Re: BRICK Reviews

by **Bluebagthepirate** 24.07.24 11:34

Silentscope wrote:I would Question Danie if has kept a few Hairs for himself before he gave the Hairbrush back to Martin Brunt?

Without a Source sample, how would his planned return to Portugal even work out?

Even if his newer Model MOS Machine works or not?

You think it might work?

Really after watching that?

He has other videos in which he uses a machine and a wooden cross that was once placed on the tomb of christ as part of the process.

by **Bluebagthepirate** 24.07.24 12:11

James Randi offered Krugel a million dollars if he could prove his machine worked.

The offer was not taken up.

https://archive.randi.org/site/jr/2007-08/081007reason.html#i4

And, we’re told, controlled environment testing of the MOS is currently under way. All this leads us to enthusiastically offer Colonel Daniel Krugel, and Carte Blanche, the JREF million-dollar prize, if the MOS can operate as claimed. Tests would take less than an hour, and we already have experts standing by on site to spring into action as soon as Krugel or Carte Blanche give us the word.

James Randi was the one who exposed Uri Gellar, he sadly died in 2020.

by Shash T 24.07.24 13:40

My guess is he had a magnet on the hair brush.

by Shash T 24.07.24 13:42

Paddingtom wrote:the more I think about this, the more I cant see anyone cracking. If they think their life is intolerable now, they aint seen nothing yet.

All the Tapas lot, all the helpers, nuggets, P.M.s, officials, police chiefs etc. will be negatively affected by the big reveal. Jobs will be lost, reputations will be in the gutter and friends and family will be forever estranged.

Can you imagine the wrath of all those people who, so far have been coping, but will have their lives changed beyond recognition?

The whistle blower will receive more anger than they knew was possible.
Their life will be much, much worse than it is now. They have to keep quiet.....pact of silence..... Theyre all tied together, unable to move.

The only 2 ways I can see this coming out is by a deathbed confession
where the whistle blower wont have to face the consequences of losing all their friends, or for physical evidence to be found.

We need the quantum physical remote scanning dna tracer machine back.

I agree but use dogs instead of the "magic" machine.

by Shash T 24.07.24 13:52

I agree with Paddington. I don't think anyone will crack. Bernt hasn't really said anything new that hasn't been discussed here.
The sticking point is why the government, etc, interference?
If it was just, "a good marketing ploy", it would have been dropped as soon as they realised all was not as it seemed. But they didn't and haven't. Why?
Just my opinion.

by **Jill Havern** 24.07.24 14:00

Shash T wrote:I agree with Paddington. I don't think anyone will crack. Bernt hasn't really said anything new that hasn't been discussed here.

Have we discussed the surprise appearance of people on the strategically-placed field cameras before?
If so, I must have missed it.

by **Bluebagthepirate** 24.07.24 14:11

Shash T wrote:I agree with Paddington. I don't think anyone will crack. Bernt hasn't really said anything new that hasn't been discussed here.

???

200 pages of new stuff.

by pinkgladioli 24.07.24 14:19

Slowly slowly catch the monkey as the saying goes, the info given by Bernt in his book in my opinion was potentially identifiable not only to the nugget themselves but possibly residents in PDL and other resorts close by who happen to read it,

by **Bluebagthepirate** 24.07.24 14:21

pinkgladioli wrote:Slowly slowly catch the monkey as the saying goes, the info given by Bernt in his book in my opinion was potentially identifiable not only to the nugget themselves but possibly residents in PDL and other resorts close by who happen to read it,

Absolutely.

The congregation of St Vincent's in PDL is quite small.

They know, or will know soon enough.

by Shash T 24.07.24 14:22

The people that show up on the camera don't do anything but "look", except for Mrs N, who does something in the dirt. I think this could be where a beloved dog was buried.

After the first cryptic email where it says they have a week, no one shows up for 3 weeks! No rush, no panic, and they just look.

The next email no one shows up for months. No rush, no panic!

by **Bluebagthepirate** 24.07.24 14:28

Shash T wrote:The next email no one shows up for months. No rush, no panic!

But people were turning up and checking - and the Nuggets were some of them.

Word will get out in PDL about the Nuggets if it hasn't already.

I wonder if St Vincent's has a chat site?

by Cake Lover 24.07.24 14:58

by Cake Lover 24.07.24 14:58

My home made missing person detector.

by pinkgladioli 24.07.24 15:00

Shash T wrote:The people that show up on the camera don't do anything but "look", except for Mrs N, who does something in the dirt. I think this could be where a beloved dog was buried.

After the first cryptic email where it says they have a week, no one shows up for 3 weeks! No rush, no panic, and they just look.

The next email no one shows up for months. No rush, no panic!

Maybe the nuggets weren’t in Portugal in the 3 weeks time frame, anyway I think Bernt’s got a lot more info up his sleeve than what has been written in his book, he will deffo have held back potentially other incriminating stuff or info
As much as we all want it to end and desperate for any updates we just have to be patient

by pinkgladioli 24.07.24 15:08

Bluebagthepirate wrote:
Shash T wrote:The next email no one shows up for months. No rush, no panic!
But people were turning up and checking - and the Nuggets were some of them.

Word will get out in PDL about the Nuggets if it hasn't already.

I wonder if St Vincent's has a chat site?

Especially if they happen to attend the same dance class!

by deepeepee 24.07.24 17:30

Cake Lover wrote:My home made missing person detector.

Unfortunately, I think that colour of bog plunger is not going to work properly. It has to be an orange rubber or the DNA gets disturbed and sent somewhere else. big grin

by Cake Lover 24.07.24 19:18

Is that why I didn't get a result? Damn - I went to a lot of trouble designing and building that machine. laugh

by **Silentscope** 24.07.24 19:44

@CaKeLoveR#Post 62
Are you now in breach of Copyright Law?
laugh

by **Bluebagthepirate** 24.07.24 19:45

Did you use anything quantum? You need a quantum (try B&Q). You have some entangled hair I see which is excellent.

by Cake Lover 24.07.24 21:21

deepeepee wrote:
Cake Lover wrote:My home made missing person detector.
Unfortunately, I think that colour of bog plunger is not going to work properly. It has to be an orange rubber or the DNA gets disturbed and sent somewhere else.

My neighbour, a Sikh man, was singing Men of Harlech as he raised the Welsh flag in his garden this afternoon, so that's where my missing DNA went, so you're correct about the orange bog plunger. I had two ounces of quantum but it was blunt. Silly mistakes - thanks for pointing them out. Should I tell old Hardeep what I've done?

by **PeterMac** 31.07.24 9:39

In chapter 61 I wrote

“WHERE DOES THIS LEAVE THE NUGGETS ?

Potentially in a very seriously compromised situation. Even assuming that as church-going and legally upright and decent professional people who either were lied to, or at best not told the whole truth when asked to do what appeared to be a simple if strange and obscure task by some acquaintances, they must by now realise that they have been ’set up’, and that their involvement is capable of being seen in the eyes of the law as conspiracy, or “accessory after the fact.”

If, with that knowledge, they remain silent, they could also fall into the definition of Assisting Offender S. 4(1) Criminal Law Act 1967 refers, as Mr Nugget, a lawyer, will be well aware”

I have reflected on that for another day or so.

Bernt Stellander reports the Mr Nugget is an English Lawyer – which gives us the choice of Solicitor - whose disciplinary authority is the Law Society, or Barrister – whose authority is the Bar Council

As divisions of the second great profession they have almost identical Codes of Conduct, which apply to all members, and they apply whether the members are practising as lawyers, or are using their Professional status to persuade people of their probity and overall trustworthiness to be, for example on the Board of a company, on the County Council, as an MP, or any such similar occupation.

The Law Society Code reads
Under Section 1: Maintaining trust and acting fairly
1.4 You do not mislead or attempt to mislead […] others, either by your own acts or omissions or allowing or being complicit in the acts or omissions of others […]

The Bar Council Code reads
Under Rule C8
rC8 You must not do anything which could reasonably be seen by the public to undermine your honesty, integrity (CD3) and independence (CD4).

The Codes obviously mention and are aimed at dealings with Clients but are still wide enough to include ‘restrictions’ and clear statements about how the profession wishes its members to behave.

Bernt Stellander reports that Mrs Nugget is a regular Church goer, which implies a devout follower of and believer in the Christian Faith of whichever sect or nomination.

I am told on good authority that the New Testament is full of instructions and exhortations about how Christians should conduct themselves and live their lives even in the most extreme of circumstances and even when feeling themselves to be in personal danger.

I will not presume to repeat those words here. Those who know, know.

IF THEN what Bernt Stellander observed and reported, and his interpretation of those events is correct, which given the temporal nexus with other things he reports seems more likely than pure coincidence and Occams Razor would allow, the Nuggets may be in an invidious position, BUT THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN, except to have offered friendship and Charitable assistance in good faith to those who asked for and said they needed it.

REFS:
https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/standards-regulations/code-conduct-solicitors/
https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/the-bsb-handbook.
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/

by Cake Lover 31.07.24 10:44

This lawyer, who would be aware of the Bar Council Code, was stupid to agree to a 'simple, if strange and obscure task', surely. He should have a very suspicious mind, given his profession.