Operation Grange Update

russiandoll wrote:

plebgate wrote:I don't understand why a 10 yr old girl would not tell her parents about an attempted sexual assault on her by a smelly pot bellied man (or any other person).  She would have been so frightened, I am surprised her parents would  not have noticed and asked what had frightened/upset her.

How can arrests expect to be made shortly when they haven't even traced where the offender lives and as others have said, will have scarpered by now without leaving a forwarding address.   Like eveything else we have read thus far, it doesn't make sense.

  Plebgate.... according to Sky news yesterday this girl did tell her parents, this was iirc the incident which was reported to the holiday rep but not the police and as I have posted earlier one Portuguese news outlet has said that this was a rape.

 Whoever reported what at the time and to whom....[ confusion is good] ,  it is clear that since the incident, there was no additional report to police until approx. 9 years later.

Dee Coy wrote:A rhetorical question. Why is the patsy the Met has finally plumped for a paedophile? As opposed to a disturbed burglar, a bitter ex-OC employee or a freelance British cleaner?

Dee Coy wrote:A rhetorical question. Why is the patsy the Met has finally plumped for a paedophile? As opposed to a disturbed burglar, a bitter ex-OC employee or a freelance British cleaner?

Bishop Brennan wrote:

Dee Coy wrote:A rhetorical question. Why is the patsy the Met has finally plumped for a paedophile? As opposed to a disturbed burglar, a bitter ex-OC employee or a freelance British cleaner?

SY have basically run several "straw men" in the media and all of them were rightly ridiculed. The motives they tried to pin on the burglars or ex-employees were absurd.  The only one that got traction with the red tops and the public was the paedo patsy. Nobody could question it, the press could have a field day with it.  

Having discovered the correct "motive" and profile, there was a brief attempt to link it the dead tractorman, but that again was just too ridiculous for the public. So now we have a serial sex attacker - a string of crimes to convince everyone, and the hunt is on.  

Of course the chances are this smellyman doesn't exist at all.  Or if he does, he will almost certainly be untraceable. For that reason we have the increase in anti PJ rhetoric, so that SY can bow out in a few months time, complaining that they could not make progress because of the bungling and obstructive PJ.   Patsy identified but not caught; parents exonerated; politicians safe; PJ to blame. Job done. £10m well spent...  

MILLIE wrote:

Bishop Brennan wrote:

Dee Coy wrote:A rhetorical question. Why is the patsy the Met has finally plumped for a paedophile? As opposed to a disturbed burglar, a bitter ex-OC employee or a freelance British cleaner?

SY have basically run several "straw men" in the media and all of them were rightly ridiculed. The motives they tried to pin on the burglars or ex-employees were absurd.  The only one that got traction with the red tops and the public was the paedo patsy. Nobody could question it, the press could have a field day with it.  

Having discovered the correct "motive" and profile, there was a brief attempt to link it the dead tractorman, but that again was just too ridiculous for the public. So now we have a serial sex attacker - a string of crimes to convince everyone, and the hunt is on.  

Of course the chances are this smellyman doesn't exist at all.  Or if he does, he will almost certainly be untraceable. For that reason we have the increase in anti PJ rhetoric, so that SY can bow out in a few months time, complaining that they could not make progress because of the bungling and obstructive PJ.   Patsy identified but not caught; parents exonerated; politicians safe; PJ to blame. Job done. £10m well spent...  

They may think it will work out like that. However, if the Smelly and unshaven bur nevertheless aftershave-favouring (?) paedophile does actually exist at all, and indeed, if all the recently publicised crimes are going to be attributed to him, then surely his defence barrister is going to have a field day with all the anomalies apparent between the other alleged crimes and that relating to Madeleine. It won't be over til the fat man (or at least the fat man's barrister) sings and is heard.

aquila wrote:

MILLIE wrote:

Bishop Brennan wrote:

Dee Coy wrote:A rhetorical question. Why is the patsy the Met has finally plumped for a paedophile? As opposed to a disturbed burglar, a bitter ex-OC employee or a freelance British cleaner?

SY have basically run several "straw men" in the media and all of them were rightly ridiculed. The motives they tried to pin on the burglars or ex-employees were absurd.  The only one that got traction with the red tops and the public was the paedo patsy. Nobody could question it, the press could have a field day with it.  

Having discovered the correct "motive" and profile, there was a brief attempt to link it the dead tractorman, but that again was just too ridiculous for the public. So now we have a serial sex attacker - a string of crimes to convince everyone, and the hunt is on.  




Of course the chances are this smellyman doesn't exist at all.  Or if he does, he will almost certainly be untraceable. For that reason we have the increase in anti PJ rhetoric, so that SY can bow out in a few months time, complaining that they could not make progress because of the bungling and obstructive PJ.   Patsy identified but not caught; parents exonerated; politicians safe; PJ to blame. Job done. £10m well spent...  

They may think it will work out like that. However, if the Smelly and unshaven bur nevertheless aftershave-favouring (?) paedophile does actually exist at all, and indeed, if all the recently publicised crimes are going to be attributed to him, then surely his defence barrister is going to have a field day with all the anomalies apparent between the other alleged crimes and that relating to Madeleine. It won't be over til the fat man (or at least the fat man's barrister) sings and is heard.

The show's not over 'til the fat belly sings.

   

Bishop Brennan wrote: 
Of course the chances are this smellyman doesn't exist at all.  Or if he does, he will almost certainly be untraceable. For that reason we have the increase in anti PJ rhetoric, so that SY can bow out in a few months time, complaining that they could not make progress because of the bungling and obstructive PJ.   Patsy identified but not caught; parents exonerated; politicians safe; PJ to blame. Job done. £10m well spent...