Jim Gamble Child 'PROTECTION'.....'EXPERT'!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

A child protection expert has said he should not have been allowed to get away with the crimes, and that police had enough to pursue a prosecution.
"In this incidence you had an admission, so you didn't have... to worry that the allegation was old, and the evidence may be stale," said Jim Gamble, a former senior officer with the Police Service of Northern Ireland.
"You had a contemporary admission. And given that, I don't understand why he wasn't prosecuted."
----------------------------------------------------------

Remind me, how MANY Asian 'gangs' 'child abusers' did Gamble actually 'prosecute' when he was 'big boss' at CEOP, for 4 YEARS?

Here's Gamble.......AGAIN!

Gamble, who headed up CEOP (2006-2010) when 'thousands upon thousands' of vulnerable children were 'industrially ABUSED', under his 'watch', in Rochdale, Rotherham, Derby, Oxford, Nottingham etc., has the effing 'nerve' to call himself 'a child PROTECTION'..... EXPERT'!

Has this, 'self acclaimed', 'child protection EXPERT' ever 'apologised' to even a SINGLE one of the 'abused' children, HE was, 'supposed' to PROTECT!

Thought NOT!

Gamble is the CEO and one of the founding partners of Ineqe Group, where he has continued in his dedication to protecting the welfare of children and helping to make people safer.

He is a frequent media commentator on issues related to protective services, best practice, the internet and child protection.

This man cannot even be 'considered' a 'joke'......... because he is totally 'not funny'!

"Ask the abused CHILDREN, Jim"

This is the way of Northern Ireland in the 60s 70s. Many people were abused, the RUC did not want to know but most disturbingly these were establishment figures. Church leaders, teachers and so on. When the Police have been informed since they are still not interested in any so called historical abuse enquiry unless the evidence brought forward is so overwhelming. As a result of friends reunited a man was convicted of assaulting boys in a grammer school during the 80s. There were calls by the BBC etc to hold the governers to account. Well they never held the teachers up in shame as they were all aware of what this man was like? Come to think of it we called him "Poofter Pogle" when I attended Bangor Grammer in 1973.

Captain_Pugwash wrote:This is the way of Northern Ireland in the 60s 70s. Many people were abused, the RUC did not want to know but most disturbingly these were establishment figures. Church leaders, teachers and so on. When the Police have been informed since they are still not interested in any so called historical abuse enquiry unless the evidence brought forward is so overwhelming. As a result of friends reunited a man was convicted of assaulting boys in a grammer school during the 80s. There were calls by the BBC etc to hold the governers to account. Well they never held the teachers up in shame as they were all aware of what this man was like? Come to think of it we called him "Poofter Pogle" when I attended Bangor Grammer in 1973.

Hi Captain_Pugwash, 

Thanks for your post, think it chimes with a lot of my thoughts on that part of the world around that time.  As a young person I grew up hearing about the violence, the hatred, on both sides for almost 20 years.  It seems as we go deeper down the rabbit hole we find both sides were united in one terrible activity.

Nowadays, post the 'troubles' if Jim Gamble ran a cattery I'd never go on holiday again.

Hi sar,thanks for your post,if you can believe of what news Paper Editors were threatened with by Police Officers MI5/6 on disclosure of evidence that they had obtained,then quickly confiscated for"Safety"reasons,never to re-surface.  The amount of Politicians and their"dubious alliances"to under world figures in the"Supply chain"and how they where able to avoid an earlier prison sentences,due to other persuading methods used of the upper Echelons in society shows subterfuge to hide what was becoming known?
As Jeanmonroe,has stated Mr Gamble was in charge of CEOP when thousands of young adolescents where left open to being abused,that a Major Police Force's in the UK had in fact had knowledge of what was being undertaken in the Care Home system,but turned a "Blind Eye"to the abuse,"Well if I don't actually see the abuse,it hasn't happened,has it"?
Harvey Proctor is having to decide to bring a "Civil Claim" against his assailant"Nick"who had informed the Police of Abuse he had seen being perpetrated to young boys.  
Nick had privately gone on tours of the Estate to familiarise him self of being a"Credible Witness" upon his descriptions to Police Officers of the Rooms where the Alleged offences had taken place,which can be confirmed by the Operation Midland Investigation?
The Police or CPS have as yet not brought any charges of"Perverting the Course of Justice" yet?
Did the Police have full knowledge of "Nick" having visited the Estate,"Prior to his Allegations" that he made to them of the abuse?
As DougD has disclosed of the"Jillings Report" and the redacted information being obtained by FOI that something has been being"Covered Up" for years?
Ann Clwyd had raised questions to Parliament about the abused survivors being entitled to "Compensation"which would have to be paid out of the Public Office,due to any Criminal Acts carried out
 on the young adolescents within the Care Home System, run by the Government of the Day,was this why it is being Covered Up or because it had Ma Learned friends being involved to the acts that had been carried out?
Remember the untimely deaths of Frank Beck and his Solicitor,Leicestershire Police Force investigation of child Abuse and a now well known Lord,who put the Police onto Frank Beck(His Lordship)?

Good afternoon willowthewisp,

Thanks for your apposite post.  Seven circles of hell?  Ed heath's yacht, the "Care System" (system of supplying girls and boys to be ab  used more like), boarding schools, dolphin square, childline (an early warning system for peterfiles?) facilitators who "heard nothing" and all that work for chariddy! At very least an in-virtuous circle, at worst....I dread to think.  And now we are wondering what really happened in this case.....? If this is how we treat the vulnerable in society then I'm not surprised we are in the situation we are on this planet

Hi Sar,thanks for your reply.
Add into the equation of PIE in the 1970's and the MP's knowingly wanting to change the age of consent to sex to under Ten years of age with children?
I watched Panorama on the BBC last night on Government Legislation to payments of Benefits for unemployed people and the cuts to Housing Benefit?
Now I may not be the Brightest lamp bulb,but isn't a Benefit some form of entitlement of that payment,but if you knowingly move the "Goal post"so your made to miss the Goal post,it isn't a Benefit your any longer entitled to?
I cannot remember the name of the MP from the Government espousing like a"Broken Record mantra"of what the Government had now put into law with regards to the latest Benefit changes unemployment allowances and Work related Benefits,but failed to Answer any relevant questions from the Production Team of Panorama?
Who are these MP'S accountable to the Electorate not their cohorts who are implementing "Policies" that are an instant failure,but refuse to fix the problem?
It is little wonder that the"Electorate"sits at home pulling their Hair out at these MP's who cannot supply an adequate answer?
It seems as though Society is broken,much akin to Lady Thatchers,"There is no such thing as Society",I don't suppose there is when you create a Police state institution,where only the Laws rule that you wish to adhere to,which is what we are now seeing on cost grounds before"citizens Rights"to have laws enforced for the Benefit of everyone?

"Mr Gamble, the outgoing chief of Britain's child protection agency posed as a paedophile (purely for 'research' you'll understand) to investigate the sex trafficking of Cambodian youngsters"

Jim Gamble, ex-chief executive of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop), was shocked when they went into a Cambodian bar where there were 50 to 60 girls.

"Within two minutes a madam came up and said, 'What are you looking for?' Mr Gamble said: 'We're looking for young girls' She brought over three or four girls that were (about) 12 or 13 years old - very, very young."

Mr Gamble told her 'they wanted younger girls,...... '

PURELY FOR 'RESEARCH PURPOSES', EH, JIM??

As a side-note about Jimbo.  He also appeared in a Stinson Hunter docu concerning catching on-line paed****ls and reporting them to the police.

*Will look to see if it's on YT*

THE PAEDOPHILE HUNTER

Channel 4

First shown 1st October 2014

This documentary follows online vigilante Stinson Hunter and his associates, who pose as children on social networking sites to draw out men who they assert have paedophilic predilections.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

An oldie but goodie from 2015.

A Risky Gamble

The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) was formed in April 2006, and was absorbed into the NCA on 7 October 2013 by the UK Crime and Courts Act 2013.  The predecessor to CEOP was the Paedophile Online Exploitation Team.

Until March 2010, this was headed by Jim Gamble - he who called for a "panic button" for the public to report suspected paedophiles, to be installed on the main profile page of every Facebook user,  thereby planting the suggestion that every single Facebook user is also, potentially, a paedophile.  And of course inviting millions of aggrieved teens, or even older, to treat them as flippers on a pinball machine.

The common word in both CEOP and it's predecessor is, of course, "online".

Mr Gamble, now so-called "self employed", keeps himself very busy online, particularly on Twitter.  Here is a small selection of his microblogs.


Mr Gamble has also been involved, with the McCann case, right from the start.  Even though there is zero suggestion that Madeleine has been involved in any nefarious online activity; and zero evidence that she has been abducted by paedophiles.

Yet Mr Gamble has thrown his entire person into the fray.  He has blocked every single person on Twitter who has even remotely questioned the McCanns' version of events, including many who have never even interacted with him.  He has publicly stated that persons with a contrary opinion should not be allowed to give broadcasts on the radio.  He very visibly applauded Sky's Martin Brunt for doorstepping one dissenter, on the very day that that lady's probable suicide was announced.  He is now actively attempting to prevent independent journalists from writing, or broadcasting, about the case.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]One has to wonder why Mr Gamble is so passionate and involved over this one particular case, when there is absolutely no reason for himself or his former agency to become involved at all.

We must also ask how Dr Gerry McCann came into possession of several hard-backed CEOP internal manuals, as early as 2007; Mr Gamble tells us that "they can be downloaded by anyone from the Internet".  He seems unwilling, however, to provide any links, or explain how a digital download can suddenly transform itself into a hard-backed book.

Or how a former senior policeman has apparently, suddenly transformed into one of the "haters" and "trolls" that he claims to despise so much.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

And, by extension and association, it is Gamble's long-term involvement in the Madeleine McCann case that offers it a child exploitation angle or, at worse, a whiff of paedophilia. IMO