FRAUDULENT FUND

by **PeterMac** 21.10.13 22:01

The web page is STILL appealing for evidence of Tanner's Bundleman, Tannerman, measleman,
This is some days after Tanner was exposed, and that part of the last 6 year 'strategy' was consigned to history
They are STILL AT IT.

Taken at 22:56 Monday 23 Oct 2013
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]" />

This is Fraud on a GRAND scale

by Daisy 21.10.13 22:08

PeterMac wrote:The web page is STILL appealing for evidence of Tanner's Bundleman, Tannerman, measleman,
This is some days after Tanner was exposed, and that part of the last 6 year 'strategy' was consigned to history
They are STILL AT IT.

Taken at 22:56 Monday 23 Oct 2013
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]" />

This is Fraud on a GRAND scale

So what can we do about it?

Also, It's Mon 21st Oct not 23rd eh?

by TheTruthWillOut 21.10.13 22:18

Peter, can I ask you, being a retired police officer, Why the police haven't arrested someone and/or shut down the website and fund if its so obviously fraud?

by tiredofthebs 21.10.13 22:21

PeterMac wrote:The web page is STILL appealing for evidence of Tanner's Bundleman, Tannerman, measleman,
This is some days after Tanner was exposed, and that part of the last 6 year 'strategy' was consigned to history
They are STILL AT IT.

Taken at 22:56 Monday 23 Oct 2013
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]" />

This is Fraud on a GRAND scale

Is it worth sending this screenshot to the SY enquiry, I wonder. Or would we be labelled "vile unhelpful trolls" for doing so?

by tiredofthebs 21.10.13 22:22

TheTruthWillOut wrote:Peter, can I ask you, being a retired police officer, Why the police haven't arrested someone and/or shut down the website and fund if its so obviously fraud?

It has been a fraud since 2007. Leicestershire police used to direct people to the main suspects' website. And that was while they were still arguidos.

by Sockpuppet 21.10.13 22:24

I signed up just so that I could let you know something that I've just noticed!

Seeing this I went onto the findmadeleine site, and it changed before my very eyes. The page 'The Madeleine Team' started off with something like 'At the moment no investigation team is looking for Madeleine...' or something along those lines. At about 10.16 this changed to now reference the Met investigation.

Just pointing this out, as it seems likely somebody saw your OP PeterMac and rushed to get the site changed.

by Seek truth 21.10.13 22:29

I was saying to just leave it on there but to late if it's been removed as soon as you spoke.

Ooh they watching this? Hello.

EVIL !!!!!

by mouse 21.10.13 22:38

Yep - this fund has always been the route to their (imo) wrong doing. First advertised as a charity, never really clarified in public as such, and never corrected when announced as a charity by some ill-informed presenter on radio and TV, or press interviews. This surely should have been shut down ages ago, as many have said before, and at least when SY started to do their investigation government backed with money.....It's almost as if they feel they are untouchable....

Shouldn't be really surprised though, even 'Children In Need' the BBC flagship fundraiser is now being called into question and another Panorama investigation - into this - has now been cancelled by the BBC. Much like they did with the Jimmy Saville investigate - that too was cancelled. /You could not make this up....

And follwoing on - I guess if this has been removed we have it confirmed that they are watching now...Very Closely. But are donations still asked for?

by TheTruthWillOut 21.10.13 22:41

tiredofthebs wrote:
TheTruthWillOut wrote:Peter, can I ask you, being a retired police officer, Why the police haven't arrested someone and/or shut down the website and fund if its so obviously fraud?
It has been a fraud since 2007. Leicestershire police used to direct people to the main suspects' website. And that was while they were still arguidos.

I'm sure it is but am no legal expert! big grin

Common sense told me that Leicestershire Police are very wrong (breaking a law?) in promoting their website.

My question to Peter was being an ex police officer, why would they do something so stupid and continue doing it for over six years?

by Guest 21.10.13 23:04

The Findmadeleine homepage has been changed. It still features the 8 "e-fits" but now also a picture of [the iconic] Madeleine. However, their pages asking for information about bundleman, spotty man and Mme Beckham lookalike are still there, as well as their own investigation telephone number and email address ... Well, it takes some time, I guess, to iron it all out. Good night smilie

by ProfessorPPlum 22.10.13 1:02

The page that PeterMac referred to is still there at 1am Tue 22nd Oct. So whatever's changing, it's not this page.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by **tigger** 22.10.13 6:26

Châtelaine wrote:The Findmadeleine homepage has been changed. It still features the 8 "e-fits" but now also a picture of [the iconic] Madeleine. However, their pages asking for information about bundleman, spotty man and Mme Beckham lookalike are still there, as well as their own investigation telephone number and email address ... Well, it takes some time, I guess, to iron it all out. Good night

But SY are working closely with the parents, the script was written well over six months ago and someone must have told them the gist of it? They could have changed the website a week ago.
Besides, the website is there to gather money to search for Maddie, although they''ve stopped doing that since May 2011. So forget the last four words. But don't forget that £ 100.00 donate button....

So the more up to date the information, the better. Well, we're running up to Christmas, sick bags at the ready!

by tiredofthebs 23.10.13 3:28

Why does findmadeleine.com have a Met Police logo on it?

by MRNOODLES 23.10.13 20:02

IMPORTANT: Who are these people?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Can you help us identify these people

by Guest 23.10.13 20:04

Still????? Unbelievable!

BTW Mr. Noodles. I do love your avatar, but somehow it seriously distracts me from reading the comments ... winkwink

by Guest 23.10.13 20:07

If you look at their homepage, you also still have:
---
Do you have any information?

Fill in our contact form >
Email: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Investigation Line: +44 845 838 4699
---
!!!!!!!!

by Guest 23.10.13 20:09

MRNOODLES wrote:
IMPORTANT: Who are these people?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Can you help us identify these people

How do you do that MRNOODLES it is very clever having the pictures change like that.

Whatever ever happened to that very important lead, ie posh spice in the pic above, we had the grand press conference etc., I can't ever remember SY mentioning this very important witness/suspect.

by MRNOODLES 23.10.13 20:36

candyfloss wrote:
MRNOODLES wrote:
IMPORTANT: Who are these people?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Can you help us identify these people
How do you do that MRNOODLES it is very clever having the pictures change like that.

Whatever ever happened to that very important lead, ie posh spice in the pic above, we had the grand press conference etc., I can't ever remember SY mentioning this very important witness/suspect.

It's what they have on the fraud site atm. I just copied it across to show that they want to know who bundleman is.

by Guest 23.10.13 20:55

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

For the benefit of all the newbies who may not have seen the independent report into the setting up of the fund and its accounts.

by bristow 27.10.13 11:22

BIG BUMP!

by bristow 27.10.13 11:27

PeterMac wrote:The web page is STILL appealing for evidence of Tanner's Bundleman, Tannerman, measleman,
This is some days after Tanner was exposed, and that part of the last 6 year 'strategy' was consigned to history
They are STILL AT IT.

Taken at 22:56 Monday 23 Oct 2013
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]" />

This is Fraud on a GRAND scale

And it's still there at 11.26am Sunday 27th October 2013!

by Guest 27.10.13 13:00

I guess there's quite some in-fighting going on and they have other things on their mind right now ...

by pennylane 27.10.13 13:06

Châtelaine wrote:I guess there's quite some in-fighting going on and they have other things on their mind right now ...

Yes but how difficult would it be to put a picture of Gerry up? whistling

by **PeterMac** 27.10.13 17:48

. . . it was November 2008 that the McCanns their Fund Directors were presented with the report, the damning report, with the E. Fits from their private detectives.

Madeleine Fund Directors November 2008

JA Corner (Friend of McCanns)
MJ Linnett (Retired account- friend of McCanns?)
E.G. Smethurst (solicitor)
D. Skehan (Colleague Gerry McCann)
John McCann (Gerry McCanns brother)
Brian Kennedy (Kate McCanns uncle)
PJB Hubner (Colleague of Gerry McCann?)
Kate McCann (appointed 12th November 2008)
Gerry McCann (appointed 12th November 2008)

So one big happy family together, brothers, uncles, buddies, colleagues, who all got together with Kate and Gerry McCann, Madeleine's parents and decided
(as the Fund un-named spokesperson/source told the Sunday Times) to NOT ISSUE the E.Fits to help find Madeleine, against the advice of their private detectives.

So while they were counting the monies donated to help find Madeleine - unknown to those very generous members of the public who so kindly gave to this Fund,
the aforementioned Board of Directors were making plans - not to find the child - but to bury the E.Fits.

And bury them they did for FIVE YEARS.

by Smokeandmirrors 27.10.13 17:56

It's a bloody disgrace.

When in the history of criminal justice, do witnesses and former suspects get to decide what evidence or information the police receive, or require written requests for information. When asked for a written request by the Fund SY should have issued a caution.

by russiandoll 27.10.13 18:00

I have re read the Times piece. Am I right in thinking that when the files were handed over to SY, certain items were missing, having been removed prior to handover?

It is the only way I can make sense of SY not having sat on this info since the start of their review... I would have thought pretty much as soon as it began certain detectives were tasked with going through the PI stuff.

by **PeterMac** 27.10.13 18:08

russiandoll wrote:I have re read the Times piece. Am I right in thinking that when the files were handed over to SY, certain items were missing, having been removed prior to handover?
It is the only way I can make sense of SY not having sat on this info since the start of their review... I would have thought pretty much as soon as it began certain detectives were tasked with going through the PI stuff.

That is the interpretation I put on it, in the same way that the PJ only gave SY and the McCanns and the world certain parts of their information, and Leicester Police also held back vital parts even when the McCanns went to court to try to get everything.
The difference here is that thee were official bodies withholding information, for reasons to do with their part of the investigation .
The Fund's withholding anything of this nature may turn out to be a Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.

Is it coincidental that the McCanns joined the board of Directors at exactly this time ?

by Tangledweb 27.10.13 18:11

Smokeandmirrors wrote:It's a bloody disgrace.

When in the history of criminal justice, do witnesses and former suspects get to decide what evidence or information the police receive, or require written requests for information. When asked for a written request by the Fund SY should have issued a caution.

Couldn't agree more - the police shouldn't have had to write to request information. If it was my child, the police would be sick of me giving them every snippet of every bit of information I had! Bloody disgrace indeed. They've been treated with kid gloves and way too much respect from day one. At the end of the day, they are at best guilty of neglect, and they've been feted like royalty.

by Guest 27.10.13 19:22

PeterMac wrote: [...]
Is it coincidental that the McCanns joined the board of Directors at exactly this time ?

***
No, I don't think so.
It's obvious, isn't it?

But where did it get them? As I see it, only a couple of years respite ... And now, the hammer is coming down IMO

I've said it before, but I would be grateful to family taking in the twins for the next couple of weeks ...