NOT AGAIN!!!!! - Portugal cabbie offers lead to Scotland Yard's Madeleine McCann investigation -Standard 16/8/13

jeanmonroe wrote:Duh brain me!

If it was the 3rd May 2007 at 8pm as he (taxi driver) states then Gerry couldn't have seen Madeleine in her bed at 9:05pm could he?
JT could NOT have seen Madeleine being carried off at 9:15/20pm could she?
Madeleine would have been 'gone' an HOUR  or more before Gerry's 'check'
_______________________________________________________________

If it were 8pm on the 3rd May 2007 then Gerry and Kate were IN the apartment 5A drinking wine and telling stories!

They didn't leave for the Tapas until 8:30pm!

My brain hurts!

Searcher wrote:I am very interested in the versions of what KM allegedly said/called out on the night of 3 May.  One version, as said earlier here, is "They've taken her ..".

In the horrific circumstances of a child missing from their bed, what would a mother say in that agonising moment?   She is likely to say the truth - "I can't find her ... we must look .. where is she?" and the mother would be out, calling for her child, frantic to look and to find.

If the alleged words "They have taken her .." or "The Fxxxxxx Bxxxxx have taken her" were reliably witnessed, then this must be a known truth.  Therefore, who are "they"?  And if so, was this an alive child taken or a deceased one? 

The other alleged words at the same time are "We have let her down ..". 

Also, as has been said in various places many times, if a child was presumed abducted, would a parent leave the apartment with two other children still sleeping, even for a moment?

BerylJ wrote:

Searcher wrote:I am very interested in the versions of what KM allegedly said/called out on the night of 3 May.  One version, as said earlier here, is "They've taken her ..".

In the horrific circumstances of a child missing from their bed, what would a mother say in that agonising moment?   She is likely to say the truth - "I can't find her ... we must look .. where is she?" and the mother would be out, calling for her child, frantic to look and to find.

If the alleged words "They have taken her .." or "The Fxxxxxx Bxxxxx have taken her" were reliably witnessed, then this must be a known truth.  Therefore, who are "they"?  And if so, was this an alive child taken or a deceased one? 

The other alleged words at the same time are "We have let her down ..". 

Also, as has been said in various places many times, if a child was presumed abducted, would a parent leave the apartment with two other children still sleeping, even for a moment?

In that agonizing moment of finding my child missing, what would I say/shout? The child's name. I would scream the name. Nothing else at that time.

Hicks wrote:

BerylJ wrote:

Searcher wrote:I am very interested in the versions of what KM allegedly said/called out on the night of 3 May.  One version, as said earlier here, is "They've taken her ..".

In the horrific circumstances of a child missing from their bed, what would a mother say in that agonising moment?   She is likely to say the truth - "I can't find her ... we must look .. where is she?" and the mother would be out, calling for her child, frantic to look and to find.

If the alleged words "They have taken her .." or "The Fxxxxxx Bxxxxx have taken her" were reliably witnessed, then this must be a known truth.  Therefore, who are "they"?  And if so, was this an alive child taken or a deceased one? 

The other alleged words at the same time are "We have let her down ..". 

Also, as has been said in various places many times, if a child was presumed abducted, would a parent leave the apartment with two other children still sleeping, even for a moment?

In that agonizing moment of finding my child missing, what would I say/shout? The child's name. I would scream the name. Nothing else at that time.

Listen to Kate in this vid. I believe that she is talking about the couple who were to adopt M. Note how guarded she is in what she says, can't give the game away now Kate!


[url=http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=kate mccann youtube&source][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

jeanmonroe wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

ugh, ugh ,ugh , i'll saves ya Hicks!

From Correio da Manhã: A source connected with the investigation guaranteed that the facts told by António Castela were "investigated" and the “lead was proven false”.

Madeleine has no Twitches

Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for the McCanns, reacted yesterday with amazement at the declarations of the taxi-driver. “The declarations of Mr. Castela are false. They are a perfect nonsense. He can only be mistaken when he says that at that time he transported Kate and Madeleine with three men”, he said, underlining the fact of being several independent witnesses who place Madeleine's parents in a completely different place. “How is that possible, if at 20h35 several witnesses say that Kate and Gerry were sitting down on a table of the Tapas restaurant”, he questioned. Clarence doubts of the intentions of the taxi-driver. “It astonishes me that only now, ten months later, [which puts it at March 2008]  he talks about this. These are declarations that only cause pain to Kate and Gerry", he said, advancing that that the McCann's daughter has no facial twitches.
“The only sign to report is the one she has in the eye.”

PeterMac wrote:But let us never forget the words of the immortal Clarence on this very subject al those years ago . . .

From Correio da Manhã: A source connected with the investigation guaranteed that the facts told by António Castela were "investigated" and the “lead was proven false”.

Madeleine has no Twitches

Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for the McCanns, reacted yesterday with amazement at the declarations of the taxi-driver. “The declarations of Mr. Castela are false. They are a perfect nonsense. He can only be mistaken when he says that at that time he transported Kate and Madeleine with three men”, he said, underlining the fact of being several independent witnesses who place Madeleine's parents in a completely different place. “How is that possible, if at 20h35 several witnesses say that Kate and Gerry were sitting down on a table of the Tapas restaurant”, he questioned. Clarence doubts of the intentions of the taxi-driver. “It astonishes me that only now, ten months later, [which puts it at March 2008]  he talks about this. These are declarations that only cause pain to Kate and Gerry", he said, advancing that that the McCann's daughter has no facial twitches.
“The only sign to report is the one she has in the eye.”

Ah, yes, the eye./  Another foot in mouth by the spokesthing.

And that was a long time ago !