questions/observations.of the mccann case

by Ashley1999 13.06.24 12:14

Hi everyone am new to the forum and just wondering peoples thoughts on the following:

We can agree the Jane Tanner sighting was a fabrication and that the crimewatch 2013 episode may have been an attempt at perverting the course of justice where the DCI had claimed the creheman was tanner man ( I know Richard Hall is of the same opinion here)

Although the dog evidence proved inconclusive would you say in your opinion that the overwhelming amount of behavioural evidence surrounding the dogs alerts does indeed confirm that the dogs alert were correct?

And also was it true that Tony Blair had sent the boss of the media spinning unit Clarence Mitchell to Portgual to oversee operations shortly after the disappearance?

by Silentscope 13.06.24 14:38

From Mr Mitchells Statement.

These are the replies that I can make to the following questions. In relation to how I met Gerry and Kate McCann and what my relationship with them is: I met Gerry at the end of May 2007 when he returned to the UK after his daughter's disappearance. It was a circumstantial meeting at Leicestershire Police station. At the time I was working as part of the Consular Assistance Group, representing the foreigners department. I as asked to return to Portugal with Mr McCann, where I met his wife. Later I became the McCann family's representative and I developed a good personal and professional relationship with them.

Source: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Clarence was brought in to Control what came out in the Media.
Or was he brought in to shut Gerry, Kate and the Gaspars up?
Because the Media never mentions them at all.

by Ashley1999 13.06.24 15:02

Nice any thoughts on the first 2 points?

by Silentscope 13.06.24 15:16

1.
You have Answered your own Question.

2.
The Dogs indications were correct, it was the FSS Laboratory that found the traces located there inconclusive.

Any offers to use Modern DNA Computer assisted Profiling on those Samples have been denied.

Probably because it would reveal either who had been in contact with the Body, or whose DNA the Body was made up of.

by Ashley1999 13.06.24 15:30

Yh I have heard this too about operation Grange being unwilling to secure a conclusive DNA result..I can only assume because they know full right it will prove to be Madeleine Mccann and would incriminate the Mccans of course. So every time more money is spend on this travesty of an investigation the longer the lie plays out.