Sonia Poulton on Murdoch's SKY News AGAIN - today (4 April 2015)

aquila wrote:

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

snook wrote:Hutton is convinced you, Verdi and Tony are one and the same.

Nope. I'm Tony.

I beg to differ, I'm Tony.

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

aquila wrote:

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

Here is the Cristobell formula.

Write stuff about yourself on your blog after using two forums about Madeleine McCann to promote your blog. Find that no-one is really interested in your blog and write a hate blog about Tony Bennett and CMoMM to regenerate.

aquila wrote:

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

Here is the Cristobell formula.

Write stuff about yourself on your blog after using two forums about Madeleine McCann to promote your blog. Find that no-one is really interested in your blog and write a hate blog about Tony Bennett and CMoMM to regenerate.

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

aquila wrote:

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

Here is the Cristobell formula.

Write stuff about yourself on your blog after using two forums about Madeleine McCann to promote your blog. Find that no-one is really interested in your blog and write a hate blog about Tony Bennett and CMoMM to regenerate.

Is this the hate blog that Candyfloss promotes?

aquila wrote:

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

aquila wrote:

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

Here is the Cristobell formula.

Write stuff about yourself on your blog after using two forums about Madeleine McCann to promote your blog. Find that no-one is really interested in your blog and write a hate blog about Tony Bennett and CMoMM to regenerate.

Is this the hate blog that Candyfloss promotes?

It's not only that but it's the forum where Cristobell is allowed to be vicious to anyone who dares to question her (against the rules apparently) - and when I say question I just mean average questions and not intimidation.

Nuts innit!

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

aquila wrote:

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

aquila wrote:

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

Here is the Cristobell formula.

Write stuff about yourself on your blog after using two forums about Madeleine McCann to promote your blog. Find that no-one is really interested in your blog and write a hate blog about Tony Bennett and CMoMM to regenerate.

Is this the hate blog that Candyfloss promotes?

It's not only that but it's the forum where Cristobell is allowed to be vicious to anyone who dares to question her (against the rules apparently) - and when I say question I just mean average questions and not intimidation.

Nuts innit!

Not really, no.

It's what was allowed to happen here before the forum was divided.

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

Tony Bennett wrote:

aquila wrote:Ms Hutton has changed tack and is now 'writing for pleasure' without the usual need to stick in a couple of personal blogs and then a Tony Bennett hate blog. Ms Hutton is showing exceptional restraint for someone dedicated to trashing Tony Bennett and CMoMM.

Er...o no she hasn't changed tack.

Her deep need to attack this ever-popular forum and myself remains entrenched - and this was published today under the title: 'Discussing the McCanns':

[EXTRACT]

Tony Bennett became the unacceptable face of those who did not believe the McCanns.  Taking on the case as investigator, prosecutor, Judge and Jury, he confirmed time and time again, that even the most reasonable of people who dared to question the abduction story were cut from the same hardfaced vigilante cloth as himself and thus we were all treated by the media with the same disdain and contempt.  Most of us had nothing to do with his 'Madeleine Foundation' (a way to steer donations to himself?), or his hounding of the McCann family and their associates but we were all tarred with the same despicable brush. 

For the McCanns, Bennett was the gift that kept on giving, he gave them headlines during the quiet periods, provided evidence of harassment in their damages claim against Goncalo Amaral and invoked public sympathy for their cause.  Who could fail to feel sorry for them, Bennett's stalking knows no bounds.  

However, the majority of McCann sceptics are nothing like Bennett.  They were drawn to the case through their sympathy for the little girl who's life was taken and who's image has been abused for this past 8 years... 

 
So, most McCann-sceptics good; Tony Bennett bad - and the 'gift that kept on giving' to the McCanns.

She may have forgotten by now about the disastrous 2-page spread in Murdoch's Sun earlier this year in which she boasted of being 'a nasty anti-McCann bitch who gets a buzz out of squishing and attacking McCann supporters'. 

At least one kind soul has responded with a defence of me - it wasn't me, honest!

1.   Anonymous [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

One of your very best, Christobel...a superb over-view...with the exception of the slagging off...again...of Tony Bennett. He may be irritatingly OTT with his huge lists of important points, and he cannot always see that other people legitimately think differently, but he is doggedly trying to be 'Mr Relentless for Truth' in finding out what really happened...whether to Stuart Lubbock, Lee Balkwell, or Madeleine...and he has suffered for it.

 
candyfloss's forum helpfully has a prominent 'Sticky' page which enthusiastically directs members and guests over there straight to Hutton's blog posts, where they can carry on reading a seemingly continuous stream of anti-CMOMM and anti-Tony Bennett  posts.

Oh well...

TMH wrote:Hmmmm Hutton only publishes certain comments on her blog then? I wrote that I'd rather listen to TB than a blogger who sells non-stories to the Scum newspaper and she hasn't allowed it on her blog although she has published others after.

C'est la vie!

I apologise but sometime I need cheering up and this transcript never fails to do so. 

Doug D wrote:Lazzeri’s back (from her hol’s?) with a Hutton/Bennett blog:
 
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

sallypelt wrote:

aquila wrote:

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

Here is the Cristobell formula.

Write stuff about yourself on your blog after using two forums about Madeleine McCann to promote your blog. Find that no-one is really interested in your blog and write a hate blog about Tony Bennett and CMoMM to regenerate.

I couldn't have put it better, myself, Aquila. Her last long-winded post on her "blog" didn't get a single comment, so what better way to regenerate interest than to attack Tony? Does the trick EVERY time!

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

aquila wrote:

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

Here is the Cristobell formula.

Write stuff about yourself on your blog after using two forums about Madeleine McCann to promote your blog. Find that no-one is really interested in your blog and write a hate blog about Tony Bennett and CMoMM to regenerate.

Is this the hate blog that Candyfloss promotes?

aquila wrote:

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

aquila wrote:

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

Here is the Cristobell formula.

Write stuff about yourself on your blog after using two forums about Madeleine McCann to promote your blog. Find that no-one is really interested in your blog and write a hate blog about Tony Bennett and CMoMM to regenerate.

Is this the hate blog that Candyfloss promotes?

It's not only that but it's the forum where Cristobell is allowed to be vicious to anyone who dares to question her (against the rules apparently) - and when I say question I just mean average questions and not intimidation.

Nuts innit!

snook wrote:Hutton is convinced you, Verdi and Tony are one and the same.

tigger wrote:

TMH wrote:Hmmmm Hutton only publishes certain comments on her blog then? I wrote that I'd rather listen to TB than a blogger who sells non-stories to the Scum newspaper and she hasn't allowed it on her blog although she has published others after.

C'est la vie!

Ms Hutton was also unable to find the transcript from her first interview with Poulton, remember? The one which was going to put her in terrible danger and which resulted in her being 'slaughtered' on twitter. 

No transcript and no YouTube video of the interview - it's still a classic imo - here's a snippet: 

SONIA POULTON Thank you for joining me. Now I do avidly read your blog. (RH Oh, I see?) I do, I do because I, in common with many millions of people around the world I am eternally fascinated about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. I'm equally fascinated about the fact that we don't talk about all the many hundreds of thousands of other children that have gone missing. But I feel that this is a sort of hinge case. Its a very interesting one so please, for the benefit of our viewers, share with us, you know, your take on the situation. 

ROSALINDA HUTTON Erm, it, it, it is indeed a very, very intriguing case. Erm, I, I became, became drawn to it when the news first broke back in May 2007. And, erm there were so many things that didn't ring true. Er, er, and, I, I'm an inquisitive sort of person. So I, I got online and I looked up, erm, you know, the difference, for example, between the Tapas and the, and the apartment and none of them seemed to tally. 
This is not an answer to the above question. It goes into meta language, describes herself  as an inquisitive person - used ‘seemed’ this is not a statement of any kind or indeed an opinion. 

SONIA POULTON Right.

ROSALINDA HUTTON Er, er, I also found that, erm, what we were reading in our own mainstream newspapers wasn't tallying with what I was reading online. 
Still no answer.

SONIA POULTON Right.

ROSALINDA HUTTON Erm, this, this, led me to sort of dig a little bit deeper and er, you know, it, it really is a sort of rabbit hole once you start digging.
Still no answer.

SONIA POULTON Indeed.

ROSALINDA HUTTON And it, it, is er, a puzzling case.
We’re no further. 


SONIA POULTON (now in desperation starts giving us the answer herself) I mean my first take was as you say what we were reading in sort of mainstream media and what we were discovering weren't tallying. 
unquote (my comments in italics)


I apologise but sometime I need cheering up and this transcript never fails to do so. 

Tony Bennett wrote:

aquila wrote:

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

snook wrote:Hutton is convinced you, Verdi and Tony are one and the same.

Nope. I'm Tony.

I beg to differ, I'm Tony.

Cue: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]    49 seconds onwards

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

aquila wrote:

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

aquila wrote:

snook wrote:Seriously?  I shall have to up my game if I want to be included.

On another note, Hutton's plague has spread to FB. 
I cannot believe the arrogance.  2nd guessing Tony's lehal competance.  It Beggars belief. She really is like a contagious disease.
Tony has his supporters and I'm sure has better things to do than justify himself to barrack room lawyers who spend all day reporting twitter spats.

Here is the Cristobell formula.

Write stuff about yourself on your blog after using two forums about Madeleine McCann to promote your blog. Find that no-one is really interested in your blog and write a hate blog about Tony Bennett and CMoMM to regenerate.

Is this the hate blog that Candyfloss promotes?

It's not only that but it's the forum where Cristobell is allowed to be vicious to anyone who dares to question her (against the rules apparently) - and when I say question I just mean average questions and not intimidation.

Nuts innit!

Not really, no.

It's what was allowed to happen here before the forum was divided.

TMH wrote:Hmmmm Hutton only publishes certain comments on her blog then? I wrote that I'd rather listen to TB than a blogger who sells non-stories to the Scum newspaper and she hasn't allowed it on her blog although she has published others after.

And to think she left this forum when she threw her toys out of her pram, when she accused the admins of stifling freedom of speech.  She then set up her “unbound” blog where people could say what they wanted without censorship, or so she claimed. This is yet another glaring case of hypocrisy.  The woman is crazy. Maybe we should cut her some slack and ignore her. After all, one wouldn’t go into a mental institution and argue with the patients………..would one?  

lj wrote:


Silly me, I'm rather aligned with Tony than with other "McCann sceptics". 
Finally I am a minority (according to this woman).

Can I get some affirmative action?

:drunken:

Tony Bennett wrote:
Neither Hutton, nor those who back her stream of malice towards CMOMM and myself, have any ideaa about what they are really doing and saying

tigger wrote:@ Aiyoyo: 
From about 2 years ago: 

  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] on Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:21 pm

I have often wondered how Kate and Gerry managed to assist with the composition of age progression pictures of Madeleine, it must be a very emotional experience for parents with a missing child.  I think the Madeleine they have sold us, is a mythical child, one they may have developed as a coping mechanism - how else can we explain their detached demeanour?  All the genuinely grieving parents I have seen interviewed, can barely speak their beloved child's name before breaking down in tears.

I have taken this a little further in my blog [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], as with so many factors of this case, I simply cannot understand the magnitude of what (we believe) they have done, and how they have managed to do it.
unquote
The Sybil speaks and - advertises.  Every click on her blog earns her a bit of money from Google as it has done since it was advertised here.
 

Verdi wrote:

snook wrote:Hutton is convinced you, Verdi and Tony are one and the same.

In less than twelve hours l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun also becomes a sock puppet - again!  Just shows the weak minds of these people who believe, because you support a particular person/theory/opinion, that you are all one.

If you can't come up with a better form of attack than such a childishly feeble chant, it's time to pack your bags and go back home.  Just like the McCanns did when they found themselves up against the wall.  This vicious woman has long exceeded her shelf life.

tigger wrote:@ Aiyoyo: 
From about 2 years ago: 

  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] on Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:21 pm

I have often wondered how Kate and Gerry managed to assist with the composition of age progression pictures of Madeleine, it must be a very emotional experience for parents with a missing child.  I think the Madeleine they have sold us, is a mythical child, one they may have developed as a coping mechanism - how else can we explain their detached demeanour?  All the genuinely grieving parents I have seen interviewed, can barely speak their beloved child's name before breaking down in tears.

I have taken this a little further in my blog [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], as with so many factors of this case, I simply cannot understand the magnitude of what (we believe) they have done, and how they have managed to do it.
unquote
The Sybil speaks and - advertises.  Every click on her blog earns her a bit of money from Google as it has done since it was advertised here.