Colin Sutton: Met only interested in proving McCann parents innocent

Alan Vinnicombe posted this in Abduction of Scam.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
2 hrs
Wolf in sheep's clothing Colin Sutton


Aesop's Fables(620–560 BC) yes that's how long this warning has been going... to be careful... lets tell the story then explain that in the mystery of MBM nothing is what it seems, it's so big that the cleverest and indeed most dark and devious brains in the country are at work. We only see the clock face but not the working of this most complicated of clocks. The fable goes like this .......
''Once upon a time, a Wolf [1] resolved to disguise his appearance in order to secure food more easily. Encased in the skin of a sheep,[2] he pastured with the flock deceiving the shepherd by his costume. In the evening he was shut up by the shepherd in the fold;

The gate was closed, and the entrance made thoroughly secure. But the shepherd,[3] returning to the fold during the night to obtain meat for the next day, mistakenly caught up the Wolf instead of a sheep and killed him instantly.
A cautionary tale from the mists of time itself, what if I told you the characters in the story were ......

[1] The McCanns
[2] Operation Grange
[3] Colin Sutton

Changes things, yes these fables were warnings, in this case, do not try to be too clever and deceive people or you might end up destroying yourselves! You see the McCann's are hiding behind Grange, praising them thanking them well they must, it's their cloak of innocents if Grange think us innocent than we are, very safe in there, and so they were the ten years of establishment support makes it so, until one day the shepherd, Colin Sutton, destroys the facade, the wolves that think they are clever and oh so devious are destroyed in a heartbeat, all over when Sutton out the blue opened the entrance the wolves thought so thoroughly secure and took them out !

Let Sutton explain. how it was done ......

Sutton tipped to head up the Madeleine McCann probe was warned he would be ordered to prove she was abducted and ignore other leads.

The source warned that he would be tasked with proving her parents Kate and Gerry were innocent and ignoring any alternatives to the abduction theory.

Speaking to Martin Brunt on Sky News, he said:
'I did receive a call from a very senior met police officer who knew me and said ''it wouldn’t be a good idea for me to head investigation on the basis that I wouldn’t be happy conducting an investigation being told where I could go and where I couldn’t go, the things I could investigate and the things I couldn’t. '

The Scotland Yard investigation was going to be very narrowly focused and that focus would be away from any suspicion of wrongdoing on the part of the McCanns or the tapas friends.' watch in on this u tube entry
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Things are not always what they seem!

Wow no one saw that coming, the public thought Grange were investigating team McCann and one day would swoop arrest them, or at least question them, after all 12 million pounds spent and the dogs they must be interviewed... it seems not we are told, not by hearsay, not a theory of an online blogger, not a C list celeb... NO, a creditable establishment figure who cannot be doubted, there it is set in stone. Grange has no remit to investigate the McCann's, the untouchable are just that... or they were.. until Sutton let the cat out of the bag, BOOM, it's a scam tax payers money wasted!

Encapsulated right there Colin Sutton drops, Redwood, Assistant Commissioner Mark Rowley Nicola Wall, puts them all at risk, now why would he do that?

More importantly, why was he allowed to do that, make no mistake this doesn't make MSM sky TV without getting government approval, no no not in the nation's interest to tell the public all these headlines, all that money wasted imagine the emails to all MPs from an irate public, no make no mistake this was orchestrated start of a campaign to expose the McCann's for what the are!

This is a man who's colleagues who have climbed the greasy ladder to the top of the Met as Sutton himself has done, he's friends with them, they don't get to the top by talking out of school, spilling the beans on each other!

This is where I expose the machinations of the elite of our society Colin Sutton IMO was put up to it merely a messenger sent by the powers that be to start the fall of the empire of team McCann,

My contacts tell me he wouldn't possibly do this alone unless if he was told too, paid too, promised a job on Sky, this is how these things work it's called risk and reward ,assured his fellow top cops are safe from disaster, from what I know Sutton is far from him being a brave whistle blower he just part of the plan to ditch team McCann in the near future!

How can this work well he's told us the Met is not investigating the McCanns, a terrible revelation for McCann's it was their umbrella of cover, the premise the Met think them innocent they must be! not if they are not to be looked at, boom game changer!

Now, what has this as done to the case, think outside the box please, the impact is he's destroyed the McCann in a minute!

But saves Mets top cops, if they didn't investigate the team McCanns they can't be blamed for not noticing what a 5-year-old could see... the lies and the dogs and the ridiculous timeline, a get out of jail card, done before it happens the preparation done by Sutton! he has saved his mates at the Met they are home free, well played Mr Sutton, the non-whistle blower but destroyer of team McCann in the skilful positioning of the Establishment dumping of the Tapas 9 very soon! they have been out thought and mesmerised!

Of course, others have to be warned to desert a sinking ship, some are rats did you know that the dispatched Clarence Mitchell is set to become the head of media monitoring for the Conservative Party campaign unit, and was also a spokesman for Madeleine McCann's parents.
[note the was!]
Mr Mitchell will report to Andy Coulson, the Tories' director of communications, he will not be an active spokesperson for the political party.The two men reportedly have a close relationship, following Mr Coulson's stint as editor of the News of the World.
The funds' accountants has resigned and a whole raft of believers in MSM have fallen silent, worse of the Sun their biggest supporters banner headline last week

''Pals of the parents have said Goncalo Amaral 'has won once and for all'

they have never had the public's support if the lose MSM's blind faith the ship will sink faster than the Titanic
If I take you back to Aesop's time he would say
''The end is Nigh''

I have that from the top, Colin Sutton Ex-Senior Investigating Officer for the Met Police Murder Squad no less, he said a high-ranking friend in the Met called him!

I think I've explained the real reason why.TOMORROW I tell who is behind bringing them down and why !

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Snipped from the above post

"I have that from the top, Colin Sutton Ex-Senior Investigating Officer for the Met Police Murder Squad no less, he said a high-ranking friend in the Met called him!

I think I've explained the real reason why.TOMORROW I tell who is behind bringing them down and why !"


The only thing I can think of in response to this obvious rubbish is the famous words of Batman who promises next week something will happen, a bit like Sonia Poulton promised an explosive revealing documentary.



[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Why is it rubbish?

hogwash wrote:Why is it rubbish?

Because it is.

The "top" is not an ex-senior investigating officer. The top is now Cressida Dick. And she won't blab !

It's like the pub sign "Free Beer Tomorrow"

aquila wrote:

hogwash wrote:Why is it rubbish?

Because it is.

Thank you for your help.

hogwash wrote:

aquila wrote:

hogwash wrote:Why is it rubbish?

Because it is.

Thank you for your help.

Happy to assist.

See polyenne's post for clarity.

IMO this piece from "Abduction of scam" is wishful thinking. Is the U.K establishment actively setting itself up for ridicule? Most unlikely. To admit that the McCanns might have had any direct role in their daughter's disappearance immediately points the finger of blame at those who interfered politically (as Dr. Amaral has claimed) in scuppering the Portuguese investigation in 2007 which had made them the prime suspects. Subsequent governments of all hues failed to condemn this interference. They are all in the same boat and will do nothing to rock it. However Op.Grange fizzles out it will not burn any political/establishment figures.

Aesop's fable?  More like a Brothers Grimm fairytale.

Once upon a time......

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

......  The End

The style of this short but sweet ripping yarn has an air of familiarity.  Tell me whoever you are today - Colin Sutton (ex of the Yard) made this radical unverified claim two and a half months ago, when he said he received the information from the unnamed caller back in 2010 - so where are we now?

Only this weekend, the UK media reported that Operation Grange are surging ahead, looking at leads (dogs?) old and new.  How does this fit in with your elaborate fable Mr/s Anon?

Social media can be very destructive in the wrong hands.

Here's Part Two of Alan's post.

A bit longer than the last one, but food for thought, as it follows our own thinking about what the Sun have been doing more recently - letting Tracey's stupid articles sit with Comments open and not moderated . . . 

Doesn't take us much further into the Grange thing though.


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Public opinion brings down the McCanns

The media is called the unofficial branch of government for a reason, Winston Churchill took the view that there was "No such thing as public opinion. There is only published opinion". While Abraham Lincoln's take was simply: "Public opinion is everything''

At one end the post-war generation who are used to believing what they read and at the other, a younger generation, who broadly take a more "individualist" view of the world indeed think for themselves. so we have underlying changes in public opinion across generations, image the government calling all the nations young to go a and die in a world war today won't happen couldn't work, we would point blank refuse to go and serve Queen and country Volunteer yes if that's what you want, its a fact we don't just swallow the pills the press feed us anymore,

This has had a profound impact within reach of Whitehall's civil servants and ministers is a vast array of researchers watching us and publications.

There's no doubt a program intent on buying the influence of all major media outlets by recruiting and paying news organisations and journalists by means of propaganda.

Famous five run the MSM

On the one hand, just five individual Billionaires in Britain get to control 80% what you read in printed media and on the other hand, just five Internet Service Providers get to control what 87% of people get to see on their devices.

Both are heavily influenced by government. It is no wonder what the public think there is a misinterpretation of the truth. the harsh reality is that the 5 billionaires who run our media, have huge power in our democracy forcing our political parties to prioritise their wishes over the wishes of the British public. These 5 people not only own 80% of the newspapers they also own TV stations, press agencies, book companies, cinemas, so everything we think or speak about in Britain is nearly controlled entirely by tiny group they are
Rupert Murdoch, Jonathon Harmsworth, Richard Desmond and Barclay’s Twins. None of these people live in Britain.

They control what you read and see, they want you to believe a manufactured story to keep them where they are and keep you where you are.they are the puppet masters king makers they put theses people in as PMs and crushed them all when finished with none were able or allowed to ever say anything in the MSM after their downfall ,the above elite are there all the time of course led by one Rupert Murdoch!

1979-90 Margaret Thatcher Conservative
1990-97 John Major Conservative
1997-2007 Tony Blair Labour
2007-2010 Gordon Brown Labour
2010 – 2016 David Cameron Con / Lib coalition

Note the silence from them after they lose nothing to report no one to whistle blow on? nothing the saw all those years, oh they better not, similar to the silence from everyone who has ever worked on the Maddie investigation, nothing gets out think about that, why?
So it's plain to see the powerful men, in reality, are the billionaires who oversee
the general election, the parties spend millions adverting in the MSM you need the owners onside you certainly won't win an election without them, so you invite them to Downing street listen to their ideas,

LIKE THEY ARE YOUR BOSS ITS BEST TO KEEP THEM HAPPY after all they have the power to get you sacked!

Heres some proof that shown the policial parties you better do what we say or else.....................
The Sun tells its readers to vote Labour, switching sides after more than 20 years of unswerving support for the Tory party.

In a front page article headlined 'The Sun Backs Blair', the paper, which has a daily readership of more than 10 million, says Tony Blair should be the next prime minister.Sun readers were important to Mr Major in 1992, comprising more than a fifth of the electorate and more than a third of the don't know.

The paper's change of allegiance is made more striking by the fact that owner Rupert Murdoch has always taken a direct part in the decision-making at every election.

The Sun became an enthusiastic supporter of the Conservatives when Margaret Thatcher was elected leader in 1975. Attracted by her anti-union stance, THE MSM needed to sack so many with tech advances cutting the need for many jobs the all powerful unions fought this, RM needed them smashed Mrs T was the one chosen to do it, then threw its weight behind her three successive election victories.

So you see Mr Murdoch and the other 4 can write what they like and instructed staff to report with a certain slant if they want to destroy a celebrity or politician they do.

Do you think these guys even know whats being written listen to one of the big 5

Richard Desmond.......
he just bought the Express when was the columnist Stephen Pollard, who left his feelings encoded within his final leader column. The first letter of each sentence spelt out: “F?**K YOU DESMOND”. It was Rupert Murdoch who alerted the paper’s new proprietor to the insult. “He called me at about five in the morning. He was furious about it. I didn’t even know what a leader column was then.

Well RM telling his friend about a sly move in what was not even his paper! oh he knows whats being said about the McCann's he knows how many front pages he knows the terrible demonising of GA he could stop it just like that, a million comments from us means less than nothing, one phone call from RM will change the case, if he wants that for 9 years he doesn't want that,
The first few months the reporting was balanced and all times totally against the McCann's, leading to being sued no less, gulp would you risk poking the Lion, that they did and were not destroyed far from it, saying so much!

They are lorded over the Sun have their own reporter on the Suns staff writing endless support pieces, their spokesperson can have front pages when ever he likes, to print non-stories and anti GA and PJ propaganda and spin to minimise things likes the dogs, the big question is why are they doing this , has a deal been struck with the government, does the Home Office want support for the McCann's in exchange for something the big 5 want.

Is it so simple that the McCann's are mere pawns in a giant power game, overtly all this isn't about a missing child , I believe it's about freedom of the press, which has always been the fight between the two fractions the owners vs the politics the horse trading that's gone on over the years the big 5 have the
MSM POWER TO CONTROL HOW THE PUBLIC THINK and the government have the power to control the press, so an uneasy alliance is in place, I'm sure by the weight of support thrown at the McCann team from day one that the government think it's in national interests to support the McCanns, what are they giving the big 5 too also back team McCann's ?

Let me show you how the battle is waged with little regard for justice to Maddie from either side!

What if I told you Mr Murdoch set up Operation Grange
By now you will have worked out these big 5 are the ones protecting the McCann's along side the establishment for so long that the government faces have changed but the abduction is still 100 % pushed relentlessly, so much so that the MSM king set up the cover better known as Operation Grange this is how explain how,,,,,,,,,,,,

Through Rebekah Brooks who ran Rupert Murdoch’s entire British newspaper empire a. almost a member of the Murdoch family, close to Prime Ministers Blair, Brown, and Cameron, they attended Brooks amazing wedding along with Rupert Murdoch [oh dear] who had flown with wait for it daughter Elisabeth Murdoch married at the time to public relations man Matthew Freud, the son of former MP Sir Clement Freud !

From this perspective, the power BROOKS wielded Cameron agreed to launch Grange the review began in May 2011 following a request to Scotland Yard from Home Secretary Theresa May,
The issue of whether this request was the result of "persuasion" from Rebekah Brooks was one of the issues raised at the Leveson Inquiry. good chance it was?

Brooks left the stage because the phone-hacking scandal took her down.

Now the same people who lined up behind the McCann's gave us GRANGE are the same ones with SUTTONS help have discredited a Home Office paid for investigation ordered by Murdoch we have to ask way? dropping the Met in the brown stuff pouring suspicion on the untouchables on the Tapas 9 how are they feeling watching that, heart stopping I should think! untouchable not anymore!I think they are preparing the exposure of the Tapas 9 all of them, things are reported in a way in the years before would be spun as a non-story and how dare they keystones third world cops are drunk again!

So the McCann's are still suspected say Murdoch now and not only that his Grange is bull a sham a waste of tax payers money has dropped them all in it the people he was so carefully protecting why is the important thing
Now I've explained how thing are today in the UK MSM, imagine how perplexed they are that for all the power, the 10 years of the front page SCREAMING McCanns are innocent, poor parents no proof of any evidence against them, while at the same time pillaring Portugal, the lie of turning the entire Portuguese police force into just one man promoted as the slug working alone the Portuguese nutter waging war against them with HIS crazy theories! when in fact it was the opinion of many including the UK police there on the spot by September!

WE THE British public are having none of it! Much scratching of powerful brows ''But BOSS we have told the sheep the McCanns are saints'', why are the not believing us?

I will tell you behind the time's Newspaper dinosaurs it's because of us little people on the internet more people use the net today they have turned to us for the truth!

And that's the reason they are about to dump the doctors, they only back winners and the McCanns have become frankly embarrassing!

Leaving trolls comments on their pro-McCann storylines tells me they have at last woken up its not trolls it's public opinion even CM given up he can't spin 95% non-believers into a few trolls! the plethora of lies have caught up with them, the new internet age sheep are not that stupid nowdays, they forgot to do the research that I did above!

Pointless BLAND REPORTING
Over recent years restricting press freedom in the name of national security has been a focal point for the government.

The UK’s lack of constitutional guarantees for freedom of expression locked down by leading them all to be under the elite! all news or current affairs publisher must be registered as such with a government regulatory body. goes without saying it’s a reversal of hundreds of years of liberty where we’ve been allowed to say or print whatever we want to subject only to the laws of libel,
Have you noticed how nothing is exposed anymore, no one is investigating anything, outrages are only exposed when the powers want them to be, given up to the wolves, usually after they have died?

Anyone publishing any form of news anywhere in the world, who allows UK based people to read it, will need to either submit to the UK regulators or leave themselves at risk, I cannot emphasise enough how established this already is in law, the definition of the jurisdiction of publication is not where it was published, but where it was read.

As an example, The New York Times has readers of its online edition in the UK. It's certainly a news organisation under the meaning of the bill: and because those readers in the UK read through their browsers then the NYT is deemed to be published in the UK. The NYT must, therefore, register with the regulator and agree to be bound by it.

How BIG is that UK has now got power over the world's press, No wonder GA book is still not been printed in English it will have to be put to the UK regulators and we know what they will do don't we?

THIS stops Amazon printing the truth of the lie in English as if it is read here is the same as publishing it here, lightbulb moment now you know why we can't buy an English version anywhere it's because our government have covered the whole damn world.

I think Maddie is in the middle of a battlefield between Murdoch and his friends and the government, this is the reason GA saying this case with be solved when the politics are right, I believe that day is dawning soon, RM is about to change sides like he did with Bliar making him PM after being staunch tory for 20 years, I'm sure Thatcher never thought he would change sides, remember a fifth of the electorate and more than a third of the don't know are Sun readers, the sudden silence from team McCann and sea change in the MSM have they realised ''The Sun is for turning ?

DO THEY HAVE controlling influence over the British electorate, of course, they still do, when the McCanns ship sinks it will be "The Sun wot done it "

After all public opinion is everything without it sells will fall ''can't have that, can we?
SAID THE BOSS WITH A FROWN.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Thank goodness for punctuation

"At one end the post-war generation who are used to believing what they read and at the other, a younger generation, who broadly take a more "individualist" view of the world indeed think for themselves. so we have underlying changes in public opinion across generations, image the government calling all the nations young to go a and die in a world war today won't happen couldn't work, we would point blank refuse to go and serve Queen and country Volunteer yes if that's what you want, its a fact we don't just swallow the pills the press feed us anymore," 


I would describe this as a laborious rant.

The suggestion that those who fought and died in either of the World Wars were in any way less intelligent than you Vinnie, must be taken with a huge bucket of salt.
People were not called up to die, they were called up to fight for this country.

Of course, the younger generation can no longer be so naive as to go to war, unless of course, somebody like Tony Blair or George Bush invents a reason, and thousands of young soldiers are there like a shot.

So Vinnie, nothing changes, you're young generation is just as gullible as the past inhabitants.

Oh, and by the way.
Do you really think that Rupert Murdoch suddenly woke up one morning and decided he would support Labour?
Or is it more likely that he realised  the Conservatives had ran their course, John Major wasn't going to win. Tony Blair re-invented Labour into a centrist party, more akin to Tory ideals than the Labour left.

Murdoch didn't change colour, Labour did.

But hey! Who am I to lecture a smart kid... huh!

JRP wrote:"At one end the post-war generation who are used to believing what they read and at the other, a younger generation, who broadly take a more "individualist" view of the world indeed think for themselves. so we have underlying changes in public opinion across generations, image the government calling all the nations young to go a and die in a world war today won't happen couldn't work, we would point blank refuse to go and serve Queen and country Volunteer yes if that's what you want, its a fact we don't just swallow the pills the press feed us anymore," 


I would describe this as a laborious rant.

The suggestion that those who fought and died in either of the World Wars were in any way less intelligent than you Vinnie, must be taken with a huge bucket of salt.
People were not called up to die, they were called up to fight for this country.

Of course, the younger generation can no longer be so naive as to go to war, unless of course, somebody like Tony Blair or George Bush invents a reason, and thousands of young soldiers are there like a shot.

So Vinnie, nothing changes, you're young generation is just as gullible as the past inhabitants.

Oh, and by the way.
Do you really think that Rupert Murdoch suddenly woke up one morning and decided he would support Labour?
Or is it more likely that he realised  the Conservatives had ran their course, John Major wasn't going to win. Tony Blair re-invented Labour into a centrist party, more akin to Tory ideals than the Labour left.

Murdoch didn't change colour, Labour did.

But hey! Who am I to lecture a smart kid... huh!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], I think you are very generous to waste your time indulging obvious rubbish that belongs on a blog not too far away to recognise which is occupied by verbose narcissists. Oh Lord, that'll rattle a few cages today and no doubt  keep things bubbling in the libertarian cauldron.

Thank you [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], happy to help.
I think we should have a whip-round for some commas and full stops, as an aid to easy reading. 

JRP wrote:Thank you [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], happy to help.
I think we should have a whip-round for some commas and full stops, as an aid to easy reading. 

I only guess where commas go but I did work in advertising and there was no need to understand such complexities. I'd hate to become commaphobic.

Colin Sutton, personally chose to make some form of declaration to the worldwide Press. Colin, then went on to speak to the Australian media alongside Pat Brown, both by invitation.

Nothing that either have said helps Madeleine McCann.

Pat Brown, went on to say she was busy packing for a holiday in Cuba when the call came and she rushed to give an interview.

Colin Sutton, gave an interview with the Australian Press (not the Murdoch press by the way) and the whole thing turned into a disgraceful circus. Colin Sutton, then went on to give audience to the UK Press at the time of the tenth anniversary of Madeleine's disappearance.

Colin Sutton, has a media career. He's up for sale to the highest bidder in my opinion and the media will pay him thousands upon thousands for a bit of tittilation.

Colin Sutton, has not once substantiated anything he said concerning the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, to the point he has said nothing since his media storm.

Imagine you are Madeleine McCann, and surrounded by such deviance.

Daily Mail having a go at Colin Sutton's failure to review correct CCTV which led to another murder, his first mistake in 30 years.

Colin went to apologise to the murdered girls family and he said they were "incredibly accepting of the mistake. It was amazing really".

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

But Colin got Bellfield behind bars 

What a pity he can't/won't pursue the alleged call from a very senior police officer warning him away from leading what was to become Operation Grange,  because of a proposed limited remit.

You have to wonder how many other major bloopers lay at his door.  The police don't generally admit to their officers crass faux-pas - all part of the 'under cover' operations policy.

Justice for Madeleine McCann !!!

Hi GoGetemGoncalo,  It is quite clear that Mr Colin Sutton has joined the Madeleine McCann case involvement at a precarious point on Operation Grange-Farce and isn't as Independent as he seems,he is One of the Boys in blue remember!
He(CS) may come across as One of the"good copper's" as opposed to the Bad cop"Amaral" you know the One who was actually involved in trying to find Madeleine,whilst the parents never really searched for her,their words!

The Evidence from "Textusa"article shows how the Metropolitan Police Service/Gold Group,have been involved from the start of the case 3 May 2007,via Leicestershire Police force.
It is/has been a"Cover Up"by various factions,PR people within a Government Network, but why is the $64,000 dollar question,they(Government)do not wish to answer for all their collusion?
The UK Government actually used"National security,D-Notice" to obstruct the MSM from enquiring as to what had happened to Madeleine McCann,now isn't that strange?
Interpol has been alerted to find the wherabouts of Madeleine McCann,yet the Government slaps on a D-notice,secure for 100 yrs?
The UK Police has been shown to be involved in Madeleine McCann's case, So why haven't they with"first hand Knowledge"still not been able to bring any persons before a Court of Law,nearly eleven Years after Madeleine,suddenly disappeared from an Un-locked apartment,with no signs of an abduction,yet Madeleine is still thought to be alive and well by certain persons?
Is this a sign of,"Cognitive Dissonance" of how the UK Police Force work on certain protracted cases,of difficulty to digest based around a certain collective group,with associates to the Murdochs,"We'Er All In This Together,eh Rebekah,Leveson!