The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

by **Tony Bennett** 08.01.15 9:34

New message on the Find Madeleine website:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ·

Please call on your MP to recommit to Leveson Part 2 taking place. Thank you! ~FM Webmaster

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Help make sure Leveson Part 2 takes place

...which takes you to the HackingInquiry.Org website, which says:

Please call on your MP to recommit to Leveson Part 2 taking place.

Just fill in your postcode below and click “Email my MP”. You’ll see the “template” letter which you can change if you wish, and which you can email to your local MP using the postcode and address you provide.

Please let us know what you hear back, by forwarding replies to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] or post copies of letters from your MP to Hacked Off, Millbank Tower, 21-24 Millbank, London, SW1P 4QP.

Thank you for your support.

If you have any questions, please email us at [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

'Never give up'

by nomendelta 08.01.15 9:53

How curious. The British press have, IMHO, done more than the fund itself to perpetuate the notion that Madeleine is out there somewhere with reported sightings (which have been shown on more than one occasion to have no actual basis in fact) all over the world making the front pages. Yes, there has been a shift with the SY investigation pointing more towards Madeleine being dead but they are only following the lead given by SY (and it's beyond doubt that many supposed "insider" stories purporting to be from SY have come from elsewhere). In fact up until recently the press seems to hae been very much more active in "searching" for the child than the fund has.

Why on earth would the McCanns want to go after the press again? A bit ungrateful surely? And why should the fund web page promote this? Isn't the fund all about finding Madeleine? A wee slip because - and I'm sure many will forgive me for this thought - it comes across from that single action of pushing for a Levenson II that the fund is purely their for the whims of the parents! Surely that couldn't be?

by Smokeandmirrors 08.01.15 11:11

I think they have been seriously rattled by Sonia Poulton seeking to find a broadcaster for her documentary. They also fear that Brenda Leyland inquest will reveal who compiled the infamous dossier and the death threats made by their supporters. If they think they have had a hard time to date, that'll be nothing compared to what ' ll hit them if indeed it turns out that trolls and shills have been paid by anyone associated to them. IMO the proverbial brown stuff could hit the fan quite soon.

by **PeterMac** 08.01.15 11:26

Smokeandmirrors wrote:I think they have been seriously rattled by Sonia Poulton seeking to find a broadcaster for her documentary. They also fear that Brenda Leyland inquest will reveal who compiled the infamous dossier and the death threats made by their supporters. If they think they have had a hard time to date, that'll be nothing compared to what ' ll hit them if indeed it turns out that trolls and shills have been paid by anyone associated to them. IMO the proverbial brown stuff could hit the fan quite soon.

HM Coroner has been given certain evidence about who may have compiled the dossier, if she chooses to follow it up.
We know that the McCanns, Gamble ( ! ! ), and Brunt / Sky said it was not prepared by the family - which is McCode for IT WAS
Then unfortunately the highest ranking Police officer in the Country, BHH, said it WAS.
Oh bu***** !

HM Coroner has also been sent another, rather fuller dossier, with the explicit death threats, threats to rape, threats to kill, and much more too horrible to reveal here
aimed through Twitter and other media at Brenda, either directly by, or with tacit support of, the McCanns. We know that some of those were apparently sent by people outside the jurisdiction, and others by people who on any test are in need of urgent psychiatric help, but there are others who deny being mad or vile, and who could therefore be tracked down and prosecuted, as BHH explained.

Of course if there is a documented evidence of the McCanns or Mitchell or any member of the extended family specifically distancing themselves . . . then it should be shown.
But I haven't seen it.
They do have their own donation machine = web site where this could have been done.
But they haven't.

by Gaggzy 08.01.15 12:04

PeterMac wrote:
Smokeandmirrors wrote:I think they have been seriously rattled by Sonia Poulton seeking to find a broadcaster for her documentary. They also fear that Brenda Leyland inquest will reveal who compiled the infamous dossier and the death threats made by their supporters. If they think they have had a hard time to date, that'll be nothing compared to what ' ll hit them if indeed it turns out that trolls and shills have been paid by anyone associated to them. IMO the proverbial brown stuff could hit the fan quite soon.

HM Coroner has been given certain evidence about who may have compiled the dossier, if she chooses to follow it up.
We know that the McCanns, Gamble ( ! ! ), and Brunt / Sky said it was not prepared by the family - which is McCode for IT WAS
Then unfortunately the highest ranking Police officer in the Country, BHH, said it WAS.
Oh bu***** !

HM Coroner has also been sent another, rather fuller dossier, with the explicit death threats, threats to rape, threats to kill, and much more too horrible to reveal here
aimed through Twitter and other media at Brenda, either directly by, or with tacit support of, the McCanns. We know that some of those were apparently sent by people outside the jurisdiction, and others by people who on any test are in need of urgent psychiatric help, but there are others who deny being mad or vile, and who could therefore be tracked down and prosecuted, as BHH explained.

Of course if there is a documented evidence of the McCanns or Mitchell or any member of the extended family specifically distancing themselves . . . then it should be shown.
But I haven't seen it.
They do have their own donation machine = web site where this could have been done.
But they haven't.

There'll be a couple of chunky calfs quacking in their EEE-width boots somewhere in Ullapool about now.

bomb

by angie o'plasty 08.01.15 12:31

Gaggzy wrote:
PeterMac wrote:
Smokeandmirrors wrote:I think they have been seriously rattled by Sonia Poulton seeking to find a broadcaster for her documentary. They also fear that Brenda Leyland inquest will reveal who compiled the infamous dossier and the death threats made by their supporters. If they think they have had a hard time to date, that'll be nothing compared to what ' ll hit them if indeed it turns out that trolls and shills have been paid by anyone associated to them. IMO the proverbial brown stuff could hit the fan quite soon.

HM Coroner has been given certain evidence about who may have compiled the dossier, if she chooses to follow it up.
We know that the McCanns, Gamble ( ! ! ), and Brunt / Sky said it was not prepared by the family - which is McCode for IT WAS
Then unfortunately the highest ranking Police officer in the Country, BHH, said it WAS.
Oh bu***** !

HM Coroner has also been sent another, rather fuller dossier, with the explicit death threats, threats to rape, threats to kill, and much more too horrible to reveal here
aimed through Twitter and other media at Brenda, either directly by, or with tacit support of, the McCanns. We know that some of those were apparently sent by people outside the jurisdiction, and others by people who on any test are in need of urgent psychiatric help, but there are others who deny being mad or vile, and who could therefore be tracked down and prosecuted, as BHH explained.

Of course if there is a documented evidence of the McCanns or Mitchell or any member of the extended family specifically distancing themselves . . . then it should be shown.
But I haven't seen it.
They do have their own donation machine = web site where this could have been done.
But they haven't.

There'll be a couple of chunky calfs quacking in their EEE-width boots somewhere in Ullapool about now.

Oh yes. Chunky calves. Phankles.

by ChippyM 08.01.15 13:11

nomendelta wrote:.......Why on earth would the McCanns want to go after the press again? A bit ungrateful surely? And why should the fund web page promote this? Isn't the fund all about finding Madeleine? A wee slip because - and I'm sure many will forgive me for this thought - it comes across from that single action of pushing for a Levenson II that the fund is purely their for the whims of the parents! Surely that couldn't be?

Maybe because one of the cases with most emotional leverage in the Leveson case was the hacking of a murdered school girl's phone. Of course no-one would disagree that was abhorrent....which makes it an ideal shield for people to hide behind who wouldn't want any private hacked info coming out which may shed light on the death of their own daughter...as the case may be, or not!

by Knitted 08.01.15 13:31

nomendelta wrote:[Snipped] ... Why on earth would the McCanns want to go after the press again? ....

A case of 'attack being the best form of defence' maybe? Or maybe they're now so infected by the cult of celebrity they have to feed their narcissism by keep popping up and playing the victim?

by plebgate 08.01.15 15:53

Who cares what they want - I know some zelebs do, but the many members of general public don't, especially as a lot of the gen. public want to read what zelebs and others are up to.

IMO some of those who want Leveson to shut the press up are hoping it will save them a fortune in court action to keep their business out of the papers.

The gen. public love a bit of scandal and wont support it IMO.

by **PeterMac** 08.01.15 16:32

Perhaps they should have a quiet word with their Spokes-creature who clearly does not support them in this endeavour.

Clarence Mitchell
‏‪@mitch_1uk
Appalled by Paris killings. Terrorism pure and simple that no God wld recognise or sanction. Journalism must remain free. Tolerance will out

Which MUST mean that he supports Dr Amaral, and Pat Brown, and by extension TB, and their right to publish what they themselves believe to be true, and their own opinions on that truth !
Or has he merely changed sides again ?

by Rogue-a-Tory 08.01.15 16:32

TM appears to be poking the wasps' next with a long pole. Soon they'll have to run fast big grin

by plebgate 08.01.15 16:39

PeterMac wrote:Perhaps they should have a quiet word with their Spokes-creature who clearly does not support them in this endeavour.
Clarence Mitchell
‏‪@mitch_1uk
Appalled by Paris killings. Terrorism pure and simple that no God wld recognise or sanction. Journalism must remain free. Tolerance will out

Not only journalism remain free but also bloggers and forum users on internet must remain free.

The people of Brighton are not daft, no siree.

He's gone out from 33/1 to 50/1. The bookies are rarely wrong. Anybody ever heard of a poor bookmaker?

by Lance De Boils 10.01.15 17:32

plebgate wrote:
PeterMac wrote:Perhaps they should have a quiet word with their Spokes-creature who clearly does not support them in this endeavour.
Clarence Mitchell
‏‪@mitch_1uk
Appalled by Paris killings. Terrorism pure and simple that no God wld recognise or sanction. Journalism must remain free. Tolerance will out
Not only journalism remain free but also bloggers and forum users on internet must remain free.

The people of Brighton are not daft, no siree.

He's gone out from 33/1 to 50/1. The bookies are rarely wrong. Anybody ever heard of a poor bookmaker?

I'll bet my last Ferrero Rocher that he hasn't got a chance in hell of getting anywhere in Brighton. smilie

by Casey5 10.01.15 18:43

The McCanns must be feeling, well- totally hacked off- that their plea for people to petition to gag the press has just been totally blown away by the "Je suis Charlie" outpouring of people determined to uphold freedom of speech and a free press.
You could almost feel sorry for them. winkwink

Then again, maybe not.

by **PeterMac** 10.01.15 22:23

Casey5 wrote:The McCanns must be feeling, well- totally hacked off- that their plea for people to petition to gag the press has just been totally blown away by the "Je suis Charlie" outpouring of people determined to uphold freedom of speech and a free press.
You could almost feel sorry for them. Then again, maybe not.

Not only them, but all the libel lawyers, and everyone else who works for an end to freedom of the Press.
We have seen the PM saying he believes in freedom of the press, so who now dares say they don't.

Well Mitchell for one. The entire McCann team for two, The Opposition (labour) for three - think Maxwell, Dunblane, Kelly, Chilcott, Todd, Elm House, . . . . . .

by aiyoyo 11.01.15 19:21

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ·

Please call on your MP to recommit to Leveson Part 2 taking place. Thank you! ~FM Webmaster

Just fill in your postcode below and click “Email my MP”. You’ll see the “template” letter which you can change if you wish, and which you can email to your local MP using the postcode and address you provide.

Please let us know what you hear back, by forwarding replies to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] or post copies of letters from your MP to Hacked Off, Millbank Tower, 21-24 Millbank, London, SW1P 4QP.

Thank you for your support.

"Je ne suis pas Charlie" - That's what they should have plastered on their website as logo.

The FM webmaster together with Kate and Gerry and Clarence should march with the placard "Je ne suis pas Charlie" in front of Parliament Building to set example if they want people to call on their MP to implement Leveson. Otherwise they are just cowards asking people to do their dirty work for them.

Come on, show us you have the guts to take to the street to call for curtailment of Press Freedom of Speech.

by **PeterMac** 11.01.15 22:11

The Leaders of the free world, (and a few others) have gone on display in Paris for FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
And have spoken to camera about how important it is . . .

Carter-Ruck are probably tomorrow opening an office dealing in Mortgage applications and Real Estate, and another dealing with Tax Avoidance and Off Shore funds.
Mitchell has just seen his entire "raison d'étre" (if only he could understand what that meant) destroyed in an instant
Tugendhat J. is poring over some papers he had been meaning to look at again . . .
Team McCann are probably not, err, yer know, umm, like, what, errmm even dimly aware of what is happening.
Their paid shills, and their acolytes and trolls, and even their extended faaaaamilly, and thick ankled swan-feeding relatives may not, mercifully, be aware of anything that is going on.

by ultimaThule 12.01.15 0:53

It seems unlikely that the MP for Bromsgrove will be recommitting to any part of Leveson:

"The Culture Secretary also rejected the suggestion that Governments should step in on matters involving newspaper articles deemed to be offensive.

The former banker said: ‘Most people would accept in our country just as in any free country, we have a balance of laws that are there to protect people but also to protect their right to freedom of speech and freedom of expression. That is absolutely vital, that is something we can never let go of.

"When a newspaper decides to do, or a magazine or TV channel for that matter, it is up to them, it has got nothing to do with the Government. It never should have.

‘People can still object to something they don't like in a paper or magazine, but that doesn’t mean to say that it can’t be published. That is freedom, that is how it works.

‘There is no role for government to tell any media organisation what they should or should not publish. It is what makes us such a special society."

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by aiyoyo 12.01.15 1:12

‘There is no role for government to tell any media organisation what they should or should not publish. It is what makes us such a special society."

Coming on the back of Charlie Hebdo where millions of people including world leaders of different nations of which UK is one amongst them have turned out in Unity March in Paris supporting Freedom of Speech, there is no way in hell this government is going to implement Leveson.

McCanns' wishing thinking will simply have to continue to boil their blood, as everything is, when they cannot get their way.

I am surprised they've not taken that down from the website given the gravity of the situation in Paris.

The pair are the only strange creatures on planet earth that are going against the flow of world's sentiment.

by ultimaThule 12.01.15 1:21

aiyoyo wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ·

Please call on your MP to recommit to Leveson Part 2 taking place. Thank you! ~FM Webmaster

Just fill in your postcode below and click “Email my MP”. You’ll see the “template” letter which you can change if you wish, and which you can email to your local MP using the postcode and address you provide.

Please let us know what you hear back, by forwarding replies to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] or post copies of letters from your MP to Hacked Off, Millbank Tower, 21-24 Millbank, London, SW1P 4QP.

Thank you for your support.

"Je ne suis pas Charlie" - That's what they should have plastered on their website as logo.

The FM webmaster together with Kate and Gerry and Clarence should march with the placard "Je ne suis pas Charlie" in front of Parliament Building to set example if they want people to call on their MP to implement Leveson. Otherwise they are just cowards asking people to do their dirty work for them.

Come on, show us you have the guts to take to the street to call for curtailment of Press Freedom of Speech.

What an image that conjures up, aiyoyo. The McCanns, the prospective MP for Brighton Pavilion, Ms Fat Ankles, Hugh Grant, JK Rowling, and other members of JHacked Off, marching arm in arm on Downing Street supported by a crowd of ... thinking

... pigeons.
,

by aiyoyo 12.01.15 1:33

If they have the balls to march for their belief, they will easily be outnumbered by reporters, and that will be a sight to behold !

Imagine the headlines :

Madeleine's parents, Kate and Gerry McCanns, challenge the world calling for curtailment of Freedom of Speech.

Kate with "Je ne suis pas Charlie" and Gerry with "Je suis anti-Charlie" painted across their faces chanting: " Leveson Part II ......Leveson Part II...Leveson Part II.....".
Two Mr Plods will be sufficient to riot control this pair of nutters.

And, the NEWS headline....of the day....will be......?

by ultimaThule 12.01.15 3:37

Although they talk a lot of it, balls isn't a quality I associate with the wee one and his spouse who have long been outnumbered by reporters whenever they make a public appearance at anything other than a group event such as a football match, church gathering, or Missing People Gala, aiyoyo.

To continue with our imaginary scenario, outside the gates of no.10 Gerry will claim that freedom of speech has harmed ~~his lucrative marketing strategy~~ the search for Madeleine, Kate will ~~whinge~~ say that it's most inconsiderate of Mr Cameron to be away from home after she'd gone to the trouble of arranging childcare to travel to London, and the ~~family source~~ prospective MP for Brighton Pavilion will deplore the right of constituents to openly express their views which has severely diminished his chance of election big grin

NB: Ms Fat Ankles will have taken herself off to feed her face at MaccyD's in Whitehall and ~~Who~~ Hugh Grant will have sent his apologies from Paris where he's been detained by ~~a charming courtesan~~ unforeseen circumstances.

So far, so predicable, but what I'd like to hear is JK Rowling, well-known writer and champion of liberal causes, explain why she isn't standing shoulder to shoulder with the editorial staff of Charlie Hebdo.

As for the headline... "MCCANNS NIGHTMARE CONTINUES" sarcastic

by missbeetle 12.01.15 4:23

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Juxtapositional comment on Gerry's flat-top hairdo?

Perhaps someone else also finds him a ~~pain~~ ~~payne~~ paign.

My thoughts only.

by ultimaThule 12.01.15 13:30

Well blow me down! Put a Tyrolean hat on him and Gerry's a dead ringer for Pinocchio - you can even see his strings big grin

by Montclair 12.01.15 19:06

missbeetle wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Juxtapositional comment on Gerry's flat-top hairdo?

Perhaps someone else also finds him a ~~pain~~ ~~payne~~ paign.

My thoughts only.

Looks like the top of his head has been hacked off! big grin

by Ho Lee Fuq 12.01.15 19:10

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Montclair 12.01.15 19:21

Ho Lee Fuq wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by **PeterMac** 12.01.15 22:08

Sorry,
I have just turned up this thread.
Is this another suspect ?
He does look a bit like Smithman,.

Have SY / Grange been told ?

by ultimaThule 12.01.15 22:23

Did Smithman have a string attached to his nose? big grin

by Guest 12.01.15 22:27

ultimaThule wrote:Did Smithman have a string attached to his nose?

Maybe Kate's got one of those strings attached to her lip that makes her do this:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Like the top of a soft-boiled egg...

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Re: The McCanns are 'HACKED OFF' once again - now they're calling for LEVESON MARK 2

Latest topics