Sonia Poulton 'Teaser Trailer' out now (4 Oct 2015)

Mark Willis wrote:

Verdi wrote:

Mark Willis wrote:

Verdi........... wrote:
Ho-hum!   It's not going to happen is it..

No.
You win something from the missing shelf.

for nothing!  Why do I always get the golden raspberry?

Because Hutton got the sour grapes, is all.
Tell you what, as a one-off concession, here's a copy of the full vid of SP's "untold story", with an intro by the Cheshire Cat complete with a cameo of The Invisible Man, shot on location in the Bermuda Triangle directed by Jimmy Hoffa, film crew courtesy of the Mary Celeste. Vid comes with FREE shelf, good quality wrist band and an invite to the Metodo3 Christmas bash. Oh, and to go with your raspberry, an apple and orange, a box of sky hooks, a bucket of steam and a long stand. 

jeanmonroe wrote:Max Bygraves' 'catchphrase' was "I wanna tell you a story".

SP's 'catchphrase' is 'I DON'T wanna tell you a story'!

aiyoyo wrote:

jeanmonroe wrote:Max Bygraves' 'catchphrase' was "I wanna tell you a story".

SP's 'catchphrase' is 'I DON'T wanna tell you a story'!

Rather I wanna tell you a story but I can't for xyz reasons.

Verdi wrote:

Mark Willis wrote:

Verdi wrote:

Mark Willis wrote:

Verdi........... wrote:
Ho-hum!   It's not going to happen is it..

No.
You win something from the missing shelf.

for nothing!  Why do I always get the golden raspberry?

Because Hutton got the sour grapes, is all.
Tell you what, as a one-off concession, here's a copy of the full vid of SP's "untold story", with an intro by the Cheshire Cat complete with a cameo of The Invisible Man, shot on location in the Bermuda Triangle directed by Jimmy Hoffa, film crew courtesy of the Mary Celeste. Vid comes with FREE shelf, good quality wrist band and an invite to the Metodo3 Christmas bash. Oh, and to go with your raspberry, an apple and orange, a box of sky hooks, a bucket of steam and a long stand. 

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]  That brought tears to the eyes!

aquila wrote:I'll donate a tin of the following

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

aquila wrote:Cristobell is now taking 'traffic' away from MMM forum (not that it has much going for it anyway as most of it is dedicated to having a bitch at CMoMM) and expanding her blog hits (n.b. around 20% of the response to the selected published posts is from Cristobell herself) whilst no longer basking in the public announcement support/facility to promote said blog on MMM. She pooped on that platter and decent people left the forum.

Cristobell has taken to the airwaves of Twitter to make public announcements as a direction to her blog where she resides in custody of what can and can't be published. No more tweets of bashing Tony Bennett (well, just a tad of spite introduced to 'keep things going') since the very serious tweets and posts insinuating Tony Bennett is a paedophile and the subsequent police involvement.

The latest, insane offering from the lady who outed herself as a troll is this


Anonymous[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
In time, when everything's calmed down a bit and the PTB have worked out how to solve this trying and difficult dilemma, I hope Rosalinda and Kate can meet up for lunch/brunch or whatever and just have a human to human chat about anything but this blasted case.
Reply

Replies


[list="thread-chrome thread-expanded"]
[*][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
I would be happy to meet Kate at any time 22:27 and I guarantee my absolute discretion. For me this has never been about a witch hunt, it is the human behaviour and the psychological aspects, that intrigue me. I want to understand why, and I am a good listener.
[/list]


This is the woman Sonia Poulton has put out as a teaser to her 'forthcoming' documentary.

It's insane.

Verdi wrote:"we're currently dealing with legal issues regarding Operation Grange. More info to follow."

???

Pull the other one hun ..  X 

aquila wrote:Cristobell is now taking 'traffic' away from MMM forum (not that it has much going for it anyway as most of it is dedicated to having a bitch at CMoMM) and expanding her blog hits (n.b. around 20% of the response to the selected published posts is from Cristobell herself) whilst no longer basking in the public announcement support/facility to promote said blog on MMM. She pooped on that platter and decent people left the forum.

Cristobell has taken to the airwaves of Twitter to make public announcements as a direction to her blog where she resides in custody of what can and can't be published. No more tweets of bashing Tony Bennett (well, just a tad of spite introduced to 'keep things going') since the very serious tweets and posts insinuating Tony Bennett is a paedophile and the subsequent police involvement.

The latest, insane offering from the lady who outed herself as a troll is this


Anonymous[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
In time, when everything's calmed down a bit and the PTB have worked out how to solve this trying and difficult dilemma, I hope Rosalinda and Kate can meet up for lunch/brunch or whatever and just have a human to human chat about anything but this blasted case.
Reply

Replies


[list="thread-chrome thread-expanded"]
[*][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
I would be happy to meet Kate at any time 22:27 and I guarantee my absolute discretion. For me this has never been about a witch hunt, it is the human behaviour and the psychological aspects, that intrigue me. I want to understand why, and I am a good listener.
[/list]


This is the woman Sonia Poulton has put out as a teaser to her 'forthcoming' documentary.

It's insane.

aiyoyo wrote:

aquila wrote:Cristobell is now taking 'traffic' away from MMM forum (not that it has much going for it anyway as most of it is dedicated to having a bitch at CMoMM) and expanding her blog hits (n.b. around 20% of the response to the selected published posts is from Cristobell herself) whilst no longer basking in the public announcement support/facility to promote said blog on MMM. She pooped on that platter and decent people left the forum.

Cristobell has taken to the airwaves of Twitter to make public announcements as a direction to her blog where she resides in custody of what can and can't be published. No more tweets of bashing Tony Bennett (well, just a tad of spite introduced to 'keep things going') since the very serious tweets and posts insinuating Tony Bennett is a paedophile and the subsequent police involvement.

The latest, insane offering from the lady who outed herself as a troll is this


Anonymous[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
In time, when everything's calmed down a bit and the PTB have worked out how to solve this trying and difficult dilemma, I hope Rosalinda and Kate can meet up for lunch/brunch or whatever and just have a human to human chat about anything but this blasted case.
Reply

Replies


[list="thread-chrome thread-expanded"]
[*][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
I would be happy to meet Kate at any time 22:27 and I guarantee my absolute discretion. For me this has never been about a witch hunt, it is the human behaviour and the psychological aspects, that intrigue me. I want to understand why, and I am a good listener.
[/list]


This is the woman Sonia Poulton has put out as a teaser to her 'forthcoming' documentary.

It's insane.

Insane indeed.

Capable of being discreet ?  Is that woman for real?  
She proves she's a [ Deleted - Mod ] head case every time she opens her motor gob. She who delights in telling the world and its dog of her mental health issues, going stroppy and going into suicidal meltdown each time she gets back her own medicine, and saying in the Sun interview that she's a bitch delighting in squishing people.  That's not 'discreet' is it?

Why in hell would Kate want to a foul mouth, malicious, [ Other words deleted - Mod ] bogus expert on every topic under the sun anywhere near her?

She's a study subject of psychology students to her blog and she wants to analyse the psychology of Kate over personal chat ? What planet is she on? Fantasizing as usual.

aiyoyo wrote:

Verdi wrote:"we're currently dealing with legal issues regarding Operation Grange. More info to follow."

???

Pull the other one hun ..  X 

Maybe OG told her to STFU ie where to stuff her story, and like a flea she wouldn't go away.....

Verdi wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:  Birmingham FSS hung the McCanns out to dry with their initial report; and then 'whoosh,' it all took a very dark and seedy U-turn.

Much obliged pennylane!  Here you make a very good point and partly the reason I think the case is one big cover-up.  Rumour has it that Sr Amaral is the buffoon that incorrectly interpreted the FSS initial forensic results but a regular cynic views this with extreme suspicion.  After all, Sr Amaral as an officer of the law is dependent on experts to guide him through the technicalities and who was that expert - John Lowe and his minions perhaps?  Every man has a price so they say.  Wasn't the first time the FSS got it wrong, it's no wonder they were short lived.

If you think about it, the McCanns are two insignificant working class people, nothing special or exclusive, just ordinary people who rather unfortunately mislaid one of their children in mysterious circumstances, nothing complex about the case until after the event.  So why did their child's disappearance instantly turn into one monster cirque burlesque?  As isolated individuals have they the power or influence to engineer media and world attention of such a disproportionate scale?  Answer is no they couldn't - there has to be some other explanation.  An explanation that encompasses just about every corner of the UK establishment and also explain the sudden media reluctance to report anything concerning the case other than a load of rubbish stories about burglars and so on.

I'm sure it's not McCann power armed with lawyers that's kept them walking - they couldn't possibly afford to retain the services of high power lawyers, such as Carter Ruck, the fund would have dried up long ago.  If the fund is administered as the public are led to believe, it sits there year in year out (more out than in these days it would appear), making but a pittance in annual interest.  Seriously, how could they (the fund) possibly be able to afford expensive lawyers for over eight years.  I know KM's got a £million floating about just in case but a decent lawyer would swallow that in a matter of weeks as would Operation Grange.

Going back to the UK media, McCann style threats of litigation are nothing to multi-billion £ media conglomerates.  The odd half mill out of court settlement is but petty cash to the likes of the Express group or the Murdoch empire, what care they for small fry like the McCanns threatening them with legal action.

It's just got to be something big behind this apparent cover up and somehow I don't think Ms Poulton is the one to persuade members of the establishment to come clean.  She hardly features high on the echalon of journalistic influence, she is but a self serving crusader riding on the back of a child's disappearance and victims left in the wake of the McCanns protection. 

As a collective we can all fly the flag for justice but the establishment has the power, influence and money to control.

Just an opinion - of course..

pennylane wrote:

Spot on, Verdi, there has to be something big going on!

A British Ambassador warned of the McCanns dodgy behaviour in the very early days; and their actions and version/s of events are chillingly suspicious... right from the first night when they didn't bother to even search for their vanished 3 year old. The CSI blood and cadaver dog alerts, and Jane Tanner's ridiculous sighting raise red flags galore, and the McCanns immediately going for a run, and dropping the twins back off in the creche, pretty much says it all.  The list goes on and on.  The more suspicions hangs over them, the greater the effort to shove them up the 'respectable' ladder. Crimewatch/Andy Redwood was just another in a long list of dubious endeavors surrounding this case. Then there's Jim Gamble and Clarence Mitchell... a sleazier pair of McCann defending Establishment thugs figures you'd be hard pressed to find! Probably both in SS.  

Yes, someone/something big is behind the McCann facade that's for sure, and like you say they are being funded and kept afloat by whomever that is.

Tony Bennett wrote:

pennylane wrote:

Spot on, Verdi, there has to be something big going on!

A British Ambassador warned of the McCanns dodgy behaviour in the very early days; and their actions and version/s of events are chillingly suspicious... right from the first night when they didn't bother to even search for their vanished 3 year old. The CSI blood and cadaver dog alerts, and Jane Tanner's ridiculous sighting raise red flags galore, and the McCanns immediately going for a run, and dropping the twins back off in the creche, pretty much says it all.  The list goes on and on.  The more suspicions hangs over them, the greater the effort to shove them up the 'respectable' ladder. Crimewatch/Andy Redwood was just another in a long list of dubious endeavors surrounding this case. Then there's Jim Gamble and Clarence Mitchell... a sleazier pair of McCann defending Establishment thugs figures you'd be hard pressed to find! Probably both in SS.  

Yes, someone/something big is behind the McCann facade that's for sure, and like you say they are being funded and kept afloat by whomever that is.

As I think you know, @ pennylane, at least on this issue we are and have always been in total agreement.

Indeed it was the appointment and role of the HEAD of the government's Media Monitoring Unit that told me from early on that this was no ordinary case and, as you aptly put it, "There has to be something big going on".

Or as I have preferred to put it over the years: "Something sinister, and probably both illegal and immoral - which directly affects the interests of the British government and the higher levels of the British establishment".

Tony Bennett wrote:

pennylane wrote:

Spot on, Verdi, there has to be something big going on!

A British Ambassador warned of the McCanns dodgy behaviour in the very early days; and their actions and version/s of events are chillingly suspicious... right from the first night when they didn't bother to even search for their vanished 3 year old. The CSI blood and cadaver dog alerts, and Jane Tanner's ridiculous sighting raise red flags galore, and the McCanns immediately going for a run, and dropping the twins back off in the creche, pretty much says it all.  The list goes on and on.  The more suspicions hangs over them, the greater the effort to shove them up the 'respectable' ladder. Crimewatch/Andy Redwood was just another in a long list of dubious endeavors surrounding this case. Then there's Jim Gamble and Clarence Mitchell... a sleazier pair of McCann defending Establishment thugs figures you'd be hard pressed to find! Probably both in SS.  

Yes, someone/something big is behind the McCann facade that's for sure, and like you say they are being funded and kept afloat by whomever that is.

As I think you know, @ pennylane, at least on this issue we are and have always been in total agreement.

Indeed it was the appointment and role of the HEAD of the government's Media Monitoring Unit that told me from early on that this was no ordinary case and, as you aptly put it, "There has to be something big going on".

Or as I have preferred to put it over the years: "Something sinister, and probably both illegal and immoral - which directly affects the interests of the British government and the higher levels of the British establishment".

\"Verdi wrote:
Bugger - whatever you wrote has been deleted but judging by the general tenor of your post I've no doubt your were spot on!  There is no proof that this individual has mental health issues, at least not in accordance with the recognized definition.  She spouts a heck of a lot about various aspects of her past and then regularly contradicts herself - how then can you believe a word she says?  Even her opinion of the case of MBM changes like the wind every time she writes on the subject.  Not because of any new developments that might sway opinion but because she writes as her belly guides her and/or makes it up as she goes along."]
Clearly an attention seeker, a duplicitous fraud and a dangerous manipulative hussy.  So much for the Untold Story of Madeleine McCann if H-RH has contributed to the production.  I thought Swan and Edgars 'Looking for Madeleine' was detrimental to discovering the truth but this individual goes way beyond even their machinations.  Don't these people that sing her praises read and remember what she writes, don't they realize how she contradicts herself from one day to the next and even when reminded insists that everything she writes stands up to scrutiny?

For god sake, this isn't about personal advancement, financial reward, ego - it's about a little child that has disappeared off the face of the earth.  It would be well for H-RH to remember that when she's up to her usual tricks.

aiyoyo wrote:

\"Verdi wrote:
Bugger - whatever you wrote has been deleted but judging by the general tenor of your post I've no doubt your were spot on!  There is no proof that this individual has mental health issues, at least not in accordance with the recognized definition.  She spouts a heck of a lot about various aspects of her past and then regularly contradicts herself - how then can you believe a word she says?  Even her opinion of the case of MBM changes like the wind every time she writes on the subject.  Not because of any new developments that might sway opinion but because she writes as her belly guides her and/or makes it up as she goes along."]
Clearly an attention seeker, a duplicitous fraud and a dangerous manipulative hussy.  So much for the Untold Story of Madeleine McCann if H-RH has contributed to the production.  I thought Swan and Edgars 'Looking for Madeleine' was detrimental to discovering the truth but this individual goes way beyond even their machinations.  Don't these people that sing her praises read and remember what she writes, don't they realize how she contradicts herself from one day to the next and even when reminded insists that everything she writes stands up to scrutiny?

For god sake, this isn't about personal advancement, financial reward, ego - it's about a little child that has disappeared off the face of the earth.  It would be well for H-RH to remember that when she's up to her usual tricks.

You didn't miss much despite the deletion. I said she's a liar.  She lies about TB, lies that the documentary was commissioned, never mind she's persistently telling lies about people.

Ignoring her isn't going to help as it only serves her purpose.
As you correctly observed, no one knows the veracity of her self confessed mental health issue .
But what seems clear is, it's a card she had used to get herself out of trouble when it suited her.
Look how she exploits it when she was pulled up on MMM over her comments in the Sun - she pulled out that card and forum owner had to urge people to back off just in case.  Happens everywhere she goes.  She stirs up and when confronted she tries to backtrack denying she ever said this or that when the evidence are still littered all over fora and her blog, the latter a platform she has total control over censorship.
She uses twitter and her blog (directly or indirectly) to slag off, denigrate and lies about people but when she's called out she likes to play the victim.Nothing I said about her isn't already put forward by her or something she trips herself up on. But given her propensity to lie, twist things and dramatize, people in turn are mindful all because she uses her self confessed condition willy nilly to suit her convenience.

aiyoyo wrote:

\"Verdi wrote:
Bugger - whatever you wrote has been deleted but judging by the general tenor of your post I've no doubt your were spot on!  There is no proof that this individual has mental health issues, at least not in accordance with the recognized definition.  She spouts a heck of a lot about various aspects of her past and then regularly contradicts herself - how then can you believe a word she says?  Even her opinion of the case of MBM changes like the wind every time she writes on the subject.  Not because of any new developments that might sway opinion but because she writes as her belly guides her and/or makes it up as she goes along."]
Clearly an attention seeker, a duplicitous fraud and a dangerous manipulative hussy.  So much for the Untold Story of Madeleine McCann if H-RH has contributed to the production.  I thought Swan and Edgars 'Looking for Madeleine' was detrimental to discovering the truth but this individual goes way beyond even their machinations.  Don't these people that sing her praises read and remember what she writes, don't they realize how she contradicts herself from one day to the next and even when reminded insists that everything she writes stands up to scrutiny?

For god sake, this isn't about personal advancement, financial reward, ego - it's about a little child that has disappeared off the face of the earth.  It would be well for H-RH to remember that when she's up to her usual tricks.

You didn't miss much despite the deletion. I said she's a liar.  She lies about TB, lies that the documentary was commissioned, never mind she's persistently telling lies about people.

Ignoring her isn't going to help as it only serves her purpose.
As you correctly observed, no one knows the veracity of her self confessed mental health issue .
But what seems clear is, it's a card she had used to get herself out of trouble when it suited her.
Look how she exploits it when she was pulled up on MMM over her comments in the Sun - she pulled out that card and forum owner had to urge people to back off just in case.  Happens everywhere she goes.  She stirs up and when confronted she tries to backtrack denying she ever said this or that when the evidence are still littered all over fora and her blog, the latter a platform she has total control over censorship.
She uses twitter and her blog (directly or indirectly) to slag off, denigrate and lies about people but when she's called out she likes to play the victim.Nothing I said about her isn't already put forward by her or something she trips herself up on. But given her propensity to lie, twist things and dramatize, people in turn are mindful all because she uses her self confessed condition willy nilly to suit her convenience.

snook wrote:Is it me or is Hutton trying to change stance regarding the Mccanns and their deliberate involvement in Madeleine's disappearance?  

I'm wondering,  given Poulton's latest excuse whether she is trying to redeem herself for was is to come.?
I know the Mccanns probably don't even know who she is despite her assertions that they have ' tried to destroy het for 8 year's but perhaps she's preparing for a new tack in that she has never attacked and the Mccanns are more sinned against than sinning?

snook wrote:Is it me or is Hutton trying to change stance regarding the McCanns and their deliberate involvement in Madeleine's disappearance?  

Verdi wrote:

snook wrote:Is it me or is Hutton trying to change stance regarding the Mccanns and their deliberate involvement in Madeleine's disappearance?  

I'm wondering,  given Poulton's latest excuse whether she is trying to redeem herself for was is to come.?
I know the Mccanns probably don't even know who she is despite her assertions that they have ' tried to destroy het for 8 year's but perhaps she's preparing for a new tack in that she has never attacked and the Mccanns are more sinned against than sinning?

This latest comment from the blogspot might add weight to your thoughts..

At some point the forum owner will have to understand that Tony's lack of boundaries might end with several of them in the dock. For 8+ years his 'research' and 'work' has been devoted to attacking people, from the McCanns, to selected members of their entourage and family (who can forget HIS weirdo obsession with quicksand) to fellow antis. The CMoMM is a catalogue of libel!

If you haven't already done so - take a look.  What is she saying - attack is the best form of defence?