The Assassination of Jo Cox - an Independent Investigation by Richard D. Hall

by skyrocket 05.06.18 7:47

Richard D. Hall film: The Assassination of Jo Cox

by **Jill Havern** 06.06.18 8:16

A very good film as usual by Richard, well worth watching and sending the link to your MP's.

I hope CMOMM member Copodenieve has watched it as she was there.

This is the write-up by Richard in his email:

Greetings,

The latest Richplanet film is now available to watch from the website ...

http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=252&part=1

There is currently considerable dis-information and media manipulation being put out regarding Jo Cox. Most of this I believe has been triggered because of the recent expose of the Jo Cox assasination, which you can watch here ...

http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=251&part=1

Here is a list of things that have appeared in mainstream media immediatly after the evidence was published ...

Negative reports about Mandy RICHARDs, a Labour candidate who questioned the veracity of the Cox narrative.
(This was a clear warning to existing MPs not to listen to alternative theories)
The appearance of the Cox family on state propoganda TV show "Loose Women".
(Handling the family, making them into celebrities in order to psychologically manipulate them)
The inviting to Parliament of the two arresting officers of Thomas Mair, to receive a round of applause by all MPs.
(This served 2 purposes. 1. Forced MPs to visibly support the official story, 2. Gave re-assurance to the two police officers who probably know the case was a set up.)
The story of David HALL who allegedly sent threats to Labour MPs by EMAIL in relation to Jo Cox.
(This story followed 2 days after I emailed all Labour MPs a link to the Jo Cox video).

THEY ARE VERY WORRIED ABOUT THIS CASE

If the content of my investigation can be brought into Parliament, I see this as the BEST opportunity so far in my lifetime, to expose the corrupt political and government system in the UK.

IF YOU WANT THINGS TO CHANGE, PLEASE - Get your arse in front of your MP, and insist they watch the video.

The senior officers in this case ought to be put on trial (in my opinion). This WILL happen (in my opinion) if you persuade your MP of the evidence.

People often ask me "What can we do about the state of things Richard". Well this is what YOU CAN DO. Go to your MP surgery ASAP and insist YOUR MP watch the Jo Cox lecture video. If you want to give them the link it is simply, www.richplanet.net/cox .

Thankyou
Richard D. Hall

by Copodenieve 06.06.18 10:10

Wow! I've watched a bit of it Jill and I already have some queries, especially about the time he was supposed be walking away. I'm at work now so I need to watch the whole video and go back to my notes. I wrote the times down where I was and what time I arrived. I'm sure it could have been no earlier than five to one when I arrived at the shooting so he should have still been at the scene at this time. However, I will check my notes tonight and get back to this.

by Copodenieve 06.06.18 19:21

Here are my observations:
1.       I checked my notes and the timing seems spot on. It will have taken the man in the white cap about the same time to get to the corner before he turns left towards Union Street as it would have taken me to get to the scene of the crime. That is if he left the scene immediately after the third shot.
2.       I would have taken the same route as he did to get to Union Street, simply because I never take the stairs in to Tesco’s car park unless I am actually calling in to the supermarket. Neither do I ever cut through the car park at the bottom. I don’t know why I do this, I just do. However, I have lived abroad for many years and I’ve only been back in this area for a few years, so I don’t have the same customs as people who have lived here all their lives like Tommy. But cutting through the car park that near to the end of the street seems pointless to me and there are the added obstacles of manoeuvring cars and people in the way to slow you down.
3.       Why is the other Asian man not mentioned at all in this video? Sandra and Fazila were with Jo Cox but there was also another Asian man who was on the phone to the emergency services? I gathered afterwards that he must have been part of their constituency. Maybe he wasn’t.
4.       I saw a body on the floor on the road between two parked cars. Her head was at the far side and her legs reached near to the path. Her hair was covered in blood and covered her face which was facing towards the car in front of her. The rest of her body was face down. Her coat was large and covered her body. I seem to remember her legs being fat. Fazila was standing at the far end of the body by the head looking at the man on the phone who was talking to the emergency services. I got the impression that she was obstructing the view of the body to passing cars. I never saw her even look at the body never mind hold her hand or crouch down near her. She just looked like she was waiting for a bus. This struck me as being really odd but I thought she might have been in shock. She wasn’t crying and showed no emotion whatsoever. I never saw her on the phone to anyone either. I heard the Asian man say to the emergency operator “no, she is not breathing”. At one point we both stared at each other and I had the feeling we were both willing the ambulance to arrive.
5.       The person dressed in white shown in the video was a man with a white shirt and black trousers. I think he works in Brearley’s solicitor’s office on the corner but I’m not sure. He was lovely and very helpful. We both comforted Susan and then when I broke down he hugged me and asked if I was ok.
6.       When the police arrived they went straight for the witnesses. I didn’t see any police men approach the body straight away. Their main concern was to get us away from it. I thought this was strange as I would have thought their first concern would be to check if she was dead or not. The second thing I found strange was when I asked if I could leave the scene; the police woman who seemed to be in charge just asked me if I had witnessed the shooting. I said that I hadn’t, that I had just seen the body and heard the shots, so she just asked me my name and nothing else and let me go. It was also very clear that I was in a terrible state of shock, crying uncontrollably and shaking like a leaf, and there was no concern whatsoever for my own well being. Afterwards I thought she should have said “Don’t go, you need to see a doctor” or something like that.
7.       If Tommy’s motive was racism, why did he not harm the other two Asians at the scene? His target seemed to be Jo Cox and nobody else.
8.       My friend who lived opposite Tommy and has known him all her life said that she just doesn’t understand it. That if she had been there at the time she would have walked up to him with no fear what so ever and said “Tommy, what on earth are you doing?” In fact, nobody seems to want to talk about it in Birstall and the funeral tour completely missed Birstall out. People who knew him do not understand how this could have happened and they don’t believe he was political.
9.       I saw CCTV footage of him walking up Gelderd road which is in the opposite direction to where the killer was walking away from the scene. This route would take Tommy back to his house in Fieldhead. I was told that this was the recording from a CCTV taped the day before the murder. He was wearing a cap but I can’t remember what colour it was.

by willowthewisp 09.06.18 14:19

Hi Copodenieve, Mr Hall alludes to MI5 or similar type of event if the (State) did need to be rid of a problem,(Miss Cox)reference made to Gordon and Brenden,Oxfam allegations, Jo Cox, (Barack O'Bama) Syria,White Helmets,Oxfam,tainted pasts?

The only thing sticking out are the recent "Revelations,Oxfam" child Prostitution exploitation, for Food,Haiti,Hilary Clinton,Africa, Government aid etc?

What Richard Hall has shown even by the shown footage if correct,the(Thomas Mair) caught on CCTV was further down the Road from where Jo Cox was shot,that Jo Cox's car would have Thomas on the opposite side of the street from where he is supposed to have shot,stabbed,Killed and wounded at least Two person's,within 15-30 seconds of the recording?

It really is a dubious conviction,with an eye witness contacting the Police to have the UK Police then speak to Richard Hall on harassment,having contacted him Twice,something not right there,after highlighting discrepancies in evidence,safe house in a side street,where the suspect changes his cap from white to Black for the arrest scene?

then there is the"Doppleganger" at Police Televised recordings,with No Comments or words from the accused,which even the Police were stumped by?

People within the UK will mock Richard Halls films as,"Conspiracy Theories" lunatics with nothing better to do or watch?

A bit like David Icke moment on "Wogan" pilioried for exposing World events being linked to certain possible"Fiefdoms" dynasties,then when David had a second appearance he tied Wogan up in knots,"Beach Fronted apartments in Birmingham for sale by George W Bush",classic!

A few years ago,colleagues within the workplace asked me about the,"Illuminati", I had no idea what they were talking about,but now after reading up on certain Families connected to Wars,Banks,Armourments sales to opposing factions going back Hundreds of years,creating Wars that Re-generate regions after being destroyed,(thought process) so if the present owners die in the conflict,who becomes the New owners,"All's Fair in Love and War"?

In 1979 Jeremy Thorpe chose Not to go into the Witness box,having been charged with Hiring,conspiring to have a person Killed,he and his Three accomplaces walked free from Court,giving No evidence?

Thomas Mair,chose Not to give evidence on charges of killing Jo Cox,MP in Batley,Yorkshire 2016 and is found guilty as charged,apparently the same Judicial system used!

Is this another one of those Mis-carriages of Justice,Birmingham Six?

by Guest 09.06.18 15:38

White Helmets = Bad = Atrocity fakers.

Maybe she found out.

by willowthewisp 09.06.18 16:02

BlueBag wrote:White Helmets = Bad = Atrocity fakers.

Maybe she found out.

Hi blueBag,White Helmets,but didn't her husband Brendan Continue to support or have donations made to the White Helmets in Charity support groups after Jo Cox's Murder!

White Helmets being supported by CIA,NGO groups in the USA,with Former UK Army based personel?

by Copodenieve 24.06.18 17:02

Hi Willowthewhisp: "What Richard Hall has shown even by the shown footage if correct,the(Thomas Mair) caught on CCTV was further down the Road from where Jo Cox was shot,that Jo Cox's car would have Thomas on the opposite side of the street from where he is supposed to have shot,stabbed,Killed and wounded at least Two person's,within 15-30 seconds of the recording?"

The stabbing and shooting took place between the two parked cars. Sandra (secretary to Jo Cox) was standing between the parked cars with her back to the library and with Jo Cox in front of her. Therefore Tommy must have been on the road facing the library and Jo Cox who had her back to Sandra facing the road side and Tommy. This positioning actually prevented any of Jo Cox’s team helping her as they were stood behind and the two parked cars blocked anyone from coming at him from the side. People who were running towards me away from the shooting were looking backwards towards the road side and not at the kerb. It is logical to me that Tommy walked away downwards on the Tesco side of the road rather than upwards or on the Library side of the road because that is the route were there were less people if any at all.
Please forgive my ignorance but I can’t seem to be able to get my head around how you work out how long it took to carry out the attack. All I know is that when the last shot was fired I started walking towards the library and it would have taken him just as long to get to the corner of Tesco’s car park as it took me to get to the library. For what it’s worth, the shots were seconds apart.
I’m not sure what to think about Richard’s idea that it wasn’t Tommy that did the shooting. I find it hard to believe because even though nobody at the scene actually knew him, the odds were higher that someone would have passed by there who did know him. He has lived in the same house all his life and I lived around the corner from him but I can hardly remember him now because I moved away when I was 19 years old. I was only seconds away from actually being right at the scene at the actual time of the shooting because the Library is exactly where I was heading.
I think that he did indeed carry out the attack but there are a lot of things that don’t add up for me and at this moment I tend to think that he may have been brain washed or something like that. I don’t believe he was racist. My initial thought before watching Richard's DVD was that he was angry at Jo Cox because he needed help and he wasn’t getting it. If he had been racist, why didn’t he attack the two Asians that were standing right next to Jo Cox during the incident?

by Copodenieve 24.06.18 17:05

willowthewisp wrote:
BlueBag wrote:White Helmets = Bad = Atrocity fakers.

Maybe she found out.
Hi blueBag,White Helmets,but didn't her husband Brendan Continue to support or have donations made to the White Helmets in Charity support groups after Jo Cox's Murder!

White Helmets being supported by CIA,NGO groups in the USA,with Former UK Army based personel?

I don't know if you have seen this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5404241/Jo-Coxs-husband-admits-sex-pest-resigns.html

by willowthewisp 24.06.18 21:48

Copodenieve wrote:Hi Willowthewhisp: "What Richard Hall has shown even by the shown footage if correct,the(Thomas Mair) caught on CCTV was further down the Road from where Jo Cox was shot,that Jo Cox's car would have Thomas on the opposite side of the street from where he is supposed to have shot,stabbed,Killed and wounded at least Two person's,within 15-30 seconds of the recording?"

The stabbing and shooting took place between the two parked cars. Sandra (secretary to Jo Cox) was standing between the parked cars with her back to the library and with Jo Cox in front of her. Therefore Tommy must have been on the road facing the library and Jo Cox who had her back to Sandra facing the road side and Tommy. This positioning actually prevented any of Jo Cox’s team helping her as they were stood behind and the two parked cars blocked anyone from coming at him from the side. People who were running towards me away from the shooting were looking backwards towards the road side and not at the kerb. It is logical to me that Tommy walked away downwards on the Tesco side of the road rather than upwards or on the Library side of the road because that is the route were there were less people if any at all.
Please forgive my ignorance but I can’t seem to be able to get my head around how you work out how long it took to carry out the attack. All I know is that when the last shot was fired I started walking towards the library and it would have taken him just as long to get to the corner of Tesco’s car park as it took me to get to the library. For what it’s worth, the shots were seconds apart.
I’m not sure what to think about Richard’s idea that it wasn’t Tommy that did the shooting. I find it hard to believe because even though nobody at the scene actually knew him, the odds were higher that someone would have passed by there who did know him. He has lived in the same house all his life and I lived around the corner from him but I can hardly remember him now because I moved away when I was 19 years old. I was only seconds away from actually being right at the scene at the actual time of the shooting because the Library is exactly where I was heading.
I think that he did indeed carry out the attack but there are a lot of things that don’t add up for me and at this moment I tend to think that he may have been brain washed or something like that. I don’t believe he was racist. My initial thought before watching Richard's DVD was that he was angry at Jo Cox because he needed help and he wasn’t getting it. If he had been racist, why didn’t he attack the two Asians that were standing right next to Jo Cox during the incident?

Ho Copodenieve,forgive me but I don't know where the Tesco shop is located,eg Library side?

If you watch Richard D Halls film and Jo Cox's car approaching the Library,(Left Hand side),when the Car is at the departure point of Jo Cox,(Library)the car had already passed Tommy Mair,(opposite side of Library)therefore Mr Mair must possess an amazing amount of speed whilst walking to cover 50-150 yards or more in seconds,take a look at the CCTV provided by the Police, a person cannot be in Two places at One time?
What about the forensic examination of Tommy Mairs clothing,How did he manage to dispose of his soiled clothing in the Cul-de-Sac,waiting for twenty minutes between being arrested,Forty minutes since the murder to be found where he was arrested in a now black Cap as opposite to the white cap in the CCTV?
The"Gun" Tommy Mair was supposed to have used was used in subsequent Crimes within Twelve months of Jo Cox's murder,did Mr Mair have possession of the gun in this Twelve months period?
Two person's were shot,then the Gun failed,then a"Knife" was used,but No blood shown on Mr Mairs clothing at the scene of arrest,apart from the police rugby tackling Mr Mair causing a bleed to his head, as seen by personel CCTV images,Richards film?

As I have stated the same,"Judicial process" produces opposite results,Jeremy Thorpe,refuses to speak at his trail alongside Three accused Apellents,result not guilty, Mr Thomas Mair confirms name and address,Guilty Ma Lord with No Appeals process on his tariff?

So apparently people can be"Brain washed" into committing a crime,but the"State or Establishment" can never fit a person(s) up for a crime,take a look at the Birmingham Six and Colin Wallace Ex- British Army(Secret services) Manslaughter charges,Kincora Boys Home!

Does this mean Mr Thomas Mair was "fitted Up" to tie into an event,$64,000, Patsy?

by Copodenieve 25.06.18 9:06

I will watch the dvd again and take some notes Willowthewisp. I seem to remember that the car was parked outside the library when Tommy was at the corner walking away from the crime scene. From memory I thought Richard showed a clip of the car going up the road towards the Library (Library on the left as you are walking up wards in the opposite direction to where Tommy was walking) at that point I don't remember seeing Tommy in the clip, then he shows another clip of the parked car in front of the library with all the commotion and Tommy is at the corner of Tesco's car park walking away from the scene. Tesco's is on the opposite side of the road from the library but behind the shops, so where you see Tommy in the video at the corner you will see a car park on his left hand side. This is Tesco's car park and Richard says that a local man had said that Tommy would have crossed this car park to get to Union Street rather than walk around it. I disagree here because I find it quicker to walk round it than cross through it because of all the cars coming in and going out all the time.
I also believe that the stabbing occurred first and then he shot her. The man who intervened and tried to stop him was stabbed, not shot. He shot Jo Cox three times and I heard three shots. At least this is the version I was given from Sandra (Secretary). I think he left the scene immediately after the third shot because it's the same distances more or less from the scene to the corner at the bottom of the road where he was captured on camera as it is from the corner at the top of the road, where I was, to get to the scene.
I was also told by locals that he had made the gun himself, so I am surprised to hear that the gun had been used previously.
There is another thing that I have just remembered. It started raining quite heavily at about a quarter past one and it was raining for at least half an hour. This may be totally insignificant, but for some reason it is nagging me.
The changing of hats seems very odd and doesn't make sense at all. I saw the police searching the car park behind the Volts Pub which is the turning just before the turning right to where Richard said the safe house was located. This bothers me a bit too because if a man had followed him to the safe house, the police would know immediately where he had stopped off and that would have been the first place they would have gone to look for whatever they were looking for. They made a big deal of searching all the gardens on the main roads that where nowhere near the route that Tommy had supposedly taken. It was said that they were looking for the weapons and his bag. This was the day after and even two days after the incident. It was like they where making a big show of searching.
As for Tommy not speaking in the interview; according to my friend who has known him all her life, it was rare to get a couple of words from him. However, I've also been told that he taught Engish to Asian people which seems contradictory because you have to be quite communicative to teach. Nothing seems to make much sense.

by Copodenieve 25.06.18 11:54

I have watched the beginning of the video again. I never saw the actual attack but I have always had it in my head that he had attacked her from the road side and not from the curb. I can’t see how she could have rolled from the curb between the two parked cars because of the position she was lying in. She could have crawled to that position but not rolled to it. Since there was no blood on the curb, she must have been attacked whilst standing between the two parked cars. Since she was face down with her head at the far side of the cars towards the road and her legs nearer the curb, it seems more likely to me that she was facing the road, so I think her attacker came from the opposite side of the road towards the parked cars and attacked her whilst she was standing between the cars facing towards the road. Maybe she was heading towards the library and he confronted her and she turned round to face him.
If it did happen like that, it makes sense that he would walk away from the scene to the opposite side of the road.
However, I cannot get my head around how calmly this guy is walking away and nobody is taking any notice of him. He just looks like a guy who is minding his own business and just looks around at the commotion but decides to carry on walking. Nobody is following or seems to be in the slightest bit interested in him as he is walking down the road. When did the star witness actually start to follow him? He isn’t following him in the video. For him to know he was the attacker he must have been at the scene, so why isn’t he shown in this video following him from the moment he sets off?

by willowthewisp 25.06.18 13:17

Ho Copodenieve,another interesting point is the"Star witness" and his Brother are the only CCTV showing a person dressed in the Grey Top,black Trousers with a hand bag.

Then the Police are called in to investigate"Harassment"against Richard D Hall having contacted a person on Two occasions,so if the plod visit your abode for a second time is this then construed as "Harassment by the Police",whats good for the goose is good for the Gander?

On youtube,there was several videos alerting to aspects of how the Police behaved around the"Black bag",thought to be carrying the "Gun & Knife",used at the Crime scene,One video showed an Officer retrieve a bag from a Car and place it adjacent to the nearest Patrol car to the Handcuffed Mr Mair,then the bag was placed within the scene,perhaps they may still be on CMMoM/youtube parts of the Jo Cox murder?

Whatever had taken place on the day Jo Cox is supposed to have been Murdered by Mr Thomas Mair,there are once again"Mysterious Presence" of sleight of hand being involved,with the now Guilty person placed in a catergory A prison,with a "Special Tariff"with No parole?

Then you see Mr Bercow milking the moment in the"House of Common's" praising the Bravery,gallantry of the Two Police Officers,"Starsky & Hutch" performance at the arrest of Tommy Mair,where they knew his name,as broadcast on Good Morning Britain,fluffing their lines?

Ah well it's just another innocent pleb filling in the Prison cells,whilst the guilty still walk about "Free" to do as they please?

by Copodenieve 26.06.18 11:37

Oh yes! The "Starsky & Hutch" interview! This is very strange indeed, especially when coupled with the neighbours' statement who said they heard the police shout his name.

by willowthewisp 26.06.18 12:11

Copodenieve wrote:Oh yes! The "Starsky & Hutch" interview! This is very strange indeed, especially when coupled with the neighbours' statement who said they heard the police shout his name.

Hi Copodennieve, "Starsky & Hutch" were calling Tommy Mairs name to ensure they were about to"Taser" the right suspect in the Jo Cox Murder,didn't want Tommy escaping on a technicality?

A big thanks to Richard D Hall for taking the time and commitment to investigate the Jo Cox murder,thank you Richard bingo

by Copodenieve 01.07.18 18:19

This was article was in our local paper on Friday - Journalist is Danny Lockwood.
MAIR QUESTIONS REMAIN
In light of the second anniversary of the tragic murder of Jo Cox, it's worth reflecting on the solitary task that faced West Yorkshire Police in its aftermath.
Thomas Mair was swiftly apprehended and his modus operandi established by the simple expedient of studying his internet browsing history at local libraries.
As to how he got the gun he used though - nothing. Zilch. Police know where it was stolen from but not how it got to Mair, a man who didn't drive and had a very limited social circle.
Two years on and it's still a blank. A vital, puzzling one.
As such, you'd think that a journalist who has since gained Mair's confidence to the point that the killer is willing to talk to him, would be encouraged by the police and the judiciary, wouldn't you? To get answers they simply can't?
But no, the writer has been blocked from seeing Mair by the authorities, thus ensuring no-one can get the answers and explanations so many people would like.
You'd almost think they have something to hide...

by willowthewisp 01.07.18 19:42

Copodenieve wrote:This was article was in our local paper on Friday - Journalist is Danny Lockwood.
MAIR QUESTIONS REMAIN
In light of the second anniversary of the tragic murder of Jo Cox, it's worth reflecting on the solitary task that faced West Yorkshire Police in its aftermath.
Thomas Mair was swiftly apprehended and his modus operandi established by the simple expedient of studying his internet browsing history at local libraries.
As to how he got the gun he used though - nothing. Zilch. Police know where it was stolen from but not how it got to Mair, a man who didn't drive and had a very limited social circle.
Two years on and it's still a blank. A vital, puzzling one.
As such, you'd think that a journalist who has since gained Mair's confidence to the point that the killer is willing to talk to him, would be encouraged by the police and the judiciary, wouldn't you? To get answers they simply can't?
But no, the writer has been blocked from seeing Mair by the authorities, thus ensuring no-one can get the answers and explanations so many people would like.
You'd almost think they have something to hide...

Hi Copodenieve,That is the reason why Mr Thomas Mair was given access to a legal team,who made systematically sure,they had executed all"Legal" points as a defendant,they had crossed and marked off all the I's and T's accordingly,so Mr Thomas Mair couldn't,"Appeal",then placed in a Category A prison,full term to be served with No remission?
So the Police knew all about the Gun?
The" Gun " Mr Mair had procured by hand,an Home made device,No,this "fire arm" had been used elsewhere in Yorkshire,used in other Crimes?

The"Deeper You dig" on this case,the stinkier it smells and sticks to the stick,but will Thomas Mair be released?

Not your nelly,they've got their Man,South Yorkshire Police,who didn't know "1400 Girls were being Groomed" under their very own noses,assisted by Council Officials,yeah right,"What you don't know about, you cannot investigate" isn't that remarkable?

by Guest 02.07.18 7:56

But no, the writer has been blocked from seeing Mair by the authorities,

But of course.
We don't want tricky questions and awkward answers now do we?

You'd almost think they have something to hide...

I'm sure they do.

by **Jill Havern** 21.07.18 5:57

Richard's new show: FREE TOMMY

In today's show Richard calls for the release of the innocent Tommy. Tommy was convicted without a trial, and is now in prison behind bars. It is critical that Tommy is given a voice. Only by giving Tommy a voice will the truth be told about what really happened to him on the day he was arrested. Tommy has been used as a political scapegoat, and we ask all viewers to visit their MPs to pass on critical information.

https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=255&part=1&gen=99

by Guest 21.07.18 6:55

Tommy was covering a child grooming court case and was arrested for "breaching the peace" when in fact he did no such thing.

He streamed and recorded the whole hour before his arrest.

I've watched it and the Police are yet again a disgrace acting the way I would have expected Soviet police to act back in the day.

This country is slipping further and further into a left wing tyranny that will not allow freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech is everything and we need to do everything we can to protect it.

by **Jill Havern** 29.01.19 8:54

Email from Richard today:

Greetings,

Just to let you know I have released the latest Richplanet film "Exit from Brexit, The Jo Cox Departure", early.

It is available on DVD now from this link,

https://www.richplanet.net/store/richplanetfilms?product_id=411

Due to the current Brexit situation and claims in mainstream media that so called “far right” extremism is increasing due to Brexit, I felt that people need to see the content of the film as soon as possible. The media and politicians keep using the Jo Cox fake narrative to re-enforce a myth that asserts that certain people who support Brexit have either killed or are likely to kill due to their beliefs. This film exposes the truth about the Jo Cox incident and proves beyond reasonable doubt that Jo Cox was NOT killed by the man they have claimed.

PLEASE NOTE : The film will be available to watch free online soon. I have not decided on the exact online release date yet, but I will send out another email newsletter to you when it is available to view.

I will be talking about the film and other things at the up coming April tour,

https://www.richplanet.net/events.php

Thank you,

Richard
--------

The Assassination of Jo Cox - an Independent Investigation by Richard D. Hall Df022-10

Filmed in 2018, DVD PAL 16:9, By Richard D. Hall
2 Part DVD Film

This film follows Richard D. Hall’s investigation into the alleged murder of MP Jo Cox which happened on June 16th 2016. Following on from his initial findings presented in a lecture in April 2018, he has searched further for evidence and presents it here for the first time. The film proves beyond reasonable doubt that the official version of events is wholly untrue. Richard presents compelling evidence that the man blamed for the attack was a patsy and played no part in any murder, if indeed there was a murder. The film looks at all the CCTV evidence, witness testimony and physical evidence. Also featured are interviews with witnesses who have been kept out of mainstream media and were not asked to take part in the trial. The film suggests a plausible motive for a highly organised plot to remove Jo Cox from her position of MP. Her departure occurred just one week before the UK Brexit referendum and the film explains why this may have happened.
This film contains extensive analysis by statement analyst Peter Hyatt.
The Box Set includes a 3rd Disk containing the film in HD (1280x720) MP4 format.
Format : PAL 16:9, Region Free
Running Time : 3h 15m

by **PeterMac** 29.01.19 10:20

If anyone is in doubt about what the White Helmets actually ARE - namely the fire brigade, ambulance, and funeral service for ISIS
look at the videos on

https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fd8_1430900709

for the faint hearted - one involves a summary execution / MURDER by ISIS of a captured person, by shooting in the back of the head, and a coup de grace in the temple when he is on the ground. Immediately afterwards without a break in the filming, the White Helmets appear from off camera, equipped with body bag, scoop up the corpse and take him away.

The second is White Helmets on a truck loaded with corpses, giving celebratory hand gestures to the camera as it drives along

In all cases their clothing bears the distinctive LOGO.

The Canadians have granted Refugee status to several hundred of these people, in the politically correct belief that they were in some way Independent Peace Keepers

by skyrocket 02.03.19 8:54

Richard's film 'Exit from Brexit' is now available to view on his website richplanet.net and on youtube

Top quality investigative work.

by **Jill Havern** 02.03.19 9:12

RICHPLANET LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

1.3.2019 - Questionable Time, MP describes Richaplanet film as "Racist Abuse"

On 28th February the BBC's flagship political discussion programme, "Questionable Time" featured comments by labour MP Barry Gardiner. Watch his comments here. Gardiner held up a copy of Richaplanet's latest film about the Jo Cox assasination. You can watch the 3 hour film here. Gardiner started by reading out an alleged letter from a far right extremist, he then held up the Richplanet DVD film while holding my covering letter in his other hand. Was he trying to confuse the two letters?

In January 2019 I sent a copy of my film to every UK MP. 650 DVDs were sent out to MPs constituency offices along with a stong covering letter. Since the films were sent out, the UK media has been awash with stories featuring stories linked to Jo Cox and her assassination. These stories in my opinion are attempts to re-inforce a bogus mainstream narrative about the Jo Cox assasination, first put forward in 2016 by the UK media. Many MPs will have watched the film by now, including my own MP Gerald Jones who I know has watched the film. I urge everyone to book an appointment with your MP, to ask them if they have watched the film which they would have received at the latest by early February.

I am intersted in any feedback your MPs give you.

I have written to Mr Gardiner and chellenged him to a public debate about the evidence surrounding the Jo Cox assassination.

Richard D. Hall

by Guest 03.03.19 7:38

What did he consider racist about it?

by Guest 03.03.19 7:43

Go to 29:35

That is an outrageous conflation by a MP who has to be described as scum for doing it.

I disagree with many of your videos Richard (Apollo Hoax is just bad science) but this one hits home.

by Guest 03.03.19 8:48

Another AMAZING job by Richard. Meticulous. If only the people whose actual job it was were so thorough.

by skyrocket 03.03.19 9:41

Hopefully Gardiner's comments will actually direct more viewers to Richard's 'pretend' film. I doubt he has watched it.

Need to watch it all through again. Fascinating new insights: the 'movement' expert - once you see the differences in gait it becomes glaringly obvious that there are 2 different men walking around; the appearance of the guy getting out of the car at the arrest scene; the x-armed police officer's ridicule of the arrest (which always seemed way too laid back for a gun attack); the odd countenance of Jo Cox's younger assistant who seems to be smiling (duping?) as she describes what happened (part 2/16.25); the fact that Jo Cox's body was whisked straight down to London, side-stepping normal procedures; etc.

by willowthewisp 03.03.19 17:49

Jill Havern wrote:
RICHPLANET LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

1.3.2019 - Questionable Time, MP describes Richaplanet film as "Racist Abuse"

On 28th February the BBC's flagship political discussion programme, "Questionable Time" featured comments by labour MP Barry Gardiner. Watch his comments here. Gardiner held up a copy of Richaplanet's latest film about the Jo Cox assasination. You can watch the 3 hour film here. Gardiner started by reading out an alleged letter from a far right extremist, he then held up the Richplanet DVD film while holding my covering letter in his other hand. Was he trying to confuse the two letters?

In January 2019 I sent a copy of my film to every UK MP. 650 DVDs were sent out to MPs constituency offices along with a stong covering letter. Since the films were sent out, the UK media has been awash with stories featuring stories linked to Jo Cox and her assassination. These stories in my opinion are attempts to re-inforce a bogus mainstream narrative about the Jo Cox assasination, first put forward in 2016 by the UK media. Many MPs will have watched the film by now, including my own MP Gerald Jones who I know has watched the film. I urge everyone to book an appointment with your MP, to ask them if they have watched the film which they would have received at the latest by early February.

I am intersted in any feedback your MPs give you.

I have written to Mr Gardiner and chellenged him to a public debate about the evidence surrounding the Jo Cox assassination.

Richard D. Hall

Hi Jill Havern, I have watched Richard D Halls, Brexit-Jo Cox Four part series, thank you Mr Hall for another remarkable investigation into the Jo Cox Murder,allegedly carried out by Mr T Mair?

Mr B Gardner and the nefarious MP's in Parliament are now showing their true colours in regard to Democracy in the UK,2016 Referendum result.

These MP's do Not wish for Europe Union to be disbanded,they think they are so clever,by using Hypothetical questions of Not knowing the future,So I cannot provide an answer?
Perhaps Jo Cox had become an alias John Doe over what Jo had uncovered in close connections to European Union, UK based Tax Heavens, being a cousin to the Kinnocks in Parliament, Lords, where Neil Kinnock was in charge of accounts on Europe spending accountancy, never published, 2004?

There are so many unanswered questions in regard to what may have happened to MP Jo Cox, to believe on what has been told is Not enough with the "Fake News" scenario's making people think twice about most reported events,where Death has occurred,eg Three Young Men mowed down by a driver in London and the Metropolitan Police service once again involved!

by **Tony Bennett** 03.03.19 22:08

I have watched the whole Richard Hall documentary through twice. The first time in disbelief, but then as our resident and cautious analyst of things right or wrong, @BlueBag, says - and I agree: "I disagree with many of your videos Richard...but this one hits home".

Another of our other resident analysts, @skyrocket, who delves into certain things re Madeleine in great depth, agrees, giving a list of things which made him think that the official story was wrong.

For the record I fully agree also with @JimbobJones, who wrote: "Another AMAZING job by Richard. Meticulous. If only the people whose actual job it was were so thorough".

I have made my own list of things to look out for in this film, these are:

1 The differences between the dress of the two men in the videoes, one wearing a black cap and the other a white cap (we commented on that on CMOMM back in 2016 when the first reports broke.

2 The man seen hiding behind a chapel wall, lying on the ground peering through binoculars, before the murder.

3 How on earth the police already knew the name of the man (Tommy Mair) as they arrested him just minutes after the incident.

4 The highly unusual procedures followed immediately after the incident by police, hospital, coroner etc.

5 The trial of Tommy Mair. Why were friends and family kept away from it? Was it really Tommy Mair in the dock. Why did he say nothing during the whole trial except the word 'Yes; in answer to his name and then 'Not Guilty'. Just three words.

6 The letter sent by Tommy Mair to Richard Hall.

7 The connections between Jo Cox and left-wing, Marxist, anti-Christian globalist George Soros...Jo Cox's controversial work supporting the Syrian White Helmets - purportedly a neutral 'Red Cross' type of organisation but in reality a U.S. and U.K.-backed 'front' group for violent, jihadi, Islamist rebels trying to topple the lawful government of Syria.

There is one more curiosity I would add. The murder of Jo Cox was carried out on 16 - 6 - 16. Now for those who have studied the way secret groups like the Illuminati, Freemasonry etc. conduct their affairs, it can readily be seen that 666 is a favoured number, as are other triples like 111, 333 and 555. The obelisk, the White House and the plan of Washington D.C. were all designed by top Freemasons of the time. The height of the obelisk is 555 feet, or 6660 inches. I believe that these dimensions were chosen deliberately by high-level plotters very familiar with occult numerology.

If you watch this documentary, and agree with Richard's astonishing conclusion, you will go on to ponder just how this operation was planned, and also how long beforehand it was planned. You will also wonder why the man alleged to be Tommy Mair was heard to shout out slogans like 'Britain First!'. Was this an attempt to stop people voting Brexit? - Jo Cox was a huge Remain supporter.

Finally, this is a brilliant, individual investigation. Richard has the mind of a genius in the way he has put this together with dozens of ours of dedicated, insightful research.

How lucky we all were here on CMOMM that back in 2014 - it seems a long time ago now! - he turned his skills into the most complete analysis yet of the disappearance of poor Madeleine McCann.

WATCH Richard's Jo Cox Documentary - EXIT FROM BREXIT - NOW before YouTube take it down!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxXcYsC8aIM

17,000 views plus in just the first 2 days

The Assassination of Jo Cox - an Independent Investigation by Richard D. Hall