Sonia Poulton on Murdoch's SKY News AGAIN - today (4 April 2015)

aiyoyo wrote:

Verdi wrote:

snook wrote:Hutton is convinced you, Verdi and Tony are one and the same.

In less than twelve hours l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun also becomes a sock puppet - again!  Just shows the weak minds of these people who believe, because you support a particular person/theory/opinion, that you are all one.

If you can't come up with a better form of attack than such a childishly feeble chant, it's time to pack your bags and go back home.  Just like the McCanns did when they found themselves up against the wall.  This vicious woman has long exceeded her shelf life.

My observation is: it's not so much because you support TB that you are all one.
I don't support any one particular person blindly, I support principles.
Rather, if you dare speak negatively about them, you must be TB.  They refused to believe the critiquing of them may have nothing to do with support for TB, but rather the critiquing of them was purely on their appalling behavior.

A forum that allows members to promote the idea that any and everyone here that speaks up against them is sock of TB is rather pathetic. A blogger that constantly needs to put down TB to big herself and to attract people to her blog is beyond pathetic.

Actually that malicious woman puts herself in a glasshouse and it's quite an entertaining spectators sport to watch her self combust.  The unbelievable thing is none of her valued internet/forum friends urged her to restrain, instead by sticking up for her regardless they are supporting her route to self destruction.

Can't disagree with that sentiment, most likely the reason I keep going back for more.  Although can't deny I do sometimes get totally exasperated by her hypocritical nonsensical musings.  She really does talk out the of the rear portion of her anatomy - you know, the one she invites all and sundry to kiss !?!  

sallypelt wrote:

TMH wrote:Hmmmm Hutton only publishes certain comments on her blog then? I wrote that I'd rather listen to TB than a blogger who sells non-stories to the Scum newspaper and she hasn't allowed it on her blog although she has published others after.

And to think she left this forum when she threw her toys out of her pram, when she accused the admins of stifling freedom of speech.  She then set up her “unbound” blog where people could say what they wanted without censorship, or so she claimed. This is yet another glaring case of hypocrisy.  The woman is crazy. Maybe we should cut her some slack and ignore her. After all, one wouldn’t go into a mental institution and argue with the patients………..would one?  

Despite what she thinks sallypelt, I've long since given up posting comments on her blog.  Slightest innocuous criticism and she declines to publish, why waste valuable time.

Verdi wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:

Verdi wrote:

snook wrote:Hutton is convinced you, Verdi and Tony are one and the same.

In less than twelve hours l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun also becomes a sock puppet - again!  Just shows the weak minds of these people who believe, because you support a particular person/theory/opinion, that you are all one.

If you can't come up with a better form of attack than such a childishly feeble chant, it's time to pack your bags and go back home.  Just like the McCanns did when they found themselves up against the wall.  This vicious woman has long exceeded her shelf life.

My observation is: it's not so much because you support TB that you are all one.
I don't support any one particular person blindly, I support principles.
Rather, if you dare speak negatively about them, you must be TB.  They refused to believe the critiquing of them may have nothing to do with support for TB, but rather the critiquing of them was purely on their appalling behavior.

A forum that allows members to promote the idea that any and everyone here that speaks up against them is sock of TB is rather pathetic. A blogger that constantly needs to put down TB to big herself and to attract people to her blog is beyond pathetic.

Actually that malicious woman puts herself in a glasshouse and it's quite an entertaining spectators sport to watch her self combust.  The unbelievable thing is none of her valued internet/forum friends urged her to restrain, instead by sticking up for her regardless they are supporting her route to self destruction.

Can't disagree with that sentiment, most likely the reason I keep going back for more.  Although can't deny I do sometimes get totally exasperated by her hypocritical nonsensical musings.  She really does talk out the of the rear portion of her anatomy - you know, the one she invites all and sundry to kiss !?!  

I stop visiting that hell hole of hers long time ago.
But, whenever she made a total twat of herself, there are plenty commentaries around that one can easily gather she is up to her usual trademark writing - spreading lies, spouting venom on her dissenters, or self promoting. A leopard will never change its spots.

aiyoyo wrote:

Verdi wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:

Verdi wrote:

snook wrote:Hutton is convinced you, Verdi and Tony are one and the same.

In less than twelve hours l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun also becomes a sock puppet - again!  Just shows the weak minds of these people who believe, because you support a particular person/theory/opinion, that you are all one.

If you can't come up with a better form of attack than such a childishly feeble chant, it's time to pack your bags and go back home.  Just like the McCanns did when they found themselves up against the wall.  This vicious woman has long exceeded her shelf life.

My observation is: it's not so much because you support TB that you are all one.
I don't support any one particular person blindly, I support principles.
Rather, if you dare speak negatively about them, you must be TB.  They refused to believe the critiquing of them may have nothing to do with support for TB, but rather the critiquing of them was purely on their appalling behavior.

A forum that allows members to promote the idea that any and everyone here that speaks up against them is sock of TB is rather pathetic. A blogger that constantly needs to put down TB to big herself and to attract people to her blog is beyond pathetic.

Actually that malicious woman puts herself in a glasshouse and it's quite an entertaining spectators sport to watch her self combust.  The unbelievable thing is none of her valued internet/forum friends urged her to restrain, instead by sticking up for her regardless they are supporting her route to self destruction.

Can't disagree with that sentiment, most likely the reason I keep going back for more.  Although can't deny I do sometimes get totally exasperated by her hypocritical nonsensical musings.  She really does talk out the of the rear portion of her anatomy - you know, the one she invites all and sundry to kiss !?!  

I stop visiting that hell hole of hers long time ago.  
But, whenever she made a total twat of herself, there are plenty commentaries around that one can easily gather she is up to her usual trademark writing - spreading lies, spouting venom on her dissenters, or self promoting.  A leopard will never change its spots.

I also don't go there...or to MMM.

Why go to an empty well and come back with an empty bucket?

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:

Verdi wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:

Verdi wrote:

snook wrote:Hutton is convinced you, Verdi and Tony are one and the same.

In less than twelve hours l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun also becomes a sock puppet - again!  Just shows the weak minds of these people who believe, because you support a particular person/theory/opinion, that you are all one.

If you can't come up with a better form of attack than such a childishly feeble chant, it's time to pack your bags and go back home.  Just like the McCanns did when they found themselves up against the wall.  This vicious woman has long exceeded her shelf life.

My observation is: it's not so much because you support TB that you are all one.
I don't support any one particular person blindly, I support principles.
Rather, if you dare speak negatively about them, you must be TB.  They refused to believe the critiquing of them may have nothing to do with support for TB, but rather the critiquing of them was purely on their appalling behavior.

A forum that allows members to promote the idea that any and everyone here that speaks up against them is sock of TB is rather pathetic. A blogger that constantly needs to put down TB to big herself and to attract people to her blog is beyond pathetic.

Actually that malicious woman puts herself in a glasshouse and it's quite an entertaining spectators sport to watch her self combust.  The unbelievable thing is none of her valued internet/forum friends urged her to restrain, instead by sticking up for her regardless they are supporting her route to self destruction.

Can't disagree with that sentiment, most likely the reason I keep going back for more.  Although can't deny I do sometimes get totally exasperated by her hypocritical nonsensical musings.  She really does talk out the of the rear portion of her anatomy - you know, the one she invites all and sundry to kiss !?!  

I stop visiting that hell hole of hers long time ago.  
But, whenever she made a total twat of herself, there are plenty commentaries around that one can easily gather she is up to her usual trademark writing - spreading lies, spouting venom on her dissenters, or self promoting.  A leopard will never change its spots.

I also don't go there...or to MMM.

Why go to an empty well and come back with an empty bucket?

Wise, you are not missing out on anything.

I visit MMM from time to time, as to be fair, some posters there are still sensible and decent.

The crying shame is that the forum owner there is such a hypocrite - not putting her money where her mouth is, doing the exact opposites of what she preached!

aiyoyo wrote:

Verdi wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:

Verdi wrote:

snook wrote:Hutton is convinced you, Verdi and Tony are one and the same.

In less than twelve hours l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun also becomes a sock puppet - again!  Just shows the weak minds of these people who believe, because you support a particular person/theory/opinion, that you are all one.

If you can't come up with a better form of attack than such a childishly feeble chant, it's time to pack your bags and go back home.  Just like the McCanns did when they found themselves up against the wall.  This vicious woman has long exceeded her shelf life.

My observation is: it's not so much because you support TB that you are all one.
I don't support any one particular person blindly, I support principles.
Rather, if you dare speak negatively about them, you must be TB.  They refused to believe the critiquing of them may have nothing to do with support for TB, but rather the critiquing of them was purely on their appalling behavior.

A forum that allows members to promote the idea that any and everyone here that speaks up against them is sock of TB is rather pathetic. A blogger that constantly needs to put down TB to big herself and to attract people to her blog is beyond pathetic.

Actually that malicious woman puts herself in a glasshouse and it's quite an entertaining spectators sport to watch her self combust.  The unbelievable thing is none of her valued internet/forum friends urged her to restrain, instead by sticking up for her regardless they are supporting her route to self destruction.

Can't disagree with that sentiment, most likely the reason I keep going back for more.  Although can't deny I do sometimes get totally exasperated by her hypocritical nonsensical musings.  She really does talk out the of the rear portion of her anatomy - you know, the one she invites all and sundry to kiss !?!  

I stop visiting that hell hole of hers long time ago.  
But, whenever she made a total twat of herself, there are plenty commentaries around that one can easily gather she is up to her usual trademark writing - spreading lies, spouting venom on her dissenters, or self promoting.  A leopard will never change its spots.

Wise decision, guess I'm just naturally curious - not always to my advantage I might add.

I think what infuriates me more than anything about the blog and the associated link (the other place) is the downright hypocrisy of it all.  The latest is a declaration that this forum has nothing better to discuss than Cristobell and the candyflossery, such is the vindictive nature of most CMOMM members.  Don't they even read what's written by their own network?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Verdi wrote:

Wise decision, guess I'm just naturally curious - not always to my advantage I might add.

I think what infuriates me more than anything about the blog and the associated link (the other place) is the downright hypocrisy of it all.  The latest is a declaration that this forum has nothing better to discuss than Cristobell and the candyflossery, such is the vindictive nature of most CMOMM members.  Don't they even read what's written by their own network?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

That's not correct.  I don't agree with that.
I don't see people here initiating discussion of Hutton and Candybandy forum without good valid reasons.   It is their denigration of CMoMM and members here that invoked discussions of them.
It's our prerogative to object to their disgraceful behavior of stalking this place for denigration.

If they don't like this place or the threads here why not keep away?
Or, give it a wide berth so says their Mod.....
Or, be adults about it so says their owner...read at your own will or not...etc...

What irks me is candy defending her hypocrisy, saying she was only providing choices to her members, but whether they read or not, it's up to them ... and have opinions (or not presumably, also up to them) ... but when members here exercise their rights to those things she preached - read what and from where we chose (without necessarily having to be given links to or pointed to it as if we are complete idiots) and freely express our opinions at will, members here are immediately labelled socks of TB in nearly every opening line by the usual suspects there.  

The denigration of this forum happening right under her nose has been carrying on since the outset without her telling making a noise, but when it is time people dished it back to them she bitches about it.  It's such a blatant display of can dish it but can't take it.

It's ludicrous that she expects members here to just let her members gossip and denigrate and not to react.  It is hypocrisy of the highest order.  No wonder they won't and can't look into the mirror about what's said in their network, for fear the mirror would crack.

In her naiveness, she doesn't realise it's her atrocious hypocrisy that is dragging her forum into mud.  No outside opinion can ever achieve that, or destroy her forum, it's the lack of decorum from within that can bring it down in people's eyes.  When they have nothing better or constructive to contribute, they gossip about TB and CMoMM and then in the same breath say we are wishing to shut them down.  If that is not so laughable you would cry at their ignorance.

All this inter-fora bickering/bitching is pathetic quite honestly. It has nothing to do with the subject at hand and is a complete waste of time doing it. And plays right into the hands of those that don't want this case solved.

I post on both forums and will continue to do so. Why there is more "discussion" about which forum is best or what have you than about finding out what happened to Madeleine I'll never understand...

I will have nothing to do with that forum. It promotes a blog by someone who doesn't know (or care it would seem) what the truth is!
I would feel ashamed in fact to be associated with it.

The vileness of comments with naming (surely libellous) sickens me to the core when we are supposed to be here for the truth of what happened to a child.

The history alone of how that forum became shows the low (if existing at all) baseline of, I shall call it, moral fibre.

They have shown up their true worth themselves. They should only blame themselves.

Glory seekers I call those who feel the need to promote vileness in order to promote themselves.

TheTruthWillOut wrote:All this inter-fora bickering/bitching is pathetic quite honestly. It has nothing to do with the subject at hand and is a complete waste of time doing it. And plays right into the hands of those that don't want this case solved.

I post on both forums and will continue to do so. Why there is more "discussion" about which forum is best or what have you than about finding out what happened to Madeleine I'll never understand...

I share your sentiment that the inter-fora feud of words is waste of time, has absolutely zilch to do with Madeleine, and totally unnecessary.  

Since you are a member there surely you've seen the incessant gossips there about this place, am I right?  How come I don't see you expressing your disapproval there....just asking?

You know right, that the forum owner and mod there as well as the usual suspects constantly watch this forum and then gossip about it, am I right?  

You also know right, that they started it (the gossips I mean) and have been going at it ceaselessly, always picking on this forum and disapproving of everything here - from the characters here (TB being their constant focus and target), to the threads they don't like, to how this place is run, and even rejuvenation of threads got criticized.  What has any of those things they gossip about got to do with finding out what happened to Madeleine?  Did you object to them?  If not, why not - since those have absolutely nothing to do with finding out what happened to Madeleine?  

Incidentally, while I am at it, I might as well ask about why their constant promoting of a malicious blogger (proven liar) and her blog, what has that got to do with finding out what happened to Madeleine?  Did you wonder?

In fact, the forum owner there encouraged her members to c&p posts from here to there just so they can mock and/or jump on them collectively if they wish; this does not happen here, but I haven't noticed you expressing your disapproval of that over there or urging them to restrain from their disgraceful behavior, am I right?

Oh, I totally agree with you, the mocking is VERY unpleasant, and has been going on constantly on that side since inception, thus my popping in to object to them (something I had restrained from until now, in case you haven't noticed) so how is telling this side to refrain going to stop the other side from indulging in their disgusting gossip hobby, may I ask?

The playing into the hands of whoever and what not does not wash anymore IMO since fora are so fragmented and dispersed, but some people simply enjoy gossip, setting uponTB and CMoMM.  

Had you raised your objection there over their disgraceful behavior, to be fair to this forum, I would have nothing to say to you.  Not being personal, my remarks would be the same to anyone, no matter who broaches this from the angle you did.  

And this has got nothing to do with which forum is best or what not, and for that matter nothing to do with supporting TB (as those over there seem to think and excuse to) every time their distasteful behavior comes under the spotlight.  Since they engage in gossips about this place, have a pop at this forum and members here, it's par for the course isn't it when members here retaliate?  At least be fair, not much to ask is it?

hentie wrote:I will have nothing to do with that forum. It promotes a blog by someone who doesn't know (or care it would seem) what the truth is!
I would feel ashamed in fact to be associated with it.

The vileness of comments with naming (surely libellous) sickens me to the core when we are supposed to be here for the truth of what happened to a child.

The history alone of how that forum became shows the low (if existing at all) baseline of, I shall call it, moral fibre.

They have shown up their true worth themselves. They should only blame themselves.

Glory seekers I call those who feel the need to promote vileness in order to promote themselves.

Quite, you expressed it better than me.

They knew that malicious woman is sick. How can they not? They were so frightened of her scary meltdown threatening to do herself in, that they told their members to zip up where that mad woman is concerned, yet they continue to promote that sick woman's blog filled with malicious ranting and libeling of a certain member here.

You are right, they have shown their true worth, and the irony is they can't see that they brought it on themselves?

You have to wonder if their low moral fibre is linked to their personal hatred of TB and hence propping up that woman's vicious attacks on TB is gratifying to them.

aiyoyo I agree with your previous longer post.

The so called 'author' criticised Richard D Hall's excellent first set of DVD's on Twitter. I had words with her then as her petulant criticisms were not helpful at all to promoting a set of factual DVD's that would. and have, shown so many people the real elements of the case.
I am sure the reason Tony bears the brunt of so much vileness is jealousy! She, and others are jealous of his success in being the person who has researched endlessly to bring the discrepancies to public knowledge.

She will criticise anyone she feels is getting more attention than her!

Her blog replies is heavily moderated by HER. Fact as I failed to get my reply posted. Too near the truth for her liking I guess!

Another one who can dish it out in a disgusting manner but can't deal with the truth put to her in even a moderate way.

Maybe Ms.Hutton could have a thread of her own. Why is this debate about Hutton on Sonia's thread? They aren't interchangeable. They are individuals. Not joined at the hip. 
Just a suggestion.

@slave. It seems that Poulton is or at least was encouraging Hutton. Wasn't it her who launched the attack on Tony regarding his payments to CR?  From what I see on various forums and blogs Ms Poulton likes to issue the bullets for others to fire. In Hutton she has found the perfect stooge.

aiyoyo wrote:

lj wrote:


Silly me, I'm rather aligned with Tony than with other "McCann sceptics". 
Finally I am a minority (according to this woman).

Can I get some affirmative action?

:drunken:

Minority? vs what though?  A troll and her imaginary worldwide internet friends?

snippet of CB interview with the Sun
"I’d gone from this lonely, isolated existence to suddenly having this huge arena of friends from all around the world.
“We had this hard-core group, all women much like myself – similar age, backgrounds. We formed a friendship."

Surely you wouldn't want to in that hard-core group majority?  

Just joking that the majority of the "anti" McCanns were not like Tony. 

Believe me I was one of the first here to smell her out here but, since everyone was still lauding her, I just shut up. As far as MMM goes: I looked there once and have since lost the link. Ah Freud how right he was.

hentie wrote:aiyoyo I agree with your previous longer post.

The so called 'author' criticised Richard D Hall's excellent first set of DVD's on Twitter. I had words with her then as her petulant criticisms were not helpful at all to promoting a set of factual DVD's that would. and have, shown so many people the real elements of the case.
I am sure the reason Tony bears the brunt of so much vileness is jealousy! She, and others are jealous of his success in being the person who has researched endlessly to bring the discrepancies to public knowledge.

She will criticise anyone she feels is getting more attention than her!

Her blog replies is heavily moderated by HER. Fact as I failed to get my reply posted. Too near the truth for her liking I guess!

Another one who can dish it out in a disgusting manner but can't deal with the truth put to her in even a moderate way.

She seems hell bent on destroying everybody's work that no one is spared her acid tongue, not even Richard D Hall, and he hasn't done anything to her to incur her wrath. Even say if she found flaws in his presentation or whatever I don't understand her need to put down the seriously good work of Richard Hall when she has done f... all for the case, except to run off her mouth all over the places.

Jealously is just one element of an unstable person unreasonable behavior. What she needs is serious psychiatric help.

lj wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:

lj wrote:


Silly me, I'm rather aligned with Tony than with other "McCann sceptics". 
Finally I am a minority (according to this woman).

Can I get some affirmative action?

:drunken:

Minority? vs what though?  A troll and her imaginary worldwide internet friends?

snippet of CB interview with the Sun
"I’d gone from this lonely, isolated existence to suddenly having this huge arena of friends from all around the world.
“We had this hard-core group, all women much like myself – similar age, backgrounds. We formed a friendship."

Surely you wouldn't want to in that hard-core group majority?  

Just joking that the majority of the "anti" McCanns were not like Tony. 

Believe me I was one of the first here to smell her out here but, since everyone was still lauding her, I just shut up. As far as MMM goes: I looked there once and have since lost the link. Ah Freud how right he was.

Quite a few of us here sussed her out from the get go.
The ex-mod lauding her here still has her face too close to Hutton's backside.
Yeap, you are right MMM isn't worth time of the day.

aiyoyo wrote:

hentie wrote:aiyoyo I agree with your previous longer post.

The so called 'author' criticised Richard D Hall's excellent first set of DVD's on Twitter. I had words with her then as her petulant criticisms were not helpful at all to promoting a set of factual DVD's that would. and have, shown so many people the real elements of the case.
I am sure the reason Tony bears the brunt of so much vileness is jealousy! She, and others are jealous of his success in being the person who has researched endlessly to bring the discrepancies to public knowledge.

She will criticise anyone she feels is getting more attention than her!

Her blog replies is heavily moderated by HER. Fact as I failed to get my reply posted. Too near the truth for her liking I guess!

Another one who can dish it out in a disgusting manner but can't deal with the truth put to her in even a moderate way.

She seems hell bent on destroying everybody's work that no one is spared her acid tongue, not even Richard D Hall, and he hasn't done anything to her to incur her wrath.  Even say if she found flaws in his presentation or whatever I don't understand her need to put down the seriously good work of Richard Hall when she has done f... all for the case, except to run off her mouth all over the places.

Jealously is just one element of an unstable person unreasonable behavior.  What she needs is serious psychiatric help.  

Absolutely right! If she has any genuine friends they should put her on the right track to get the help she needs.

Just as in the last episode/drama there is the mention of suicide, being bi-polar etc.

There is also the usual expected tripe and lies but the underlying response is suicide and being bi-polar.

Back to the Sun interview now...the interview arranged by Sonia Poulton which showcased the bi-polar, suicidal, bitch tendencies of anyone who is interested in the case of Madeleine McCann and questions the official line. Remember this was on the back of the death of Brenda Leyland and Sonia does seem to work increasingly more on Murdoch programmes doesn't she?

Poulton has gone missing from Twitter. No longer is Poulton attacking Jim Gamble on Twitter - remember those spats?. There was a little snippet of Poulton showing up to 'interview/tackle' Clarence Mitchell. Nothing came of it - it was hyped up as a teaser and released for public consumption. There was also Poulton showing up at the McCann's door with a camera crew - lots of tweeting about that. There was Poulton showing up at the Coroner's Court and harrassing a member of the public who attended. Lots and lots of tweeting about that. Whoever that woman was, she left by a different exit. Nothing since.

As for Cristobell, she thrives on creating chaos wherever she goes for reason she chooses to reveal at the time to justify things. This latest malarkey is just another repeat of her predictable forumula.

Hutton and Poulton see themselves as victims on the internet. Let me just say, neither of them would turn a hair on their head at being vicious to anyone. There have been threats of exposing people's identities and having people's IP addresses looked into. None of it has anything to do with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann but has an awful lot to do with the protagonists. Hutton used CMoMM to promote her blog, created mayhem, left and continues to create mayhem. Candyfloss is left holding a bi-polar baby with suicidal tendencies now - not that I feel any sympathy for MMM.

As someone who doesn't bake cakes (shops sell them) I'm tempted to get out a recipe book to bake a celebratory cake for the Poulton documentary - the documentary that I truly believe has been a fact finding mission, is not a final production and is on sale to the mainstream media who can dissect it as and how they wish.

Phew, that's a long post.

Not one bit surprised she is using her mental health condition card to play the victim (again). Seems a recurring theme when the going gets tough for her, even though she left herself wide open.

What was she trying to prove and who to though?
At most it is just to a bunch of strangers on internet that she is justifying her sad existence to. How pathetic is that that she feels the need to bank on her mental health condition to solicit pity and buy sympathy votes.  At the same time she expects people just to ignore her recurring malevolent behavior by using her manic depressive, bi-polar conditions as excuse.  So, why is she messing about on the internet posting up tripe and lies if her mental condition is so serious. I just don't get it why she is attaching herself to Madeleine case to post up all this malicious gibberish when she should be under surveillance on controlled internet use if she is bi-polar and can't help her violent mood swing?  Madeleine is just a case she uses to showcase herself.  Pathetic really. There is no excuse for her malice, bi polar or not.

Not surprised SP has gone AWOL either.  After those failed promises to her unquestioning followers, and spats with CM et al, bragging she will show them all her worth, and then nothing materializes. What a massive lost of face not to mention credibility. No wonder she's avoiding twitter.  Even her stooge that self appoint mouthpiece Hutton is keeping shtumm.  I really did hope her film will be given air time, but judging by their silence, it's not realistic hope.

@ Aquila,
Your baking skills will have to come up with a pokementary-design celebratory cake to celebrate the demise of the great future of an epic film err journalist I mean.

Candyfloss isn't left in any situation, she has a choice, she seems to enjoy nursing a bi-polar viper, good of her to mother CB, and good for CB they have each other and deservedly so.

If nothing else she's certainly brought out the best in you guys, straight for the jugular - excellent posts!  I'm a mere fledgling that can't recall the first encounter with the name Cristobell but I do remember the fuss she made when she decided to leave this forum.  The lie about being banned, flying in the face of all who knew otherwise, was despicable, deceitful and totally out of order and that was just for starters.  As is her continued attack against this forum generally, Tony in particular and many other members - no doubt some whose support she coveted in the past.

I distinctly remember at some stage after her latest kindle booklet 'the reluctant dieters guide ...' was plugged, she said that her new found regime had cured her manic depression, as she prefers to call it.  At the time I posted a comment on her blog questioning the claim which she declined to publish - since then all reference to this miracle cure has been deleted.  She must have swiftly realized that she could no longer use it to her advantage if cured !?!

As an aside, earlier today in reply to someone on her blog she says:  "Bennett, like myself is active in the case of missing Madeleine McCann, we put ourselves 'out there',..." 



Active in the case of missing Madeleine McCann?  I can't say I've ever seen any evidence of that - I'm sure someone better acquainted with her antics will correct me if wrong.

I don't believe for one minute Hutton is bi polar in the true clinical sense of the word. What she is is a nasty malevolent woman with a huge ego and overblown sense of her own ability. 

That she has a mental illness is not in question and, I'm no expert but I think she is a sociopath. Classic character traits. Loves herself. Loves being lauded and can't take the tiniest bit of criticism yet relishes belittling others and spreading downright lies. I've noticed she will not engage with anyone who tries to reason with her and resorts to insults even when caught out in a bare faced lie. 

So far I've seen her brag about having a masters in English.  Being officially one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK. A journalist.  Successful writer and now tells us her revolutionary diet book (. 99p on Amazon)  is being recommended by GPs. This last statement came a week or so after she blogged that she thought her book should be a standard in every doctors surgery. 

Her latest relentless attack on Tony, with ever increasing viciousness must have her screeching with delight. She now has all and sundry believing her assertion that he must be working for the Mccanns. What a vile excuse for a woman.

I think her brief acquaintance with Poulton has made her brave and that is why she has upped her attacks. Although she keeps saying 'wait & see' when asked about THE documentary I wouldn't be at all surprised if Poulton has cut her loose and slunk into a dark corner hoping we will forget about her promised 'work of art'.

She has served her purpose to Poulton,  that being I believe, to stir up dissent and make us look barking mad. Linking insanity and distrust of the Mccanns makes good copy for all those bored journalists out there working for the MSM.

I am even more convinced Poulton has been gathering evidence for a troll expose and her goading of Tony may have been a fishing expedition to push him into breaking the law. The pair have fooled so many, Poulton deliberately,  Hutton as her perfect stooge as she already has a penchant for being wicked.

Just been reading Hutton's comments from yesterday. Am I misinterpreting or has she let the cat out of the bag re Poulton's documentary?  
10. 47 I think, can't link at mo' but it goes along lines of (paraphrased)  ' haters using the excuse for attacking Kate & Gerry because they wanted justice for a child. They can't use this any more and are terrified that Sonia's film is going to expose them ' 

'they knew their odious behaviour was unacceptable to most people that's why they hid behind anonymity and are now paranoid and terrified of exposure'

Seems Hutton has forgotten she falls into the category of unacceptable behaviour as she so proudly bragged about in the The Sun.

If this groundbreaking piece is to uncover McCann or indeed their supporters why would 'antis' have a need to fear it?

snook wrote:I don't believe for one minute Hutton is bi polar in the true clinical sense of the word. What she is is a nasty malevolent woman with a huge ego and overblown sense of her own ability. 

That she has a mental illness is not in question and, I'm no expert but I think she is a sociopath. Classic character traits. Loves herself. Loves being lauded and can't take the tiniest bit of criticism yet relishes belittling others and spreading downright lies. I've noticed she will not engage with anyone who tries to reason with her and resorts to insults even when caught out in a bare faced lie. 

So far I've seen her brag about having a masters in English.  Being officially one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK. A journalist.  Successful writer and now tells us her revolutionary diet book (. 99p on Amazon)  is being recommended by GPs. This last statement came a week or so after she blogged that she thought her book should be a standard in every doctors surgery. 

Her latest relentless attack on Tony, with ever increasing viciousness must have her screeching with delight. She now has all and sundry believing her assertion that he must be working for the Mccanns. What a vile excuse for a woman.

I think her brief acquaintance with Poulton has made her brave and that is why she has upped her attacks. Although she keeps saying 'wait & see' when asked about THE documentary I wouldn't be at all surprised if Poulton has cut her loose and slunk into a dark corner hoping we will forget about her promised 'work of art'.

She has served her purpose to Poulton,  that being I believe, to stir up dissent and make us look barking mad. Linking insanity and distrust of the Mccanns makes good copy for all those bored journalists out there working for the MSM.

I am even more convinced Poulton has been gathering evidence for a troll expose and her goading of Tony may have been a fishing expedition to push him into breaking the law. The pair have fooled so many, Poulton deliberately,  Hutton as her perfect stooge as she already has a penchant for being wicked.

Very astute observations snooks - I applaud you! 

You did however omit to mention the honours degree in humanities, the life-long study of psychology, being a college lecturer, working with the disadvantaged and an assortment of other diverse attributes.

snook wrote:Just been reading Hutton's comments from yesterday. Am I misinterpreting or has she let the cat out of the bag re Poulton's documentary?  
10. 47 I think, can't link at mo' but it goes along lines of (paraphrased)  ' haters using the excuse for attacking Kate & Gerry because they wanted justice for a child. They can't use this any more and are terrified that Sonia's film is going to expose them ' 

'they knew their odious behaviour was unacceptable to most people that's why they hid behind anonymity and are now paranoid and terrified of exposure'

Seems Hutton has forgotten she falls into the category of unacceptable behaviour as she so proudly bragged about in the The Sun.

If this groundbreaking piece is to uncover McCann or indeed their supporters why would 'antis' have a need to fear it?

This is quite interesting in view of her protestations when she joined here. I once had the temerity to ask her what she meant by posting that she  didn't hate the McCanns and she didn't hate Maddie.

I asked her why on earth she'd think that anyone would  think she hates Maddie'. 

Reactions were much as usual.

But, in view of the amazing 'Pro' Poulton is going to unmask   zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz     ( sorry, fell asleep there, this acts faster than Mogadon)  and the above quoted post from Snook, food for thought.
Mind you, I've read the quotes several times and the logic escapes me whichever way you look at it, from the point of view of TM or any point of the compass.

What was that quote again from Kate McCann about wanting Goncalo Amaral to feel fear?   Surely Poulton/Cristobell wouldn't wish the same on us? Or worse, 'terrified?

If I recall correctly (can't be bothered to look it up but I do have a note of it) Cristobell called Kate McCann 'batshit crazy'.

It was the Mc's Aquila, not just KM:

'bat shit crazy McCanns'

Doug D wrote:It was the Mc's Aquila, not just KM:

'bat shit crazy McCanns'

Thanks. It says a lot really doesn't it.

snook wrote:I don't believe for one minute Hutton is bi polar in the true clinical sense of the word. What she is is a nasty malevolent woman with a huge ego and overblown sense of her own ability. 

That she has a mental illness is not in question and, I'm no expert but I think she is a sociopath. Classic character traits. Loves herself. Loves being lauded and can't take the tiniest bit of criticism yet relishes belittling others and spreading downright lies. I've noticed she will not engage with anyone who tries to reason with her and resorts to insults even when caught out in a bare faced lie. 

So far I've seen her brag about having a masters in English.  Being officially one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK. A journalist.  Successful writer and now tells us her revolutionary diet book (. 99p on Amazon)  is being recommended by GPs. This last statement came a week or so after she blogged that she thought her book should be a standard in every doctors surgery. 

Her latest relentless attack on Tony, with ever increasing viciousness must have her screeching with delight. She now has all and sundry believing her assertion that he must be working for the Mccanns. What a vile excuse for a woman.

I think her brief acquaintance with Poulton has made her brave and that is why she has upped her attacks. Although she keeps saying 'wait & see' when asked about THE documentary I wouldn't be at all surprised if Poulton has cut her loose and slunk into a dark corner hoping we will forget about her promised 'work of art'.

She has served her purpose to Poulton,  that being I believe, to stir up dissent and make us look barking mad. Linking insanity and distrust of the Mccanns makes good copy for all those bored journalists out there working for the MSM.

I am even more convinced Poulton has been gathering evidence for a troll expose and her goading of Tony may have been a fishing expedition to push him into breaking the law. The pair have fooled so many, Poulton deliberately,  Hutton as her perfect stooge as she already has a penchant for being wicked.

Yes, I think you've hit the nail on the head there snook, I've wondered in the past if that's the reason Tony is singled out by certain people.

There appears to be a small elite group lurking in the shadows trying to destroy,  thus silence, anyone who has genuinely tried to uncover the truth about MBM's disappearance and they all exhibit the same sociopathic traits.  They relentlessly denegrate the likes of this forum,Tony (of course), Joanne Morais, Hi-De-Ho, lazzeri, Richard D Hall - to name but a few.  They also never appear to criticise each other - unless of course we a talking 'one and the same'.

Apart from HR-H and Ms Poulton, I believe the blacksmith is one of the clique, as is the person that writes under the pseudonym nottextusa.  Whether it's just because they like the sound of their own voices or whether it's a concerted effort to protect the McCanns is a matter of conjecture.

SP appears on This Morning as "music journalist" 2 days ago:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]