Re: Norwegian ex-military detective claims to have solved Madeleine case

by **Jill Havern** Today at 13:29

I doubt it, if they were there on the previous visit.

by Loz_Enger Today at 13:32

Jill Havern wrote:I doubt it, if they were there on the previous visit.

By which I meant they appeared to be significant due to their proximity / orientation, actually may just be coincidence.
Let's not forget that he also thought the cave was where the 'treasure' was buried, and look how that panned out.

by **Jill Havern** Today at 13:34

I think we've established that you're here to diss Bernt's seven year 'boots on the ground work'.

Now it's your turn to tell us what you've done.

by GreenTara Today at 13:42

Jill Havern wrote:I think we've established that you're here to diss Bernt's seven year 'boots on the ground work'.

Now it's your turn to tell us what you've done.

A thousand “yay”s! But I was only allowed one

by **Jill Havern** Today at 13:44

I can feel Father Ted coming on...in the nicest possible way big grin

by GreenTara Today at 13:46

“ I don't think there's much complex or delicate about any of this.”
…said the bull as he bounded through the china shop, blissfully unaware of any impact on the work of others…

by Justice for Maddie Today at 13:50

by **Jill Havern** Today at 13:51

It's good, but it's not right.

by **crusader** Today at 13:53

I don't think banning posters for having an opinion is the way to go.
This thread is titled Ex military detective CLAIMS to have solved Madeleine case, that warrants discussion.
I don't think Loz_Enger has said anything wrong up to now.

by Justice for Maddie Today at 14:00

Norwegian ex-military detective claims to have solved Madeleine case - Page 34 Screen19

Maddie's grave?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9leEbwh3ck

by Loz_Enger Today at 14:07

Justice for Maddie wrote:

Maddie's grave?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9leEbwh3ck

Thanks for that, I've got the ebook and have never seen that picture. Or watched that video.

by **Jill Havern** Today at 14:07

crusader wrote:I don't think banning posters for having an opinion is the way to go.
This thread is titled Ex military detective CLAIMS to have solved Madeleine case, that warrants discussion.
I don't think Loz_Enger has said anything wrong up to now.

My bullshit-o-meter is twitching.

But I have asked him what he's done, so will wait to see what he says.

No reply so far.

But I will leave this thread alone and let you all get on with it.

by Loz_Enger Today at 14:10

Jill Havern wrote:
crusader wrote:I don't think banning posters for having an opinion is the way to go.
This thread is titled Ex military detective CLAIMS to have solved Madeleine case, that warrants discussion.
I don't think Loz_Enger has said anything wrong up to now.
My bullshit-o-meter is twitching.

But I have asked him what he's done, so will wait to see what he says.

No reply so far.

But I will leave this thread alone and let you all get on with it.

I've replied further up the thread. And it's she, not he. (Lauren, not Lawrence)

by **crusader** Today at 14:13

My bullshit meter has been twitching for a while now.

by GreenTara Today at 14:22

Loz_Enger wrote:
Jill Havern wrote:
crusader wrote:I don't think banning posters for having an opinion is the way to go.
This thread is titled Ex military detective CLAIMS to have solved Madeleine case, that warrants discussion.
I don't think Loz_Enger has said anything wrong up to now.
My bullshit-o-meter is twitching.

But I have asked him what he's done, so will wait to see what he says.

No reply so far.

But I will leave this thread alone and let you all get on with it.
I've replied further up the thread. And it's she, not he. (Lauren, not Lawrence)

Can’t find it sorry. What is it you’ve done? Certainly nothing that’s having any impact anywhere right?

by Loz_Enger Today at 14:32

GreenTara wrote:
Loz_Enger wrote:
Jill Havern wrote:
crusader wrote:I don't think banning posters for having an opinion is the way to go.
This thread is titled Ex military detective CLAIMS to have solved Madeleine case, that warrants discussion.
I don't think Loz_Enger has said anything wrong up to now.
My bullshit-o-meter is twitching.

But I have asked him what he's done, so will wait to see what he says.

No reply so far.

But I will leave this thread alone and let you all get on with it.
I've replied further up the thread. And it's she, not he. (Lauren, not Lawrence)
Can’t find it sorry. What is it you’ve done? Certainly nothing that’s having any impact anywhere right?

I can't find it either. But it now looks like I'm being asked two questions - what have I done in the search for MM? and what have I done that has had an impact elsewhere?
1. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. I have not hid in a hedge, put trail cams up - nothing. I don't have the wherewithal or resources.
2. That's for other to judge, but I'm not young and daft, I've led a full life, so there must be some impact somewhere, I suppose.

Do either of those answers preclude me from having an opnion and commenting on the thread?

by **crusader** Today at 14:35

What have you done GreenTara? You don't have to have done anything significant apart from be a member of the forum and give your opinion and not be disruptive.

by GreenTara Today at 14:41

Loz_Enger wrote:
GreenTara wrote:
Loz_Enger wrote:
Jill Havern wrote:
crusader wrote:I don't think banning posters for having an opinion is the way to go.
This thread is titled Ex military detective CLAIMS to have solved Madeleine case, that warrants discussion.
I don't think Loz_Enger has said anything wrong up to now.
My bullshit-o-meter is twitching.

But I have asked him what he's done, so will wait to see what he says.

No reply so far.

But I will leave this thread alone and let you all get on with it.
I've replied further up the thread. And it's she, not he. (Lauren, not Lawrence)
Can’t find it sorry. What is it you’ve done? Certainly nothing that’s having any impact anywhere right?
I can't find it either. But it now looks like I'm being asked two questions - what have I done in the search for MM? and what have I done that has had an impact elsewhere?
1. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. I have not hid in a hedge, put trail cams up - nothing. I don't have the wherewithal or resources.
2. That's for other to judge, but I'm not young and daft, I've led a full life, so there must be some impact somewhere, I suppose.

Do either of those answers preclude me from having an opnion and commenting on the thread?

One question only from Liz Havern - what have you done to help crack the MM case? A reasonable question to ask someone who is so vocal about damning what someone else has extensively done. I certainly was not asking if you have had any impact on anything ever in your whole life - that would be daft.

by GreenTara Today at 15:07

crusader wrote:What have you done GreenTara? You don't have to have done anything significant apart from be a member of the forum and give your opinion and not be disruptive.

I think if you are going to be highly critical of the work of others then you have a responsibility to answer questions like the one Jill posed. I was merely keen to see the answer. Personally I would say anyone abstaining from trampling over this work-in-progress is doing their bit.

by **Ladyinred** Today at 15:14

Green Tara - you seem to have taken it upon yourself to police the Bernt threads, jumping on anyone who posts anything mildly critical.

by **crusader** Today at 15:20

I'd like to know where Loz_Enger was highly critical of BS work.

by **crusader** Today at 15:31

This forum has always been fact based, backed up by evidence, it's what has set it apart from other forums.
I for one will not believe something someone writes unless it's backed up by evidence.
If BS has what he say's he has, brilliant, up to now we have the book to read. but no evidence of anything.
Until then, we question.

Latest topics