Re: Sonia Poulton 'Teaser Trailer' out now (4 Oct 2015)

by Liz Eagles 14.10.15 13:03

OwnGoal wrote:Does she mean PeterMac?

I don't think for a moment that it's PeterMac but it just goes to show how you swiftly jumped to that conclusion.

It also goes to show how not releasing a production can be delayed by perceived threats and utter nonsense.

Add to this the other Poulton tweet about cesspits and barren of courage then you have yet another load of bullpoo.

by aiyoyo 14.10.15 13:24

aquila wrote:After a 90 second teaser trailer released on the anniversary of Brenda Leyland's demise with a promise of a documentary coming soon, here is the latest Poulton Twitter drama.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
A glimpse into my inbox. Here's an ex-police chief warning me to be careful. As you do.

........................................................

Christ

Only her words that arrived in her inbox.

Who's to know that's not her coming up with a get out excuse for not showing the documentary?

Otherwise why the need to tell people content of her inbox? Why would it be in anyone's interest to know that?

Doesn't make sense.

Oh wait...she's a sucker for attention....

Silly me....she's so transparent.

by jeanmonroe 14.10.15 13:26

[quote="aquila"]After a 90 second teaser trailer released on the anniversary of Brenda Leyland's demise with a promise of a documentary coming soon, here is the latest Poulton Twitter drama.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
A glimpse into my inbox. Here's an ex-police chief warning me to be careful. As you do.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Armchair Anarchist ‏@narkyanarchist Oct 12 @SoniaPoulton Sonia, do you feel that constitutes a threat?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] I'm not sure what I feel about it but I thought it wise to make public as that comes with its own form of protection.
[/list]
...............................................
Chris Palmer
SoniaPoulton[/b] - The police, ex police whatever, should know better than to make threats. I hope you reported it.
........................................................

Sonia Poulton
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] he wasn't threatening me, he was warning me. He's one of the good guys.
..........................................................

SoniaPoulton [/url]

CaroleShooter]@CaroleShooter[/url] just warning me to be careful because when people 'over step' the mark 'things' happen.
---------------------------------------------------

'kept' that 'quiet' didn't she?

Wonder if she has 'warned' her cohort, RH, that she might have 'overstepped, the mark', with the RH 'tweet' to TB saying 'you have been warned'?

Anyway,

'Infamy, infamy, they've all got it 'in fa ME'!

'NAME' the ex 'cop', police 'chief', SP, or otherwise, sadly, people might 'not' believe you!

by aiyoyo 14.10.15 13:31

aquila wrote:
It also goes to show how not releasing a production can be delayed by perceived threats and utter nonsense.

Exactly
Tramped up excuse to save face for no show of documentary

by jeanmonroe 14.10.15 13:36

@ aiyoyo

Exactly.

"Tramped up........." laughat

Loving it! high5

by aiyoyo 14.10.15 13:37

jeanmonroe wrote:
aquila wrote:After a 90 second teaser trailer released on the anniversary of Brenda Leyland's demise with a promise of a documentary coming soon, here is the latest Poulton Twitter drama.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
A glimpse into my inbox. Here's an ex-police chief warning me to be careful. As you do.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Armchair Anarchist ‏@narkyanarchist Oct 12 @SoniaPoulton Sonia, do you feel that constitutes a threat?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] I'm not sure what I feel about it but I thought it wise to make public as that comes with its own form of protection.
[/list]
...............................................
Chris Palmer
SoniaPoulton[/b] - The police, ex police whatever, should know better than to make threats. I hope you reported it.
........................................................

Sonia Poulton
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] he wasn't threatening me, he was warning me. He's one of the good guys.
..........................................................

SoniaPoulton [/url]

CaroleShooter]@CaroleShooter[/url] just warning me to be careful because when people 'over step' the mark 'things' happen.
---------------------------------------------------

'kept' that 'quiet' didn't she?

Wonder if she has 'warned' her cohort, RH, that she might have overstepped' the mark, with the RH 'tweet' to TB saying 'you have been warned'?

Anyway,

'Infamy, infamy, they've all got it 'in for ME'!

'NAME' the ex 'cop', police 'chief', SP, or otherwise, sadly, people might 'not' believe you!

No way hosey
She will tramp up another excuse why she cannot name the ex cop.....

It's so transparent where she is heading with this....

by jeanmonroe 14.10.15 13:50

Did SP EVER 'name' the 'person', whose identity, SHE has 'concealed' for over a YEAR, will 'shock everyone' to 'the core'?

You know, THE 'person' that HAS to 'keep the Madeleine McCann 'abduction' 'story' GOING, AT ALL 'COSTS', for 'ever'!

'Book, her, read, like an, open'

by sami 14.10.15 14:01

jeanmonroe wrote:Did SP EVER 'name' the 'person', whose identity, SHE has 'concealed' for over a YEAR, will 'shock everyone' to 'the core'?

I will be shocked to the core if she ever stops talking about what she's going to do and actually produces something.

There is no way in hell anybody with anything significant to bring to the table about this case will pre announce it. Crimewatch drove me nuts with teaser trailers, Summers and Swan was a dead duck. Now this. As soon as they start trumpet blowing, it's time to ignore the lot of them.

by Liz Eagles 14.10.15 14:10

....meanwhile, over the road on Planet Hutton there is a post from candyfloss

...........................................................................................

There is an update on Cristobell's blog re the timing of the documentary and interfering with the investigation, posted today.

Interesting last paragraph......

We are all on tenterhooks at the moment, something appears to be happening - Operation Grange have a deadline. Sonia has all the footage and all the interviews and is ready to go!

by goodqualitywristbands 14.10.15 14:13

aquila wrote:....meanwhile, over the road on Planet Hutton there is a post from candyfloss

...........................................................................................

There is an update on Cristobell's blog re the timing of the documentary and interfering with the investigation, posted today.

Interesting last paragraph......

We are all on tenterhooks at the moment, something appears to be happening - Operation Grange have a deadline. Sonia has all the footage and all the interviews and is ready to go!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by jeanmonroe 14.10.15 14:22

Get'emGonçalo wrote:According to Cristobell: We are all on tenterhooks at the moment, something appears to be happening - Operation Grange have a deadline. Sonia has all the footage, and all the interviews and is ready to go!

Oooppsss, 'unfortunate' use of word 'there'?

A 'deadline'!

Perhaps 'that' IS the 'different' 'line of inquiry' BHH has told us, OG are 'investigating'?

Oh, can't be, OG are ONLY 'investigating'................'THE abduction' of Madeleine McCann.

by jeanmonroe 14.10.15 14:33

meanwhile, over the road on Planet Hutton there is a post from candyfloss
...........................................................................................

There is an update on Cristobell's blog re the timing of the documentary and interfering with the investigation, posted today.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

------------------------------

'Interfering' with the 'investigation'?

WHO?

SP or BK?

Is it politically 'correct' to 'say' SP and RH are 'ThunderBIRDS' laughat

by Mark Willis 14.10.15 15:34

Could be worse. TerraHAWKS. (I could have used a far more pejorative prefix to HAWKS there; shhhhh, you know what....lol)

Meanwhile, I do believe it's been said that she will have her documentary home for Christmas.

I'm sure I've heard that somewhere before.... shit happens

<< Or in this case, it just remains dormant, reminiscent of SP's veracity and RH's brain.

by Liz Eagles 14.10.15 15:46

Mark Willis wrote:Could be worse. TerraHAWKS. (I could have used a far more pejorative prefix to HAWKS there; shhhhh, you know what....lol)

Meanwhile, I do believe it's been said that she will have her documentary home for Christmas.

I'm sure I've heard that somewhere before.... << Or in this case, it just remains dormant, reminiscent of SP's veracity and RH's brain.

I've had a bit of an education in the last couple of days. I didn't know what a cesspit looks like - to be perfectly honest when I looked at the photograph of a cesspit posted by Poulton it looked to me like a chocolate souffle offered up in some sort of back to basics creative style cooking competition to serve the Womens' Institute at a celebration dinner (must stop watching The Great British Menu) and the word 'pejorative'. Had to look that up.

I got the shitehawk though. titter

by plebgate 14.10.15 15:49

I know we can all scroll by on the SP/RH threads, but how many more posts and threads are there going to be about these two?

I keep clicking to see if there is actually any news about the docu. but there never is any just the same old same old about they said this and they said that nasty comment.

If they thought there was going to be no discussion/comment about them for a while maybe they reduce the number of comments made, but seriously, to me, it is very boring and some of the other threads are not getting a look in because more and more it is becoming about them (IMO).

There are one or two posters who have racked up posts to their name - mostly responding to these threads - I haven't actually seen many posts from them asking questions about or giving their views on the actual case files.

A good way of amassing enough posts to start sending PMs? Just a thought, but I do a lot of thinking - when I have the time.

by Mark Willis 14.10.15 15:56

aquila wrote:
Mark Willis wrote:Could be worse. TerraHAWKS. (I could have used a far more pejorative prefix to HAWKS there; shhhhh, you know what....lol)

Meanwhile, I do believe it's been said that she will have her documentary home for Christmas.

I'm sure I've heard that somewhere before.... << Or in this case, it just remains dormant, reminiscent of SP's veracity and RH's brain.
I've had a bit of an education in the last couple of days. I didn't know what a cesspit looks like - to be perfectly honest when I looked at the photograph of a cesspit posted by Poulton it looked to me like a chocolate souffle offered up in some sort of back to basics creative style cooking competition to serve the Womens' Institute at a celebration dinner (must stop watching The Great British Menu) and the word 'pejorative'. Had to look that up.

I got the shitehawk though.

That merits a prize in my book.

Have to say that this whole Mc-affair has become like a fractal, with iteration after iteration of scams within scams, always the same however deep you look.
The tiresome part is they are all so blatant, old hat and time wasting. Time wasted having to explain to those who believe these people that they are being conned, which can be a lengthy business.

It's really rather simple and has been said many times, but in a nutshell, no one at all related to the MSM will ever be in any position to put forward the truth whilst the Mcs retain their protection from them, the current government, SY, Special Branch and various SKY sofa dwellers (see under "Sundry Liars).
If you bear that in mind, along with "never speak to the Press" you shouldn't go too far wrong.

by Mark Willis 14.10.15 15:59

As for the abundance of posts in this thread it is always worthwhile to point out what's true and what is not to help those who are not so swift or cynical to see what's hiding in plain sight.
I will continue to post about these two snake oil merchants to help serve as a warning to the credulous.

by Carrry On Doctor 14.10.15 16:01

Agreed Plebgate, CMOMM currently feels like [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and the constant bickering is only playing into the hands of those who wish to disrupt.

Mods - by permitting such posts you doing the site no favours - please clamp down !

by Liz Eagles 14.10.15 16:21

Mark Willis wrote:As for the abundance of posts in this thread it is always worthwhile to point out what's true and what is not to help those who are not so swift or cynical to see what's hiding in plain sight.
I will continue to post about these two snake oil merchants to help serve as a warning to the credulous.

So far this week there is Hutton accusing Tony Bennett (not for the first time) of child sexual abuse and there is Poulton tweeting an ex senior police officer warning her about what happens to people who blow the whistle - injections of insulin with syringes that are barely detectable.

Snake oil? Lower than a snake's belly.

by aiyoyo 14.10.15 18:01

jeanmonroe wrote:Did SP EVER 'name' the 'person', whose identity, SHE has 'concealed' for over a YEAR, will 'shock everyone' to 'the core'?

Nope!

She's said it's not a youtube video.
And, if no mainstream channel will take it, she'll probably be left with having to take it to her grave.

by aiyoyo 14.10.15 18:07

aquila wrote:
Mark Willis wrote:Could be worse. TerraHAWKS. (I could have used a far more pejorative prefix to HAWKS there; shhhhh, you know what....lol)

Meanwhile, I do believe it's been said that she will have her documentary home for Christmas.

I'm sure I've heard that somewhere before.... << Or in this case, it just remains dormant, reminiscent of SP's veracity and RH's brain.

I've had a bit of an education in the last couple of days. I didn't know what a cesspit looks like - to be perfectly honest when I looked at the photograph of a cesspit posted by Poulton it looked to me like a chocolate souffle offered up in some sort of back to basics creative style cooking competition to serve the Womens' Institute at a celebration dinner (must stop watching The Great British Menu) and the word 'pejorative'. Had to look that up.

I got the shitehawk though.

Oh bugger.... I thought the image was the collections of her bull poops ! big grin

by aiyoyo 14.10.15 18:13

aquila wrote:....meanwhile, over the road on Planet Hutton there is a post from candyfloss

...........................................................................................

There is an update on Cristobell's blog re the timing of the documentary and interfering with the investigation, posted today.

Interesting last paragraph......

We are all on tenterhooks at the moment, something appears to be happening - Operation Grange have a deadline. [b]Sonia has all the footage and all the interviews and is ready to go!

As usual no value in the info....

Ready to go where with the footage etc....? To the skip ?

What has the Grange Operation having deadline or not, got to with her film ?

She knew darn well Grange was investigating even before she embarked on making this documentary......

by Guest 14.10.15 22:17

Carrry On Doctor wrote:Agreed Plebgate, CMOMM currently feels like [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and the constant bickering is only playing into the hands of those who wish to disrupt.

Mods - by permitting such posts you doing the site no favours - please clamp down !

There is another way of looking at it. Drawing attention to the Poulton/Hutton alliance is giving them an ideal opportunity to show their true colours - and my aren't they doing that with great aplomb. It's always an advantage to know who your enemies are, if you can give them a little nudge to help them on their way - so much the better IMO.

I wonder just how many join this forum, for example, for the sole purpose of infiltration. I noticed very recently that a particular member, who was treated kindly by some, has deflected to the Hutton haunt/s and twitterland and is now using that platform to hurl abuse in this direction. Disgraceful behaviour.

by Guest 14.10.15 22:34

@Get'emGoncalo wrote:

According to Cristobell: We are all on tenterhooks at the moment, something appears to be happening - Operation Grange have a deadline. Sonia has all the footage, and all the interviews and is ready to go!

Please don't tell me this is a subtle hint that the proposed documentary film is not going to be released until after Operation Grange deadline (?) has expired. By that time she'll need to come up with a new title - howz about 'The Big Bang Theory'?.. whacky

PHUT!

by aiyoyo 15.10.15 1:08

Verdi wrote:@Get'emGoncalo wrote:

According to Cristobell: We are all on tenterhooks at the moment, something appears to be happening - Operation Grange have a deadline. Sonia has all the footage, and all the interviews and is ready to go!

Please don't tell me this is a subtle hint that the proposed documentary film is not going to be released until after Operation Grange deadline (?) has expired. By that time she'll need to come up with a new title - howz about 'The Big Bang Theory'?.. PHUT!

She's unofficial mouthpiece for SP and spouting her usual nonsense.
A poor version of Clarence Mitchell but same purpose, ie spin.
Blowing hot air for SP.

Read between the lines, nothing that we don't already know.

"Something appears to be happening" is not the same as something IS happening.
Something MUST (is bound to) happen sooner or later, that is a given, even if only announcement of closure and no arrest.
Isn't that the whole point of the investigation?

Of course Op Grange must have a deadline. Funding won't go on forever, even a dipstick knows that. In fact that was already announced in the press.

As for her master having footage and interviews ready to go, what is she waiting for?

For the next eclipse of the sun ?

by Guest 15.10.15 1:16

aiyoyo wrote:
Verdi wrote:@Get'emGoncalo wrote:

According to Cristobell: We are all on tenterhooks at the moment, something appears to be happening - Operation Grange have a deadline. Sonia has all the footage, and all the interviews and is ready to go!

Please don't tell me this is a subtle hint that the proposed documentary film is not going to be released until after Operation Grange deadline (?) has expired. By that time she'll need to come up with a new title - howz about 'The Big Bang Theory'?.. PHUT!

She's unofficial mouthpiece for SP and spouting her usual nonsense.
A poor version of Clarence Mitchell but same purpose, ie spin.
Blowing hot air for SP.

Read between the lines, nothing that we don't already know.

"Something appears to be happening" is not the same as something IS happening.
Something MUST (is bound to) happen sooner or later, that is a given, even if only announcement of closure and no arrest.
Isn't that the whole point of the investigation?

Of course Op Grange must have a deadline. Funding won't go on forever, even a dipstick knows that. In fact that was already announced in the press.

As for her master having footage and interviews ready to go, what is she waiting for?

For the next eclipse of the sun ?

I omitted to mention, only hours before this proclamation she said she knows nothing about what's going on in Poulton's world and now she is the talking clock. A quick consultation - or a flight of fancy, wouldn't be the first time.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by aiyoyo 15.10.15 9:40

Making it up as she goes along.......
Reminds me of another narcissistic pathological liar the fragrant St. K.

by Mark Willis 15.10.15 12:34

aquila wrote:
Mark Willis wrote:As for the abundance of posts in this thread it is always worthwhile to point out what's true and what is not to help those who are not so swift or cynical to see what's hiding in plain sight.
I will continue to post about these two snake oil merchants to help serve as a warning to the credulous.
So far this week there is Hutton accusing Tony Bennett (not for the first time) of child sexual abuse and there is Poulton tweeting an ex senior police officer warning her about what happens to people who blow the whistle - injections of insulin with syringes that are barely detectable.

Snake oil? Lower than a snake's belly.

Indeed and why all references to these two must continue given the nonsense they are spreading.
Like Birch they lend no credibility to the case and it behoves us to rectify their bull.

by Liz Eagles 15.10.15 13:31

Mark Willis wrote:
aquila wrote:
Mark Willis wrote:Could be worse. TerraHAWKS. (I could have used a far more pejorative prefix to HAWKS there; shhhhh, you know what....lol)

Meanwhile, I do believe it's been said that she will have her documentary home for Christmas.

I'm sure I've heard that somewhere before.... << Or in this case, it just remains dormant, reminiscent of SP's veracity and RH's brain.
I've had a bit of an education in the last couple of days. I didn't know what a cesspit looks like - to be perfectly honest when I looked at the photograph of a cesspit posted by Poulton it looked to me like a chocolate souffle offered up in some sort of back to basics creative style cooking competition to serve the Womens' Institute at a celebration dinner (must stop watching The Great British Menu) and the word 'pejorative'. Had to look that up.

I got the shitehawk though.
That merits a prize in my book.
Have to say that this whole Mc-affair has become like a fractal, with iteration after iteration of scams within scams, always the same however deep you look.
The tiresome part is they are all so blatant, old hat and time wasting. Time wasted having to explain to those who believe these people that they are being conned, which can be a lengthy business.

It's really rather simple and has been said many times, but in a nutshell, no one at all related to the MSM will ever be in any position to put forward the truth whilst the Mcs retain their protection from them, the current government, SY, Special Branch and various SKY sofa dwellers (see under "Sundry Liars).
If you bear that in mind, along with "never speak to the Press" you shouldn't go too far wrong.

Here's a lovely fractal for you to use as an avatar - (I had to look up the word fractal - my vocabulary is increasing).

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Mark Willis 17.10.15 12:00

Love the owl. He looks very Mandelbrot to me.

He's a wise owl all right, he sees the multi-layered scams that obtain within the Mc Team which stretch across suppression of free speech, the demonising of Internet commentators, the manipulation of the MSM, the corrupt ion that lies within government and SY, the perpetuation of unsavoury sexual activities in Westminster.
Unfortunately for them the Internet is the Zeitgeist and MSM is the dead medium walking. They just refuse to lie down, is all. But their day will come, as dramatic as when Murdoch hauled the dinosaurs from Fleet Street to the digital age. In essence he made himself a hostage to fortune as the Net will be his nemesis and the delightful Mcs, too.

Latest topics