who did the surgery ? What did it cost ? Where did he get the money ? How long did it take to heal ?

by **Silentscope** 28.07.24 11:55

Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be - Page 31 Img_0223

Brückner had his Teeth fixed in Prison in 1999.

Clarke lying through his back teeth as usual.

by **Silentscope** 15.08.24 12:12

Isabel claims all charges will be dropped.

https://x.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1823842406154035213

Nothing as yet today in the Braunschweiger Zeitung.

https://www.braunschweiger-zeitung.de/niedersachsen/braunschweig/article407008228/was-christian-b-mit-serienmoerder-ted-bundy-gemeinsam-haben-soll.html

Or from Press Release LG Braunschweig.

https://landgericht-braunschweig.niedersachsen.de/startseite/aktuelles_akkreditierungsverfahren_2_strafkammer_2_kls_15_22/presseinformationen/

by **Silentscope** 15.08.24 17:36

Regarding the procedure 2 KLs 213 Js 52790/18 (15/22), which was carried out on the 16th February 2024 (see separate press preview for 2 KLs 15/22), the continuation date has been cancelled tomorrow Friday, 08/16/2024.

The next continuation date is scheduled for:

Thursday, 09/05/2024, 09:00 a.m.

It is pointed out that the overview of the dates is not binding. Any changes can be found in the notice in the court and will also be announced by the press office by means of a press release.

Source: https://landgericht-braunschweig.niedersachsen.de/startseite/aktuelles_akkreditierungsverfahren_2_strafkammer_2_kls_15_22/presseinformationen/verfahren-vor-der-2-strafkammer-im-zusammenhang-mit-funf-taten-gegen-die-sexuelle-selbstbestimmung-aktenzeichen-2-kls-213-js-52790-18-15-22-fortsetzungstermin-vom-16-08-2024-wurde-aufgehoben-234678.html

5th September 24 is the next Courtroom date for Christian B.

by **Jill Havern** 16.08.24 12:22

https://x.com/Babs108164110/status/1649031373426925570

Latest topics