Scotland Yard takes over the inquiry into Maddie's disappearance from Portuguese plus *UPDATE* CPS lawyers fly to Portugal

aiyoyo wrote:

PeterMac wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:
It would appear Justine Mcguiness (sp) was taken in hook line and sinker.

I think yo are right, but then look at this

Asked what she now believes happened to Madeleine, McGuiness said it was highly unlikely she was kidnapped to order as some theories suggested or just walked out of the apartment herself.

Why ? On what basis does she come to that conclusion ?. Why does she blow the "Living like a princess" story out of the water ?
Their friends, family, and spokesthings hem them in every time they speak.
The combination of McGuinness, Edgar. Philomena and Mitchell have just about denied them any wriggle room whatsoever.

She believes Maddie was taken by a paedo****.

Woofer wrote:Not long after RM was made an arguido, there was a video on Youtube by a young woman querying why his mother had said he was at home because she knew he wasn`t.   I`ve subsequently searched for it but its gone.
I wish I`d taken more notice of it at the time.

I had wondered if Max C had info on him which the MET had recently got hold of.

aiyoyo wrote:

PeterMac wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:
It would appear Justine Mcguiness (sp) was taken in hook line and sinker.

I think yo are right, but then look at this

Asked what she now believes happened to Madeleine, McGuiness said it was highly unlikely she was kidnapped to order as some theories suggested or just walked out of the apartment herself.

Why ? On what basis does she come to that conclusion ?. Why does she blow the "Living like a princess" story out of the water ?
Their friends, family, and spokesthings hem them in every time they speak.
The combination of McGuinness, Edgar. Philomena and Mitchell have just about denied them any wriggle room whatsoever.

She believes Maddie was taken by a paedo****.

marconi wrote:It is possible that the McCanns used Murat to spy for them because they are control freaks and they had to control what was going on.

When he became arguido, the Tapas had no choice than to point to him as being the perpetrator.

marconi wrote:which one of you can tell me if Justice in England accepts 15 or a little more than 15 DNA marks as a legal proof?
If it accepts, the trial will happen in the UK.

I hope it will. And where are the very pleased McCanns?

I feel sorry for Kate's parents who blindly believed their daughter and son-in-law. Mrs. Healy even thought that the PJ planted the evidence.
 

And I continue to believing that Murat sold PJ's information to the McCanns. He was never involved himself in the crime.  Perhaps he even believed the parents were innocent.

And I wonder if Payne is involved in the death too, that's  why he had a monitor and besides we never say him back.

lj wrote:

marconi wrote:which one of you can tell me if Justice in England accepts 15 or a little more than 15 DNA marks as a legal proof?
If it accepts, the trial will happen in the UK.

I hope it will. And where are the very pleased McCanns?

I feel sorry for Kate's parents who blindly believed their daughter and son-in-law. Mrs. Healy even thought that the PJ planted the evidence.
 

And I continue to believing that Murat sold PJ's information to the McCanns. He was never involved himself in the crime.  Perhaps he even believed the parents were innocent.

And I wonder if Payne is involved in the death too, that's  why he had a monitor and besides we never say him back.

I don't think Ma Healy fell for their abduction story, not for a second. That woman and Kate are cut from the same cloth: hard as nails and they will do anything to keep up appearances.