Sonia Poulton 'Teaser Trailer' out now (4 Oct 2015)

Mark Willis wrote:Love the owl. He looks very Mandelbrot to me.

He's a wise owl all right, he sees the multi-layered scams that obtain within the Mc Team which stretch across suppression of free speech, the demonising of Internet commentators, the manipulation of the MSM, the corrupt ion that lies within government and SY, the perpetuation of unsavoury sexual activities in Westminster.
Unfortunately for them the Internet is the Zeitgeist and MSM is the dead medium walking. They just refuse to lie down, is all. But their day will come, as dramatic as when Murdoch hauled the dinosaurs from Fleet Street to the digital age. In essence he made himself a hostage to fortune as the Net will be his nemesis and the delightful Mcs, too.

Providing you get rid of the imposters who spread false information and lies, just like the MSM.  Hold on a minute - aren't they one and the same?  

Forgive me, just catching up on this thread. But really? Really?  The darling of the SKY sofa just wanders up to the Mccanns' bunker and doorsteps them without not one jot of fallout?  

My Opinion on the matter This so called docu is being dragged out for a reason. Plus being unfished yet, strikes me as being a little fishy.  I guessing SP is pretending to be a MacSkeptic.  But as the investigation continues the Macskeptic will be transformed into a sympathiser.  Cititing, after first hand investigating the Maccanns are victims of unfortunate events and coincidences. And are not responsible for poor Maddie's disappearance.

MRNOODLES wrote:Forgive me, just catching up on this thread. But really? Really?  The darling of the SKY sofa just wanders up to the McCanns' bunker and doorsteps them without not one jot of fallout?  

My Opinion on the matter This so called docu is being dragged out for a reason. Plus being unfinished yet, strikes me as being a little fishy.  I guessing SP is pretending to be a MacSkeptic.  But as the investigation continues the MacSkeptic will be transformed into a sympathiser.  Citing, after first hand investigating - the McCanns are victims of unfortunate events and coincidences. And are not responsible for poor Maddie's disappearance.

Very possible.

IMO a very dirty game indeed is being played by Poulton and her supporters.

This has been posted by a victim of child sexual abuse on whom Poulton (allegedly) turned):

QUOTE

So, there I was, very soon after, getting screamed at by Poulton down the phone…she went full retard for about 3 minutes.  This was unprompted by me. I had no idea at the time why anyone would make such a scene on the phone, but I was completely shocked that a well-spoken woman could be so nasty.

On Twitter, at the same point, Poulton was crowing about this door-stepping-by-phone.  Then she wrote about it in the Express.

In hindsight, I know now that Poulton was preparing for insertion into the McCann debate, as a ‘no-nonsense Journo who’ll deal with the nasty trolls’. She was going to do this, using what remained of Jones’ influence, infrastructure, and blog, as well as her own self-publication.  And that’s what she did – screwing Icke’s ‘The People’s Voice’ along the way.

Not meaning to appear facetious, I sometimes wonder if this person who doesn't always seem to be in control of her own mouth, regularly indulges in something of the class A variety.  I have read that she's a fancy for the funny fags but her behaviour IMO goes way beyond the effects of puffing weed.  How often do you see an image of her looking like a deer caught in headlights, aside from her regular rants?

Meanwhile in the wings, I notice she who can only be mentioned on pain of death, has added 'journalist' to her list of attributes !?!  I sincerely hope Poulton has not called on this person to be her official advisor on all things McCann as has been hinted - someone that professes to become anything they want to be, on any one day, should be treated with maximum caution I feel.  Certainly not relied upon as chef of all knowledge.

Verdi wrote:

Mark Willis wrote:Love the owl. He looks very Mandelbrot to me.

He's a wise owl all right, he sees the multi-layered scams that obtain within the Mc Team which stretch across suppression of free speech, the demonising of Internet commentators, the manipulation of the MSM, the corrupt ion that lies within government and SY, the perpetuation of unsavoury sexual activities in Westminster.
Unfortunately for them the Internet is the Zeitgeist and MSM is the dead medium walking. They just refuse to lie down, is all. But their day will come, as dramatic as when Murdoch hauled the dinosaurs from Fleet Street to the digital age. In essence he made himself a hostage to fortune as the Net will be his nemesis and the delightful Mcs, too.

Providing you get rid of the imposters who spread false information and lies, just like the MSM.  Hold on a minute - aren't they one and the same?  

Separated at birth. Like the Mcs and truth. Like an SP documentary and release date...

Mark Willis wrote:

Verdi wrote:

Mark Willis wrote:Love the owl. He looks very Mandelbrot to me.

He's a wise owl all right, he sees the multi-layered scams that obtain within the Mc Team which stretch across suppression of free speech, the demonising of Internet commentators, the manipulation of the MSM, the corrupt ion that lies within government and SY, the perpetuation of unsavoury sexual activities in Westminster.
Unfortunately for them the Internet is the Zeitgeist and MSM is the dead medium walking. They just refuse to lie down, is all. But their day will come, as dramatic as when Murdoch hauled the dinosaurs from Fleet Street to the digital age. In essence he made himself a hostage to fortune as the Net will be his nemesis and the delightful Mcs, too.

Providing you get rid of the imposters who spread false information and lies, just like the MSM.  Hold on a minute - aren't they one and the same?  

Separated at birth. Like the Mcs and truth. Like an SP documentary and release date...

SP documentary is beginning to sound like a terminal medical condition.

ETA:  I hear the long awaited release it's all about timing.  Only 67 days left to xmas - maybe she's planning on a gift wrapped finale, a sort of stocking filler, or if you prefer a sock stuffer.

Verdi wrote:

SP documentary is beginning to sound like a terminal medical condition.

ETA:  I hear the long awaited release it's all about timing.  Only 67 days left to xmas - maybe she's planning on a gift wrapped finale, a sort of stocking filler, or if you prefer a sock stuffer.

When you can't get rid of the terminal disease/condition, what else can you say except...
it's all about timing....
you wait and wait and wait and wait and hope and hope and hope...
and still nothing happens ...then you have no choice but to surrender.....

An imagined future time is only the wishing thinking of two delusional so and so

The film will never see light of the day on mainstream, not this christmas, nor the next christmas, nor the next several decades ones in the twins' lifetime.

eta: It will be a sock stuffers secret.....or until the makers get fed up of releasing teasers...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  
If it wasn't for sociopaths, stalkers, GCHQ spies, narcissists & bigots, internet would be WOW! TY to all ace people, you're appreciated. X

AMEN !!!

Oooops almost forgot  X lol

Verdi wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  
If it wasn't for sociopaths, stalkers, GCHQ spies, narcissists & bigots, internet would be WOW! TY to all ace people, you're appreciated. X

AMEN !!!

Oooops almost forgot  X lol

I wonder if she includes 'the one that shall be unnamed'? 

Added here, with sadness, just for the written record - on Hutton's blog today, 19th Oct:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

QUOTE

UPDATE 19/10/15 -  So who doesn't want the truth out there?

The personal attacks on myself and Sonia Poulton are relentless and most of them are coming from the antis in the form of the CMoMM forum, who claim to be fighting for justice for Madeleine, but who are in reality, doing everything they can to silence those who are trying to get the truth into the public domain. 
 
On the forum where I currently post several members accuse myself and Sonia of using this case to advance our careers - as if that were a bad thing!  Doesn't everyone try to advance their careers?  I find the British idea of NOT trying to win, and NOT trying to be successful, ridiculous. 

Why is it wrong to try to advance your career?  Should we all be aiming for mediocrity?  Should we all be 'umble and unassuming? Are we not allowed to take or expect credit for the work we do?  I know those were the rules when I was having the catechism pounded into me at the age of 6, but I discarded that nonsense decades ago. 

I, and indeed Sonia, are using our talents to get the truth of Madeleine's disappearance into the mainstream media, something genuine 'antis' have been trying to do for years.  And as a respected mainstream journalist, Sonia has the talent and the connections to make this a reality. 

UNQUOTE

What career would that be then?

snook wrote:What career would that be then?

Self promotion career, of course !

Also, what talent would that be then?

Talent to lie, boast, insult and to big oneself, of course !

At the risk of getting a slapped wrist again, I cannot and will not shut up on the subject of the Poulton/Hutton alliance.  Two things in life I despise above all else are duplicity and lies, two traits this hapless pair have by the bucket load.

I don't often bother to look in on the alternative place (nothing much being discussed on the open forum) but something Mrs Blogs wrote a few days ago made me curious.  So since I've being following the Untold Story - Sonia Poulton (as Mark Willis pointed out - emphasis on the untold  ) thread and can't believe what I see.  Not often my jaw hits the deck but really that blind support for the nameless one by the forum bosses is quite literally beyond belief.  Can't they even see that the Mrs Blogs domain does not take kindly to criticism - in fact Mrs Blogs declines the publish comments not only when abusive (her claim - I wouldn't know) but also when she doesn't like what's said unless she thinks she can squish or lol.  I speak from experience!

If that forum goes belly-up, they've only themselves to blame.  As for the nameless one - I'm speechless..

Hong Kong Phooey Hero of the Hour...                                              

From the outside looking in, how it looked:-

In the red corner we had HKP, fighting for the right to voice opinion, fighting to be heard, fighting for all to be treated equally on the forum....and fighting his/her corner, persistent and patient in equal measure - ...hooray, hooray  

In the blue corner, Bad News...boo boo...rude and rotten, trying to silence one and all, and ably assisted by the forum enforcer, Candy (none so blind as she who refuses to see ) Floss!

Round 1 saw the 'thread being closed down' a swift end to those who were clearly being considered dissenters.  

Like those who disagree with McCann abduction tale, the members who disagreed with Bad News were smartly shut down.  

The thread was not re-instated.

Today Round 2 began on, none other than, the Cristobell Blog Thread.  (Is that worthy of a 'lol or three?' hell, why not  - lol, lol, lol,)

Flossy was still of the opinion however, that one and all should listen to Bad News, not make comment, or disagree with her in any shape or form.  If that was their position, they were to keep it to themselves!

On a discussion forum?

Meanwhile back at the ranch - Bad News could do or say no wrong in Flossy's eyes. She was NOT TOLD not at any point that if she disagreed with the point of view of others, that she was to keep it to herself.  No Siree!   Freedom of the Forum was hers!  A one way street! A friend like Flossy handy to have when you want to get bossy, and bully others!

Now why would that be, one rule for Bad News and another, for anyone who dared question her?

Why would it be that those questioning were to be deemed, haters, disruptors, when anyone reading could see that this was not the case at all?

If the blogs blogs of Bad News are to be posted, given an entire section of the forum, then surely members have a right to voice opinion on them, else what is the point?  

It is a forum for discussion, not a platform for one individual to be allowed to dictate to others, no?

HKP in the red corner was having none of that.  Hooray, Hooray

A very nice young lady, a very su-sensible one too, voiced her support of HKP, their right to voice opinion and freely so, she too felt she had the same right to opinion as Bad News.  As did another member who was refusing to be silenced, a resistor no less.

It was hotting up now!

Bad 'I can do and say as I please because I think I'm bonkers, and Flossy is my friend'  News, entered the ring.

The usual LOL'ing around spitting spiteful stuff followed!

Reinforcements arrived!

A cry from Freedom -  for a moderator, one who is meant to act in fairness, treat all members equally -   her words were not wise, fanned the flames:

Freedom:

Locking for a moment to allow myself time to read through the last few pages properly. I don't think that my initial reaction will change though -WTF is going on.  Certain people should be ashamed of themselves but more likely they're finding all this hilarious.

END

The forum fell silent, everyone on tenterhooks as they waited
for Freedom to re-emerge after having given fair consideration to
situation (not really, she'd already made it clear - "I don't think that my
initial reaction will change...!")

Lordy, lordy, some never learn.  Can take horse to water an' all that...

Certain people absolutely should be ashamed of themselves, namely -
Flossy and Freedumb!  

Hell what a shed load -  we all know she meant those decent people
who dared question Bad News, are the ones she feels should be
ashamed of themselves.  No mistaken whose corner she snuck off to,
to sit and read those LAST FEW PAGES.

I for one, as someone looking in, an observer, didn't find the situation
hilarious at all, and I very much doubt those folks Freedumb is
referring to, those members who she said should be ashamed of
themselves (and she ain't including Bad News in that statement)
don't find it one bit amusing as they have nothing to be ashamed of.  

When did it become shameful to ask a pertinent question or to expect
to be treated fairly and equally?

That they have to be silenced while Bad News has freedom
of the forum, is, well...BAD NEWS!

Freedumb did return with more, again, not so wise words, after she'd
read carefully of course the LAST FEW PAGES...then used them to,
yip, fan the flames once more.

I can guarantee anyone of sound mind, a sense of fair play will indeed
find it hilarious, not the situation, but rather, her...well, her findings...


Freedom:

" Having now read through the last few pages with increasing
amazement, I can add little to Candyfloss's post.  Any
further personal comments - regardless of who says them and about
whom - will be removed together with the poster.

You won't be missed by me, that's for sure.  Anyone who wants to
delete their account google the information from Forumotion

END

What a dumbass thing to say!  But then she has defended almost every
vile, senseless word uttered by Bad News, every insult, derogatory
comment, and made excuses for same...

And hell, I'm just guessing, but next time Bad News insults or is rude
to a fellow member - she won't be removed...

And I'm guessing again, that Freedumb is not referring to Bad News
when she says - 'you won't be missed by me!'

Hardly gives anyone thinking of getting on board the
Flossy & Freedumb Forum, incentive to do so!   Frighten them away
I shouldn't wonder!

Flossy, Bossy and Freedumb - what a team!


HKP, Sir/Madam, wisest words came from you today -

"CF (Candyfloss) it does actually matter..."

Well said! - Of course it DID darn well matter, of course it did, you are
spot on. As did it matter that everyone's viewpoint be given an equal
airing without being swiftly removed.  It mattered that you are able to
make comment, question any blog that is posted on the forum without
being shouted down by either Flossy or Freedumb, or indeed the writer
who cannot accept any critique at all, generally responding, referring
to any member who has politely questioned her, as an idiot - what do
they know, they are told, you must be as big an idiot in the real world
as I find you to be on the forum she generally continues.
(pretty shocking stuff I might add) The real world most often is
included in the response.   I rather think the real world  is alien to the
writer.  Oh and the response, to add further insult is always peppered
with the trademark 'LOL'

Bad news folks, is, there is, a common denominator where disruption
has been experienced on certain forums.  Yip it's bad news!

Whilst Freedumb continues to be amazed at what she read.  

Members were utterly dismayed at what they read!  Freedumb's
responding as she did, once again refusing to acknowledge and
address the source of the problem!

Flossy and Freedumb themselves being a huge part of!

If they ain't gonna sort out the obvious issue...choose to remain in
denial, then their little forum will soon bite the dust...

Little friendly advice ladies if I may - wake up smell the coffee!

As one member said - 'it's embarrassing to be a member!'  

Can't argue with that, it made for embarrassing reading!

And what nonsense from Freedumb that those who wish to discuss
this should refrain from doing so until the documentary has aired.

Most everything discussed on forum is based on opinion and to
a huge degree speculation.

So what makes this topic different?  Why have members not to
discuss until it airs?

And no it's not because it might interfere with an ongoing investigation
that is just laughable!  Why post anything at all then if this is the
case?  Why not keep any talk of this documentary under wraps
altogether, not allow it to be mentioned, not allow blogs relating
to it, to be mentioned, not allow them to be posted on the forum?

In fact, why allow any talk of the McCann case on the forum?

What the hell we could all release a documentary after the fact, after
the case is solved, perpetrators caught charged, found guilty whatever!.

The statements made by Flossy and Freedumb in this regard quite
defy logic, common sense, any sense of fair play.

Meanwhile the individual who writes the blogs on said subject/is
involved in documentary can do so, can comment, put forward
any point she wishes, spout any shed load she wants about it before
it airs?

Most agree anything to do with this documentary is not worth writing
home about, but if Flossy and Freedumb are going to post blogs about
it on the forum, and members want to ask questions, day in day out,
about it, voice opinion, where is the harm?

And to say a release date can only be given once the case is solved -

Censorship for some, if ever there was!  Freedom, might want to think
about changing her name!    (more at link, remove xxxx to access)

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

18th October 2015

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Get'emGonçalo wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT!  (yes I am shouting) - thanks a trillion for posting the link.

Flossy, Bossy and Freedumb - what a team!

squish - lol !

Statement on Hutton's blog tonight:

-------------------------------------------------

QUOTE:     "When I left CMoMM, almost 75% of their forum left with me and the entire forum collapsed".    UNQUOTE

Tony Bennett wrote:Statement on Hutton's blog tonight:

-------------------------------------------------

QUOTE:     "When I left CMoMM, almost 75% of their forum left with me and the entire forum collapsed".    UNQUOTE

And then she woke up.

Tony Bennett wrote:Statement on Hutton's blog tonight:

-------------------------------------------------

QUOTE:     "When I left CMoMM, almost 75% of their forum left with me and the entire forum collapsed".    UNQUOTE

Is that what she said?

What can't speak, can't lie:
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann Forum: Most users ever online was 2583 on Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:33 pm

Madeleine McCann Mystery Forum: Most users ever online was 149 on Mon May 11, 2015 6:34 pm

sallypelt wrote:

Tony Bennett wrote:Statement on Hutton's blog tonight:

-------------------------------------------------

QUOTE:     "When I left CMoMM, almost 75% of their forum left with me and the entire forum collapsed".    UNQUOTE

And then she woke up.

With ridiculous grandeur comments like that it will be more of 'us' that'll wake up to her, that her words have little honesty or realism.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]  chirpyinsect Today at 9:34 pm
Well I guess this will earn me a slap but it has to be said. I am absolutely shocked at the stance taken by Candy and Freedom tonight.
There have been many subjects that have become heated in the past and admin and mod have done their best to adjudicate as fairly as possible. Not so this time.
It's as if there has been a complete volte face in manner and fair mindedness, even descending into sarcasm and childish roffling about aunties and cousins.
Not like you ladies. I normally admire you both and don't envy you your task one bit, but you have lost 2 posters today that we know of and upset a fair few more in your defence of someone who, by her own admittance, expects and invites criticism.
If the members here can disagree with each other on diverse subjects such as shadows and weather conditions yet still remain civil, why can Cristobell not defend her own actions? 
I am not attacking Cristobell by the way although I am not a fan. I'm sure she won't lose sleep over that fact but then nor will I.
Nor am I going to criticise Sonia as I am happy to wait for her doc if it gets aired. However, I am saddened by the ripping apart of this place and the ridicule it has received tonight. I used to be so proud of us here. Now it has gone the way of the place we have been denigrating. Such a shame.
Ps Freedom and Candy. I am sticking here as I really hope this can be sorted out, so please don't take this as a dig at you.

----------

At least she admits they have been denigrating this forum.

sallypelt wrote:What can't speak, can't lie:
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann Forum: Most users ever online was 2583 on Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:33 pm

Madeleine McCann Mystery Forum: Most users ever online was 149 on Mon May 11, 2015 6:34 pm

Yes.

But to bring it up-to-date:

Numbers viewing the form this minute: 311 

Daily views: Over 20,000

Get'emGonçalo wrote: (quoting chirpyinsect):  I used to be so proud of us here. Now it has gone the way of the place we have been denigrating. Such a shame.
Ps Freedom and Candy. I am sticking here as I really hope this can be sorted out, so please don't take this as a dig at you.
----------
At least she admits they have been denigrating this forum.

Yes, this formal admission is useful, they have been dishing out abuse and denigration at us by the bucketload, cunningly and willingly encouraged by (sorry, can't help it), 'Flossy' and 'Freedumb', lazz's new nicks for them.

But then chirpyinsect has happily been proved utterly wrong about MMM having 'gone the way of the other place' (CMOMM)?

What has happened to CMOMM since MMM formed?

Daily visitors to the forum are UP.

Membership has increased by SEVERAL HUNDRED.

New members joining since 1st October alone: SEVENTY-TWO. 

Several who left us on the crest of a wave of organised hostility towards us have RETURNED. 

One of our new members is Richard Hall, one who HAS produced not one Madeleine documentary but TWO, and has attracted over 1.5 million views of them to date.     

Dozens of new research threads have STARTED UP and new forum sections CREATED.

A sound Moderation Team has been BUILT.

Thank you to all those who remained in the good ship CMOMM as it sailed through choppy waters.

Tony Bennett wrote:Added here, with sadness, just for the written record - on Hutton's blog today, 19th Oct:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

QUOTE

UPDATE 19/10/15 -  So who doesn't want the truth out there?

The personal attacks on myself and Sonia Poulton are relentless and most of them are coming from the antis in the form of the CMoMM forum, who claim to be fighting for justice for Madeleine, but who are in reality, doing everything they can to silence those who are trying to get the truth into the public domain. 
 
On the forum where I currently post several members accuse myself and Sonia of using this case to advance our careers - as if that were a bad thing!  Doesn't everyone try to advance their careers?  I find the British idea of NOT trying to win, and NOT trying to be successful, ridiculous. 

Why is it wrong to try to advance your career?  Should we all be aiming for mediocrity?  Should we all be 'umble and unassuming? Are we not allowed to take or expect credit for the work we do?  I know those were the rules when I was having the catechism pounded into me at the age of 6, but I discarded that nonsense decades ago. 

I, and indeed Sonia, are using our talents to get the truth of Madeleine's disappearance into the mainstream media, something genuine 'antis' have been trying to do for years.  And as a respected mainstream journalist, Sonia has the talent and the connections to make this a reality. 

UNQUOTE

Was the entire twelve paragraph version there when you plucked that excerpt, or have bits been added throughout the day, as and when?

It's unbelievable - I urge anyone who wonders at the continued criticism to read.  As a teaser, the final sentence is..

The hypocrisy of those shouting  'think of the children' while hiding behind walls of anonymity and in a vermin ridden cesspit, never fails to astonish me.

Tony Bennett wrote:

Get'emGonçalo wrote: (quoting chirpyinsect):  I used to be so proud of us here. Now it has gone the way of the place we have been denigrating. Such a shame.
Ps Freedom and Candy. I am sticking here as I really hope this can be sorted out, so please don't take this as a dig at you.
----------
At least she admits they have been denigrating this forum.

Yes, this formal admission is useful, they have been dishing out abuse and denigration at us by the bucketload, cunningly and willingly encouraged by (sorry, can't help it), 'Flossy' and 'Freedumb', lazz's new nicks for them.

But then chirpyinsect has happily been proved utterly wrong about MMM having 'gone the way of the other place'.

Whathas happened to CMOMM since MMM formed?

Daily visitors to the forum are UP.

Membership has increased by SEVERAL HUNDRED.

New members joining since 1st October alone: SEVENTY-TWO. 

Several who left us on the crest of a wave of organised hostility towards us have RETURNED. 

One of our new members is Richard Hall, one who HAS produced not one Madeleine documentary but TWO, and has attracted over 1.5 million views of them to date.     

Dozens of new research threads have STARTED UP and new forum sections CREATED.

A sound Moderation Team has been BUILT.

Thank you to all those who remained in the good ship CMOMM as it sailed through choppy waters.

Excellent facts and figures.
This forum can't be beaten and that's what galls them. 
They hoped to bring it down but have failed miserably.

It's no good, I can't resist it..

Paragraph 5

As for myself, my writing and my blogs are read by thousands, including newspaper editors, police, psychology students [she has clearly forgotten to mention the NHS] and ordinary members of the public who like straight talking articles that sort the wheat from the chaff, and give a reader friendly perspective of what is going on. I have studied this case in depth for 8 years!  I know it inside out and upside down and I am quickly able to distinguish between fact and bullshit.  My enemies are, understandably, those in the bullshit category.


That is one heck of a revelatory jaw dropping moment - I quite understand if this is promptly deleted.

Tony Bennett wrote:Statement on Hutton's blog tonight:

-------------------------------------------------

QUOTE:     "When I left CMoMM, almost 75% of their forum left with me and the entire forum collapsed".    UNQUOTE

Grandoise delusional condition on fine display. lol

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

Tony Bennett wrote:Statement on Hutton's blog tonight:

-------------------------------------------------

QUOTE:     "When I left CMoMM, almost 75% of their forum left with me and the entire forum collapsed".    UNQUOTE

Is that what she said?  

Apparently! lol  

But then she also said she is a certified nut case ...

Flossy (or Bossy - are they one and the same or two different ones?) has closed this momentous thread over on MMM with 600-plus posts on it, mostly about Hutton:

 The untold story of Madeleine McCann - Sonia Poulton
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]  candyfloss Today at 10:19 pm

...for this reason:

"Locked until we have some news from Sonia".

You gotta laugh

"I have a get out of jail free card, confirmation of lunacy from two renowned psychiatrists."

Why did this person need to be assessed by two renowned psychiatrists (previously referred to as the UK's top psychiatrists) - was it connected to the case she instigated against the catholic childcare institution?  If so, no surprising it was thrown out of court.