Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Madeleine Beth McCann :: Madeleine's 1st - 17th year anniversaries
Page 1 of 2 • Share
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
Amaral diz que pista de Maddie é aldrabice
Antigo coordenador da PJ nega ter dado uma entrevista a canal australiano.
Google translation
Homicidal in wide escape car in empty villa
Amaral says Maddie's track is bullshit
Former PJ coordinator denies giving an interview to Australian channel.
(I.e.
Eur-lex.europa.eu eur-lex.europa.eu
A little trick. This is how Gonçalo Amaral (PJ) former Inspector of the Judicial Police (PJ) classifies the documentary on channel 7 of Australia on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, who revealed a clue about an employee of the Ocean Club in Lagos, where the child disappeared almost 10 years.
The production of the Sunday Night program used images of the former PJ coordinator to stroll the beach. Amaral assured CM that "it's a lie" that he gave any interview for this program.
"I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]. It's a mistake, which only demonstrates the lack of credibility of that track," said the former PJ investigator. Parents of the English child to have "a powerful and well-oiled communication machine that over the years has contributed to the defense of its main concern: its image."
Amaral says he was "shocked" by Maddie's father's response to the question of whether his daughter was killed in the documentary. "It's strange that a father has to say what he said. A simple" no "is more spontaneous and sincere than an emphatic" no, nothing "(father's words)," he says.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
I am having great difficulty getting access to the article. I did, however, manage to get the above information. I am getting a "serious error" message. It could just be my internet connection, but someone else may be able to read the whole article, from the link provided
Antigo coordenador da PJ nega ter dado uma entrevista a canal australiano.
Google translation
Homicidal in wide escape car in empty villa
Amaral says Maddie's track is bullshit
Former PJ coordinator denies giving an interview to Australian channel.
(I.e.
Eur-lex.europa.eu eur-lex.europa.eu
A little trick. This is how Gonçalo Amaral (PJ) former Inspector of the Judicial Police (PJ) classifies the documentary on channel 7 of Australia on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, who revealed a clue about an employee of the Ocean Club in Lagos, where the child disappeared almost 10 years.
The production of the Sunday Night program used images of the former PJ coordinator to stroll the beach. Amaral assured CM that "it's a lie" that he gave any interview for this program.
"I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]. It's a mistake, which only demonstrates the lack of credibility of that track," said the former PJ investigator. Parents of the English child to have "a powerful and well-oiled communication machine that over the years has contributed to the defense of its main concern: its image."
Amaral says he was "shocked" by Maddie's father's response to the question of whether his daughter was killed in the documentary. "It's strange that a father has to say what he said. A simple" no "is more spontaneous and sincere than an emphatic" no, nothing "(father's words)," he says.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
I am having great difficulty getting access to the article. I did, however, manage to get the above information. I am getting a "serious error" message. It could just be my internet connection, but someone else may be able to read the whole article, from the link provided
sallypelt- Posts : 4004
Activity : 5319
Likes received : 961
Join date : 2012-11-10
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
It looked very much like splicing to me. If this is how far they will go then questions need to be asked. Media have sunk to new depths, he needs to sue them.
Guest- Guest
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
The following article has been translated by a Portuguese researcher.
Amaral says Maddie Clue is Rubbish
Former PJ coordinator denies giving an interview to Australian channel.
By Rui Pando Gomes , CM
A Deceitful trick. This is how Gonçalo Amaral (PJ) former Inspector of the Judiciary Police (PJ) classifies the documentary on Australian channel 7 on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, that revealed a clue about an employee of the Ocean Club in Lagos, where the child disappeared almost 10 years ago .
The production of the Sunday Night programme used images of the former PJ coordinator strolling along the beach. Amaral told CM that "it's a lie" that he gave any interview for this program.
"I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]. It's a deceitful falsehood , which only demonstrates the lack of credibility of that so called clue," said the former PJ investigator. the Parents of the English Child have "a powerful and well-oiled communication machine that over the years has contributed to the defense of their main concern: Their Image . "
Amaral also says that he was "shocked" by Maddie's father's response to the question of whether he has killed his daughter, in the documentary. "It's strange that a father has to say what he said. A simple" no "is more spontaneous and sincere than an emphatic" no, nothing "(father's words)," he says.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Amaral says Maddie Clue is Rubbish
Former PJ coordinator denies giving an interview to Australian channel.
By Rui Pando Gomes , CM
A Deceitful trick. This is how Gonçalo Amaral (PJ) former Inspector of the Judiciary Police (PJ) classifies the documentary on Australian channel 7 on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, that revealed a clue about an employee of the Ocean Club in Lagos, where the child disappeared almost 10 years ago .
The production of the Sunday Night programme used images of the former PJ coordinator strolling along the beach. Amaral told CM that "it's a lie" that he gave any interview for this program.
"I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]. It's a deceitful falsehood , which only demonstrates the lack of credibility of that so called clue," said the former PJ investigator. the Parents of the English Child have "a powerful and well-oiled communication machine that over the years has contributed to the defense of their main concern: Their Image . "
Amaral also says that he was "shocked" by Maddie's father's response to the question of whether he has killed his daughter, in the documentary. "It's strange that a father has to say what he said. A simple" no "is more spontaneous and sincere than an emphatic" no, nothing "(father's words)," he says.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
____________________
Those who play games do not see as clearly as those who watch.
Keitei- Fraud investigator
- Posts : 1045
Activity : 1560
Likes received : 265
Join date : 2015-10-13
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
Sadler, who set out to promote the McCanns by whatever sleazy, lying means she could, has actually hurt them even more! The scandal surrounding her dirty tricks, is a bad reflection on those that defend the McCanns. She has unwittingly helped put the boot in further (imo).
pennylane- Posts : 2770
Activity : 4406
Likes received : 1638
Join date : 2009-12-07
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
melisande wrote:It looked very much like splicing to me. If this is how far they will go then questions need to be asked. Media have sunk to new depths, he needs to sue them.
i think there's no doubt of that. Many journalists/interviewers record separate footage of them asking the questions and then edit it in-between the interviewees response, they do it so it looks clearer and flows better etc.
But how Sadler was edited in smirking in response and even edited into an interview she wasn't present at, that is a whole other level!
ChippyM- Posts : 1334
Activity : 1817
Likes received : 467
Join date : 2013-06-15
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
Or seen walking up the hill chatting to GA.ChippyM wrote:melisande wrote:It looked very much like splicing to me. If this is how far they will go then questions need to be asked. Media have sunk to new depths, he needs to sue them.
i think there's no doubt of that. Many journalists/interviewers record separate footage of them asking the questions and then edit it in-between the interviewees response, they do it so it looks clearer and flows better etc.
But how Sadler was edited in smirking in response and even edited into an interview she wasn't present at, that is a whole other level!
____________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MAGA [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MBGA
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
I totally agree. It really doesn't help their case at all, but I don't think we can single out Sadler here , there would be others behind this and someone at the top who signed it off before airing.pennylane wrote:Sadler, who set out to promote the McCanns by whatever sleazy, lying means she could, has actually hurt them even more! The scandal surrounding her dirty tricks, is a bad reflection on those that defend the McCanns. She has unwittingly helped put the boot in further (imo).
Guest- Guest
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
This is the bit that stood out for me. I just knew something wasn't quite right about it when I first watched it. You don't hear them talking either.Get'emGonçalo wrote:Or seen walking up the hill chatting to GA.ChippyM wrote:melisande wrote:It looked very much like splicing to me. If this is how far they will go then questions need to be asked. Media have sunk to new depths, he needs to sue them.
i think there's no doubt of that. Many journalists/interviewers record separate footage of them asking the questions and then edit it in-between the interviewees response, they do it so it looks clearer and flows better etc.
But how Sadler was edited in smirking in response and even edited into an interview she wasn't present at, that is a whole other level!
Guest- Guest
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
melisande wrote:I totally agree. It really doesn't help their case at all, but I don't think we can single out Sadler here , there would be others behind this and someone at the top who signed it off before airing.pennylane wrote:Sadler, who set out to promote the McCanns by whatever sleazy, lying means she could, has actually hurt them even more! The scandal surrounding her dirty tricks, is a bad reflection on those that defend the McCanns. She has unwittingly helped put the boot in further (imo).
That's absolutely true, but Sadler did the dirty work and is ultimately responsible for the deception! Just like Brunt was with Brenda Leyland.
pennylane- Posts : 2770
Activity : 4406
Likes received : 1638
Join date : 2009-12-07
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
Yes, a whole other level. This wasn't editing, this was fakery.ChippyM wrote:melisande wrote:It looked very much like splicing to me. If this is how far they will go then questions need to be asked. Media have sunk to new depths, he needs to sue them.
i think there's no doubt of that. Many journalists/interviewers record separate footage of them asking the questions and then edit it in-between the interviewees response, they do it so it looks clearer and flows better etc.
But how Sadler was edited in smirking in response and even edited into an interview she wasn't present at, that is a whole other level!
Guest- Guest
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
pennylane wrote:melisande wrote:I totally agree. It really doesn't help their case at all, but I don't think we can single out Sadler here , there would be others behind this and someone at the top who signed it off before airing.pennylane wrote:Sadler, who set out to promote the McCanns by whatever sleazy, lying means she could, has actually hurt them even more! The scandal surrounding her dirty tricks, is a bad reflection on those that defend the McCanns. She has unwittingly helped put the boot in further (imo).
That's absolutely true, but Sadler did the dirty work and is ultimately responsible for the deception! Just like Brunt was with Brenda Leyland.
I think Rahni was loving it, she was almost gleeful! I can imagine maybe a bit fat
ChippyM- Posts : 1334
Activity : 1817
Likes received : 467
Join date : 2013-06-15
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
It makes me wonder why someone would risk their career to do this? What is in it for her to defend the McCanns and discredit others? Two doctors who live on the other side of the world whom she has no relation to, it just doesn't make sense. What was she thinking of? Hoping of worldwide acclaim?pennylane wrote:melisande wrote:I totally agree. It really doesn't help their case at all, but I don't think we can single out Sadler here , there would be others behind this and someone at the top who signed it off before airing.pennylane wrote:Sadler, who set out to promote the McCanns by whatever sleazy, lying means she could, has actually hurt them even more! The scandal surrounding her dirty tricks, is a bad reflection on those that defend the McCanns. She has unwittingly helped put the boot in further (imo).
That's absolutely true, but Sadler did the dirty work and is ultimately responsible for the deception! Just like Brunt was with Brenda Leyland.
Guest- Guest
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
It would need to be a hell of a bribe. Can't just be about money.ChippyM wrote:pennylane wrote:melisande wrote:I totally agree. It really doesn't help their case at all, but I don't think we can single out Sadler here , there would be others behind this and someone at the top who signed it off before airing.pennylane wrote:Sadler, who set out to promote the McCanns by whatever sleazy, lying means she could, has actually hurt them even more! The scandal surrounding her dirty tricks, is a bad reflection on those that defend the McCanns. She has unwittingly helped put the boot in further (imo).
That's absolutely true, but Sadler did the dirty work and is ultimately responsible for the deception! Just like Brunt was with Brenda Leyland.
I think Rahni was loving it, she was almost gleeful! I can imagine maybe a bit fatbribepayment from somewhere sweetened the deal. I wonder if she will sue me for misrepresentation?
Guest- Guest
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
@ Melisande.
It would need to be a hell of a bribe. Can't just be about money.
Ask the nanny who can't string two coherent words together but is now editor of a magazine.
It would need to be a hell of a bribe. Can't just be about money.
Ask the nanny who can't string two coherent words together but is now editor of a magazine.
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
melisande wrote:It makes me wonder why someone would risk their career to do this? What is in it for her to defend the McCanns and discredit others? Two doctors who live on the other side of the world whom she has no relation to, it just doesn't make sense. What was she thinking of? Hoping of worldwide acclaim?pennylane wrote:melisande wrote:I totally agree. It really doesn't help their case at all, but I don't think we can single out Sadler here , there would be others behind this and someone at the top who signed it off before airing.pennylane wrote:Sadler, who set out to promote the McCanns by whatever sleazy, lying means she could, has actually hurt them even more! The scandal surrounding her dirty tricks, is a bad reflection on those that defend the McCanns. She has unwittingly helped put the boot in further (imo).
That's absolutely true, but Sadler did the dirty work and is ultimately responsible for the deception! Just like Brunt was with Brenda Leyland.
Whenever efforts are afoot to discredit Goncalo Amaral, the pink sphincter muscle is usually flexing himself somewhere nearby.
pennylane- Posts : 2770
Activity : 4406
Likes received : 1638
Join date : 2009-12-07
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
melisande wrote:It would need to be a hell of a bribe. Can't just be about money.ChippyM wrote:pennylane wrote:melisande wrote:I totally agree. It really doesn't help their case at all, but I don't think we can single out Sadler here , there would be others behind this and someone at the top who signed it off before airing.pennylane wrote:Sadler, who set out to promote the McCanns by whatever sleazy, lying means she could, has actually hurt them even more! The scandal surrounding her dirty tricks, is a bad reflection on those that defend the McCanns. She has unwittingly helped put the boot in further (imo).
That's absolutely true, but Sadler did the dirty work and is ultimately responsible for the deception! Just like Brunt was with Brenda Leyland.
I think Rahni was loving it, she was almost gleeful! I can imagine maybe a bit fatbribepayment from somewhere sweetened the deal. I wonder if she will sue me for misrepresentation?
This is a bit 'Godwin's'
But 'just following orders' didn't wash at Nuremberg. In other words Whoever was involved in this front to back are all responsible.
Same with, 'I was just there to do my job' Brunty.
MRNOODLES- Posts : 751
Activity : 1059
Likes received : 298
Join date : 2013-07-04
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
Well there's my answer then. Will be interesting to see where she ends up.....Phoebe wrote:@ Melisande.
It would need to be a hell of a bribe. Can't just be about money.
Ask the nanny who can't string two coherent words together but is now editor of a magazine.
Guest- Guest
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
Ewww that's a vision i don't want in my head lolpennylane wrote:melisande wrote:It makes me wonder why someone would risk their career to do this? What is in it for her to defend the McCanns and discredit others? Two doctors who live on the other side of the world whom she has no relation to, it just doesn't make sense. What was she thinking of? Hoping of worldwide acclaim?pennylane wrote:melisande wrote:I totally agree. It really doesn't help their case at all, but I don't think we can single out Sadler here , there would be others behind this and someone at the top who signed it off before airing.pennylane wrote:Sadler, who set out to promote the McCanns by whatever sleazy, lying means she could, has actually hurt them even more! The scandal surrounding her dirty tricks, is a bad reflection on those that defend the McCanns. She has unwittingly helped put the boot in further (imo).
That's absolutely true, but Sadler did the dirty work and is ultimately responsible for the deception! Just like Brunt was with Brenda Leyland.
Whenever efforts are afoot to discredit Goncalo Amaral, the pink sphincter muscle is usually flexing himself somewhere nearby.
Guest- Guest
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
Sorry!melisande wrote:Ewww that's a vision i don't want in my head lolpennylane wrote:melisande wrote:It makes me wonder why someone would risk their career to do this? What is in it for her to defend the McCanns and discredit others? Two doctors who live on the other side of the world whom she has no relation to, it just doesn't make sense. What was she thinking of? Hoping of worldwide acclaim?pennylane wrote:melisande wrote:
I totally agree. It really doesn't help their case at all, but I don't think we can single out Sadler here , there would be others behind this and someone at the top who signed it off before airing.
That's absolutely true, but Sadler did the dirty work and is ultimately responsible for the deception! Just like Brunt was with Brenda Leyland.
Whenever efforts are afoot to discredit Goncalo Amaral, the pink sphincter muscle is usually flexing himself somewhere nearby.
pennylane- Posts : 2770
Activity : 4406
Likes received : 1638
Join date : 2009-12-07
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
melisande wrote:It makes me wonder why someone would risk their career to do this? What is in it for her to defend the McCanns and discredit others? Two doctors who live on the other side of the world whom she has no relation to, it just doesn't make sense. What was she thinking of? Hoping of worldwide acclaim?pennylane wrote:melisande wrote:I totally agree. It really doesn't help their case at all, but I don't think we can single out Sadler here , there would be others behind this and someone at the top who signed it off before airing.pennylane wrote:Sadler, who set out to promote the McCanns by whatever sleazy, lying means she could, has actually hurt them even more! The scandal surrounding her dirty tricks, is a bad reflection on those that defend the McCanns. She has unwittingly helped put the boot in further (imo).
That's absolutely true, but Sadler did the dirty work and is ultimately responsible for the deception! Just like Brunt was with Brenda Leyland.
I imagine she was doing it mostly for ratings. It doesn't matter how you get them for some people.
ChippyM- Posts : 1334
Activity : 1817
Likes received : 467
Join date : 2013-06-15
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
Well, Forest Gump was shown cosying up to J.F.K and a host of others. Rhanni was just having a "Life's a box of chocolates" fantasy moment, strolling along with Dr. Amaral. Wouldn't it be lovely to trace the original footage and expose the sham.
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
Keitei wrote:The production of the Sunday Night programme used images of the former PJ coordinator strolling along the beach. Amaral told CM that "it's a lie" that he gave any interview for this program.
"I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]. It's a deceitful falsehood, which only demonstrates the lack of credibility of that so called clue," said the former PJ investigator. the Parents of the English Child have "a powerful and well-oiled communication machine that over the years has contributed to the defense of their main concern: Their Image . "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
____________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MAGA [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MBGA
Goncalo Amaral,Australian programme,Madeleine MCann.
Anyone know the flowering plant and what time of year it flowers in Portugal!?Get'emGonçalo wrote:Keitei wrote:The production of the Sunday Night programme used images of the former PJ coordinator strolling along the beach. Amaral told CM that "it's a lie" that he gave any interview for this program.
"I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]. It's a deceitful falsehood, which only demonstrates the lack of credibility of that so called clue," said the former PJ investigator. the Parents of the English Child have "a powerful and well-oiled communication machine that over the years has contributed to the defense of their main concern: Their Image . "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Is it possible to Photoshop a beach environment into a Back ground?
willowthewisp- Posts : 3392
Activity : 4912
Likes received : 1160
Join date : 2015-05-07
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
Don't know much about this myself but it seems strange that Dr. Amaral is in shadow, with only sunlight on the tip of his shoulders, more on his left as we look at it and a sliver on his right but Rhani seems to be much more sunlight, particularly her right side closest to G.A.. I don't know which direction the sun is coming from but it looks odd. Maybe someone with knowledge could take a look if they think it's odd too?
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
Is this even the part that he is referring to? because those stills are in the street and not the beach?
You can remove and change backgrounds in video using Adobe After Effects but ideally people would need to be filmed in front of a green screen. We know G. Amaral has never been filmed in front of a green screen. So if they were going to try and edit the presenter in, she would need to have been filmed in front of a green screen and they would have to try and match the lighting and go to a lot of trouble. They have to do it frame by frame aswell, as far as I know. That's why most fake 'lights in the sky' ufo videos are so short, like 10 -30 seconds. and shows like Game Of Thrones cost millions to produce one episode because there are teams of people working on hour long episodes to get things looking realistic.
It's definitely possible but it would be much easier just to edit existing footage to make it look like she was there and asking the questions. I can't remember if this is what it looked like or not because the 'documentary' has been 'wooshed' from youtube.
You can remove and change backgrounds in video using Adobe After Effects but ideally people would need to be filmed in front of a green screen. We know G. Amaral has never been filmed in front of a green screen. So if they were going to try and edit the presenter in, she would need to have been filmed in front of a green screen and they would have to try and match the lighting and go to a lot of trouble. They have to do it frame by frame aswell, as far as I know. That's why most fake 'lights in the sky' ufo videos are so short, like 10 -30 seconds. and shows like Game Of Thrones cost millions to produce one episode because there are teams of people working on hour long episodes to get things looking realistic.
It's definitely possible but it would be much easier just to edit existing footage to make it look like she was there and asking the questions. I can't remember if this is what it looked like or not because the 'documentary' has been 'wooshed' from youtube.
ChippyM- Posts : 1334
Activity : 1817
Likes received : 467
Join date : 2013-06-15
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
As Goncalo Amaral doesn't speak English/Strine, I can't imagine any meaningful conversation.
____________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Sir Winston Churchill: “Diplomacy is the art of telling people to go to hell in such a way that they ask for directions.”
Liz Eagles- Posts : 11186
Activity : 13595
Likes received : 2218
Join date : 2011-09-03
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
ChippyM wrote:Is this even the part that he is referring to? because those stills are in the street and not the beach?
You can remove and change backgrounds in video using Adobe After Effects but ideally people would need to be filmed in front of a green screen. We know G. Amaral has never been filmed in front of a green screen. So if they were going to try and edit the presenter in, she would need to have been filmed in front of a green screen and they would have to try and match the lighting and go to a lot of trouble. They have to do it frame by frame aswell, as far as I know. That's why most fake 'lights in the sky' ufo videos are so short, like 10 -30 seconds. and shows like Game Of Thrones cost millions to produce one episode because there are teams of people working on hour long episodes to get things looking realistic.
It's definitely possible but it would be much easier just to edit existing footage to make it look like she was there and asking the questions. I can't remember if this is what it looked like or not because the 'documentary' has been 'wooshed' from youtube.
If you are looking this...
EnglishBull- Posts : 29
Activity : 91
Likes received : 38
Join date : 2017-02-19
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
it's been 'blocked on copyright grounds' EnglishBull.
Hopefully Mr Amaral managed to get a recording for his own legal purposes.
Hopefully Mr Amaral managed to get a recording for his own legal purposes.
ChippyM- Posts : 1334
Activity : 1817
Likes received : 467
Join date : 2013-06-15
Re: Amaral denies giving an interview to Australian channel: "I do not know how they did it, I've been to many beaches, but never with that journalist [Rahni Sadler]"
RS: Gudday Bruce, what d'ya reckon about the new clue our film is gonna reveal about an Ocean Club employee where Madeleine disappeared ten years ago?aquila wrote:As Goncalo Amaral doesn't speak English/Strine, I can't imagine any meaningful conversation.
GA: perdão?
RS: Good on ya cobber, that'll do nicely.
____________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MAGA [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MBGA
Is this really Goncalo Amaral walking next to Rahni Sadler?
I haven't seen the video but as soon as I saw the two still photographs above, I doubted that it was Snr Amaral.
The hat , glasses and jacket style are very distinctive. Rahni Sadler is wearing a shirt and slacks. Presumably it is hotter in Australia than Portugal for a good portion of the year. If 'GA' is wearing a hat and jacket as well as a shirt and slacks, isn't this the wrong way around? She is used to heat and should be wearing an extra layer? One more than the local who is used to a lower temperature? In effect, isn't his 'outfit' just visual shorthand?Hat. glasses, jacket, folded hands=Goncalo Amaral?
The hat , glasses and jacket style are very distinctive. Rahni Sadler is wearing a shirt and slacks. Presumably it is hotter in Australia than Portugal for a good portion of the year. If 'GA' is wearing a hat and jacket as well as a shirt and slacks, isn't this the wrong way around? She is used to heat and should be wearing an extra layer? One more than the local who is used to a lower temperature? In effect, isn't his 'outfit' just visual shorthand?Hat. glasses, jacket, folded hands=Goncalo Amaral?
worriedmum- Posts : 2062
Activity : 2819
Likes received : 583
Join date : 2012-01-17
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» HOW TO WATCH THE NEW RAHNI SADLER AUSTRALIAN TV MADELEINE DOCUMENTARY LIVE (ANDROID USERS)
» "Gonçalo Amaral denies participation in controversial program"
» Goncalo Amaral claims ‘MI5 hid Madeleine McCann’s body in cover-up after her parents killed her’ - The IDENTICAL THEORY that Richard D Hall propounds in his latest Maddie documentary: 'WHY THE COVER-UP?
» Strange lawyer, Marcos Aragao Corriea, a witness against Dr Goncalo Amaral, says a few interesting things to a journalist
» An interview with Mr Amaral
» "Gonçalo Amaral denies participation in controversial program"
» Goncalo Amaral claims ‘MI5 hid Madeleine McCann’s body in cover-up after her parents killed her’ - The IDENTICAL THEORY that Richard D Hall propounds in his latest Maddie documentary: 'WHY THE COVER-UP?
» Strange lawyer, Marcos Aragao Corriea, a witness against Dr Goncalo Amaral, says a few interesting things to a journalist
» An interview with Mr Amaral
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Madeleine Beth McCann :: Madeleine's 1st - 17th year anniversaries
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum