Re: 'VIDEO OF THE DAY'

by **CaKeLoveR** 13.11.24 9:52

The channel was started on 24th June, this year, in the U.S. and has 1.32 subscribers. It's sensationalist and very dodgy, imo. I won't be looking at it again.

by **AnneCGuedes** 14.11.24 1:14

crusader wrote:For anyone who's interested in the Smith sighting, this is the next video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Zc1OT1bxuU

Some mistakes in the time line. Martin S contacted the Garda Siochana and made a statement which was sent to DC Hughes John (LC) on Sept 20, then to the PJ. MS ("quite worried and shaken") asked to be called back by a member of OP task. Ricardo Paiva called him on Sept 27. MS confirmed the sighting (he thought the child carrier was G and the child looked like M) and said he was willing to come to Portugal to give evidence and cooperate with the police.
Then GA was dismissed and more than 5 weeks passed... At last, an independent witness believes he has identified the kidnapper and the child and no immediate reaction from the PJ !
On Nov 8, the inspector João Carlos called Bernard Gaffney, liaison officer of the Irish Force, and asked him to organize an interview with Martin S in Drogheda, emailing a list of questions (in English). Note that the first interview in Praia da Luz on May 26, without the go-between of Mr Gaffney, had taken a couple of days. 10 weeks passed...
On Jan 23 Martin S made an additional statement which Liam Hogan sent to Bernard Gaffney on Jan 30. 3 weeks passed..
The statement is translated and sent to João Carlos on Feb 19. In the meantime, JC had drawn up a list of the protagonists required for the reconstitution. The S family is not on it.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm#p11p2871

by **PeterMac** 14.11.24 6:48

The statement proving the Kelly's bar till receipt was taken by TWO PJ inspectors on 10 Oct , Rui Fernandes and Paiva

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm#p10p3276

So they knew by then that the time simply did not fit into any other story.

by **AnneCGuedes** 14.11.24 13:07

Couldn't they only guess which of the bills was the S one ?

By the way the liaison officer's name is Gaffney, and not Gattney
https://rocketreach.co/bernard-gaffney-email_77444776

by Keelafreeze 15.11.24 11:18

Has anybody else noticed the alarming amount of videos regarding the Madeleine McCann case that have popped up on YouTube in recent months? They wouldn’t be alarming if they dealt with facts and evidence, but they don’t and seem to be a disinformation campaign.
It MAY be coincidence

‍�
It may be creators just wanting views and likes and they’ve chosen a case which most people over a certain age have heard of, which may give it a global appeal yet precious few seem to have done their research at all.
To even mention CB in any serious way as a connection or point of focus tells me it’s pure sensationalism…or a hope that your average Tom, Dick (Clarence Mitchell anyone?) or Harry will believe it or buy into their theories.
Maybe I’m wrong.
Here’s the good news though, for every worthless lying video there are dozens of comments pointing out their errors and correcting them with FACTS

by **CaKeLoveR** 15.11.24 11:46

I got the impression that more McCann videos were appearing, and wondered if it's because the subject is one I go to a lot? Could we be affecting an algorithm?

by pinkgladioli 15.11.24 12:06

Keelafreeze wrote:Has anybody else noticed the alarming amount of videos regarding the Madeleine McCann case that have popped up on YouTube in recent months? They wouldn’t be alarming if they dealt with facts and evidence, but they don’t and seem to be a disinformation campaign.
It MAY be coincidence‍
It may be creators just wanting views and likes and they’ve chosen a case which most people over a certain age have heard of, which may give it a global appeal yet precious few seem to have done their research at all.
To even mention CB in any serious way as a connection or point of focus tells me it’s pure sensationalism…or a hope that your average Tom, Dick (Clarence Mitchell anyone?) or Harry will believe it or buy into their theories.
Maybe I’m wrong.
Here’s the good news though, for every worthless lying video there are dozens of comments pointing out their errors and correcting them with FACTS

I’m glad you brought this up, especially the disinformation part, it has made me wonder if it’s some sort of campaign in trying to keep Bernt’s theory of it potentially being the 2nd of May, and the new info contained in the Sudden Impulse at bay from Joe Public

All theses coincidences When does a coincidence stop being a coincidence!

by **Nina** 15.11.24 13:31

CaKeLoveR wrote: I got the impression that more McCann videos were appearing, and wondered if it's because the subject is one I go to a lot? Could we be affecting an algorithm?

Strange that and you could be correct in your thinking. Our daughter knows of my involvement for the last 17 years but hasn't followed the case at all. I have asked her if she ever sees these videos whilst she is surfing the net and she said she didn't think that she had and if she had she wouldn't have watched anyway so yes CaKeLoVeR I think we trigger them.
Very strange too I was speaking on the house phone the other day whilst on my laptop and mentioned that I was looking for an electric over throw and blow me down but when I went back to my laptop there was an advert for electric heated throws. I hope it was just a coincidinky pray3

by Honesty 15.11.24 14:16

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssMSYOztG-Q

A video by Practical Linguistics which seeks to explain why the Tapas 7 supported the McCanns' abduction claim. I do not know why he gets so few views.

by Jojo1 15.11.24 16:28

Honesty wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssMSYOztG-Q

A video by Practical Linguistics which seeks to explain why the Tapas 7 supported the McCanns' abduction claim. I do not know why he gets so few views.

I watched this a couple of weeks ago and thought it was an excellent analysis. He is an expert in linguistics and presents very compelling analysis
He goes into great depth in his videos dissecting the MM statements piece by piece and at the same time directs the viewer to form their own opinion based on the evidence.
This video is particularly interesting and worth watching. His hypotheses made sense imo and was a lightbulb moment for me.

by **crusader** 15.11.24 17:00

Like someone said in the comments, I'm not sure they would be performing a tracheotomy behind the couch.

by **Nina** 15.11.24 17:48

crusader wrote:Like someone said in the comments, I'm not sure they would be performing a tracheotomy behind the couch.

I agree crusader. For one thing the gap behind the sofa wouldn't be big enough to get an adult behind without moving the sofa further out and kneeling down isn't the best way to do such a surgery. If this actually was to have happened which I don't think did happen then a swift carry to a work surface in the kitchen would have been more suitable.
I agree with a fatal fall behind the sofa and aspiration from choking but not on vomit but rather blood from a facial/head injury and the blood splatters were from this choking and the pressure of it.
I believe this happened whilst the parents were out and that with poor checks other than maybe a hearing check which Kate herself alluded to rather than actually going in and checking properly. I think Madeleine was behind the sofa for some hours before being found by which time she had been dead for some time.
The toxic shock was from the foot infection not a stomach bug, though there was a stomach bug going around amongst the party.

by **crusader** 15.11.24 17:53

Exactly, and the blood found behind the sofa came from at least 2 different men, not Madeleine.

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JOHN_LOWE.htm

by Jojo1 15.11.24 18:07

She may have still fallen from sofa and vomited also. It's an interesting hypotheses though. However I am not sure K or G would have achieved much by performing a tracheotomy as it is a dangerous procedure with too many risks outside a hospital setting and Madeleine would have needed to be hospitalised afterwards anyway.

by **CaKeLoveR** 15.11.24 18:23

That ^ may be the reason for the abduction hoax; a botched tracheotomy, and poor Madeleine with a cut throat, caused by one or perhaps both doctors?

by **Nina** 15.11.24 18:43

CaKeLoveR wrote:That ^ may be the reason for the abduction hoax; a botched tracheotomy, and poor Madeleine with a cut throat, caused by one or perhaps both doctors?

Kate and Fiona would have been the best of all the group to have done this as they were both trained as anaesthetists so adept at intubating which can be tricky at the best of times let alone under such an accident. I don't believe that there was such an intervention though rather any blood on the wall was through choking from aspirating during a fatal accident/incident.

by Guest 15.11.24 19:48

Why would they try and save her with such a procedure, and not call an ambulance.........
Make it make sense.

by **Nina** 15.11.24 20:03

BerntS wrote:Why would they try and save her with such a procedure, and not call an ambulance.........
Make it make sense.

Are you posting to me BerntS, or everyone who has reacted to the video?
As I posted I do not believe there was any attempt at a resuscitation because I believe Madeleine had been dead for some time when she was found and that length of time would have been far beyond the time any responsible parent would have let pass whilst diligently checking.

by Guest 15.11.24 22:30

Nina.
Not to you.
To the linguist's theory...

by Justice for Maddie 17.11.24 11:04

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tPWnRXMAG9M

Crime Knight Part 27

I'm sure that with a modern DNA test in the US, the McCanns would be send to prison.

by **Jill Havern** 17.11.24 12:38

Kate McCann's lawyer Carlos Pinto de Abreu: ''If you were Portuguese this would be enough to put you in prison''

by Honesty 17.11.24 16:07

Justice for Maddie wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tPWnRXMAG9M

Crime Knight Part 27

I'm sure that with a modern DNA test in the US, the McCanns would be send to prison.

Is it known if the DNA samples have been preserved? And could, therefore, be tested again, particulary by the American expert. (I'm sorry, but I don't have his name in front of me at the time of writing.) Having read over the years how evidence has been "lost" in several cases, it would be reassuring to know that the DNA samples have been preserved.

by Jojo1 17.11.24 16:45

Honesty wrote:
Justice for Maddie wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tPWnRXMAG9M

Crime Knight Part 27

I'm sure that with a modern DNA test in the US, the McCanns would be send to prison.
Is it known if the DNA samples have been preserved? And could, therefore, be tested again, particulary by the American expert. (I'm sorry, but I don't have his name in front of me at the time of writing.) Having read over the years how evidence has been "lost" in several cases, it would be reassuring to know that the DNA samples have been preserved.

It wouldn't surprise me if they had been wooshed like so many other things to do with this case. The FSS lab was government owned and closed down shortly afterwards wasn't it, due to samples from thousands being contaminated. Sorry can't find source of info
I'm sure I heard it mentioned somewhere that Dr Perlin said that all that would be needed was the original data in order for him to do an analysis.

by **AnneCGuedes** 17.11.24 17:23

The samples have been destroyed after the FSS asked if the PJ wanted them and there was no reply (at least in the Files). But the genetic profiles are sufficient for Dr Perlin who seemed rather sure to be able to discriminate between all the persons who contributed to the DNA of a sample, given their genetic profile.
When JL said that a sample could have contained the DNA of at least 3 and possibly 4 or 5 people, he didn't explain how he came to this conclusion, but it's probably based on the fact that some loci contain 5 or 6 different markers. The closer two individuals are genealogically, the more similar are their genetic markers. In the Scenic at least four individuals belonging to the same family cell had been present.. Then think the samples weren't in good state and LCN has limits in terms of reliability.

by Milo 18.11.24 5:57

MORE ABOUT DR PERLIN

Look up the murder trial of Robert Xie, Sydney 2011
Evidence from missed bood stain, located in garage of the killer years later
The blood sample was a mixture of at least four of the victims (it was a family drama)
Dr Perlin was able to apply his technique
He is the same guy who wants to look at the Ramsey case (but has been resisted of course)

by **CaKeLoveR** 18.11.24 7:02

Nice to hear from you, Milo.

by Honesty 25.11.24 11:01

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jc9EZnto8U

"Daniel Krugel explains his testing of Madeleine's hair".

by **Jill Havern** 25.11.24 15:41

Quantum Detection Solutions Media Video

This video describes the technology of Quantum Detection Solutions in greater detail. It also includes footage from South African actuality show, Carte Blanche, in which they assembled a test to verify the authenticity of the patented QDS technology - with great success. Danie Krügel was able to locate the Carte Blanche cameraman as well as a harmless bacteria (proving the incredible usefulness of the QDS technology in the growing Coronavirus epidemic.) The clip also mentions the viability of the device in the location of gemstones (like diamonds) and precious metals like gold. The clip also includes footage from eTV's Third Degree and a glowing endorsement from Charles Nqakula, former South African Minister of Safety and Security.

by **CaKeLoveR** 25.11.24 15:59

by **Jill Havern** 25.11.24 16:21

CaKeLoveR wrote:

I think he probably graduated from the Zelensky School of Comedy.

Latest topics