The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook

dragonfly wrote:

puzzled wrote:

Me wrote:

I can only speak for myself but I would like nothing more than for her to turn up somewhere alive. The problem is I can’t see that happening.

Nobody takes any fun out of her family. What I feel is disgust and contempt at their actions both in leaving their children unattended and their subsequent strategy at media manipulation, libel bullying and fund raising.

Exactly. I think most people would be delighted if she was found alive. But statistically, that's very unlikely. It's not being callous or cruel to accept that, it's just acknowledging facts long known to the police and criminal psychologists. If she really was taken by a nonce, then we known that 75% of them kill their victims within hours. And even if she lived longer than a day, the massive publicity in this case would almost certainly motivate a kidnapper to kill her, just to protect themselves. These aren't pleasant thoughts, but they are the facts that police and criminologists have to deal with.And whatever the parents may or may not have done, that does not give them the right to try and destroy people, like they are trying to do with Amaral.

good posts

Where do the Mccann's get the American statistics, that their is some happy ending and the children come alive and well? Happy ending for whom The parents? The public?
if people believe Madeleine will be found alive, she will be placed with the very parents whose own belief 'there is no evidence to suggest she has come to any harm' have they thought how that would impact Madeleine? stating that she could be taken by peados but 'there is no evidence to suggest she has come to any harm' if people believe Madeleine will be found alive, I think it is very rose tinted view to think that she will be scooped up and the nightmare has ended , Not for any of the other girls such as jaycee ,Natascha Kampusch, Sabine Dardenne, "Elizabeth Smart, Fritzel's daughter , who were all missing from public view, lived a nightmare and the psychological effects it has on a child and the long term damage is unthinkable,
I dont think these other people are being realistic, The sad facts are she would have lived more of her life in her present reality, than her past, The trauma and abuse this poor child could of gone through , she could be severely damaged finding out her parents neglected which caused her to be in that situation, and spent money from the fund on a PR machine and defence lawyers and taking people to court ,she could develop Stockholm syndrome, if she was in a different country , being then bought back to England the culture shock not speaking the language, not to mention the abuse the living conditions PTSD, The list is endless, The bottom line is of course we would want her to be found alive and well , with people who cared for her, The reality and statistics is another thing, The outcome either way dead or alive both outlooks are unthinkable for this innocent child

scotclogs wrote:

Wendy wrote:

dragonfly wrote:

Wendy wrote:

dragonfly wrote:There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night

I did not write that look at my post
Did they not leave 3 children alone that night? Is that not a crime? If not, then why are other people in jail for doing the same?or=blue]YES ABSOLUTELY !!!!!!!
Mccanns admitted most nights they were left

nspcc website - Neglect involves failure to meet a child's needs that does or could harm the child.
That explains the constant quote of

I AGREE RE READ MY POSTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She's apparently with a friggin' paedophile isn't she? What's he supposed to be doing with her? You McCann supporters make me sick to my stomach.

ARE YOU WINDING ME UP? OR ARE YOU THICK? RE READ MY POST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHY has some one changed my words I did not say that, READ MY POST CORRECTLY ! I can not see wendys post, I am quoting the Mccanns! Mccanns said there is no evidence,
not me! I can not believe some one is thick enough to think I am sticking up for them, the total opposite

WELL SAID wendy
" 'There is no suggestion that Madeleine has come to any harm'
dragonfly :please: What planet are you on, I don't think you have read the the files if you have then read them again this time sober :drunken: or you just do this I hate to tell you but IMO POOR LITTLE MADIE HAS COME TO HARM Thats what sick paedophile do dear THEY HARM. ask Kate she will tell you all about it.

dragonfly wrote:

scotclogs wrote:

Wendy wrote:

dragonfly wrote:

Wendy wrote:

dragonfly wrote:There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night

I did not write that look at my post
Did they not leave 3 children alone that night? Is that not a crime? If not, then why are other people in jail for doing the same?or=blue]YES ABSOLUTELY !!!!!!!
Mccanns admitted most nights they were left

nspcc website - Neglect involves failure to meet a child's needs that does or could harm the child.
That explains the constant quote of

I AGREE RE READ MY POSTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She's apparently with a friggin' paedophile isn't she? What's he supposed to be doing with her? You McCann supporters make me sick to my stomach.

ARE YOU WINDING ME UP? OR ARE YOU THICK? RE READ MY POST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




WHY has some one changed my words I did not say that, READ MY POST CORRECTLY ! I can not see wendys post, I am quoting the Mccanns! Mccanns said there is no evidence,
not me! I can not believe some one is thick enough to think I am sticking up for them, the total opposite

WELL SAID wendy
" 'There is no suggestion that Madeleine has come to any harm'
dragonfly :please: What planet are you on, I don't think you have read the the files if you have then read them again this time sober :drunken: or you just do this I hate to tell you but IMO POOR LITTLE MADIE HAS COME TO HARM Thats what sick paedophile do dear THEY HARM. ask Kate she will tell you all about it.

First of all I am NOT THICK BUT YOU ARE VERY NASTY But I will go back and read your post again OK

dragonfly wrote:

scotclogs wrote:

Wendy wrote:

dragonfly wrote:

Wendy wrote:

dragonfly wrote:There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night

I did not write that look at my post
Did they not leave 3 children alone that night? Is that not a crime? If not, then why are other people in jail for doing the same?or=blue]YES ABSOLUTELY !!!!!!!
Mccanns admitted most nights they were left

nspcc website - Neglect involves failure to meet a child's needs that does or could harm the child.
That explains the constant quote of

I AGREE RE READ MY POSTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She's apparently with a friggin' paedophile isn't she? What's he supposed to be doing with her? You McCann supporters make me sick to my stomach.

ARE YOU WINDING ME UP? OR ARE YOU THICK? RE READ MY POST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




WHY has some one changed my words I did not say that, READ MY POST CORRECTLY ! I can not see wendys post, I am quoting the Mccanns! Mccanns said there is no evidence,
not me! I can not believe some one is thick enough to think I am sticking up for them, the total opposite

WELL SAID wendy
" 'There is no suggestion that Madeleine has come to any harm'
dragonfly :please: What planet are you on, I don't think you have read the the files if you have then read them again this time sober :drunken: or you just do this I hate to tell you but IMO POOR LITTLE MADIE HAS COME TO HARM Thats what sick paedophile do dear THEY HARM. ask Kate she will tell you all about it.

First of all I am NOT THICK BUT YOU ARE VERY NASTY But I will go back and read your post again OK

dragonfly wrote:Blog - from April 14th -The writing of the wrongs

OK, I’ll keep this short and sweet. I am getting more and more irritated and infuriated by being constantly told I need to read the files. Every time I go onto anywhere on the web that allows people from both sides of the argument to post together, such as newspaper comments section, and I make a comment in support of Kate and Gerry I get replies like, “You need to read the files, they are very illuminating.” Or, “Check the files, then you wouldn’t be so keen to support a couple of child murderers.” Well, for the information of all those who parrot this phrase over and over, I HAVE read the files, VERY carefully. Also the rogatory interviews, the Gaspar statements and a ton of other stuff to do with the case.

And guess what? It all leads me to the inevitable and inarguable conclusion that the Portuguese Attorney General, a man who has forgotten far more about the due process of the law than all of us keyboard warriors ever knew, was RIGHT. There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night, which in itself leads me to another inescapable conclusion. All of those people, all the McCann critics who have ever told ME to read the files have clearly and obviously NOT read the files themselves. Perhaps it is because they are so over-confident in their belief that the McCanns are guilty of something that they have utterly convinced themselves that there MUST be something incriminating somewhere in the files, so it is not necessary for them to read them but it is vital that us supporters do, so as to educate us to the ‘Truth.’ This, on their part, is either the very heights of arrogance or the very depths of stupidity, though I am not quite sure which.

So, can all those critics of the McCanns who continually tell people like me to read the files please do me a favour. YOU read them, because you are quite right, they ARE very illuminating.

dragonfly wrote:

dragonfly wrote:Blog - from April 14th -The writing of the wrongs

OK, I’ll keep this short and sweet. I am getting more and more irritated and infuriated by being constantly told I need to read the files. Every time I go onto anywhere on the web that allows people from both sides of the argument to post together, such as newspaper comments section, and I make a comment in support of Kate and Gerry I get replies like, “You need to read the files, they are very illuminating.” Or, “Check the files, then you wouldn’t be so keen to support a couple of child murderers.” Well, for the information of all those who parrot this phrase over and over, I HAVE read the files, VERY carefully. Also the rogatory interviews, the Gaspar statements and a ton of other stuff to do with the case.

And guess what? It all leads me to the inevitable and inarguable conclusion that the Portuguese Attorney General, a man who has forgotten far more about the due process of the law than all of us keyboard warriors ever knew, was RIGHT. There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night, which in itself leads me to another inescapable conclusion. All of those people, all the McCann critics who have ever told ME to read the files have clearly and obviously NOT read the files themselves. Perhaps it is because they are so over-confident in their belief that the McCanns are guilty of something that they have utterly convinced themselves that there MUST be something incriminating somewhere in the files, so it is not necessary for them to read them but it is vital that us supporters do, so as to educate us to the ‘Truth.’ This, on their part, is either the very heights of arrogance or the very depths of stupidity, though I am not quite sure which.

So, can all those critics of the McCanns who continually tell people like me to read the files please do me a favour. YOU read them, because you are quite right, they ARE very illuminating.

scotch clogs I owe you an apology , I have looked back to see why wendy has said what she did, Wendy has wrongly quoted me as saying ' There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night' These are not my words but the words from writing of the wrongs ! Despite it clearly saying it is from the blog from 14th April , I can only assume you read wendys quote attributed wrongly to me , (again maybe she did not realise it was not my words we all make mistakes ) and you did not see my original post stating it was from writing of the wrongs, I did provide a link to the blog I can see go get em has removed it by edit , but the original words are from WOTW site , hope that clears that up, and am very sorry

dragonfly wrote:

good posts

Where do the Mccann's get the American statistics, that their is some happy ending and the children come alive and well? Happy ending for whom The parents? The public?
if people believe Madeleine will be found alive, she will be placed with the very parents whose own belief 'there is no evidence to suggest she has come to any harm' have they thought how that would impact Madeleine? stating that she could be taken by peados but 'there is no evidence to suggest she has come to any harm' if people believe Madeleine will be found alive, I think it is very rose tinted view to think that she will be scooped up and the nightmare has ended , Not for any of the other girls such as jaycee ,Natascha Kampusch, Sabine Dardenne, "Elizabeth Smart, Fritzel's daughter , who were all missing from public view, lived a nightmare and the psychological effects it has on a child and the long term damage is unthinkable,
I dont think these other people are being realistic, The sad facts are she would have lived more of her life in her present reality, than her past, The trauma and abuse this poor child could of gone through , she could be severely damaged finding out her parents neglected which caused her to be in that situation, and spent money from the fund on a PR machine and defence lawyers and taking people to court ,she could develop Stockholm syndrome, if she was in a different country , being then bought back to England the culture shock not speaking the language, not to mention the abuse the living conditions PTSD, The list is endless, The bottom line is of course we would want her to be found alive and well , with people who cared for her, The reality and statistics is another thing, The outcome either way dead or alive both outlooks are unthinkable for this innocent child

dragonfly wrote:Blog - from April 14th -The writing of the wrongs

OK, I’ll keep this short and sweet. I am getting more and more irritated and infuriated by being constantly told I need to read the files. Every time I go onto anywhere on the web that allows people from both sides of the argument to post together, such as newspaper comments section, and I make a comment in support of Kate and Gerry I get replies like, “You need to read the files, they are very illuminating.” Or, “Check the files, then you wouldn’t be so keen to support a couple of child murderers.” Well, for the information of all those who parrot this phrase over and over, I HAVE read the files, VERY carefully. Also the rogatory interviews, the Gaspar statements and a ton of other stuff to do with the case.

And guess what? It all leads me to the inevitable and inarguable conclusion that the Portuguese Attorney General, a man who has forgotten far more about the due process of the law than all of us keyboard warriors ever knew, was RIGHT. There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night, which in itself leads me to another inescapable conclusion. All of those people, all the McCann critics who have ever told ME to read the files have clearly and obviously NOT read the files themselves. Perhaps it is because they are so over-confident in their belief that the McCanns are guilty of something that they have utterly convinced themselves that there MUST be something incriminating somewhere in the files, so it is not necessary for them to read them but it is vital that us supporters do, so as to educate us to the ‘Truth.’ This, on their part, is either the very heights of arrogance or the very depths of stupidity, though I am not quite sure which.

So, can all those critics of the McCanns who continually tell people like me to read the files please do me a favour. YOU read them, because you are quite right, they ARE very illuminating.

dragonfly wrote:What a vulgar poem done in Madeleine's name from the Writing of the wrongs


I am the ball that scores political goals

I am the force for bigots and trolls

I am the reason to justify a cause

I am the flag that is taken to wars

I am the paper for writing poison in stacks

I am the bullet that starts the attacks

I am the knife that stabs in the dark

I am the confrontational spark

I am all of these things but not from my choice

I am unable to speak with my stolen voice

I am crying for everyone to know who I AM

The missing child who is Madeleine McCann

poison knife stab dark war
what sort of words used in a poem for a little girl very negative

Tony Bennett wrote:Yes, said Jane, he WAS - mustard chinos and black hair.