Re: HALL OF SHAME - A record of tweets

by Guest 06.10.14 8:13

frost wrote:just to balance things on looking at his earlier tweets he did post the folowing

Lord Sugar ‏

[ltr]@Lord_Sugar[/ltr]

39m39 minutes ago
If the McCanns are not on Twitter, question must be asked who pointed out to media the so called trolling of the McCanns by Brenda Leyland

Is that Lord Sugar offering an opinion and asking questions on Twitter?

Surely he's trolling the media?

Irony... sweet irony.

by frost 07.10.14 10:44

Jencalo_Amoral ‏[ltr]@TheJENReturns[/ltr] 4 mins4 minutes ago
Enough is enough. You people have made many people's lives a complete misery with your abuse. No more. I'm closing my acct down #mccann
Expand

by frost 07.10.14 10:45

Jencalo_Amoral ‏[ltr]@TheJENReturns[/ltr] 5 mins5 minutes ago
If Scotland Yard wish to speak to me I am more than happy to have them call and discuss the abuse the #McCann s have endured and by whom.
Expand

by Rogue-a-Tory 07.10.14 10:51

frost wrote:Jencalo_Amoral ‏

[ltr]@TheJENReturns[/ltr]

5 mins5 minutes ago
If Scotland Yard wish to speak to me I am more than happy to have them call and discuss the abuse the #McCann s have endured and by whom.
Expand

Reply
Retweet
Favourite
More

Normally if you have evidence of a crime you contact the police yourself. That's the way crime reporting works. Don't wait for the old bill to knock on your door to inform that you've been burgled.

Anyway, Gurning will just create another account, the way the old dear works.

by plebgate 07.10.14 11:36

frost wrote:Jencalo_Amoral ‏

[ltr]@TheJENReturns[/ltr]

5 mins5 minutes ago
If Scotland Yard wish to speak to me I am more than happy to have them call and discuss the abuse the #McCann s have endured and by whom.
Expand

Reply
Retweet
Favourite
More

Will she be more than happy if the cops decide to call and discuss the abuse that has been levelled at Pro Maddie supporters?

by sallypelt 07.10.14 12:37

I just saw these tweets from someone with the ID Criminal ex-Cop ™ @_Goncalo_Amaral This isn't Dr G Amaral, so why is it allowed for some troll to use someone else's REAL name to post?

Here are some of the tweets:

Criminal ex-Cop ™ retweeted

Jasmine @alfibab3 · 20 Dec 2012

@_Goncalo_Amaral Its the end of the world tomorrow. Anti #mccann are at a meeting for the last troll event.

Criminal ex-Cop ™ retweeted

Jencalo_Amoral @TheJENReturns · 12 Dec 2012

@alfibab3 @hadashocker Doesn't he realise all antis want is paedo /dogs dont lie/body in freezer/substitute child absolute bollox #McCann

Criminal ex-Cop ™ @_Goncalo_Amaral · 26 Nov 2012

It matters not vile - convicted ex-Cop supporting - anti #McCann Trolls don't like the abduction evidence re M McCann

Criminal ex-Cop ™ @_Goncalo_Amaral · 26 Nov 2012

Anti #McCann Trolls have spent 5yrs+ spewing lies, distortions and myths on behalf of CRIMINAL ex-Cop & achieved NOTHING but greater madness

Criminal ex-Cop ™ @_Goncalo_Amaral · 21 Nov 2012

April 2012 - Panorama: G Amaral 'it is our fault.. our justice system.. our Attorney General.. allowed investigation to be shelved' #McCann

Criminal ex-Cop ™ @_Goncalo_Amaral · 21 Nov 2012

Disgraced Ex-Cop In Madeleine #McCann Case the convicted perjurer, Goncalo Amaral admits he made many mistakes in case http://goo.gl/j39Zb

Criminal ex-Cop ™ @_Goncalo_Amaral · 19 Nov 2012

Criminal ex-Cop G Amaral (kicked-off Madeleine #McCann case) LOST spurious libel case against torture victims Lawyer http://bit.ly/OVjcXr

The above are just some of the tweets made in the name of G Amaral. If this isn't a criminal act, I don't know what is. The tweeter is even using his photograph.

https://twitter.com/_Goncalo_Amaral?original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fjillhavern.forumotion.net%2Fportal&query=%23mccann&tw_i=519447127387537409&tw_p=embeddedtimeline&tw_w=509642023163273216

by Cora 18.10.14 16:22

Well if I ever entertain the thought of opening a Twitter account I will come back here and remind myself of why it's a bad idea. Disgusting, vile, evil, personal attacks.

by Naz_Nomad 18.10.14 17:36

Why not have this thread a a "sticky" page for a while, so that newcomers can immediately see what a vile bunch the McCann believers are?

by comperedna 18.10.14 18:56

Probably a lot of them who do not post are merely naive or ignorant of the facts, maybe the vile ones who do post in that vulgar and attacking way, are the stupid few who are said to be paid 'shills'. I don't belong to Twitter because it is not moderated.

by sallypelt 11.11.14 15:02

Occasionally, I read the new Madeleine Forum, as I have no gripe with any member, either on here, or "over there", as I believe that we are all searching for the same thing, and that is THE TRUTH of what happened to M McCann. I have, on occasion, thought about joining, as there are some members who post on this forum and on the other forum. But after reading a post, a few minutes ago, which is THIS post:

Quote:
Hear Hear, that other place truly is a cesspit. I used to cringe at TB's followers and how easily they'd be duped into his warped theories about trolls under the bed".

END

I think I will stay put where I am, and remain with just one forum, as I've done for many years. So, folks, I will remain here, in the "cesspit" Mrs

by Guest 11.11.14 15:14

sallypelt wrote:Occasionally, I read the new Madeleine Forum, as I have no gripe with any member, either on here, or "over there", as I believe that we are all searching for the same thing, and that is THE TRUTH of what happened to M McCann. I have, on occasion, thought about joining, as there are some members who post on this forum and on the other forum. But after reading a post, a few minutes ago, which is THIS post:

Quote:
Hear Hear, that other place truly is a cesspit. I used to cringe at TB's followers and how easily they'd be duped into his warped theories about trolls under the bed".

END

I think I will stay put where I am, and remain with just one forum, as I've done for many years. So, folks, I will remain here, in the "cesspit"

It is a sad fact that this forum is under attack - not from the pro's as would be expected, but from people who used to be what we thought were trusted members of this forum.

by tiny 11.11.14 15:23

just had a peek there,helenmeg said she has been banned?

by tiny 11.11.14 15:38

Isnt it a shame that they have nothing better to do than diss this forum when they join there,i feel quite sad as I thought it was a going to turn out a good forum like this one
but alas it doesn't look like its going to be.

by **Tony Bennett** 11.11.14 18:47

tiny wrote:Isnt it a shame that they have nothing better to do than diss this forum when they join there,i feel quite sad as I thought it was a going to turn out a good forum like this one
but alas it doesn't look like its going to be.

It's always a shame to lose members who become malcontents, but the figures continue to speak for themselves:

391 on CMOMM here right now

54 on MM
21 on MCF
16 on MMM

plus CMOMM ranked high on most Madeleine McCann-related searches.

It reminds me of the old Whiskas cat adverts: 8 out of 10 cats prefer Whiskas

by Guest 11.11.14 19:15

tiny wrote:just had a peek there,helenmeg said she has been banned?

Jamaica?

No, she went of her own accord.

(Old joke).

by sallypelt 26.11.14 19:54

Some interesting tweets about G Osborne, today, at PMQT. Here is a taster:

Tony Greenall [email=‏@TonyCSGreenall]‏@TonyCSGreenall[/email] 12m12 minutes ago
Govt. announced legal highs will now be Class A drugs, just like whatever George Osborne was on in Parliament today.

Paul Johnson [email=‏@PaulJohnson1861]‏@PaulJohnson1861[/email] 9m9 minutes ago
What on earth was going on with George Osborne at PMQs? http://i100.io/Ywie0rg The term Is believe is "off his tits"

tan Le Man 45 [email=‏@RFCSwitcheroo]‏@RFCSwitcheroo[/email] 1m1 minute ago
[email=.@George_Osborne].@George_Osborne[/email] you need to cut doon on that white powder fella, the feckin state of you at #pmqs today!!

by tiny 19.12.14 15:54

This must be one of the sickest tweets yet.

HALL OF SHAME - A record of tweets - Page 14 B5OR8k1IAAAQ-m6

that's a McCann supporter for you,vile,vile vile.

by **PeterMac** 19.12.14 16:11

tiny wrote:This must be one of the sickest tweets yet.

that's a McCann supporter for you,vile,vile vile.

One hopes she was not reffering to Madeleine. No name is given, so perhaps that could be turned round by someone who does Twitter

by tiny 19.12.14 16:20

I was so shocked to read that on twitter,that a normal person could say that about some one who has died,filth is the word I would use for this hancock person. BRUNT, I hope you see this,do you still feel proud of yourself .

by plebgate 21.01.15 18:33

Had to post this one

Patty Bush @choppyflops
@skymartinbrunt does it hurt when @mitch_1uk puts his hand up your arse to work your mouth? #mccann

not a shameful tweet at all imo - it made me laugh.

by **Tony Bennett** 27.01.15 11:32

Sonia Poulton has been challenged by McCann-supporters that she has door-stepped Kate McCann and has admitted it:

Sonia Poulton [email=‏@SoniaPoulton]‏[/email]@SoniaPoulton
2 hrs ago

@B_balou @_DarkMavis @tonybooth20 It's true. It's my job to seek answers. I tried route of requesting interview. This is public interest.

ETA: Followed up by this tweet a bit later:

Sonia Poulton
@ Sonia Poulton
1h1 hour ago

@_DarkMavis @B_balou @tonybooth20 I don't care what bent and twisted people on small forum think. Times have changed, they need to catch up.

ETA 2:

In another place, a McCann-sceptic has written:

I can imagine the headline: "McCanns are fearing for their safety after Kate was doorstepped by Sonia Poulton whilst their twins were cowering in the kitchen". God help us all, that is the last thing we need. What a stupid, stupid thing for SP to do especially after the good publicity that GA received and the on-going police investigation".

by tiny 27.01.15 12:31

Tony why have you put this in the hall of shame? every one keeps on asking why the msm don't ask questions and yet when some one does you put it here
you certainly have a axe to grind,shame on YOU

by **Tony Bennett** 27.01.15 13:26

tiny wrote:Tony why have you put this in the hall of shame? every one keeps on asking why the msm don't ask questions and yet when some one does you put it here
you certainly have a axe to grind, shame on YOU

Everyone who is a member of this forum and every guest here will have a view on whether doorstepping is ever justified and - if it is - under what circumstances.

I don't hink it was right for Martin Brunt and the SKY News team to doorstep Brenda Leyland.

Neither do I think it was right for Sonia Poulton to doorstep Kate McCann.

In that respect I am hopeful that 95%-plus of members and guests here will agree with me.

by tiny 27.01.15 13:33

Still does not belong in the name and shame thread even if 99% of forum members and guest do agree with you,still at least you have given the pro maccanns some thing to talk about,well done you

by **Tony Bennett** 27.01.15 13:49

tiny wrote:Still does not belong in the name and shame thread even if 99% of forum members and guest do agree with you, still at least you have given the pro-McCanns some thing to talk about, well done you

I guess it all depends on whether you think that Sonia Poulton is either:

a) a sincere and honest citizen who is genuinely seeking the truth about what happened to Madeleine McCann, working hard to get to the truth, and is going about it the right way, or

b) an attention-seeker trying to revive her flagging career as a journalist by latching on to the apparent suicide of Brenda Leyland.

If the mainstream media don't use Sonia's excursion to Kate McCann's doorstep as yet another excuse with which to bash all those seeking the truth about what reallly happened to Madeleines McCann, we shall be very lucky IMO

by tiny 27.01.15 14:02

A, and i think B was uncalled for and below the belt. you and your polls,jesus

by Jamming 27.01.15 14:53

tiny wrote:A, and i think B was uncalled for and below the belt. you and your polls,jesus

Tiny, I too would question why this is in the hall of shame particularly, but I'd also question why each of your posts here has a dig at Tony in the process ?

That said, I agree with Tony that I do not think it right for Sonia Poulton to doorstep Kate McCann, and then to go on and promote the fact on twitter. That's just self promotion at its cheapest surely ?

As for Tony's posting of this, in this thread, giving the pro McCanns something to talk about, surely Sonia's confirmation of this on twitter has done that to a far higher degree, no ?

by sallypelt 27.01.15 14:54

Jasmine @alfibab3 · 9m 9 minutes ago
BL invited MB a big difference.,Poultice comes near me and she will done for harassment. I or no pro has invited Poultice, get it #mccann

See how this person lies and lies, and twists the truth? "BL INVITED MB"???? Well, I must be on a different planet because I remember distinctly, the look of shock and surprise on Brenda Leyland's face, when MB stuck a microphone into her face.

Oh, and if proof is needed, that MB turned up at BL's door unexpectedly, just look at the banner on this Forum.

by tiny 27.01.15 15:07

Jamming wrote:
tiny wrote:A, and i think B was uncalled for and below the belt. you and your polls,jesus

Tiny, I too would question why this is in the hall of shame particularly, but I'd also question why each of your posts here has a dig at Tony in the process ?

That said, I agree with Tony that I do not think it right for Sonia Poulton to doorstep Kate McCann, and then to go on and promote the fact on twitter. That's just self promotion at its cheapest surely ?

As for Tony's posting of this, in this thread, giving the pro McCanns something to talk about, surely Sonia's confirmation of this on twitter has done that to a far higher degree, no ?

yes you could say I am having a dig at tony, the reason being this is a personal thing between him and Sonia,and not about if Sonia is doing the right thing or not,what it boils down too is the fact that she believe the hollie greig case also her time with ikce and and her interview with Rosalind and steven birch and my opinion is that this is the reason tony keeps having a dig at Sonia.( bit in red) 2 people supposedly wanting justice for Brenda and Madeleine

by Jamming 27.01.15 15:15

tiny wrote:
Jamming wrote:
tiny wrote:A, and i think B was uncalled for and below the belt. you and your polls,jesus

Tiny, I too would question why this is in the hall of shame particularly, but I'd also question why each of your posts here has a dig at Tony in the process ?

That said, I agree with Tony that I do not think it right for Sonia Poulton to doorstep Kate McCann, and then to go on and promote the fact on twitter. That's just self promotion at its cheapest surely ?

As for Tony's posting of this, in this thread, giving the pro McCanns something to talk about, surely Sonia's confirmation of this on twitter has done that to a far higher degree, no ?
yes you could say I am having a dig at tony, the reason being this is a personal thing between him and Sonia,and not about if Sonia is doing the right thing or not,what it boils down too is the fact that she believe the hollie greig case also her time with ikce and and her interview with Rosalind and steven birch and my opinion is that this is the reason tony keeps having a dig at Sonia.

Thanks for replying Tiny