l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun: The Same Kinda Clothes

While I was taking a look back this morning at the Crimewatch, Madeleine McCann Special of October 2013, it struck me that I had gotten something wrong.

I had understood that this British dad had posed for the above picture taken by the Metropolitan Police, in the VERY same clothes he had worn on the night Madeleine McCann was reported as a missing person.

I wondered where I had gotten that idea so began checking out news reports from that time, and indeed, it was reported that this guy posed for pictures in the very same clothes he had worn on that night.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2460669/Madeleine-McCann-kidnapping-innocent-British-father-mistaken-key-suspect.html

'He even agreed to be pictured in the clothes he wore in Praia da Luz on 3rd May 2007, to prove he was the man in the police sketch previously seen as key to cracking the case.'

No matter, press cannot be trusted to report accurately - and neither it seems can DCI Andy Redwood/Metropolitan Police.

The lies, deceit, corruption in the Madeleine McCann case is absolutely mind blowing!   Everyone involved, from the parents, their buddies, their spokesperson, and many others, have something to hide.   Everyone has their own agenda.  Not a one has been completely honest.

And the focus is NEVER discovering what happened to Madeleine!

According to the presenter of Crimewatch it was NOT the case at all that this British dad posed in the very clothes he had worn on that night.  The British dad has posed for pictures wearing clothes KIND OF LIKE what he wore on that night.

At the time, many, like I did, thought it odd that this guy would have preserved the clothes he had worn on the night Madeleine McCann vanished.  Thought it odd too that he would even remember what he had been wearing more than six years previously.  What guy does, in fact does anyone?  If you asked me what I wore on a particular night years back on holiday, I wouldn't have a clue, unless some special event occurred when on holiday then I might possibly have a vague idea.

But this British dad, crechedad - Did he look at the sketch of the Tannerman sighting when it was released into public domain (when would that have been, how many months AFTER Tanner's sighting, 4/5 months, more?) and at that point thought - well knock me down with a feather - that guy looks like me, the clothes are identical to the ones I wore the night that kid went missing!

Or, did he already believe the person Tanner saw was him WAY BEFORE, months before, the release of the sketch which the McCanns had drawn up?(it was not the police who commissioned this sketch as is reported in some quarters it was McCanns.  Funny that too, that they NEVER IMMEDIATELY DID THIS AS SOON AS TANNER GAVE THE DESCRIPTION, BUT THEN, TANNER'S SIGHTING DEVELOPED OVER TIME.)

At what stage did this guy go to the Leicestershire Police in the UK and tell them that he believed he was the person who Jane Tanner had seen carrying a child?

Much as I thought it odd that this guy had preserved the actual clothes he had been wearing on that night, I find it much more odd, that the clothes he is wearing in the above picture were in fact NOT those same clothes.  

So were did he get them?  Metropolitan Police provide them for him?

Makes it all the more FISHY! 

Met were hardly going to supply him with an outfit that did not match the McCanns sketch, a sketch we are told was based on their buddy Jane Tanner's sighting!

Well, now you can knock me down with a feather, because that rather changes an already outrageous story!



The British dad kitted out in the
outfit provided by Metropolitan
Police? Jane Tanner's Tannerman, an
 image she developed over many  months of a sighting she  claimed
 to have made of a man with a  child, and which was widely  discredited, considered a  fabrication by police.  A sketch
 commissioned by McCanns NOT
 the police!



Time I think British dad came out of hiding and filled in the general public about a few matters concerning him being crechedad, and BEFORE the McCanns embark on another of their money making schemes.  Public deserve to know ABSOLUTELY where McCanns, and police now stand regarding this crechedad nonsense!

Public deserve the truth!

Public need to know when this British dad AND his family:

• First believed that he COULD BE the person Jane Tanner claims to have seen on the night of 3rd May 2007. 
  
  
• When he/they first approached Leicestershire Police in this regard?
  
  
• Did he/they actually remember the clothing he wore on that night, or is it more he believes he was in that spot/location on that night that has made him believe he could be the Tanner sighting?
  
  
• Why he was in that location, as the creche and his apartment, were not in that area.  He was heading in wrong direction.
  
  
• Was there at any time, between the time he supposedly first reported to Leicestershire Police, and his family's DISCUSSION with Redwood/Metropolitan Police that he ever contacted the police to speak of his belief that he was Tanner's Tannerman?
  
  
• Why had he kept the pyjamas which it is said, are the very ones his 2 year old daughter wore on that night (and why the hell was she wearing a pair of jim jams that would ALMOST have fitted her father?)
  
  
• Did he meet with Jane Tanner?
  
  
• Did Jane Tanner ID him?
  
  
• Did he meet with the McCanns?
  
  
• Was he ever interviewed by the Portuguese Police, the police authority who are the lead in the case of the missing Madeleine McCann? (not the UK Metropolitan Police as some may believe is the case)
  
  
• Why did he go alone to the creche to pick up his child and not together with his wife/partner/
  
  
• Why on a cold night did he not have his daughter warmly clothed as he himself was?
  
  
• Where had he and his family dined that evening?
  
  
• Did he approach Met, or did the Metropolitan Police approach him?
  
  
• When did he first have any discussion with the Metropolitan Police?
  
  
• What did HE SEE on that night at the location where he believes Jane Tanner spotted him?
  
  
• Did he see Tanner?
  
  
• Did he see Gerry McCann?
  
  
• Did he see Jez Wilkins?
  
  
• Did he hear any of the above named, speaking on that quiet street, or Jane Tanner's footsteps?
  
  
• Did he see anyone else at all on that night at this location?
  
  
• McCanns keep his image on their website as they say they cannot be sure he is the person Jane Tanner saw - WHY then is HE so sure that he is?
  
  
• Does he believe that there could have been another guy dressed just like him, carrying a barefooted child, just like he was, the child dressed only in pyjamas, and the other guy CARRYING THE CHILD IN THE EXACT AND UNUSUAL WAY HE WAS?
  
  
• Did he often carry his child in this way, and did he often wander about dark streets far from his accommodation with a young child not dressed for the elements?
  
  
• Was it usual for his daughter to not wake up having been taken from the warmth of their home (or this creche) and remain sleeping when out in the cold for a quite lengthy time?
  
  
• Was his partner happy for their child to be carried through the streets dressed only in pyjamas while he was dressed for the cold night?
  
  

At what stage did this guy go to the Leicestershire Police in the UK and tell them that he believed he was the person who Jane Tanner had seen carrying a child?

willowthewisp wrote:When are the Metropolitan Police going to charge any former Police Officers with "Perverting a Course of Justice" in Madeleine McCann;s disappearance case,as they have all been involved right from the beginning,Leicestershire Police,Gold Group and finally the glorious Metropolitan Police Force,so I've answered my own question, Never!

sandancer wrote:The Totmans have 2 children .

If Julian was carrying his daughter , dressed only in pyjamas back from the night Crèche ( going the wrong way !) 

Where was his son ? 
Did his wife carry the son back separately ?
Did they only leave their daughter in the Crèche ? 
If so where was their son ?

Verdi wrote:A very simple solution.

Totman was not crecheman was not Tannerman was not abductor.

Witness sighting = abduction.  No witness sighting = no abduction.