DIVERSION AHEAD

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Any moment I'm expecting a "Prince of PR" Carrie M press release stating, Madeleine has been sighted chatting to Elvis and Lord Lucan in a supermarket, in another attempt to force us to believe Madeleine is alive and so proves the McCann's original "Abduction Theory".  I  am going to be very careful about feeling too excited about the latest batch of revelations. We have the success of Goncalo Amaral's win. We've had the Prince of PR - CM down under on - how to put your foot in your mouth without really trying. ("Holiday Inn" ???  Really !!!!).  We have the TV interview of GA in Portugal with some interesting revelations. We have the McCanns dancing the twist to try and perform damage limitation while they work out who to sue next and where to get the money from, and the Sun exposure of the secret that wasn't. Given the McCann camp's main focus since that 2007 holiday is to divert attention away from anything that gets anywhere near the truth, I believe great care needs to be exercised to make sure we are not diverted yet again. Currently some older theories, and some new ones, have been brought into focus. These remind us once again that some more crucial questions badly need answers. It needs to be remembered that once the riddle of what really happened to Madeleine has been solved and diversion tactics move away from "finding" her, then we need a big focus of attention on the areas from which we were, and still are, being diverted - i.e. the large framework of people who were/are the hidden decision makers behind the McCann facade.
For Example -  and these aint all by a long way :-
1 Who authorised the sending of high level VIPs from Govt.and Business in the very first days - and who paid for them?
2 Who authorised set up of Madeleine fund and why was it set up as a Company when getting donations from the public? (The fund seemed to be a bigger priority to the McCanns than finding Madeleine.)
3 Why were KM and GM allowed to be directors of this company and restrict useage to "finding" Madeleine until mortgage needed paying etc? (Conflict of interest if they eventually are PROVED to be involved - but surely applies if they were/are arguidos/suspects.)
4 Who authorised sending UK police to Pd Luz and why? and Who decided PJ could not handle the investigation perfectly well? - GA's recent success has shown that they could.
5 Who authorised the UK police in Pd Luz to interfere with PJ investigation?
6 Who told UK press that PJ were incompetent and how would they know this?
7 Who authorised the UK police/Gov/McCanns to require GAs removal from the case and/or who in PJ seniors authorised/allowed this and why?
8 Who authorised the McCanns superior level of existence and protection that is not accorded to "normal" people like you and me?  e.g. April Jones parents never received any support at this level.
9 Why are MI5 involved in case of "missing" child?  Does it have anything to do with National Security?  If not why did GA say when asked if we will ever find out what happened to Madeleine,  "Yes, we will, when MI5 opens the case files, we will find out" (In my words - haven't confirmed actual quote). What the hell has the case of a "missing"  3 year old child got to do with MI5 - was Madeleine one of their operatives?
10 Who authorised the continuing total disregard of large amounts of evidence not favouring McCanns?  e.g DNA or lack of, cadaver dogs, conflicts in statements etc.etc.
11 Who refused to authorise the access of PJ to Madeleines medical records and why? (Something to hide?)
12 Is there any DNA proof that the child we know as Madeleine Beth McCann is the child of GM and KM?  Has the DNA reference sample used as match for Madeleine's DNA been proved to be, from Madeleine B M, genuine, and from a secure source? (no interference from McCann camp). Otherwise any DNA matching done would be useless. I'm not happy that a pillow case supplied by GM, after his trip home, and supplied as genuine reference sample for Madeleines DNA could really be acceptable as such . The scenario around the DNA profiling/matching suggests something underhand. e.g. DNA lost, UK forensics closed suddenly etc.( Can't question anyone if the unit no longer exists.)
13 What was going on in the lives of McCanns before the fateful holiday?  Some parts of this case tend to suggest some forward planning and pre-arrangement. e.g. cleaning of apartment.
14 Why were photos provided not on original media or in original cameras. All photos could easily be subjected (and were subjected) to various types of interference and are therefore useless until PROVED genuine originals. Even if looking for missing Madeleine why would the McCanns not do everything in their power to find her? Why not make all holiday photos available in original cameras on original media - not 5 colour holiday shots and others in unuseable charcoal effect black and white and possibly old photos. (something to hide again?) Why 3 week delay for "Last photo"?
15 Who decided on the choice of PR, detective and other agencies of dubious repute. Was it the McCanns, Clarence Mitchell or someone else. Given that many involved in these choices have turned out to be criminals its important we know who chose them and why. They were paid from Find Madeleine Fund so surely the public that donated to the fund should expect proper oversight of their donated money. Are there different requirements for the operation of a charity fund and a business charity fund by which the directors could spend money without due regard to the integrity of those who they were employing? Thousands of £s wasted on achieving nothing. Who are the auditors - "McCann's fund" should have a proper independent audit.
16 Who authorised operation Grange to spend £11million or more on achieving nothing. What the hell did they do that cost that much but achieved so little? Was it digging up Portugal to "find" Madeleine. More diversion.
17 Why have the SS.(Social Services - Not The Gestapo - I think there's a difference!!!) not taken the Twins under their wing. Who is stopping them - look what happened to this parent. Link here :- [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  (More evidence of special treatment for McCanns!!!).
Where these and other big questions have not been satisfactorily answered then they should now be investigated by a reputable independent agency that can not be influenced by any of the players in this tragedy, or their money and power.  Additionally we really could do with someone among "those in the know" whose conscience wins out and causes them to blow the whistle. A second coming of "Snowdon" type event maybe, by someone who already knows who belongs to the hidden gang of power.  I live in hope!!!!!  The powerful people behind this need to be identified. I feel it's not just down to the McCanns alone and it's possible they may eventually be "sacrificed" to save the other criminals. I don't have any sympathy for them but we must not be diverted towards the persecution of the McCanns in order to allow the hidden others to escape. There is probably something very nasty underlying all this and we need to know what and who it is so we can prevent another child from suffering a similar fate. You only need to look at the facts we do know to understand why forums like this one have become so important. Notice how the opposition squirms each time Richard D Hall produces the next batch of films or someone on this forum gets close to the truth. Oh and by the way CM prince of PR mentioned while down under that his Monitors are monitoring the internet etc. Would that be GCHQ/MI5/MI6 then?  There is a large framework of irrational protection and mis-direction surrounding the McCanns that needs to be exposed in addition to the original actions of the McCanns. Finally there is one big question that really bothers me and all rational thinking "ordinary people" (as GM refers to us). WHY DID THIS HAPPEN TO AN INNOCENT 3yr OLD CHILD?
                                                                              Don't forget :-     THE TRUTH IS STILL OUT THERE   (The X Files).
Errors and Omissions apologised for in advance.

pendragon2007 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Any moment I'm expecting a "Prince of PR" Carrie M press release stating, Madeleine has been sighted chatting to Elvis and Lord Lucan in a supermarket, in another attempt to force us to believe Madeleine is alive and so proves the McCann's original "Abduction Theory".  I  am going to be very careful about feeling too excited about the latest batch of revelations. We have the success of Goncalo Amaral's win. We've had the Prince of PR - CM down under on - how to put your foot in your mouth without really trying. ("Holiday Inn" ???  Really !!!!).  We have the TV interview of GA in Portugal with some interesting revelations. We have the McCanns dancing the twist to try and perform damage limitation while they work out who to sue next and where to get the money from, and the Sun exposure of the secret that wasn't. Given the McCann camp's main focus since that 2007 holiday is to divert attention away from anything that gets anywhere near the truth, I believe great care needs to be exercised to make sure we are not diverted yet again. Currently some older theories, and some new ones, have been brought into focus. These remind us once again that some more crucial questions badly need answers. It needs to be remembered that once the riddle of what really happened to Madeleine has been solved and diversion tactics move away from "finding" her, then we need a big focus of attention on the areas from which we were, and still are, being diverted - i.e. the large framework of people who were/are the hidden decision makers behind the McCann facade.
For Example -  and these aint all by a long way :-
1 Who authorised the sending of high level VIPs from Govt.and Business in the very first days - and who paid for them?
2 Who authorised set up of Madeleine fund and why was it set up as a Company when getting donations from the public? (The fund seemed to be a bigger priority to the McCanns than finding Madeleine.)
3 Why were KM and GM allowed to be directors of this company and restrict useage to "finding" Madeleine until mortgage needed paying etc? (Conflict of interest if they eventually are PROVED to be involved - but surely applies if they were/are arguidos/suspects.)
4 Who authorised sending UK police to Pd Luz and why? and Who decided PJ could not handle the investigation perfectly well? - GA's recent success has shown that they could.
5 Who authorised the UK police in Pd Luz to interfere with PJ investigation?
6 Who told UK press that PJ were incompetent and how would they know this?
7 Who authorised the UK police/Gov/McCanns to require GAs removal from the case and/or who in PJ seniors authorised/allowed this and why?
8 Who authorised the McCanns superior level of existence and protection that is not accorded to "normal" people like you and me?  e.g. April Jones parents never received any support at this level.
9 Why are MI5 involved in case of "missing" child?  Does it have anything to do with National Security?  If not why did GA say when asked if we will ever find out what happened to Madeleine,  "Yes, we will, when MI5 opens the case files, we will find out" (In my words - haven't confirmed actual quote). What the hell has the case of a "missing"  3 year old child got to do with MI5 - was Madeleine one of their operatives?
10 Who authorised the continuing total disregard of large amounts of evidence not favouring McCanns?  e.g DNA or lack of, cadaver dogs, conflicts in statements etc.etc.
11 Who refused to authorise the access of PJ to Madeleines medical records and why? (Something to hide?)
12 Is there any DNA proof that the child we know as Madeleine Beth McCann is the child of GM and KM?  Has the DNA reference sample used as match for Madeleine's DNA been proved to be, from Madeleine B M, genuine, and from a secure source? (no interference from McCann camp). Otherwise any DNA matching done would be useless. I'm not happy that a pillow case supplied by GM, after his trip home, and supplied as genuine reference sample for Madeleines DNA could really be acceptable as such . The scenario around the DNA profiling/matching suggests something underhand. e.g. DNA lost, UK forensics closed suddenly etc.( Can't question anyone if the unit no longer exists.)
13 What was going on in the lives of McCanns before the fateful holiday?  Some parts of this case tend to suggest some forward planning and pre-arrangement. e.g. cleaning of apartment.
14 Why were photos provided not on original media or in original cameras. All photos could easily be subjected (and were subjected) to various types of interference and are therefore useless until PROVED genuine originals. Even if looking for missing Madeleine why would the McCanns not do everything in their power to find her? Why not make all holiday photos available in original cameras on original media - not 5 colour holiday shots and others in unuseable charcoal effect black and white and possibly old photos. (something to hide again?) Why 3 week delay for "Last photo"?
15 Who decided on the choice of PR, detective and other agencies of dubious repute. Was it the McCanns, Clarence Mitchell or someone else. Given that many involved in these choices have turned out to be criminals its important we know who chose them and why. They were paid from Find Madeleine Fund so surely the public that donated to the fund should expect proper oversight of their donated money. Are there different requirements for the operation of a charity fund and a business charity fund by which the directors could spend money without due regard to the integrity of those who they were employing? Thousands of £s wasted on achieving nothing. Who are the auditors - "McCann's fund" should have a proper independent audit.
16 Who authorised operation Grange to spend £11million or more on achieving nothing. What the hell did they do that cost that much but achieved so little? Was it digging up Portugal to "find" Madeleine. More diversion.
17 Why have the SS.(Social Services - Not The Gestapo - I think there's a difference!!!) not taken the Twins under their wing. Who is stopping them - look what happened to this parent. Link here :- [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  (More evidence of special treatment for McCanns!!!).
Where these and other big questions have not been satisfactorily answered then they should now be investigated by a reputable independent agency that can not be influenced by any of the players in this tragedy, or their money and power.  Additionally we really could do with someone among "those in the know" whose conscience wins out and causes them to blow the whistle. A second coming of "Snowdon" type event maybe, by someone who already knows who belongs to the hidden gang of power.  I live in hope!!!!!  The powerful people behind this need to be identified. I feel it's not just down to the McCanns alone and it's possible they may eventually be "sacrificed" to save the other criminals. I don't have any sympathy for them but we must not be diverted towards the persecution of the McCanns in order to allow the hidden others to escape. There is probably something very nasty underlying all this and we need to know what and who it is so we can prevent another child from suffering a similar fate. You only need to look at the facts we do know to understand why forums like this one have become so important. Notice how the opposition squirms each time Richard D Hall produces the next batch of films or someone on this forum gets close to the truth. Oh and by the way CM prince of PR mentioned while down under that his Monitors are monitoring the internet etc. Would that be GCHQ/MI5/MI6 then?  There is a large framework of irrational protection and mis-direction surrounding the McCanns that needs to be exposed in addition to the original actions of the McCanns. Finally there is one big question that really bothers me and all rational thinking "ordinary people" (as GM refers to us). WHY DID THIS HAPPEN TO AN INNOCENT 3yr OLD CHILD?
                                                                              Don't forget :-     THE TRUTH IS STILL OUT THERE   (The X Files).
Errors and Omissions apologised for in advance.

This has to be the most outstanding post I've seen in a long time.

pendragon2007 wrote:
...

Where these and other big questions have not been satisfactorily answered then they should now be investigated by a reputable independent agency that can not be influenced by any of the players in this tragedy, or their money and power. 

What an excellent set of questions. If only there was a £12m kitty and 29 trained detectives to find out the answers...

As for any of the questions being answered, I fear there is no chance. IMO, this entire saga is now in its final stages. The intended whitewash has been a disaster and is now working AGAINST the McCanns / SY.  The longer it goes, and the more money spent, the more it becomes clear that there never was an abductor, despite these extraordinary efforts to find (or invent) one.

And now instead of Amaral being discredited in court - here he is vindicated; his primary theory published in full as part of the Appeal Judgement.  

What now?   Will someone step forward and answer all your questions?  I'm afraid not.   I do agree about a distraction though.  If they fail at the Supreme Court / ECHR / suing anyone who has the book, then I think we will see a concerted and vicious smear campaign waged against Amaral.  They have not been able to silence his book - but they still have the ability to discredit him (in the UK MSM at least).   Right now, I think that's all they have left.

When does GA get access to his assets? Because honestly if I was him, I would immediately hire personal protection. The powers that be now want this case entirely out of sight and out of mind, and GA finding his voice again is going to be a huge concern to those who have orchestrated this whitewash

I don't think anything will happen to him.

He has stated previously that should anything untoward befall him then his family will carry on his fight.  

He is a canny one and I believe he will definitely be left standing proudly with his family at the end of all  of this.

I think that as a grand finale there will be a final unmasking of some pock marked villain who would have been hiding in the stairwell, shadows, shop doorway or similar who a new witness saw but didn't think to mention it.  There will be a furore of imminent arrests, digs and so on but it will all fizzle out like all the rest of the 'breakthroughs. '  Leaving really only one line of enquiry to be pursued.

After my first post on DIVERSION AHEAD at 09:20 on 26 April 2016 just 20 minutes later I posted - "BBC Radio 4 10am, 26 Apr 2016 - News just announced >> UK Police to close Madeleine investigation soon - if no new evidence emerges". I had just listened to the News on BBC Radio 4.  Well the CM report I jokingly mentioned  in my first post on DIVERSION didn't happen but make no mistake the DIVERSION AHEAD was still there in the guise of Sir B.H.H. (Not seen a sign of CM -probably changing his underwear).  Absolutely nothing appears changed in the SY focus on the abduction of Madeleine theory.  They have just one line of enquiry left (which they can't tell us about)  before they all go home. SY might just as well have said - Well we may re-open the case if other evidence comes along and as long as no one tells us Madeleine has not been abducted -  but we will certainly not re-open it if something else happened and you find out who dunnit.(That would be ignoring our stated objective and we must not let the truth get in the way of achieving our objective). Given the mountains of evidence they have disregarded, just one very topical word springs to mind - Hillsborough.  It's a pity the Truth for Madeleine supporters have still not been listened to in the same way as the families of victims in the Hillsborough disaster - eventually. But then the authorisation for the Madeleine DIVERSION/cover-up appears to originate from the highest levels of our society and it may be difficult to pin it on one of their minions without giving the game away. I wonder who has the power to instruct the FCO, SY, possibly MI5,  the PJ and the PR/Press to only consider Madeleine as abducted to the point when people lower in the pecking order, and closer to the facts, are feeling very disturbed about what they are being asked to do. As mentioned in other posts I worry that we may have a few David Kellys if things progress too far towards the truth. What on earth needs this level of DIVERSION/cover-up?  Sadly I am dubious that we are getting any closer to an answer and it looks as if any lingering hope remains in the hands of the PJ with GAs evidence at last being treated as important. (Another change of underwear for CM and maybe some others). I await the next DIVERSION AHEAD!
                                                                                  Dont forget :-     THE TRUTH IS STILL OUT THERE   (The X Files).
Errors and Omissions apologised for in advance.