Re: ***Missing People Bike Ride now under way (Kate McCann, Simon Cowell and Stephen Fry back Missing People campaign on Twitter)

by plebgate on 16.06.15 8:25

I have my binoculars ready for Royal Ascot today. Scouting to see if Mrs. Highness make a show there today?

I have placed a bet on the 2.30 at Ascot today - £100 quid on Truth Seeker to win - £100.00 on The Biker to be bringing up the rear. big grin

That photo of John Nooky Bear with the beef and yorkshire on the plate - doesn't look to me as though he has done much training for the race. lol

by snook on 16.06.15 9:08

Say no more bluebag. I am familiar with Mr Bono and his 'fund raising' and charidee work. He deserves a thread of his own!

by Rogue-a-Tory on 16.06.15 9:11

@BlueBag wrote:The finances of these charities need serious questioning.

U2 lead singer Bono is facing questions over his One campaign

http://metro.co.uk/2010/09/21/bono-under-fire-over-one-charity-donations-totalling-9-6m-519721/

Only 1.2% of money donated (£118,000 out of £9 million) went to good causes.

They all use millions for expenses and salaries.

That's shocking.

I'd like to see the figures for MP.

The last published accounts for the year to 31 March 2014 disclose MP spent £1.7million of its £2.2million income on salaries, one employee was paid between £70,001 - £80,000. It also spent £0.5million on fundraising activities (incl £0.3million salaries) but doesn't disclose the cost of roast beef dinners, New Zealand white wine, Lycra Le Tour style kit or bike maintenance big grin

by snook on 16.06.15 9:21

A relative of mine expressed an interest in doing a charity trek across the Sahara. He was unable to because all costs, flights, kit etc had to be met by the participants and to raise that kind of cash in addition to monies for the charity was prohibitive. Given that MP jolly is a domestic relatively low cost expedition you would like to think they could pay for their own B&b and sandwiches?

by Guest on 16.06.15 10:29

@snook wrote:A relative of mine expressed an interest in doing a charity trek across the Sahara. He was unable to because all costs, flights, kit etc had to be met by the participants and to raise that kind of cash in addition to monies for the charity was prohibitive. Given that MP jolly is a domestic relatively low cost expedition you would like to think they could pay for their own B&b and sandwiches?

by jeanmonroe on 16.06.15 10:35

http://www.itv.com/goodmorningbritain/news/kate-mccann-charity-bike-ride-for-missing-people-child-rescue-alert

What, or WHO at, does KM keep looking/flicking her eyes, to her left?

'something' or 'someone' is 'off camera' (directing?)

When K&GM were in the ITV 'studio' again, the cameraman 'panned' out, and lo and behold, CM was 'seen' HIDING, behind a studio 'fixture'

YEP. 'They' really do think WE'RE that 'stoopid'!

So, an 'idiot board', CM, CR 'lawyers'?

She keeps 'looking left' at 'something'!

"..... to get as many eyes and ears involved in the search as possible. That didn't happen."

The new 'catchphrase' for KM/MP?

'started' last Saturday and repeated 'verbatim' since.

(perhaps THAT was on the 'idiot board')

Anyway,

She 'cancelled' book signings, apparently because 'strangers' might take a 'dislike' to her, YET let's some 'woman' run across to 'hug' her on the bike ride.!

This 'woman' could have been a 'nutter/terrible, sick troll', who could of 'stabbed' her, 'thrown acid' at her, well anything really!

Unless, of course, the whole 'hugging incident' WAS STAGED!

Lucky a camera, THE 'camera' was there to 'capture' that 'touching' moment, eh?

What are the chances, of that?

At the exact 'location', KM 'stops' at, on a 500 mile bike ride.

jta: That's Nottingham 'searched' for Madeleine then, by 'uncle' John, Kate and Fi, but, sadly, with no 'luck'. So perhaps, next 'stop', on the cycle 'adventure', Northampton, WILL be 'where' they 'find' Madeleine.

So keep 'as many eyes and ears involved in 'the search' (for 'findable/totally 'unharmed' Madeleine) as possible' UK peeple!

beware

by sar on 16.06.15 10:42

@worriedmum wrote:
@aquila wrote:I'm posting the introductory paragraph to Lazz's latest blog.

'The night that our little girl was taken from her bed, we mistakenly presumed that some kind of alert would have gone out immediately to the public, to get as many eyes and ears involved in the search as possible.'

Kate McCann
Mumsnet

I think we all know that Kate McCann did NOT on the night she reported her child as missing THINK FOR A SPLIT SECOND that an alert of some kind would go out IMMEDIATELY TO THE PUBLIC, to get as many eyes and ears involved in the search as possible.

We all know the stories Kate McCann told then and has been telling for the past 8 years and NONE involved her thinking that an IMMEDIATE alert to the public would go out.

Worth looking at the McCanns ' first interview with the BBC's Jane Hill, about searching

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YWCVSjIJk8

thanks worriedmum, watched again. Very strange delivery.

by Rogue-a-Tory on 16.06.15 10:46

@jeanmonroe wrote:http://www.itv.com/goodmorningbritain/news/kate-mccann-charity-bike-ride-for-missing-people-child-rescue-alert

What, or WHO at, does KM keep looking/flicking her eyes, to her left?

'something' or 'someone' is 'off camera' (directing?)

When K&GM were in the ITV 'studio' again, the cameraman 'panned' out, and lo and behold, CM was 'seen' HIDING, behind a studio 'fixture'

YEP. 'They' really do think WE'RE that 'stoopid'!

So, an 'idiot board', CM, CR 'lawyers'?

She keeps 'looking left' at 'something'!

"..... to get as many eyes and ears involved in the search as possible. That didn't happen."

The new 'catchphrase' for KM/MP?

'started' last Saturday and repeated 'verbatim' since.

(perhaps THAT was on the 'idiot board')

Anyway,

She 'cancelled' book signings, apparently because 'strangers' might take a 'dislike' to her, YET let's some 'woman' run across to 'hug' her on the bike ride.!

This 'woman' could have been a 'nutter/terrible, sick troll', who could of 'stabbed' her, 'thrown acid' at her, well anything really!

Unless, of course, the whole 'hugging incident' WAS STAGED!

Lucky a camera, THE 'camera' was there to 'capture' that 'touching' moment, eh?

What are the chances, of that?

At the exact 'location', KM 'stops' at, on a 500 mile bike ride.

The hug was definitely staged Jean. MP security on this is tight as a tick

by sar on 16.06.15 11:03

@Rogue-a-Tory wrote:
@jeanmonroe wrote:http://www.itv.com/goodmorningbritain/news/kate-mccann-charity-bike-ride-for-missing-people-child-rescue-alert

What, or WHO at, does KM keep looking/flicking her eyes, to her left?

'something' or 'someone' is 'off camera' (directing?)

When K&GM were in the ITV 'studio' again, the cameraman 'panned' out, and lo and behold, CM was 'seen' HIDING, behind a studio 'fixture'

YEP. 'They' really do think WE'RE that 'stoopid'!

So, an 'idiot board', CM, CR 'lawyers'?

She keeps 'looking left' at 'something'!

"..... to get as many eyes and ears involved in the search as possible. That didn't happen."

The new 'catchphrase' for KM/MP?

'started' last Saturday and repeated 'verbatim' since.

(perhaps THAT was on the 'idiot board')

Anyway,

She 'cancelled' book signings, apparently because 'strangers' might take a 'dislike' to her, YET let's some 'woman' run across to 'hug' her on the bike ride.!

This 'woman' could have been a 'nutter/terrible, sick troll', who could of 'stabbed' her, 'thrown acid' at her, well anything really!

Unless, of course, the whole 'hugging incident' WAS STAGED!

Lucky a camera, THE 'camera' was there to 'capture' that 'touching' moment, eh?

What are the chances, of that?

At the exact 'location', KM 'stops' at, on a 500 mile bike ride.
The hug was definitely staged Jean. MP security on this is tight as a tick

Have some small experience of making broadcast / communications media, "reportage" can be manipulated. These segments are created as "packages", the locations are carefully chosen, shots are chosen, anything not left "on the cutting room floor" is in for a very good reason.

by Guest on 16.06.15 11:07

Did you hear that?

"Though the Drive won't certainly help Madeleine..." it will etc etc

Quoth she

How can she be so certain it won't?

Does she know more about the situation Madeleine has found herself in than we do?

Hobbs? Freud? Anyone else?

by jeanmonroe on 16.06.15 11:17

@Portia wrote:Did you hear that?

"Though the Drive won't certainly help Madeleine..." it will etc etc

Quoth she

How can she be so certain it won't?

Does she know more about the situation Madeleine has found herself in than we do?

Hobbs? Freud? Anyone else?

-----------------------------------------------------------

Hobs?..............she 'say'...... 'leakage'!

by willowthewisp on 16.06.15 12:24

Jeanmonroe
you know the old saying"Give people enough rope they will hang themselves"?
If the case doe's go to a trail, there is a lot of video evidence of any deception and involvement of all participants in any alleged deception?
Only then will we see the S**t hit the fan eek

by jeanmonroe on 16.06.15 12:35

@willowthewisp wrote:Jeanmonroe
you know the old saying"Give people enough rope they will hang themselves"?
If the case doe's go to a trail, there is a lot of video evidence of any deception and involvement of all participants in any alleged deception?
Only then will we see the S**t hit the fan

A bit like, the future 'scene' in OG's 'incident' room? fan

That's a lot of sh*t!

OG internal 'memo'.......... 'umbrella's UP, everyone, here IT comes!'

by worriedmum on 16.06.15 13:27

@jeanmonroe wrote:
@Portia wrote:Did you hear that?

"Though the Drive won't certainly help Madeleine..." it will etc etc

Quoth she

How can she be so certain it won't?

Does she know more about the situation Madeleine has found herself in than we do?

Hobbs? Freud? Anyone else?
-----------------------------------------------------------

Yes, maybe some-one with a professional interest in the case could ask how Kate McCann knows it 'won't help Madeleine'?

After all, good quality wrist bands, luggage labels and trips to America were deemed useful. And if the fund is still collecting money, surely it has to be on the basis that Madeleine IS 'findable.'

So IS Madeleine' findable'?

by j.rob on 16.06.15 13:33

@jeanmonroe wrote:KM '.......to get as many eyes and ears involved in the search as possible.'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

'absent mindedly' erm, 'forgetting', that HER, and her T7 'friends', R OLDFIELD, JANE T, D WEBSTER (and Fiona W?) and her husband's tennis 'buddy' JW (T10?) 'eyes and ears' were not 'needed' to be 'involved' in the 'search' as soon as possible.

BUT, 'everyone' else SHOULD be 'looking' for her 'missing' child. The child she, diliberately and consciously, left alone, in an unlocked apartment, out of her sight, for over 34 minutes, for her husband, but over an HOUR and a HALF, for her, which culminated in her child 'disappearing'

And TV producer Jez Wilkins whose partner Bridget O'Donnell a journalist who had worked for Crimewatch didn't bother to look for Madeleine either. Even though Jez had allegedly bumped into Gerry outside the apartment after Gerry did his 9.05pm 'check'.

Isn't that strange? Jez was supposedly wandering around that evening with his pram so surely Gerry would have wanted to grill him about whether he saw anything or anyone suspicious. But it is left to Matt to allegedly wake Jez and Bridget up in the early hours of Friday morning.

So TM wait several hours before speaking to a potential vital eye-witness. (Not forgetting that another potential vital eye-witness, neighbour Mrs Fenn, gets shouted at by Kate and Fiona).

But so unconcerned is this TV drama and documentary maker as one of the biggest news stories of the decade is breaking around him that he apparently dozes off after being told the news. And his wife who worked for Crimewatch and would know how the first few hours are critical when it comes to finding missing children also does nothing. Even though her own daugher allegedly played with Madeleine in the kids' club.

What a load of old nonsense.

by jozi on 16.06.15 13:43

@snook wrote:Say no more bluebag. I am familiar with Mr Bono and his 'fund raising' and charidee work. He deserves a thread of his own!

Oh no !!! Always loved Bono but he does "p" me off with all his charity work and spouting to everybody about it. Also Annie Lennox love her as a singer but not her over voiced beliefs .....just stick to the singing guys as you know nothing about the subject you are spouting ! All in the name of charity anyone ???

by Gaggzy on 16.06.15 13:47

@j.rob wrote:
@jeanmonroe wrote:KM '.......to get as many eyes and ears involved in the search as possible.'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

'absent mindedly' erm, 'forgetting', that HER, and her T7 'friends', R OLDFIELD, JANE T, D WEBSTER (and Fiona W?) and her husband's tennis 'buddy' JW (T10?) 'eyes and ears' were not 'needed' to be 'involved' in the 'search' as soon as possible.

BUT, 'everyone' else SHOULD be 'looking' for her 'missing' child. The child she, diliberately and consciously, left alone, in an unlocked apartment, out of her sight, for over 34 minutes, for her husband, but over an HOUR and a HALF, for her, which culminated in her child 'disappearing'

And TV producer Jez Wilkins whose partner Bridget O'Donnell a journalist who had worked for Crimewatch didn't bother to look for Madeleine either. Even though Jez had allegedly bumped into Gerry outside the apartment after Gerry did his 9.05pm 'check'.

Isn't that strange? Jez was supposedly wandering around that evening with his pram so surely Gerry would have wanted to grill him about whether he saw anything or anyone suspicious. But it is left to Matt to allegedly wake Jez and Bridget up in the early hours of Friday morning.

So TM wait several hours before speaking to a potential vital eye-witness. (Not forgetting that another potential vital eye-witness, neighbour Mrs Fenn, gets shouted at by Kate and Fiona).

But so unconcerned is this TV drama and documentaries as one of the biggest news stories of the decade is breaking around him that he apparently dozes off after being told the news. And his wife who worked for Crimewatch and would know how the first few hours are critical when it comes to finding missing children also does nothing. Even though her own daugher allegedly played with Madeleine in the kids' club.

What a load of old nonsense.

Quite correct, j.rob.

We can all see it.

Surely the police can see it, too.

by j.rob on 16.06.15 14:13

We can all see it.

Surely the police can see it, too.

-----

It is very strange that Kate McCann is still being given a platform to spout her nonsense. Are the media covering this to gauge public reaction?

That Kate should be some kind of ambassador for missing children is just farcical. The charity Missing has to be one very dodgy organisation.

ETA: Shades of what was going on at COEP? Putting the foxes in charge of the hen coop?

by Rogue-a-Tory on 16.06.15 14:22

The nervousness, hesitancy and uncertainty of the presenters is telling. It's as if they're both making a very conscious effort to think precisely what they are sanctioned to say to and ask Princess Kate.

by Rabbitte on 16.06.15 14:40

@Rogue-a-Tory wrote:The nervousness, hesitancy and uncertainty of the presenters is telling. It's as if they're both making a very conscious effort to think precisely what they are sanctioned to say to and ask Princess Kate.

Yes, this is beyond the kid glove treatment seen in the early days, this is bootlicking sycophancy territory.

by lj on 16.06.15 14:40

@worriedmum wrote:
@aquila wrote:I'm posting the introductory paragraph to Lazz's latest blog.

'The night that our little girl was taken from her bed, we mistakenly presumed that some kind of alert would have gone out immediately to the public, to get as many eyes and ears involved in the search as possible.'

Kate McCann
Mumsnet

I think we all know that Kate McCann did NOT on the night she reported her child as missing THINK FOR A SPLIT SECOND that an alert of some kind would go out IMMEDIATELY TO THE PUBLIC, to get as many eyes and ears involved in the search as possible.

We all know the stories Kate McCann told then and has been telling for the past 8 years and NONE involved her thinking that an IMMEDIATE alert to the public would go out.

Worth looking at the McCanns ' first interview with the BBC's Jane Hill, about searching

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YWCVSjIJk8

"We've been working really haaaaaard", but not with searching.

This is what Mark Harrison said in his report about the Portuguese police:

"This report has highlighted the extensive and professional efforts made by the Portuguese authorities regarding the search to locate Madeleine McCann alive."

by jeanmonroe on 16.06.15 14:55

Kate must have been 'screaming aloud, inside' (so nobody could actually 'hear' her) when the tv guy 'reminded' her it was GMB that helped 'launch' CRA, a year ago, and got 70,000 'sign ups'!

CRA was 'suppose' to be her, and her's alone, 'baby'

She must have been 'fuming' with the 'unhelpful' er, 'reminder' about GMB's 'involvement' in launching the CRA 'app'.

GMB were, imo, having no 'truck' with KM, alone, 'claiming' the sole 'credit' for CRA 'launch'

And WHY should they?

(HRH won't be 'sitting on GMB's sofa', anytime SOON!)

Anyway, she's still 'got' .............Kate's 'posties'

How many 'missing kids' have her 'posties', on their rounds, 'found' since being annoited by her 'Majesty'?

There's over 180 'missing kids' out 'there' RIGHT NOW, TODAY!

Kate's 'posties' to the 'rescue?

by jeanmonroe on 16.06.15 15:26

Anyone know how 'much' (GA 'supporters' to donate10p, for his 'appeal', for each mile she 'completes' of the 500 mile cycle 'adventure' she's on) KM has 'raised' for GA's lawyer's 'appeal' fund?

Every 'push of her pedals' raises money to appeal, against her!

How 'very quite GALLING' for her, must that be?

Maybe, she'll beat a 'tactical retreat'! laughat

----------------------------------------------------

p. 316 (madeleine)

In his statement to the Court, the Assistant Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police wrote: “While one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance”. Dr Kate: “We were completely staggered. No evidence to eliminate us?…that line stuck in our heads as ‘guilty until proven innocent’.” Dr McCann said they made ‘a tactical retreat’ to ‘accept a smaller amount of information’: “Having to withdraw was quite galling…”

'memo' to Dr Kate: 'Cops, with all their 'faults', DO have very, very, 'long memories'!

(Ok, i'll concede, ex DCI Redwood may be an 'exception' to that 'rule')

They DON'T 'like' being 'mugged off', by 'smart arses'

(again, ex DCI Redwood may.........)

by **PeterMac** on 16.06.15 15:33

@j.rob wrote:
What a load of old nonsense.

The more one sees it spelled out and written down, the more obvious it becomes that the entire thing was a charade.
Which means that the "Fund" was a fraud, right from the start, and remains so even to this day.

by jeanmonroe on 16.06.15 15:45

@PeterMac wrote:
@j.rob wrote:
What a load of old nonsense.
The more one sees it spelled out and written down, the more obvious it becomes that the entire thing was a charade.
Which means that the "Fund" was a fraud, right from the start, and remains so even to this day.

@PM

a 'deadly' charade?

IS this whole 'bike ride' thang, a 'look here, NOT there' er 'exercise', by KM, J Mc and FW?

"it couldn't be US, DCI Nicola, 'look', we raises money for charidy"