Re: Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be

by MaxHeadroom 26.09.24 22:43

PeterMac wrote:The original is from Bild reporter Kai Feldhaus, a professional journalist, not a retread geography student, and who SPEAKS GERMAN …..

You know something is rubbish when even Bild (the German equivalent to the Sun) doesn't buy it. laugh

by MaxHeadroom 26.09.24 22:53

It really tells a liot that even the German press, which so far seems to believe so firmly that C.B. is the perpetrator and uncritically spreads every piece of rubbish about it, seems to be very skeptical about the credibility of this witness:

Does this now confirm the suspicion against Christian B. again? There are several things that speak against Laurenizo C.'s trustworthiness. He originally testified against Christian B. to the police in prison. But prison witnesses are rarely particularly popular in court. Because they may expect advantages from testifying. C. initially says he can't remember anything - only to then be able to remember more and more details with each allegation from his statement, including the description of the kidnapping of a girl that he had never mentioned to investigators before. And what did C. possibly know about Christian B., whom investigators publicly named for the first time in 2020 as the main suspect in the Maddie case, from television? And then there is the language: In court, C. relies on the services of an interpreter. In the cell he could only speak German with Christian B.

Source: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This trial has seen a lot of shady characters in the witness box: petty criminals and underworld characters, who, when questioned, the court always made it clear how little the judges believed their statements. But these are the people the defendant associated with. There are no others.

And now someone suddenly appears and says: Brückner confessed to me that he kidnapped Maddie. Is this the turning point?

Probably not. Although the witness Laurentiu C. (50) was already listed as a witness for the prosecution in the indictment by the public prosecutor's office according to BILD information, the judges initially refrained from hearing his testimony. The public prosecutors had to make an additional application so that the witness could be heard.

The fact that he is now reporting a confession - for the very first time, even though he was interrogated by the BKA! - will hardly help the prosecutors in the current proceedings. Especially because these proceedings are not about Maddie. But also because Laurentiu C. was only able to substantiate the actual allegations to a limited extent.

It remains to be seen whether the court will give more credence to the Romanian's incriminating statements than to the witnesses for the prosecution that have been heard so far. If the court remains on course for an acquittal, it will be interesting to see how the public prosecutor's office reacts:

Whether they will still dare to charge Christian Brückner with the murder of Madeleine McCann.

Source: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

That probably says it all. How long will they still continue to ride this dead horse? snooze

by Silentscope Yesterday at 0:38

They will never stop because it is a Story that guarantees income for the MSM.
The 'Investigation' must keep going to fend off the FOI requests.

They will have to be stopped.

by crusader Yesterday at 8:30

I'm hoping Bernt will be the one to stop them.

by **PeterMac** Yesterday at 8:45

Has Clarke covered this in the olive Press yet ? I am blocked, somehow !

by Justice for Maddie Yesterday at 8:55

by pinkgladioli Yesterday at 9:19

PeterMac wrote:Has Clarke covered this in the olive Press yet ? I am blocked, somehow !

From googling I can only see a headline and story from 2 days ago re CB in the Olive Press

by deepeepee Yesterday at 12:32

PeterMac wrote:Has Clarke covered this in the olive Press yet ? I am blocked, somehow !

here is the Olive Press article from the other day.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Archive.ph works for many sites that you normally have to subscribe to.

by Silentscope Yesterday at 13:12

According to whichever JC vs the rest theory, Codin did not share a Cell with Brückner.

Codin had another Cell further down the Block.

He avoided going out which made Brückner suspect he was a Paedophile like he is Suspected of being.

It was then that Brückner approached him, and was invited in by Codin for Coffee. Then they had these Alledged conversations.

Conversations that could barely have taken place without a Translator and the Memory of which suddenly improved after a Break in the Court proceedings! Was his Memory refreshed for him during the Break?

by Silentscope Yesterday at 18:06

Here comes JC again with a new 'Snowball' copied from the Daily Mail, already being picked up by other Outlets.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

By [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Published: 11:59 BST, 27 September 2024

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

27 Sep, 2024 @ 15:02
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]·[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] Laurence Dollimore

Copy and Pasted 'Exclusive'?

by deepeepee Yesterday at 18:13

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

archived version for those who have no wish to register on the Olive Press... big grin

by Jojo1 Yesterday at 19:35

Looks like JC didn't write the Olive press articles this time.

by Ironside Yesterday at 22:53

crusader wrote:I'm hoping Bernt will be the one to stop them.

You may have seen on X rumours are growing that political allegiances are shifting and press restrictions on the case lifting.

Here’s hoping.

by AnneCGuedes Yesterday at 23:30

crusader wrote:I'm hoping Bernt will be the one to stop them.

Has the PJ lost jurisdiction in the MC case?
Remember that Mark Rowley said that parental involvement was addressed by the initial investigation and gave SY ‘complete satisfaction’ (based on their misunderstanding of the evidence gathered in the Portuguese investigation presumably). Parental involvement was indeed investigated, but not ruled out. The Supreme Court was clear on this point.
"Nor should we say that the applicants were exonerated by the order to close the criminal proceedings".

by **PeterMac** Today at 9:06

And we are expecting another Interview with James English very soon.
Promises to be a good one, otherwise why would he simply “Go round again” ?

by Jojo1 Today at 13:18

PeterMac wrote:And we are expecting another Interview with James English very soon.
Promises to be a good one, otherwise why would he simply “Go round again” ?

I am super excited about his forthcoming interview. Hopefully we will not have to wait too long for it.
His hypothesis and investigation did not just come to an end with his book and is clearly ongoing. He has been extremely proactive in his approach so far.
I hope you get to meet him PeterMac. Is that something that is on the horizon also?

by CaKeLoveR Today at 16:14

Latest topics