Sonia Poulton Update

by Mo on 24.12.14 14:36

UPDATE on Sonia Poulton forthcoming documentary - Video on link below....

Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton 19m19 minutes ago
UPDATE: The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann #mccann #brendaleylandhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0P7uBP8B1I&feature=youtu.be …

by **PeterMac** on 24.12.14 14:42

Hope she doesn't get C-R'd before it comes out.
She says she is going to name names.

by jeanmonroe on 24.12.14 14:43

'BROWN' trousers time, for 'somebody'! laughat

Thx Mo.

NOT Matt O, are you? winkwink

by Joss on 24.12.14 14:47

Thanks for posting the info. Sounds promising & should make for interesting viewing.

by jeanmonroe on 24.12.14 14:51

@Joss wrote:Thanks for posting the info. Sounds promising & should make for interesting viewing.

Just click on my video post, Joss!

Like the song goes: 'So good I saved it TWICE'!

Now 'copying' winkwink

FIFTY already!

I'm sure it won't be 'whooshed'! laughat

Too late for THAT, methinks! winkwink

by pennylane on 24.12.14 14:54

@jeanmonroe wrote:

'BROWN' trousers time, for 'somebody'!

Keep telling it like it is, Sonia! Looking forward to your documentary. clapping1

by tiny on 24.12.14 14:55

naming names,

Sonia

by jeanmonroe on 24.12.14 15:17

"but it's very interesting, because with modern technology, we've quite legally and legitmately, we've been able to trace these people, who are sending quite awful smeary things about myself and my loved ones, so we will be going after them for this documentary because these people need to be revealed, we will also, we've also now traced somebody whose involved with the campaign, of maintaining the abduction theory. Somebody who was very prolific online and it's somebody who will SHOCK people, and we have traced that person, and THAT person, WILL be revealed in the documentary."

I didn't know AR was prolific 'online' maintaining the 'abduction' THEORY! laughat

Oh, wait.................... winkwink

'prolific online'? (MAINTAINING the 'abduction' THEORY)

thinking

Big JG?

Trouble with that is, 'THAT' wouldn't 'SHOCK' us, would it? winkwink

by jeanmonroe on 24.12.14 15:45

So, in 'sleuth' mode now:

The McCann 'shills' don't 'shock' us, at all!

So must be somebody 'higher' up, the McCann 'food chain'

We don't actually know that perhaps one or more of the McCann more PROLIFIC 'shills' are NOT actually 'family members', do we?

Not that THAT would 'shock' us!

Not KM herself or her mum, surely?

But even THAT wouldn't 'shock' us, would it.

No, it has to be 'somebody' not 'at the top' but pretty 'close' to 'the top', imo.

Someone like a "media monitor"?

thinking

Who's got most 'to lose' If the 'abduction' THEORY is NOT 'maintained'?

HAPPY 'SLEUTHING' CHRISTMAS, EVERYBODY!

by Mo on 24.12.14 16:03

Could it be the one and only MARTIN BRUNT!! big grin

by pennylane on 24.12.14 16:12

Jim Gamble is very prolific online!

by **PeterMac** on 24.12.14 16:16

@Mo wrote:Could it be the one and only MARTIN BRUNT!!

The same Brunt who told the world that there was a 100% DNA match in the car. The one who told the world in advance that Kate was going to be arrested
The one who LIED to Brenda Leyland in front of the entire world when he said the Dossier of Death was being considered by the CPS
That one ?

by jeanmonroe on 24.12.14 16:17

WHO'S got 'most' to 'lose' if 'abduction' THEORY is NOT 'maintained'?

thinking

A certain 'pink' hued person?

Conservative, well, THIS 'week' anyways, PPC and all 'that'?

by Mo on 24.12.14 16:33

@jeanmonroe wrote:

'BROWN' trousers time, for 'somebody'!

Thx Mo.

NOT Matt O, are you?

Hi Jeanmonroe - no I'm not Matt O (whoever he is). The name Mo is my real nickname. I joined in July and thoroughly enjoy reading everyone's posts - I can't really join in the debate because I'm not up to speed! smilie

by jeanmonroe on 24.12.14 16:57

Mo wrote:

"I can't really join in the debate because I'm not up to speed!"
---------------------------------------

I wrote:

I can really join in the debate because i am on 'speed'!

IT'S JUST 'BAN-TERRR'! MR 'watching' PLOD!

Well, you gotta be on 'something', dontcha?

Otherwise this 'case' would drive you 'crazy'!

Matt O (Matthew Oldfield) is one of the 'doctor's' on the holiday that Madeleine 'vanished' from!

Don't even 'try' to analyse HIS 'statements' or you will need to take something stronger than 'speed'! laughat

by aiyoyo on 25.12.14 12:13

People going to be surprised by the identity of this person when it's revealed?

CM ? JG? Can't be surely !

Might it be the porky pies singing scrawny turkey? That would be really shocking. In fact that would be criminal - imagine advocating making example of "troll" when she's the perpetrator of trolls. Or might be her fat ankle relation or one of her merry drinking buddies? I won't be surprised if this person turns out related or associated to the main two characters.

Where is she going to broadcast it though? Youtube or use on of the MSM outlets?
Can't imagine any MSM outlet would allow her the platform for that.

If she should be C-Red, then all the more it gives reason to complain in the MSM telling the public about how the McCanns pursue and persecute their critics and it might not be a bad thing as it comes to that. She might be sure her facts are correct if she is to stand a chance against retaliation from the McCanns.

by Latetothecase on 25.12.14 21:09

Justine maybe?

If she will talk about the docs left behind and the mysterious map, then that would make it unmissable imo.

Or more likely, O 'Donnell perhaps? She has written about it already after all, but hopefully it wouldn't just become a puff piece for her own stuff.

by Brian Griffin on 25.12.14 22:58

@Mo wrote:Could it be the one and only MARTIN BRUNT!!

Oh please let it be!

by Brian Griffin on 26.12.14 2:28

Watching this 'teaser' again, I am also wondering whether there might be some political angle at play. The documentary, according to Sonia, will not see the light of day until after the end of March. Hmm. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't there some important political event scheduled for May 2015, one in which a current political party in office might be falling over itself to 'do the right thing' to garner as much favour as possible. I may, of course, be joining dots that aren't really there.

In my opinion.

by aiyoyo on 26.12.14 8:36

@Brian Griffin wrote:
@Mo wrote:Could it be the one and only MARTIN BRUNT!!
Oh please let it be!

Can not be Martin Brunt. Think about it!

by Carrry On Doctor on 26.12.14 10:19

"I have doorstepped 4 of the main characters who were there when MM was said to have disappeared..."

i.e. Members of the Tapas, other MW guests, an MW employee, or a local.

"With modern technology we have been able to quite legally and legitimately trace these people"

"Somebody who was very prolific on line and somebody who will shock people"

Is a blogger easier identified if overseas....IP address ?

Someone who was there and is involved in maintaining the abduction theory.....is there a 2 for the price of one here ? It would make sense.

Looking forward to seeing the full programme !!

IMO of course

by aiyoyo on 26.12.14 12:19

@Latetothecase wrote:Justine maybe?

If she will talk about the docs left behind and the mysterious map, then that would make it unmissable imo.

Or more likely, O 'Donnell perhaps? She has written about it already after all, but hopefully it wouldn't just become a puff piece for her own stuff.

No way it could be Justine. Justine would be last person to push the abduction theory.

Must be St. Kate or someone close to her or working in tandem with her. Otherwise where would the surprise factor come in ? It must be the very person pushing for "troll" to be made example for, yet perpetrating what s/he advocates against.

by aiyoyo on 26.12.14 12:29

@Carrry On Doctor wrote:"I have doorstepped 4 of the main characters who were there when MM was said to have disappeared..."

i.e. Members of the Tapas, other MW guests, an MW employee, or a local.

"With modern technology we have been able to quite legally and legitimately trace these people"

Quite legally and legitimately trace 'troll using modern technology? I don't get how this can be correct!
If true, the dossier compiler and Martin Brunt could say the same, and has nothing to fear in this respect at the Inquest.

"Somebody who was very prolific on line and somebody who will shock people"

Is a blogger easier identified if overseas....IP address ?

Someone who was there and is involved in maintaining the abduction theory.....is there a 2 for the price of one here ? It would make sense.

Looking forward to seeing the full programme !!

IMO of course