Kelly from the Telly - Lazzeri article - a must read

http://l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com/Kelly_From_the_Telly.html

So funny - if it weren't so true and tragic



kelly From the Telly


I don't know much about Lorraine Kelly the giggling gal from Glasgow... (is she from Glasgow? sounds like it, same accent as Gerry McCann, same high pitched voice - Gerry like Oscar Pistorius with regards the pitch, both sound like girls) other than that she is all pink and really, really fluffy, agrees with her every sofa guest, when she lets them have a word.)

If she was to interview a serial killer the laughing lady that is Lorraine Kelly - would ask where he applied for the position and tell the murderin' bastard - that sounds reeeeally reeeeally gooood, reeeeally reeeally nice...'

When he tells her he is freelance!  'That's sooo reeeeally nice for you, not having restricted hours....and do you have any particular tools of the trade or is it all hands on?  Lol lol lol lol you just need your bare hands..? Och aah should have known that....lol, lol, lol, lol...and what big strong hands you have lol, lol, lol

- Yip Scotland's answer to Sarah Palin  -  Or am I being unkind to Sarah Palin?

To see Lorraine in action:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PksIwU-OxRg

Well it's not reeeeally Lorraine... it's someone who does the most awesome impression of her...and yes the 'set' is all pink and fluffy!

But to Lorraine and the McCanns.

Of course Ms Kelly, as we all are, is entitled to her view on the McCann case, entitled to support the disgraced parents if she so wishes - that is how I view them as disgraceful - their conduct, the shocking lack of care and protection these three little kids were afforded by the selfish parents who preferred to party, leaving three little tots alone in an unlocked holiday apartment five nights running - their eldest daughter vanishing without trace. Missing now over seven years) - she is free to support them, of course she is!

Is Ms Kelly supporting the neglect of the McCann children?

Reeeeally, reeeally difficult to tell.   She may or may not be comfortable with the McCann kids, and all of those other little kids in the group having been left alone at night, and not just left alone, some of these kids were ill (all of them having doctors for parents!)

Madeleine was not well, pale and tired Kate McCann described her, and added to that lot, they LEFT THE PATIO DOOR UNLOCKED, so they say.

Far from being responsible!

Kate's best buddie, Fiona Payne saying Kate told her she did this so that Madeleine if she woke up could exit the apartment and go look for them.

I wonder what Ms Kelly thinks of that?

Or, what she thinks of Kate and Gerry McCann standing outside the Court in Lisbon last week, and blatantly lying to the press pack with respect to Dr Amaral, and therefore in turn the world?

But perhaps lies are no problem for laughing lady either, as it would appear that she too, in her column in the Sun Newspaper today did likewise, or to give her the benefit of the doubt, she JUST DID NOT CHECK HER FACTS BEFORE SHE PUT pen to paper so to speak.

Does truth and factual reporting matter to her?  

Kelly from the telly in her article claimed the following:

"Sean McCann had heard disgraced Portuguese police officer Goncalo Amaral on the radio claiming that his mum and dad had faked their daughter's abduction."

Sean McCann did not hear this, as Dr Amaral was not on the radio!

It may interest Kelly to know that Dr Amaral does not speak English, and as far as I am aware, Sean McCann the 9 year old son of Kate and Gerry McCann, does not speak Portuguese!


Why would Kelly lie?   Seems to run through the whole case - dishonesty!

Or, was it a case of she did not have the capacity to comprehend what happened at Court in Lisbon this last week, did not have the capacity to understand what Kate McCann had said in Court?  

Take your pick folks - bearing in mind this is Kelly we're speaking of. Is she too nice and fluffy but just thick as wood didn't realise that what she was putting in print was not the truth, or is she a liar, and knew absolutely what she was doing?

The fact is too, we don't even know if Kate McCann told the truth in this regard - McCann couldn't even tell the Court where Sean supposedly heard the news report where the name Dr Amaral was allegedly mentioned.   Kate McCann told the Court she 'THINKS' her young son Sean heard a report re Dr Amaral's book while travelling on the school bus.

Why would Kate McCann not have established where the child heard this?   And certainly one would have thought she would have done before appearing in Court!

Kate and Gerry McCann were very vague with the details when speaking in Court in this regard (which I have addressed in a blog I have yet to publish.)

Kelly didn't stop there with the lies or the dumbness, whichever it was, she continued with HER dramatic account of what SHE said WOULD have taken place.

And I must stress here, in absolute fairness to Kate McCann, she did NOT when in Court state anything at all close to what Kelly described in her article.  This was Kelly making it up as she went along, unless of course Kate McCann was party to this article?

Why would Kelly lie again?

Kelly:

"The poor little boy would have been completely bewildered - and Kate must have felt that a dagger had been plunged into her heart."

Says who?  You Lorraine?

Kate McCann may indeed have felt that a dagger had plunged into her heart - BUT KATE McCANN NEVER SAID ANYTHING OF THE SORT IN HER TESTIMONY in COURT!

Wonder how Kelly will describe how Kate McCann feels when/if the day ever comes when Sean asks her why they left them alone every night causing Madeleine's disappearance?

Kelly didn't stop there, she followed up the last two lies with:

"She was able to answer calmly and console her son, but how disgusting that this poor family were put through such an ordeal by the revolting claims of a man who should have been leading the hunt for Madeleine."

KATE McCANN NEVER SAID THIS IN COURT EITHER!   I asked this very question in one of my recent blogs, why Kate McCann had not given any detail as to whether Sean was upset, had simply asked out of curiosity, whether he had followed the question with another. Surely if the child had been upset, Kate McCann would have told the Court as this is the crux of her case, that the book has damaged her family her children - rather remiss of her to not say if the boy was upset and had required to be consoled by a calm mummy.

So why did Lorraine Kelly say this?

We could give Kelly the benefit of the doubt again - that perhaps Kate McCann called her to tell her this - but that still would not explain why NEITHER Kate or Gerry McCann when giving their 'statements' in Court this past week, in an action where they are claiming damages for their children, Sean McCann being one of them, DID NOT EXPLAIN TO THE COURT THE AFFECT, that hearing a radio report had had on Sean.

(Gerry McCann was desperate to tell the Court about the Dogs so why not so desperate to explain about their son his needing to be consoled?)

That struck me as the oddest thing, that they had not in Court given any exact details as to where Sean heard this, how he had reacted on the bus if it was in fact the bus, Kate McCann was not sure of this, saying only that she thought it had occurred on the school bus, and they made no mention, gave no account of his emotional state when he told his mummy or when she answered him.   - ONLY stating the child had asked the question, but giving no indication if the child was upset, or required consoling.

Yet Kelly speaks of Kate McCann having to console the child?

I'm not sure consoling is something they do...

The morning of the night Madeleine was reported as missing the child had asked the McCanns, her parents why they had not come to her when she and Sean had cried when alone in the unlocked holiday apartment the previous night - McCanns said it was SIMPLY A PASSING REMARK!

To any other other parent they would have been devastated had their child said this, when they knew they had so cruelly abandoned them.  Any other parent would have felt so guilty at hearing their child say this.   Felt so guilty that while they were out drinking and partying that their little ones had been crying and distressed.

Not Gerry and Kate McCann, that very night, dancing shoes back on and off they went to trip the light fantastic...or a tapas meal and a couple bottles anyway...kids out of sight and earshot!

Kelly gaily carried on, now speaking of Dr Amaral:

"His smears have caused unbelievable agony and led to a whole raft of conspiracy theorists crawling out of the woodwork to sling buckets of mud at Kate and Gerry. "

Isn't it peculiar, that when members of the public from all walks of life, and from many different countries, state that they do not believe in the tales, the abduction theory told by Kate and Gerry McCann,  and with very good reason, that they are automatically deemed to suffer from a mental health disorder, are hateful, or are as Kelly describes - 'crawling out of the woodwork to sling buckets of mud at Kate and Gerry.'

Would it not be much better if persons like Kelly, rather than make false statements, read up on this case, the police files, and argue sensibly, put points valid across by way of explanation at to why those who do not believe the stories told, are wrong, or may be wrong?  

If she could tell us why for instance the statements given by the McCanns and their buddies to both the Portuguese Police and the Leicestershire Police do not tally, are full of holes and inconsistencies?  Why there have been so many lies told by them?

Before declaring what she has in her column today, if Kelly had read up on this case, even a little, she would know that what she had written was complete and utter nonsense - that what she said could in fact be considered by some as her blatantly lying, rather than just being a dumbass and not checking out the facts first.  

Her article served only to show that she blindly supports, that she is not clued up on the facts of this case, and that, I'm afraid leaves her looking not just reeeeeally reeeeeally giggly, but leaves her reeeeeally reeeeeally without any credibility whatsover.

Kelly:

Amaral was so inept he was quickly taken off the investigation, and his bungled handling of the case could mean that Kate and Gerry never find out what happened to their daughter.


And another blatant lie by Kelly.

Dr Amaral was not taken off the case due to being inept...and to suggest that he was or that he bungled it, and that this could mean that the McCanns never find out what became of their daughter..?

Ms Kelly reeeeally, reeeeally needs to take a long hard look at herself...but most of all she needs to take the time to read the police files and not to jump to the very wrong conclusions which she has regarding Dr Amaral.  She may land herself, her employer in a whole lot of hot water by printing lies.


To save this uninformed female some time I will include below from The Truth of the Lie by Dr Goncalo Amaral and from the Police Report (the conclusion.)  Perhaps she will find the time to read it before putting untruths in print?  

What must her family think of her to do as she has today?


The Truth of the Lie

From the book:-

The results my team and I have arrived at are the following:


1. The minor, Madeleine McCann died inside apartment 5A of the Ocean Club in Vila da Luz, on the night of 3rd May 2007;

2. There was simulation of abduction.

3. Kate Healy and Gerald McCann are suspects of involvement in the concealment of their daughter's body.

4. The death could have occurred as a result of a tragic accident;

5. There are clues about the parents' negligence concerning the care and safety of the children.

END

-----

And from the Conclusion to the Investigation Report dated 10th September 2007

From all the elements that have been exposed, it results that:

A) The minor Madeleine McCann died in the apartment 5A of the Ocean Club resort, on the night of 3rd May 2007;

B) There was a simulation of abduction;

C) In order to make it appear impossible that the death of the minor occurred before 22.00hr, a system of checks on the McCann children while they slept was created;

D) Kate McCann and Gerald McCann are involved in the concealment of the cadaver of their child Madeleine McCann;

E) At this moment, there is no evidence that the death of the minor didn't happen due to a tragic accident;

F) From what has been established until now, everything indicates that the McCanns, by virtue of self preservation, don't want to deliver immediately and voluntarily the cadaver, even though there is a strong possibility that the same was transported from the initial place of deposition. This situation consequently raises questions about the circumstances under which the death of the minor occurred.

END

And for Ms Kelly's benefit the above are the true statements from Dr Amaral's book and the Conclusion to the Investigation Report.

Both of the above were read out in Court at the libel trial on 13th September 2013 for the benefit of the McCann witness, David Trickey, psychologist.

Ms Kelly may be a lovely lady but it would serve her well to avail herself of all relevant information in relation to this case before publishing the type of nonsense she did today.

By all means support who she wishes - but have the integrity to report with honesty - or is that too much to ask of her?

The day Ms Kelly sits on her sofa with Kate and Gerry McCann and asks them probing questions, asks them why best buddie Fiona Payne told the police a quite different story about that unlocked patio door than Kate McCann told, asks Gerry McCann why he changed his story SEVEN days after Madeleine vanished, asks them about David Payne's visit and Kate in her bath towel, asks them about the Gaspar statements, asks them about the Met getting rid of their Tannerman and why they keep the image on their website, oh and asks them WHY THEY HID THE CRUCIAL E.FITS FOR...WHAT WAS IT...FIVE YEARS, then and only then will she gain the respect of the public who support Madeleine, justice for her, be thought of as acting with integrity..


l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
12th July 2014

New Lazz:

Lorraine Kelly a Media Troll?
 
‘……….. crime reporters, and columnists print what in essence is a shed load of shit.’
 
http://l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com/Kelly_a_Media_Troll_.html

She should be challenged to discuss the case here.

She has become sooooooooo boring to me.   Who cares what she thinks?

They got rid of her from the breakfast show host slot and (wasn't pulling in the numbers apparently) she is now back to her Lorraine show which is when everyone is in work (or most anyway).    Why should I bother who or what she supports or what she thinks?


BOOORRRRING.   Not going to comment on what she thinks again.

Another great blog from Lazz.

aquila wrote:Another great blog from Lazz.

Excellent blog .... this use of the word 'troll' is designed to destroy those of us who wish to discuss the case but cannot believe in the words of Team Mc Cann. They are trying to scare us all into keeping quiet by tarnishing everyone who wants the truth to emerge as being a troll. It is a childish game. We want the truth, that is all. Something which Lorraine Kelly should also want.

plebgate wrote:She has become sooooooooo boring to me.   Who cares what she thinks?

They got rid of her from the breakfast show host slot and (wasn't pulling in the numbers apparently) she is now back to her Lorraine show which is when everyone is in work (or most anyway).    Why should I bother who or what she supports or what she thinks?


BOOORRRRING.   Not going to comment on what she thinks again.

Like you, I couldn't give a **** what Lorraine Kelly thinks... it's the fact that she is misinforming people with her 'thoughts' that really enrages me... her viewing/reading public might be in the minority, but she still has the power to influence and that reeeaaallly reeeaaallly ****s me off.

Sincere apologies for blank expletives, but that woman truly does aggravate me.

plebgate wrote:She has become sooooooooo boring to me.   Who cares what she thinks?

They got rid of her from the breakfast show host slot and (wasn't pulling in the numbers apparently) she is now back to her Lorraine show which is when everyone is in work (or most anyway).    Why should I bother who or what she supports or what she thinks?


BOOORRRRING.   Not going to comment on what she thinks again.

She's just another media whore, like Carol Malone, who will do anything (anything ) or read anything put in front of her if it will help keep her in expensive handbags and designer shoes.

Naz_Nomad wrote:

plebgate wrote:She has become sooooooooo boring to me.   Who cares what she thinks?

They got rid of her from the breakfast show host slot and (wasn't pulling in the numbers apparently) she is now back to her Lorraine show which is when everyone is in work (or most anyway).    Why should I bother who or what she supports or what she thinks?


BOOORRRRING.   Not going to comment on what she thinks again.

She's just another media whore, like Carol Malone, who will do anything (anything ) or read anything put in front of her if it will help keep her in expensive handbags and designer shoes.

Expensive habdbags & designer shoes? LOL, she's working for JD Williams fashions now

HelenMeg wrote:

aquila wrote:Another great blog from Lazz.

Excellent blog .... this use of the word 'troll' is designed to destroy those of us who wish to discuss the case but cannot believe in the words of Team Mc Cann. They are trying to scare us all into keeping quiet by tarnishing everyone who wants the truth to emerge as being a troll. It is a childish game. We want the truth, that is all. Something which Lorraine Kelly should also want.

Agree. It is used in much the same way the word 'racist' was (and sometimes still is) as an attempt to intimidate and scare people who mentioned 'immigration' in anything other than a positive light, to shut up. Gordon Brown, the big oaf, used a similar term, which I believe pretty much did for him. 'Troll' is a stupid and dishonest word in the context of the Internet anyway as it refers to Scandinavian folklore and will always do so to me. If you think about it, everyone is someone's 'troll' because no matter what view you hold, someone will disagree with it, and that is basically what a 'troll' is in these terms. "You disagree with me and I can't take it because really, hiding behind this screen is a little, inadequate me, and I can't argue with your opinion because you are obviously right and that intimidates me...I know, I'll call you a 'troll' and run away coz vat is big and clever and makes me feel better about my inadequate, little self." That's what anyone who uses that silly word on the Internet is saying (unless they are recounting a tale from Scandinavian folklore and using it in the right context).

That advert where Lorraine appears half-way through is quite pleasant, with the boogie-woogie music and dancing, until she appears.

I don't blame her for not asking the McCanns anything awkward. To do so would be professional suicide, but those who go out of their way to show how onside they are (Richard and Judy, anyone?) really make me sick.

In my opinion.

sharonl wrote:

Naz_Nomad wrote:

plebgate wrote:She has become sooooooooo boring to me.   Who cares what she thinks?

They got rid of her from the breakfast show host slot and (wasn't pulling in the numbers apparently) she is now back to her Lorraine show which is when everyone is in work (or most anyway).    Why should I bother who or what she supports or what she thinks?


BOOORRRRING.   Not going to comment on what she thinks again.

She's just another media whore, like Carol Malone, who will do anything (anything ) or read anything put in front of her if it will help keep her in expensive handbags and designer shoes.

Expensive habdbags & designer shoes? LOL, she's working for JD Williams fashions now

Are Williams a midland's firm,I'm not from there but have a daughter at uni up there and saw this advert on when visiting last week.

WMD wrote:

sharonl wrote:

Naz_Nomad wrote:

plebgate wrote:She has become sooooooooo boring to me.   Who cares what she thinks?

They got rid of her from the breakfast show host slot and (wasn't pulling in the numbers apparently) she is now back to her Lorraine show which is when everyone is in work (or most anyway).    Why should I bother who or what she supports or what she thinks?


BOOORRRRING.   Not going to comment on what she thinks again.

She's just another media whore, like Carol Malone, who will do anything (anything ) or read anything put in front of her if it will help keep her in expensive handbags and designer shoes.

Expensive habdbags & designer shoes? LOL, she's working for JD Williams fashions now

Are Williams a midland's firm,I'm not from there but have a daughter at uni up there and saw this advert on when visiting last week.

No they are in Manchester, I used to work for them.

.....I agree with the other posters here, Ms Kelly is what David Icke termed a 'repeater', she just regurgitates the accepted tabloid version of events and repeats it without question. Probably a bit too dim and naive to want to accept that 'respectable ' people lie and do awful things.