Re: Sonia Poulton on Murdoch's SKY News AGAIN - today (4 April 2015)

by TheTruthWillOut 18.05.15 23:50

@Tony

I think the man in both photos is Alan Taylor-Shearer. Check out his photos on Twitter: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] (you have to scroll a lot)

by LG 19.05.15 0:20

I do believe that The Truth Will Out is correct

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Guest 19.05.15 1:25

TheTruthWillOut wrote:@Tony

I think the man in both photos is Alan Taylor-Shearer. Check out his photos on Twitter: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] (you have to scroll a lot)

Having looked at the link posted by Doug D, I too thought it might be Alan Shearer bearing in mind he claims to be an independent photographer representing free thinkers. Having said that I'm only basing my opinion on a visual representation of a head which is hardly conclusive, in fact reminiscent of Redwoods e-fit x 2. Perhaps Tony's hands-on knowledge of a particular person has more credence than a mere whim of mine?

Has anyone ever commented on the front door lock of the Rothley mansion? I know the McCanns have issues with doors and windows but speaking personally I prefer to think my home is more secure than reliant on some antiquated mortice lock fit only for the Beefeaters guarding the Tower of London. Maybe they were expecting guests?

by TheTruthWillOut 19.05.15 1:39

This is Dave Eden for comparison:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Sorry for big size....

by joyce1938 19.05.15 10:10

Hi , I know too little about Sonia or her works to comment on ,but I will say I don't really understand Why people seem to not trust that what she is trying to put together or where or who will do filming of said work willcome to fruitation ? can we just waite a bit longer and when we see it ,then pass comment of how we might feel of content ? joyce1938

by Richard IV 19.05.15 11:11

by espeland 19.05.15 14:36

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] just want you to know that we report on GA fund in doc. Impressive all round. Big message in it.

So the documentary will be up to date(ish). And Sonia's comment that the GA fund is impressive surely points to the way she is thinking and the direction the documentary will take?

by Guest 19.05.15 15:14

espeland wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] just want you to know that we report on GA fund in doc. Impressive all round. Big message in it.

So the documentary will be up to date(ish). And Sonia's comment that the GA fund is impressive surely points to the way she is thinking and the direction the documentary will take?

I understood it to be 'The Untold Story' of Madeleine McCann. Still all will be revealed at some time - or will it?

by The Slave 19.05.15 17:45

Yes it will, Verdi. smilie

You can hardly dissapprove of a documentary that mentions the Fund for Amaral. Can you?

by plebgate 19.05.15 17:57

The Slave wrote:Yes it will, Verdi.

You can hardly dissapprove of a documentary that mentions the Fund for Amaral. Can you?

I wouldn't disapprove of such a documentary, but will the docu. be released in time of people to donate?

I understand it will be closed once it reaches the £25,000 target which could be in a matter of days but of course I may be wrong (and prob. am).

by **Nina** 19.05.15 18:56

plebgate wrote:
The Slave wrote:Yes it will, Verdi.

You can hardly dissapprove of a documentary that mentions the Fund for Amaral. Can you?
I wouldn't disapprove of such a documentary, but will the docu. be released in time of people to donate?

I understand it will be closed once it reaches the £25,000 target which could be in a matter of days but of course I may be wrong (and prob. am).

Once the limit is reached the Gofund page will close, but the master fund...............http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/

will remain open for further donations.

by sonic72 19.05.15 19:33

Nina wrote:Once the limit is reached the Gofund page will close, but the master fund...............http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/

will remain open for further donations.

It doesnt have to end at £25k, they can extend the total if they want.

by plebgate 19.05.15 19:48

Thanks Nina and Sonic for the info.

It could take 2 years or more for the appeal to be heard, I hope the docu. has been aired by then.

by Guest 19.05.15 19:58

The Slave wrote:Yes it will, Verdi.

You can hardly dissapprove of a documentary that mentions the Fund for Amaral. Can you?

Yes The Slave, actually I can and do disapprove! Ms Poulton promises to tell 'The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann' in an evidenced based documentary and that is precisely what I'm waiting to see, albeit impatiently.

The fund set up to assist Dr Amaral is not a mystery nor is it a secret, in fact it has been publicized by MSM, which is more than you can say for the truth about Madeleine Mccann's disappearance and the Portuguese investigation. If Ms Poulton or anyone else wishes to plug Dr Amaral's goodwill fund then feel free, I won't complain but it is not documentary material nor the purpose of this particular documentary.

Whatever next - plug Huttons autobiography or the Summers and Swann grand exposé or the latest episode of Eastenders? Besides, if the documentary is to be aired in the States as has been suggested (no way will the UK MSM touch it with a barge pole or anyone else with an ounce of savvy), why would they be interested? The odd bod here and there might show interest, Pat Brown for example, but I would think US citizens have got their own priorities and problems to worry about so why should they be interested in financing Dr Amaral's legal proceedings.

by lj 20.05.15 15:47

Verdi wrote:
The Slave wrote:Yes it will, Verdi.

You can hardly dissapprove of a documentary that mentions the Fund for Amaral. Can you?
Yes The Slave, actually I can and do disapprove! Ms Poulton promises to tell 'The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann' in an evidenced based documentary and that is precisely what I'm waiting to see, albeit impatiently.

The fund set up to assist Dr Amaral is not a mystery nor is it a secret, in fact it has been publicized by MSM, which is more than you can say for the truth about Madeleine Mccann's disappearance and the Portuguese investigation. If Ms Poulton or anyone else wishes to plug Dr Amaral's goodwill fund then feel free, I won't complain but it is not documentary material nor the purpose of this particular documentary.

Whatever next - plug Huttons autobiography or the Summers and Swann grand exposé or the latest episode of Eastenders? Besides, if the documentary is to be aired in the States as has been suggested (no way will the UK MSM touch it with a barge pole or anyone else with an ounce of savvy), why would they be interested? The odd bod here and there might show interest, Pat Brown for example, but I would think US citizens have got their own priorities and problems to worry about so why should they be interested in financing Dr Amaral's legal proceedings.

This odd bod has been donating to dr. Amaral's fund for several years. Not much, but when ever I can.

by Joss 20.05.15 17:22

Verdi wrote:
The Slave wrote:Yes it will, Verdi.

You can hardly dissapprove of a documentary that mentions the Fund for Amaral. Can you?
Yes The Slave, actually I can and do disapprove! Ms Poulton promises to tell 'The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann' in an evidenced based documentary and that is precisely what I'm waiting to see, albeit impatiently.

The fund set up to assist Dr Amaral is not a mystery nor is it a secret, in fact it has been publicized by MSM, which is more than you can say for the truth about Madeleine Mccann's disappearance and the Portuguese investigation. If Ms Poulton or anyone else wishes to plug Dr Amaral's goodwill fund then feel free, I won't complain but it is not documentary material nor the purpose of this particular documentary.

Whatever next - plug Huttons autobiography or the Summers and Swann grand exposé or the latest episode of Eastenders? Besides, if the documentary is to be aired in the States as has been suggested (no way will the UK MSM touch it with a barge pole or anyone else with an ounce of savvy), why would they be interested? The odd bod here and there might show interest, Pat Brown for example, but I would think US citizens have got their own priorities and problems to worry about so why should they be interested in financing Dr Amaral's legal proceedings.

ITA Verdi, All i can say is this doco. of SP's better be worth the wait big grin

Its like waiting for Halley's Comet which will next appear in mid 2061 Shocked

by **PeterMac** 20.05.15 17:35

Joss wrote:Chicxulub
ITA Verdi, All i can say is this doco. of SP's better be worth the wait Its like waiting for Halley's Comet which will next appear in mid 2061

Let us hope it is the equivalent of the Chicxulub meteorite, which renders the McCanns' stupid story and disgraceful actions extinct

by Joss 20.05.15 18:00

PeterMac wrote:
Joss wrote:Chicxulub
ITA Verdi, All i can say is this doco. of SP's better be worth the wait Its like waiting for Halley's Comet which will next appear in mid 2061

Let us hope it is the equivalent of the Chicxulub meteorite, which renders the McCanns' stupid story and disgraceful actions extinct

Yep, just like the dinosaurs, smilie

by **Tony Bennett** 20.05.15 18:30

TheTruthWillOut wrote:@Tony

I think the man in both photos is Alan Taylor-Shearer. Check out his photos on Twitter: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] (you have to scroll a lot)

I accept the correction.

I had thought the man was Dave Eden after viewing the Neil Foster interview and also David Icke's interview about Sonia Polton and Dave Eden.

So maybe it is Alan Taylor-Shearer, then, who needs the warning about Sonia Poulton from one Drew McFadyen.

Of course, it is only one side of the story. And it is still possible that Sonia Poulton's long-awaited documentary may contain a dramatic new revelation.

There is one very interesting reference in Mr McFadyen's account of events, and that is the reference to the funds Sonia Poulton raised (and maybe is still raising) by 'crowd-funding' for her proposed 'News from Sonia Online' venture, or whatever it was called. McFadyen alleges that when he asked about that, Sonia shut him up and said: 'I don't know how much money I've raised from my crowd-funding'. Now that is one thing that I really don't believe.

Anyway, here is Drew McFadyen, with a few changes for selling and grammar and amending the odd 'colourful' word:

When I met Sonia Poulton at The People’s TV, I offered to make a new personal website for her at ‘mates rates’.(half-price).

After she left, she called me in March and asked if I would help with her online TV project & her personal website.

I did not realise at that point what her true nature was. I agreed to help her and I worked my socks off making two website frameworks.and producing a couple of channel ident-vids, doing a bit of filming and other artwork.

I did all I could with no upfront cost. When it came to the point of needing money to pay for software licenses, her tune changed. She said she had no idea of how much money she had raised. When I suggested that asking people to help her create this channel without any idea of the budget was ‘magical thinking’. she lost her rag and fired me.

She then went on a campaign to bully me into handing over some unusable footage of Kenneth Clarke which she described online as me ‘withholding an important interview with a prominent paedophile’.

She also refused to pay the half price agreed sum for her personal website - and then went on to suggest on her Facebook page that I was trying to extort money from her by charging for the internet station site. That was complete lies. I did all the news site stuff for free. This woman is really a piece of work!

She then went on her Facebook page and started making threats to name me publicly, along with a list of wholly false accusations.

I sent her an email asking her to cease and desist in her on-line smearing. I also informed her I had reported the situation to the police. They had told me if she did name me online she would possibly be subject to arrest.

Within 24 hours, there was a Twitter account set up called ‘netpolicing’. This account started publishing my home address and my picture and accusing me of being ‘a rapist and a paedophile enabler’.

On balance, the info in the tweets from that account and other online comments could only have come from Sonia - or someone else in her camp with the full info.

My whole basis for volunteering for TPV and later for Sonia was to do some good and contribute to causes that matter to me, amongst which is child abuse. I and my siblings are survivors. In fact I was doing this to also try and get my life back on track, since suffering from depression and PSTD [post-traumatic stress disorder] from what I have been through.

Sonia was fully aware of this but did not waste a second in using that and my history against me to attack me.
I still have not been paid by Sonia. I have spent the last couple of months recovering from what was an incredibly traumatic time - being cyber-bullied by Sonia Poulton, yes, the very one who gets paid to write about such issues.

Sonia is a narcissist who has no real empathy with the causes she covers. It is simply something to stroke her ego with. A coat-tail to ride upon. And heaven help the one that does not doff the cap.

I have learnt that she is obsessive about getting even. If she perceives she has been disrespected, she goes into “I have my reputation to protect” mode. Truly mental. I am not the first to be bullied on line by Sonia and I’m sure I won’t be the last. Hopefully eventually she will dig her own hole and fall in it.

I skinted myself going back and forth to TPV and then left myself in trouble, pulling out all the stops for Sonia, only to be denied payment. It was only a small amount, but it made things very difficult for me. My bank charges nearly buried me.

When I am feeling up to it and have fees for court, still intend to pursue Sonia for the bill she weaseled out of. I have informed her that she will be pursued for the full amount since she did not pay as agreed - and I will be seeking interest as well.

So, @ Alan Tayler-Shearer and anyone else invovled in Sonia's project - make sure you at least get your expenses...

by IAmNotMerylStreep 20.05.15 18:47

Sonia Poulton likes to smear and bully people with online campaigns?

Isn't that what R. Hutton does?

Perfect bed partners.

I don't have any respect for any 'journalist' that smears and bullies people with any kind of campaign. Not at all professional.

by Guest 20.05.15 19:59

Joss wrote:
Verdi wrote:
The Slave wrote:Yes it will, Verdi.

You can hardly dissapprove of a documentary that mentions the Fund for Amaral. Can you?
Yes The Slave, actually I can and do disapprove! Ms Poulton promises to tell 'The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann' in an evidenced based documentary and that is precisely what I'm waiting to see, albeit impatiently.

The fund set up to assist Dr Amaral is not a mystery nor is it a secret, in fact it has been publicized by MSM, which is more than you can say for the truth about Madeleine Mccann's disappearance and the Portuguese investigation. If Ms Poulton or anyone else wishes to plug Dr Amaral's goodwill fund then feel free, I won't complain but it is not documentary material nor the purpose of this particular documentary.

Whatever next - plug Huttons autobiography or the Summers and Swann grand exposé or the latest episode of Eastenders? Besides, if the documentary is to be aired in the States as has been suggested (no way will the UK MSM touch it with a barge pole or anyone else with an ounce of savvy), why would they be interested? The odd bod here and there might show interest, Pat Brown for example, but I would think US citizens have got their own priorities and problems to worry about so why should they be interested in financing Dr Amaral's legal proceedings.
ITA Verdi, All i can say is this doco. of SP's better be worth the wait Its like waiting for Halley's Comet which will next appear in mid 2061

Did the Big Bang create a parallel universe where time goes backwards?

by **PeterMac** 20.05.15 20:02

Verdi wrote:
Did the Big Bang create a parallel universe where time goes backwards?

No.

And even if it did, you will never know about it !

by TheTruthWillOut 20.05.15 20:03

@Tony, NP. They do look alike from behind. (I'll refrain from making a E-Fit joke!)

More serious is what Drew McFadyen has to say. I'd like to hear what Sonia has to say about that. If there is any truth in that then I have to wonder why Sonia is front and centre in the Brenda leyland story.

What he describes is even worse than what happened to BL. Serious accusations....

by Guest 20.05.15 20:04

lj wrote:
Verdi wrote:
The Slave wrote:Yes it will, Verdi.

You can hardly dissapprove of a documentary that mentions the Fund for Amaral. Can you?
Yes The Slave, actually I can and do disapprove! Ms Poulton promises to tell 'The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann' in an evidenced based documentary and that is precisely what I'm waiting to see, albeit impatiently.

The fund set up to assist Dr Amaral is not a mystery nor is it a secret, in fact it has been publicized by MSM, which is more than you can say for the truth about Madeleine Mccann's disappearance and the Portuguese investigation. If Ms Poulton or anyone else wishes to plug Dr Amaral's goodwill fund then feel free, I won't complain but it is not documentary material nor the purpose of this particular documentary.

Whatever next - plug Huttons autobiography or the Summers and Swann grand exposé or the latest episode of Eastenders? Besides, if the documentary is to be aired in the States as has been suggested (no way will the UK MSM touch it with a barge pole or anyone else with an ounce of savvy), why would they be interested? The odd bod here and there might show interest, Pat Brown for example, but I would think US citizens have got their own priorities and problems to worry about so why should they be interested in financing Dr Amaral's legal proceedings.

This odd bod has been donating to dr. Amaral's fund for several years. Not much, but when ever I can.

Ah but you're the exception to the rule (in the nicest possible way) and clearly you've been following the case for a long time. I doubt if that applies to the majority of the US population - or anywhere else on the planet for that matter.

by Guest 20.05.15 20:08

IAmNotMerylStreep wrote:Sonia Poulton likes to smear and bully people with online campaigns?

Isn't that what R. Hutton does?

Perfect bed partners.

I don't have any respect for any 'journalist' that smears and bullies people with any kind of campaign. Not at all professional.

And I don't have any respect for bloggers who decline to publish comments that criticize their blogs, a form of bullying and complete cowardice. Two of a kind!

by Guest 20.05.15 20:09

PeterMac wrote:
Verdi wrote:
Did the Big Bang create a parallel universe where time goes backwards?
No.

And even if it did, you will never know about it !

Indeed - I'm beginning to feel the same way about Poulton's documentary :)

by **PeterMac** 20.05.15 20:12

Verdi wrote:
Did the Big Bang create a parallel universe where time goes backwards?

No.

And even if it did, you will never know about it !

The McCanns, however HAVE created a parallel universe where time runs at whatever speed they say it does.
29 April can become 3rd May, just because they say so.
Once a night, or not at all can become once an hour, or once every half hour, or every 15 minutes - at will.
(Even the Hadron Collider has problems with this concept !)
Curtains can be wide open AND tight closed at the same instant.
Shutters can be forced, jemmied, smashed AND in perfect condition at exactly the same time.
A locked front door can become an unlocked patio door, within a nanosecond. (well six days actually . . . but let us not break the illusion !)
Someone who has paid half a MILLION punds to a company to ensure they apprear on the front page of every newspaper for a year,
and was successful can then appear in front of a Senior judge and ON OATH say he objects to press intrusion

This is way beyond Planck and Quantum theory, which allows an electron to be in one sphere and then instantaneously in another one, but not in two at the same time !

So perhaps I am wrong. There is at least ONE parallel McUniverse
Though in which direction it is travelling is anyone's guess.
Towards purgatory one supposes.

by **Tony Bennett** 20.05.15 20:18

PeterMac wrote:
Verdi wrote:
Did the Big Bang create a parallel universe where time goes backwards?
No.

And even if it did, you will never know about it !

According to the boffins, it all began with the tiniest blob of matter of incredible density that suddenly (they admit they are not really sure why) exploded like a balloon at high speed, which they say took about one billionth of second. That, given 13.78 billion years [this is the very latest bang-up-to-speed figure] then became, well, inter alia, you, me, the McCanns and a few other people and things.

It never ceases to amaze me that so many people on here and elsewhere say they can figure out that the official Madeleine McCann story may not be true, yet swallow the totaly unbelievable 'Big Bang' theory hook, line and sinker.

And they still can't tell us which came first: the chicken or the egg