Re: Missing Tia Sharp

by Angelique 17.08.12 9:10

jozi wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Three words Spaniel................He's been whooshed!![You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
***
I'm gonna miss him. He got all of my facial muscles working whilst reading. An exercise, which is normally quite boring in front of the mirror [A-O-E-I-U-X-Y] ... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
-

Just as I was getting excited about the new complex unpronounceable and incomprehensible vocabularies introduced by our first
pseudo- intellectual.....thinking: now then.... that's challenging my vocabulary-bank.....hmmm...interesting....and then whoosed...
out goes the "cretan" which the urban dictionary defines as "someone who is an idiot and lacks gravitas". Something new I learnt today.

Dam it, we are never going to hear the theory on why they think Hazel and Huntley are patsy's .

Yes in some ways it's interesting to see how deeply submerged they are!

by aiyoyo 17.08.12 9:28

Angelique wrote:
jozi wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Three words Spaniel................He's been whooshed!![You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
***
I'm gonna miss him. He got all of my facial muscles working whilst reading. An exercise, which is normally quite boring in front of the mirror [A-O-E-I-U-X-Y] ... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
-

Just as I was getting excited about the new complex unpronounceable and incomprehensible vocabularies introduced by our first
pseudo- intellectual.....thinking: now then.... that's challenging my vocabulary-bank.....hmmm...interesting....and then whoosed...
out goes the "cretan" which the urban dictionary defines as "someone who is an idiot and lacks gravitas". Something new I learnt today.

Dam it, we are never going to hear the theory on why they think Hazel and Huntley are patsy's .

Yes in some ways it's interesting to see how deeply submerged they are!

Whooshed too soon perhaps - Dam!

Yes, if only s/he didn't insult posters intelligence then the "patsy" theory could be pry out of him/her and the degree of submersion would be evident.. Oh well..........? Never mind, it's only going to be very convoluted and twisted anyway.

by Guest 17.08.12 9:34

If it was Advocatus, he (?) is likely to be back in another guise soon. The content of the messages was loopy enough to be him but he isn't usually so rude so possibly it wasn't him.

A good name Cretan though as it's likely to be misread as Cretin.

by **tigger** 17.08.12 9:48

Jean wrote:If it was Advocatus, he (?) is likely to be back in another guise soon. The content of the messages was loopy enough to be him but he isn't usually so rude so possibly it wasn't him.

A good name Cretan though as it's likely to be misread as Cretin.

All these convicted 'patsies'! Conspiracies everywhere - I know of another one. I know for a fact that Humpty Dumpty was pushed! beware

by jozi 17.08.12 10:00

tigger wrote:
Jean wrote:If it was Advocatus, he (?) is likely to be back in another guise soon. The content of the messages was loopy enough to be him but he isn't usually so rude so possibly it wasn't him.

A good name Cretan though as it's likely to be misread as Cretin.

All these convicted 'patsies'! Conspiracies everywhere - I know of another one. I know for a fact that Humpty Dumpty was pushed! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] NO WAY !!! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Guest 17.08.12 10:05

I think that you're going to have egg on your face with that theory, Tigger!

Apologies for being off topic but I feel that a break is needed after some of the gruesome postings here.

by DLinne8 17.08.12 10:14

'Tia had no bedroom of her own at the family flat in Lancaster Avenue, Mitcham; using the front room settee as her bed and keeping her clothes in carrier bags.'

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Spaniel 17.08.12 10:44

DLinne8 wrote:'Tia had no bedroom of her own at the family flat in Lancaster Avenue, Mitcham; using the front room settee as her bed and keeping her clothes in carrier bags.'

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by **Nina** 17.08.12 10:46

If true that means that she couldn't go to bed, ie the settee, 'till all the family had gone to bed. Poor child, that is maybe why she went to Grandma's house as she had her own room there.

by jozi 17.08.12 11:13

DLinne8 wrote:'Tia had no bedroom of her own at the family flat in Lancaster Avenue, Mitcham; using the front room settee as her bed and keeping her clothes in carrier bags.'

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

OMG.... talk about feeling wanted ?

If the family had not enough bedrooms how come the authorities allowed Tia to be there,I thought the local housing put families into houses/flats to accommodate each child's need ?

by pingunootnoot 17.08.12 11:19

jozi wrote:
DLinne8 wrote:'Tia had no bedroom of her own at the family flat in Lancaster Avenue, Mitcham; using the front room settee as her bed and keeping her clothes in carrier bags.'

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

OMG.... talk about feeling wanted ?

If the family had not enough bedrooms how come the authorities allowed Tia to be there,I thought the local housing put families into houses/flats to accommodate each child's need ?

I don't have personal experience with council properties but i know in some areas there is a lack of social housing and many live in overcrowded places. IIRC local councils will regard a living room as a bedroom before making a decision whether a family is infact overcrowded. It is a cycle because that would make some people continue to have more children so that they become a bigger priority in the eyes of the council. It is completely wrong.

by Spaniel 17.08.12 11:28

jozi wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Three words Spaniel................He's been whooshed!![You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
***
I'm gonna miss him. He got all of my facial muscles working whilst reading. An exercise, which is normally quite boring in front of the mirror [A-O-E-I-U-X-Y] ... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
-

Just as I was getting excited about the new complex unpronounceable and incomprehensible vocabularies introduced by our first
pseudo- intellectual.....thinking: now then.... that's challenging my vocabulary-bank.....hmmm...interesting....and then whoosed...
out goes the "cretan" which the urban dictionary defines as "someone who is an idiot and lacks gravitas". Something new I learnt today.

Dam it, we are never going to hear the theory on why they think Hazel and Huntley are patsy's .

As I said, It's all on the David Icke Forum.

by jozi 17.08.12 12:05

Spaniel wrote:
jozi wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Three words Spaniel................He's been whooshed!![You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
***
I'm gonna miss him. He got all of my facial muscles working whilst reading. An exercise, which is normally quite boring in front of the mirror [A-O-E-I-U-X-Y] ... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
-

Just as I was getting excited about the new complex unpronounceable and incomprehensible vocabularies introduced by our first
pseudo- intellectual.....thinking: now then.... that's challenging my vocabulary-bank.....hmmm...interesting....and then whoosed...
out goes the "cretan" which the urban dictionary defines as "someone who is an idiot and lacks gravitas". Something new I learnt today.

Dam it, we are never going to hear the theory on why they think Hazel and Huntley are patsy's .

As I said, It's all on the David Icke Forum.

Hi spaniel

Just had a stroll onto David Ikes Blogs but cannot find anything about Hazel being a patsy. Have I got the right forum......Thanks

by DLinne8 17.08.12 12:22

No new info. here, just my analysis of SH' movements on the day he went 'AWOL'.

'CCTV: Stuart Hazell buys cigarettes from a shop in Mitcham' On Friday 10th Aug, 17.12. It would have taken 3 hours to get to Mitcham from New Addington by foot.

After going to Mitcham, he made the approx. 3 mile journey to Merton Park which is where he was arrested at around 20.30.

My question is this: What was SH doing in Mitcham? It is possible that he spent several hours in Mitcham.

Does anybody know the exact location of the newsagents where the CCTV of SH was recorded? I am interested to know how close SH was to CR4 2LS.

by Spaniel 17.08.12 12:25

jozi wrote:
Spaniel wrote:
jozi wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Three words Spaniel................He's been whooshed!![You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
***
I'm gonna miss him. He got all of my facial muscles working whilst reading. An exercise, which is normally quite boring in front of the mirror [A-O-E-I-U-X-Y] ... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
-

Just as I was getting excited about the new complex unpronounceable and incomprehensible vocabularies introduced by our first
pseudo- intellectual.....thinking: now then.... that's challenging my vocabulary-bank.....hmmm...interesting....and then whoosed...
out goes the "cretan" which the urban dictionary defines as "someone who is an idiot and lacks gravitas". Something new I learnt today.

Dam it, we are never going to hear the theory on why they think Hazel and Huntley are patsy's .

As I said, It's all on the David Icke Forum.

Hi spaniel

Just had a stroll onto David Ikes Blogs but cannot find anything about Hazel being a patsy. Have I got the right forum......Thanks

Hi jozi. Please don't think I'm being awkward by not giving you a direct link, but some forum owners don't consider it etiquette.

Most posters there are normal enough, but a few go on about reptilians, aliens and the New World Order, a la Cretan. Those are basically conspiracy theorists, scare mongers. I've only visited the site a couple of times as apart from the above, technically it's rubbish. There's no quote facility for instance, so you can be reading a post twice before you realise they're quoting.

It's not the blog you want but the forum.

by **PeterMac** 17.08.12 12:46

DLinne8 wrote:'Tia had no bedroom of her own at the family flat in Lancaster Avenue, Mitcham; using the front room settee as her bed and keeping her clothes in carrier bags.'
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I think I said this some pages ago, and some days ago.
Do not ever let ourselves think that the way we live is the same as the way people like this live.
So the first child has to sleep on the settee (as they would all it !) whilst no doubt the subsequent children with the next partner have a bedroom. Then comes the next partner and everyone gets pushed down a slot.

by Guest 17.08.12 12:55

DLinne8, the online issue of the Daily Mail on 19th August gives the address of the shop as Cannon Hill Lane in Mitcham or Morden. Typical sloppy journalism, it's actually in London SW20.

I've checked the Royal Mail website and the supermarket is number 149A and the postcode is SW20 9BZ.

by Guest 17.08.12 12:58

Jean wrote:If it was Advocatus, he (?) is likely to be back in another guise soon. The content of the messages was loopy enough to be him but he isn't usually so rude so possibly it wasn't him.

A good name Cretan though as it's likely to be misread as Cretin.

He did register again but I banned that username too.

by DLinne8 17.08.12 13:02

Jean wrote:DLinne8, the online issue of the Daily Mail on 19th August gives the address of the shop as Cannon Hill Lane in Mitcham or Morden. Typical sloppy journalism, it's actually in London SW20.

I've checked the Royal Mail website and the supermarket is number 149A and the postcode is SW20 9BZ.

Thank you for clarifying that. I was going to edit my post, but too late to do so.

by jozi 17.08.12 13:03

pingunootnoot wrote:
jozi wrote:
DLinne8 wrote:'Tia had no bedroom of her own at the family flat in Lancaster Avenue, Mitcham; using the front room settee as her bed and keeping her clothes in carrier bags.'

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

OMG.... talk about feeling wanted ?

If the family had not enough bedrooms how come the authorities allowed Tia to be there,I thought the local housing put families into houses/flats to accommodate each child's need ?
I don't have personal experience with council properties but i know in some areas there is a lack of social housing and many live in overcrowded places. IIRC local councils will regard a living room as a bedroom before making a decision whether a family is infact overcrowded. It is a cycle because that would make some people continue to have more children so that they become a bigger priority in the eyes of the council. It is completely wrong.

pingunootnoot

I hear what you are saying and agree but still think the children would have had there own rooms....boys in one bedroom and girls in another does not matter about their own bedrooms as that cannot work,some would need a mansion ?
Having said that it could only have been a 2 bed house/flat. Was Tia living there with her mum before the step-dad moved in. That is the only way I can think that this family is living in a 2 bed place ?

by Guest 17.08.12 13:17

I have seen a photo of the low rise block of flats where Tia lived with her mother - can't readily find it again - so it is most likely to have only two bedrooms.

by Guest 17.08.12 13:45

Jean wrote:I have seen a photo of the low rise block of flats where Tia lived with her mother - can't readily find it again - so it is most likely to have only two bedrooms.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by DLinne8 17.08.12 14:21

I believe TS lived on the Laburnum estate, CR4. Interestingly, there are two Laburnum Roads, which are just two miles apart: SW19 and CR4. The shop where SH was caught on CCTV, SW20 is about 3 miles away from where TS lived, but about 12 miles away from New Addington. I'm intrigued as to why he was heading in this direction.

by DLinne8 17.08.12 15:16

He [SC] said: "All I keep doing at the moment is crying and praying for vengeance. My little girl will never get to her 16th, 18th, or 21st birthday. We have been made to suffer. Everyone has.

"I'm so upset and angry I can't think of anything else at the moment. I'm feeling the pain while everyone else is grieving.

"That little girl was loved by everyone: by her family, friends and people who didn't even know her. When I went to New Addington, people who didn't even know me still just wanted to come and give me a hug.

"She was a beautiful little girl. I hope her memory lives for ever. It certainly will inside me and I will never forget her.

"We have all been robbed. Her heart, her soul, everything she gave to this world is gone, and now we just have the memories."

Mr Carter, who is separated from Tia's mum Natalie, last saw Tia about two years ago

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by DLinne8 17.08.12 15:21

Tia lived on Lancaster Avenue, not Laburnum Road, my apologies.

by Spaniel 17.08.12 15:26

DLinne8 wrote:I believe TS lived on the Laburnum estate, CR4. Interestingly, there are two Laburnum Roads, which are just two miles apart: SW19 and CR4. The shop where SH was caught on CCTV, SW20 is about 3 miles away from where TS lived, but about 12 miles away from New Addington. I'm intrigued as to why he was heading in this direction.

There was a report in a paper. The man quoted, had claimed he either went to school with Hazell or grew up with him and that he knew Hazell would return to his roots. This was after Hazell had been found in the park I believe.

The man made a further comment which I won't repeat, especially as the report seems to have been removed. Hence no link.

by Spaniel 17.08.12 15:37

Jean wrote:I have seen a photo of the low rise block of flats where Tia lived with her mother - can't readily find it again - so it is most likely to have only two bedrooms.

Jean hi. Do you know if granny's house was two bed as well?

by Spaniel 17.08.12 15:42

admin wrote:
Jean wrote:I have seen a photo of the low rise block of flats where Tia lived with her mother - can't readily find it again - so it is most likely to have only two bedrooms.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[url=http://www.metro.co.uk/news/908288-stuart-hazell-charged-with-murder-of-his-step-granddaughter-tia-sharp

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Sorry to post three in a row, but does anyone know what that screen over the entrance on the first floor is for please?

by DLinne8 17.08.12 15:50

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I noticed something slightly odd when I compared this picture of Buckingham Court to the picture on Google maps. It looks as though the same wooden gates (or whatever they are) are outside NS' door and in the same position... but wasn't the picture on maps taken ages ago?

by AskTheDogsSandra 17.08.12 15:57

DLinne8 wrote:Mr Carter, who is separated from Tia's mum Natalie, last saw Tia about two years ago

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

That's very sad.

Latest topics