Re: OPERATION BRICK !

by Paddingtom 18.06.24 13:13

I ordered mine before Crusader.

Its stuck in customs in coventry!!!!!........uh oh.....hope I dont get carter rucked

by Silentscope 19.06.24 13:57

@PeterMac wrote:

It is impressive that the statement from Germany let Clarke off the hook so lightly, by talking about an exaggeration or perhaps a misinterpretation of a subordinate clause. That is an act of charity or mercy.

Silentscope:
I am not impressed.

This is not an act of Charity or Mercy, as the German Legal system is based on the 'Hard but Fair' principle. Clarke is just hiding behind his British Citizenship in a Foreign land. If he were German and in Germany, he could be Charged with Interference or even Libel.

It stinks of Complicity from the desk of HCW, who knowing full well there was no real Evidence proceeded with a Fictional Case that Brückner first 'Abducted' then 'Killed' Madeleine Beth McCann.

Well Hans, 'Show us the Body, and prove he killed her'.

by AnneCGuedes 19.06.24 17:44

HCW is clearly prepared to do anything to achieve his goal, which, like St George, is to have brought down the foul beast.

by GreenTara 20.06.24 15:00

I was tempted to go straight to the last section but refrained. I’m reading every word, starting at the very beginning.
I’m about a fifth of the way thru and believe it really is worth reading it cover to cover. There is meaning in everything he chooses to do. The explanation of the front cover is poignant and beautiful. The dedications are moving.
So onto the first section. As we know the Tapas9 statements are crazy and it’s easy to understand why they refused a reenactment, it simply wouldn’t be possible. As we also know the statements were forever changing. Stellander has undertaken to look at each of the statements of the key players and to explore each permutation of the variations. Thus concluding where each route ends and as you can imagine the number of routes are endless. That is one brave man! He is speaking to you, the reader and apologises for how trawling a read it is but encourages you to continue. Indeed he makes it a surprisingly enjoyable read. I am only on that first section, he is just bringing the checking system to a close so I can only share my views up to this point.

by **Jill Havern** 20.06.24 16:28

Thank you for your feedback GreenTara. I look forward to even more of your input about the book.

Please use this thread to further discuss the contents thumbsup

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t17551-norwegian-ex-military-detective-claims-to-have-solved-madeleine-case

by GreenTara 20.06.24 16:36

Thank you, I did wonder if I wrote it in the correct thread…oopsy! Will move it…

by **Jill Havern** 20.06.24 16:46

You can certainly copy it over to the other thread if you wouldn't mind, but I'll leave your comment here aswell.

by **PeterMac** 07.07.24 11:10

Operation Brick Phase 2
Completed

The Brick is now in the hands of
* H. Wolters
* H. Fülscher
* Kate Healy / Gerry McCann
* Matt Oldfield / Rachael Oldfield
* David Payne / Fiona Payne
* Russell O'Brien / Jane Tanner
* Clarence Mitchell

And many other people across the world

The Brick is being prepared for electronic release, (using an English speaking proof reader this time) with some minor and ultimately irrelevant errors corrected.

It may include the Executive Summary
She Died
They Lied

by Silentscope 07.07.24 11:18

Wolters will have three Weeks Holiday time to read his Copy.

I wonder if he will have a Job afterwards?

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 11:39

Excellent. What will the four couples, and Mitchell, mentioned in post #98, do?

by Silentscope 07.07.24 12:00

I would recommend Bernt sends two more copies out.

Addressed to:

Arul and Katharina Gaspar
Dianne Webster

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 12:04

Is Operation Grange getting a copy?

by GreenTara 07.07.24 12:11

Silentscope wrote:I would recommend Bernt sends two more copies out.

Addressed to:

Arul and Katharina Gaspar
Dianne Webster

I was thinking Nanny Cat more as the Gaspars have already done all they can & he says he didn’t want to bring Dianne Webster into it more than necessary. He speaks directly to Nanny Cat in the book tho.

by crusader 07.07.24 12:32

Wolters and Fulscher are the only two on the above list who don't know the truth about what happened.
I don't think the rest of them will do anything there is nothing they can do.

by Silentscope 07.07.24 12:47

Wolters has either been told to ignore the PJ Files, or never bothered to read them before proceeding.

Fülscher has taken the Time to actually visit Portugal, and has read the PJ Files.

If Bernt believes the Gaspars story is true, and that Webster should be left out of it then that is his decision.

As far as I am concerned, they are all in it together.

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 12:50

When the electronic version of the Brick is released, to be seen world wide, they will be steaming mad, and might try to sue Bernt. I doubt any sensible law firm would take them on. Martin Brunt might door step them. What wonderful irony that would be.

by GreenTara 07.07.24 14:34

Silentscope wrote:Wolters has either been told to ignore the PJ Files, or never bothered to read them before proceeding.

Fülscher has taken the Time to actually visit Portugal, and has read the PJ Files.

If Bernt believes the Gaspars story is true, and that Webster should be left out of it then that is his decision.

As far as I am concerned, they are all in it together.

I’m just going by what’s in the book, he does hold her accountable too but in a more limited way. You make a good point though about the Gaspars statement cos that affects her directly.

by Silentscope 07.07.24 14:52

The Gaspars Statements would only affect Dianne Webster directly how?

by GreenTara 07.07.24 15:22

Silentscope wrote:The Gaspars Statements would only affect Dianne Webster directly how?

Not “only”, just affect her directly because David Payne is her son in law & father to her grandchildren. I thought that was the point you were making. Sorry. I myself had forgotten about her connection to David Payne till you made me think of it.

by AnneCGuedes 07.07.24 16:15

Silentscope wrote:
Fülscher has taken the Time to actually visit Portugal, and has read the PJ Files.

How do you know that FF read the PJ Files, Silentscope ?

by AnneCGuedes 07.07.24 17:01

PeterMac wrote:Operation Brick Phase 2
Completed

The Brick is now in the hands of
* H. Wolters
* H. Fülscher
* Kate Healy / Gerry McCann
* Matt Oldfield / Rachael Oldfield
* David Payne / Fiona Payne
* Russell O'Brien / Jane Tanner
* Clarence Mitchell

And many other people across the world

The Brick is being prepared for electronic release, (using an English speaking proof reader this time) with some minor and ultimately irrelevant errors corrected.

It may include the Executive Summary
She Died
They Lied

HCW won't read the book, he can barely read.
FF won't read the book, he now knows enough about HCW's bluff.
The MCs will not read a book that can only bring back dark memories, but they will send it to Carter Ruck for review.
Carter Ruck might have a look but will remind the MCs of the Met's condition for their protection: no waves.
The others are keen never to think about the case again, will they put the book in a drawer in case their lawyers would need it?
CM will only see it as a way of lighting a fire in the fireplace next winter.

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 17:11

It's very annoying that not even an official review of the case will come from the Brick. But, will the main players and the Nuggets Abroad, have to keep checking the suspected burial place, which some of them have visited because of the secret messages?

by **PeterMac** 07.07.24 17:12

Cake Lover wrote:Excellent. What will the four couples, and Mitchell, mentioned in post #98, do?

What can they do ?

Ignore it and hope it goes away
Issue statements saying it is factually inaccurate on all 4,738 substantive points
Say they were "Acting under orders/ Duress/ coercion", which since 1945-6 has not been a Defence but can still be considered as Mitigation, given a sympathetic judge
Sue for Defamation/ Libel
Throw Gerry under a Bus and make full statements
or what ?

The evidence in the book in the form of Statement analysis shows Kate as the most vulnerable.
She has lost her profession, and we believe her husband.
And she was, and is, a Trustee of what is very clearly a long term Fraud, is involved in an astonishing case of "Wasting Police Time' and "Conspiracy to Pervert"

The twins will now be at University or college, of perhaps on a 'Gap Year' to Portugal cleaning roadsigns on the Algarve of graffiti – so she is very much on her own

A short personal letter was included in her copy of the Brick, which is also annotated
It is likely that Gerry will destroy it before she sees it if he gets the book first.

by **PeterMac** 07.07.24 18:17

Anne Guedes knows that Fülscher has been involved in the book for a long time.
we recommend she buys a copy
H Wolters acknowledged receipt and said he was reading it.
H.Fülscher has had a copy for the past 3 years, in manuscript, and read it thoroughly and critically reviewing it

by Bluebagthepirate 07.07.24 18:23

Any news on the website?

I'm half way through the book now.

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 18:38

The entire ghastly bunch being hassled would be satisfying enough, if anybody has sufficient interest.

by Cake Lover 07.07.24 19:12

It would be interesting to know if Bruckner reads it.

by **PeterMac** 07.07.24 19:18

List amended to include
Jon Clarke

by **PeterMac** 08.07.24 10:05

And now H. Fülscher's 'delphic' utterance makes sense

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
He only has to raise a "reasonable Doubt"
In this case it is Virtual Certainty that Madeleine was NOT abducted between 2118 and 2125 on 3/5/7

by Honesty 08.07.24 13:29

PeterMac wrote:Anne Guedes knows that Fülscher has been involved in the book for a long time.
we recommend she buys a copy
H Wolters acknowledged receipt and said he was reading it.
H.Fülscher has had a copy for the past 3 years, in manuscript, and read it thoroughly and critically reviewing it

Anne, if you are not in possession of a copy yet, would you please allow me to buy you a copy? In gratitude.