Could Maddie be in the garden of Casa Liliana?

I'm still finding it hard to fathom this character out.

He fits into the normal hate-filled troll mould when it comes to slagging off Tony Bennett but what is so unusual about him is that he wants us to believe that he knows that Madeleine is dead and the McCanns and / or their friends were responsible.

There definitely will be no welcome for him at Rothley Towers or on the pro-sites!

Jean wrote:I'm still finding it hard to fathom this character out.

He fits into the normal hate-filled troll mould when it comes to slagging off Tony Bennett but what is so unusual about him is that he wants us to believe that he knows that Madeleine is dead and the McCanns and / or their friends were responsible.

There definitely will be no welcome for him at Rothley Towers or on the pro-sites!

IMO he says what suits to get what he is trying to achieve. Earlier he posted that Murat will allow him to dig up the driveway if he pays. He stated that he had got more investments why not use that?

Stephen D. Birch
7 hours ago near Cape Town, Western Cape (12.10pm gmt)
To My facebook friends:

People from all over the world are now asking me, who is responsible for MADELEINE MC CANN'S dissapearance ? Is is the Mc Cann's, is it Robert Murat, Is it Gipsies, is it a paedophile ring. I have a theory as to who the people are, that are responsible for Madeleine's disappearance. Until the body is recovered, the investigation cannot be narrowed, and completed. So to answer everyone's questions, let's first find the body, then complete the investigation, then make the accusations...(Making unfounded accusations, is a very dangerous thing) ask Mr Bennett, who,ll be eating jail food soon)
Like · · Share
3 people like this.

ANother fb user; Well Steven I think this is a uncalled for comment ! Not nice
7 hours ago · Like

Stephen D. Birch You may be right ANother but it's reality, you cannot go an accuse someone, if you do not have all the facts, and not finding MADELEINE, means you do not have all the facts !!!! Mr Bennett agreed not to slander the Mc Cann's. He slandered the Mc Cann's. As a member of the judicial system, he knows the implication of breaking an order of court - You go to jail. Mr Bennett studied law for at least 6-7 years, and has at least 20 years experience in practicing law, he should know the implications of his actions...
7 hours ago · Like · 2






Stephen D. Birch
5 hours ago near Cape Town, Western Cape (14.10pm gmt)
Tony Bennett breached 16 undertakings he gave the Mc Cann's not to defame them. Then he brough an application to argue that 3 of the undertaking need to be removed from the original agreement. Tony you idiot, 16-3= 13. Even if you get 3 undertakings removed from your original undertaking agreement with the Mc Cann's, you still breached your agreement - Jail food for you son....lol And this from an attorney, UK judicial system, must be is in turmoil !!!!
Like · · Share
2 people like this.

(ANotherfb user) I think Tony Bennett's interest was to get justice for Madeleine, and not as a monatery benefit for himself, it seems to me everything reguarding Madeleine is all about MONEY AND WHO THE MCCANNS CAN SUE NEXT. Where is free speach, all the McCann's has to do is take a POLYGRAPH TEST. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT MORE IS DONE TO BRING DOWN THE ANTI MCCANNS, THAN TO SEEK WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THAT POOR CHILD. i HOPE THAT TONY BENNETT GETS JUSTICE,
4 hours ago · Like · 1

Stephen D. Birch ANother what I am saying is Tony went about it the wrong way -


(names of other fb users deleted)



Stephen D. Birch
32 minutes ago near Cape Town, Western Cape (18.41pm gmt)
Went for an awesome walk along the beach - 26 degrees C and a gentle warm breeze - Cape Town

I know TB will be devastated to be off SB's Christmas Card list this year. However it seems the FB friends are unconvinced.

I wonder if SB's head spins around and around

First this dog with a bone was saying "watch kate's eyes when his name is mentioned", now he's saying "kate called him"...... a hem...have pigs in SA sprout wings?

Now he's changing his tune to say he does not know and does not want to speculate who was responsible for burying Maddie underneath Murat's drive --- geez!

He has shot his own foot in spectacular fashion!

[quote="Nina"] Hi Sami, has SB ever said how the body of Madeleine got there and who was involved. he states the grave is in the property of RM's Mum, but has he ever actually said how the body got there? I am sure that I have read he did say by whom, but will not post.[/quote

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Nina

After his first few posts my eyes glazed over and my head hurt, but he gave little information of any use. I only spoke with him on this thread, not the original one and he "pleaded the fifth" to anything I asked him. He did give some "clues" but never named names, as far as I am aware.

What I find interesting is he is trying to discredit Amaral (who imo knows lots more than he has said to date), is attacking Tony Bennett (who I think came too close to the truth at some stage for the McCanns liking), his timeline discounts the dogs alerts in the car and their search of Murats property (I totally believe the dogs) and leaves little room for taking account of the Smith sighting (McCanns have ignored that family since the start as well). In short, he has at some stage attacked many of the key people or issues that cast doubt on the McCanns story. Lucky for the McCanns that.

Don't worry about being taken in by the McCanns, millions of people were at the beginning, it is very brave thing to admit to, the only thing you are guilty of is having a kind heart. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] It is they, and only they, who should be ashamed.

I have merged David-uk thread to this one, as same being discussed on both. Quite honestly, I don't know why David you opened a new thread to give this person more attention and limelight, when most of those facebook posts were already here on this thread. Considering most people were moaning about him, I think one thread is quite enough!

candyfloss wrote:I have merged David-uk thread to this one, as same being discussed on both. Quite honestly, I don't know why David you opened a new thread to give this person more attention and limelight, when most of those facebook posts were already here on this thread. Considering most people were moaning about him, I think one thread is quite enough!

I guess I opened a new one for the same reason people put clothes on cute animals or take videos of there cats falling off walls!

david_uk wrote:

candyfloss wrote:I have merged David-uk thread to this one, as same being discussed on both. Quite honestly, I don't know why David you opened a new thread to give this person more attention and limelight, when most of those facebook posts were already here on this thread. Considering most people were moaning about him, I think one thread is quite enough!

I guess I opened a new one for the same reason people put clothes on cute animals or take videos of there cats falling off walls!

Cos they have a low IQ? Heheh [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

SkruffyKat wrote:

david_uk wrote:

candyfloss wrote:I have merged David-uk thread to this one, as same being discussed on both. Quite honestly, I don't know why David you opened a new thread to give this person more attention and limelight, when most of those facebook posts were already here on this thread. Considering most people were moaning about him, I think one thread is quite enough!

I guess I opened a new one for the same reason people put clothes on cute animals or take videos of there cats falling off walls!

Cos they have a low IQ? Heheh [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

or sometimes its just funny to watch daft creatures looking silly or falling flat on their face!....

david_uk wrote:

SkruffyKat wrote:

david_uk wrote:

candyfloss wrote:I have merged David-uk thread to this one, as same being discussed on both. Quite honestly, I don't know why David you opened a new thread to give this person more attention and limelight, when most of those facebook posts were already here on this thread. Considering most people were moaning about him, I think one thread is quite enough!

I guess I opened a new one for the same reason people put clothes on cute animals or take videos of there cats falling off walls!

Cos they have a low IQ? Heheh [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

or sometimes its just funny to watch daft creatures looking silly or falling flat on their face!....

I'm so glad you took that in good spirits [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] there are much more interesting things on youtube than the videos you mentioned... I've never been one to watch them though

From the personality changes I was wondering if there were two SBs, or were we responding to someone with a split personality, or maybe someone who was gullible and had been influenced by the pros - but then if there were two SBs, surely No.1. would have spoken up and said he was not No.2.

SkruffyKat wrote:

david_uk wrote:

SkruffyKat wrote:

david_uk wrote:

candyfloss wrote:I have merged David-uk thread to this one, as same being discussed on both. Quite honestly, I don't know why David you opened a new thread to give this person more attention and limelight, when most of those facebook posts were already here on this thread. Considering most people were moaning about him, I think one thread is quite enough!

I guess I opened a new one for the same reason people put clothes on cute animals or take videos of there cats falling off walls!

Cos they have a low IQ? Heheh [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

or sometimes its just funny to watch daft creatures looking silly or falling flat on their face!....

I'm so glad you took that in good spirits [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] there are much more interesting things on youtube than the videos you mentioned... I've never been one to watch them though

erm... I think my point was missed!, perhaps I was being too subtle. . I take no offense , I do not actually like those kinds of videos myself. I was making the point that I started the thread about Birch and his latest bizarre FB posts because its funny to watch/read daft creatures sometimes.

back on topic. I have yet to see any evidence that anyone is taking SB seriously in any way (thankfully), can anyone point me to anything that shows otherwise (except is own FB page)

Even his 'friends' on his facebook page are not all taking him seriously. There are plenty who are questioning him on there. And if your own friends think there is something wrong, well, it doesn't look good does it?

Stephen D. Birch

23 hours ago near Cape Town, Western Cape[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


To My facebook friends:

People from all over the world are now asking me, who is responsible for MADELEINE MC CANN'S dissapearance ? Is is the Mc Cann's, is it Robert Murat, Is it Gipsies, is it a paedophile ring. I have a theory as to who the people are, that are responsible for Madeleine's disappearance. Until the body is recovered, the investigation cannot be narrowed, and completed. So to answer everyone's questions, let's first find the body, then complete the investigation, then make the accusations...(Making unfounded accusations, is a very dangerous thing) ask Mr Bennett, who,ll be eating jail food soon)
3 people like this.

OFU - Well Steven I think this is a uncalled for comment ! Not nice
23 hours ago

Stephen D Birch You may be right xxxxx, but it's reality, you cannot go an accuse someone,if you do not have all the facts, and not finding MADELEINE, means you do not have all the facts !!!! Mr Bennett agreed not to slander the McCann's. He slandered the Mc Cann's. As a member of the judicial system, he knows the implication of breaking an order of court - You go to jail. Mr Bennett studied law for at least 6-7 years, and has at least 20 years experience in practicing law, he should know the implications of his actions...
23 hours ago

OFU - She is down under Robert Murats garage.
16 hours ago

OFU - What gave the McCann friends the right to slander Robert Murat? He had his life torn apart by their friends, lying. Why have the McCanns never asked Portugal to reopen the case? All they have to do is say they would do a reconstruction of that night and that would be new evidence. Of course it could mean them becoming Arguido again. No one knows what happened to Maddie, however, I think two very good British Police dogs had a very good idea!
16 hours ago

Stephen D. Birch xxxx, I ask you to be a little patient, all will be revealed........and then we'll come out guns blazing
15 hours ago

OFU - Who is "we" I have been patient along with many Stephen for over 5 years now wanting some justice for that little girl, and my opinion is she is not under Robert Murats drive. In fact one of your fellow South Africian's went out to Portugal and the request of the McCanns and supposedly found where she was buried and it wasn't under Robert Murat's driveway, )
15 hours ago

OFU - I must point out that you comment about "Mr Bennett who'll be eating jail food soon" I don't think he will go to Prison the McCanns are not that popular in the UK at the minute now more is coming out. I think there would be a public outcry if that were to happen.
15 hours ago

Stephen D. Birch Ihope he does not go to jail - was just my wicket sense of humour - he's a good man, but you cannot go to a gun fight with a knife..........
15 hours ago

OFU - Well yes that is true Stephen and Carter Ruck do have one big very expensive gun, only celebrity's can afford them!! Of course it makes no difference why these people became celebrities [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
15 hours ago



Additional comments from Mr Birch's post. OFU = Other Facebook User

Thanks Skruffykat



I had posted these yesterday at 7:15 pm, however without the added comments...



Hoping not to duplicate posts, perhaops we could quote then add additional comments.



Good contribution anywho [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Yup yup, good call! Will do in future

david_uk wrote:

SkruffyKat wrote:

david_uk wrote:

SkruffyKat wrote:

david_uk wrote:

candyfloss wrote:I have merged David-uk thread to this one, as same being discussed on both. Quite honestly, I don't know why David you opened a new thread to give this person more attention and limelight, when most of those facebook posts were already here on this thread. Considering most people were moaning about him, I think one thread is quite enough!

I guess I opened a new one for the same reason people put clothes on cute animals or take videos of there cats falling off walls!

Cos they have a low IQ? Heheh [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

or sometimes its just funny to watch daft creatures looking silly or falling flat on their face!....

I'm so glad you took that in good spirits [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] there are much more interesting things on youtube than the videos you mentioned... I've never been one to watch them though

erm... I think my point was missed!, perhaps I was being too subtle. . I take no offense , I do not actually like those kinds of videos myself. I was making the point that I started the thread about Birch and his latest bizarre FB posts because its funny to watch/read daft creatures sometimes.

No... I got the point you were trying to get across. I was simply saying that I was glad you didn't take the comment 'cos they have low IQ's' as a personal attack against you, comparing you to the idiots who post those videos... My humour is obviously lost on you. No worries, it is a particular brand

SkruffyKat wrote:

david_uk wrote:

SkruffyKat wrote:

david_uk wrote:

SkruffyKat wrote:

david_uk wrote:

candyfloss wrote:I have merged David-uk thread to this one, as same being discussed on both. Quite honestly, I don't know why David you opened a new thread to give this person more attention and limelight, when most of those facebook posts were already here on this thread. Considering most people were moaning about him, I think one thread is quite enough!

I guess I opened a new one for the same reason people put clothes on cute animals or take videos of there cats falling off walls!

Cos they have a low IQ? Heheh [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

or sometimes its just funny to watch daft creatures looking silly or falling flat on their face!....

I'm so glad you took that in good spirits [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] there are much more interesting things on youtube than the videos you mentioned... I've never been one to watch them though

erm... I think my point was missed!, perhaps I was being too subtle. . I take no offense , I do not actually like those kinds of videos myself. I was making the point that I started the thread about Birch and his latest bizarre FB posts because its funny to watch/read daft creatures sometimes.

No... I got the point you were trying to get across. I was simply saying that I was glad you didn't take the comment 'cos they have low IQ's' as a personal attack against you, comparing you to the idiots who post those videos... My humour is obviously lost on you. No worries, it is a particular brand

And you would think that hailing from the same region we would have a similar humour! That is if you are from Merseyside or just reside there. i was born in Birkenhead and raised in between Wallasey and Liverpool, a child of divorce

Stephen Birch seems to be treating it like one big game, the way he is writing on his Facebook says it all.

I don't believe it was more than one person posting on this forum, I reckon it was all him.

It is a maxim of disinformation that it doesn't matter what questions people ask as long as they are asking about the wrong thing. The one thing that could blow this whole affair open would be the discovery of the body, so I doubt very much that there is a body.

Ross wrote:It is a maxim of disinformation that it doesn't matter what questions people ask as long as they are asking about the wrong thing. The one thing that could blow this whole affair open would be the discovery of the body, so I doubt very much that there is a body.

I agree this was the first and foremost important thing to be done and whoever was involved would have made sure that it would never be found.

bristow wrote:Stephen Birch seems to be treating it like one big game, the way he is writing on his Facebook says it all.

I don't believe it was more than one person posting on this forum, I reckon it was all him.

It may just be me and it's late in the day, but his Facebook account seems to have disappeared. I wonder where he's SHOUTING from now.

Jean wrote:

bristow wrote:Stephen Birch seems to be treating it like one big game, the way he is writing on his Facebook says it all.

I don't believe it was more than one person posting on this forum, I reckon it was all him.

It may just be me and it's late in the day, but his Facebook account seems to have disappeared. I wonder where he's SHOUTING from now.

Hello Jean - he's still up and running!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] near [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


Queens gambit declined - The MADELEINE MC CANN case

Thanks for that - you have to include the D - I'm sure I didn't have to do that before though. I could think of a few good suggestions for appropriate names beginning with D!

He says he's looking forward to agreeing with Robert Murat this coming week over proceding with the exhumation. Now that will be interesting to follow......

Sorry, this is off topic but has anyone else found on Facebook that there is no longer the facility to look at messages sent privately to people? You can still send them but they aren't saved and all the previous history has gone too which is annoying.

All sounds like fantasy if you ask me

Yes I think that the expression "In your dreams!" is suitable here.

Jean wrote:Thanks for that - you have to include the D - I'm sure I didn't have to do that before though. I could think of a few good suggestions for appropriate names beginning with D!

He says he's looking forward to agreeing with Robert Murat this coming week over proceding with the exhumation. Now that will be interesting to follow......

Sorry, this is off topic but has anyone else found on Facebook that there is no longer the facility to look at messages sent privately to people? You can still send them but they aren't saved and all the previous history has gone too which is annoying.

Try using a different browser, Jean, I often have a problem viewing in chrome but not ie.

Oh dear, this from SB, have a look at this post on MM from Annabel at 11.33...........

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]