On 8 May 2007, the PJ filed a report, saying they were barking up the wrong tree....400 WEEKS LATER, is DCI Nicola Wall of Operation Grange STILL barking up the wrong tree?
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: 'Operation Grange' set up by ex-Prime Minister David Cameron
Page 1 of 1 • Share
On 8 May 2007, the PJ filed a report, saying they were barking up the wrong tree....400 WEEKS LATER, is DCI Nicola Wall of Operation Grange STILL barking up the wrong tree?
by Tony Bennett 12.01.15 19:59
One of the most remarkable documents in the entire, voluminous PJ files, is a PJ report dated Tuesday 8th May, compiled by a PJ team.
The frustrated PJ team had followed up countless leads, but nothing made sense. 'We should be looking somewhere else', they realised. And they said so in this report, reproduced below.
Since then, exactly 400 complete weeks, or very nearly 8 years, have elapsed.
Yet Operation Grange appears to be looking in the very same places that were ruled 'dead ends' back on 8 May 2007, just 5 days after Madeleine had been reported missing by Drs Gerald and Kate McCann.
And with an official remit handed down from on high, confining the Scotland Yard investigation to 'investigating the abduction', is Detective Chief Inspector Wall going to spend the next 400 weeks also looking in the wrong place?
Here is the full astonishing report:
( Credits: 'pamalam' for hosting this report and so much other invaluable information on her site for over 6 years, and AnnaEsse for the translation, which I have amended very slightly in one or two places for readability)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Madeleine's disappearance, May 8th 2007 - the PJ have doubts.
Several days of interviews.
It is May 8th 2007, being the fifth day after Madeleine McCann's disappearance.
At this stage, the PJ have taken statements from dozens of people.
Hundreds of pages in the reports.
Everybody has been interviewed:
* Employees of the Ocean Club,
* nannies,
* or child-care workers from the Kids Club,
* cooks
* and assistant cooks at the "Tapas" and the "Millenium",
* cleaners,
* gardeners,
* maintenance workers,
* managers for the club's various services,
* directors and managers of the complex,
* tourists,
* owners of apartments,
* neighbours,
* people who were at the "Tapas" on May 3rd 2007,
* tennis coaches...
...in short, no one was left out.
Everybody was interviewed.
We are sparing you all these interviews, which for the most part bring nothing to the investigation or at least no new leads.
They are mainly interviews which, in general, bring out the following common points.
1) No one noticed anything unusual about Madeleine.
2) No one noticed any strange individual at the complex.
3) No one noticed anything suspicious which could be linked to Madeleine's disappearance.
4) No one noticed any suspicious vehicles or any suspicious unidentified people.
It is to be noted that even the GRN police officers, first on the spot, were interviewed by their PJ colleagues, even though written reports of their operation had already been sent.
With regards to the PJ's interviews over the past few days, a change is noted in how the case is being perceived.
Thus the questions which the PJ are now putting to various witnesses are implying that the PJ have doubts about the statements from the parents or friends in the group.
We note, however, that the slightest info, concerning the slightest suspicion, was professionally checked, immediately.
Numerous pages of the case file attest to this.
Up to now, May 8th 2007, every lead, or hint of a lead, has been checked and it was, each time, a false lead.
Like, for example, a suspicious car noticed near the Ocean Club reception by various witnesses. In the end, it was the service vehicle of a Club employee who had come to make an urgent repair to a door lock.
Why do the PJ have these doubts?
On reading various witness statements, given the number of leads checked, it seems difficult for someone to have been able to :
* get into the complex,
* gain access to the McCanns' apartment,
* take Madeleine,
*get out of the apartment,
* leave the Ocean Club,
* take flight via whatever means of transport
* and that no- one, absolutely no-one, saw anything.
No strangers,
no suspicious or unusual vehicles,
not even a shadow of a person carrying a child at the times and places where there were other people.
From the police point of view, if these witness statements do not totally exclude the possibility of an abduction, they make the theory less credible.
As a result, the answer must lie elsewhere. Notably with the group of friends (parents included).
The only person to have seen a suspect with a child is Jane Tanner, a member of the group of friends.
Interview of an employee from the swimming pool bar:
In her interview, this employee states that access is restricted to clients and that this is controlled via the client's card at the entrance. She adds that she has not come across any unauthorised person on the site. She explains that on the day of Madeleine's disappearance, at around 8.30pm, her friend was called following a problem with a lock in an apartment situated close to the 'Millennium' restaurant.
She went there with her friend. At around 9pm, they went back towards the Club's reception.
They passed near the 'Tapas' and by the McCann family's apartment.
They state that they saw nothing suspicious.
They saw no one and no vehicles.
Her friend left the premises at around 9.10pm with his service vehicle and she left at 9.15pm in her own car.
ENDS
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
The frustrated PJ team had followed up countless leads, but nothing made sense. 'We should be looking somewhere else', they realised. And they said so in this report, reproduced below.
Since then, exactly 400 complete weeks, or very nearly 8 years, have elapsed.
Yet Operation Grange appears to be looking in the very same places that were ruled 'dead ends' back on 8 May 2007, just 5 days after Madeleine had been reported missing by Drs Gerald and Kate McCann.
And with an official remit handed down from on high, confining the Scotland Yard investigation to 'investigating the abduction', is Detective Chief Inspector Wall going to spend the next 400 weeks also looking in the wrong place?
Here is the full astonishing report:
( Credits: 'pamalam' for hosting this report and so much other invaluable information on her site for over 6 years, and AnnaEsse for the translation, which I have amended very slightly in one or two places for readability)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Madeleine's disappearance, May 8th 2007 - the PJ have doubts.
Several days of interviews.
It is May 8th 2007, being the fifth day after Madeleine McCann's disappearance.
At this stage, the PJ have taken statements from dozens of people.
Hundreds of pages in the reports.
Everybody has been interviewed:
* Employees of the Ocean Club,
* nannies,
* or child-care workers from the Kids Club,
* cooks
* and assistant cooks at the "Tapas" and the "Millenium",
* cleaners,
* gardeners,
* maintenance workers,
* managers for the club's various services,
* directors and managers of the complex,
* tourists,
* owners of apartments,
* neighbours,
* people who were at the "Tapas" on May 3rd 2007,
* tennis coaches...
...in short, no one was left out.
Everybody was interviewed.
We are sparing you all these interviews, which for the most part bring nothing to the investigation or at least no new leads.
They are mainly interviews which, in general, bring out the following common points.
1) No one noticed anything unusual about Madeleine.
2) No one noticed any strange individual at the complex.
3) No one noticed anything suspicious which could be linked to Madeleine's disappearance.
4) No one noticed any suspicious vehicles or any suspicious unidentified people.
It is to be noted that even the GRN police officers, first on the spot, were interviewed by their PJ colleagues, even though written reports of their operation had already been sent.
With regards to the PJ's interviews over the past few days, a change is noted in how the case is being perceived.
Thus the questions which the PJ are now putting to various witnesses are implying that the PJ have doubts about the statements from the parents or friends in the group.
We note, however, that the slightest info, concerning the slightest suspicion, was professionally checked, immediately.
Numerous pages of the case file attest to this.
Up to now, May 8th 2007, every lead, or hint of a lead, has been checked and it was, each time, a false lead.
Like, for example, a suspicious car noticed near the Ocean Club reception by various witnesses. In the end, it was the service vehicle of a Club employee who had come to make an urgent repair to a door lock.
Why do the PJ have these doubts?
On reading various witness statements, given the number of leads checked, it seems difficult for someone to have been able to :
* get into the complex,
* gain access to the McCanns' apartment,
* take Madeleine,
*get out of the apartment,
* leave the Ocean Club,
* take flight via whatever means of transport
* and that no- one, absolutely no-one, saw anything.
No strangers,
no suspicious or unusual vehicles,
not even a shadow of a person carrying a child at the times and places where there were other people.
From the police point of view, if these witness statements do not totally exclude the possibility of an abduction, they make the theory less credible.
As a result, the answer must lie elsewhere. Notably with the group of friends (parents included).
The only person to have seen a suspect with a child is Jane Tanner, a member of the group of friends.
Interview of an employee from the swimming pool bar:
In her interview, this employee states that access is restricted to clients and that this is controlled via the client's card at the entrance. She adds that she has not come across any unauthorised person on the site. She explains that on the day of Madeleine's disappearance, at around 8.30pm, her friend was called following a problem with a lock in an apartment situated close to the 'Millennium' restaurant.
She went there with her friend. At around 9pm, they went back towards the Club's reception.
They passed near the 'Tapas' and by the McCann family's apartment.
They state that they saw nothing suspicious.
They saw no one and no vehicles.
Her friend left the premises at around 9.10pm with his service vehicle and she left at 9.15pm in her own car.
ENDS
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Investigator
- Posts : 16926
Activity : 24792
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Re: On 8 May 2007, the PJ filed a report, saying they were barking up the wrong tree....400 WEEKS LATER, is DCI Nicola Wall of Operation Grange STILL barking up the wrong tree?
by Sourdough 14.01.15 12:48
Tony Bennett wrote:One of the most remarkable documents in the entire, voluminous PJ files, is a PJ report dated Tuesday 8th May, compiled by a PJ team.
The frustrated PJ team had followed up countless leads, but nothing made sense. 'We should be looking somewhere else', they realised. And they said so in this report, reproduced below.
Since then, exactly 400 complete weeks, or very nearly 8 years, have elapsed.
Yet Operation Grange appears to be looking in the very same places that were ruled 'dead ends' back on 8 May 2007, just 5 days after Madeleine had been reported missing by Drs Gerald and Kate McCann.
And with an official remit handed down from on high, confining the Scotland Yard investigation to 'investigating the abduction', is Detective Chief Inspector Wall going to spend the next 400 weeks also looking in the wrong place?
Here is the full astonishing report:
( Credits: 'pamalam' for hosting this report and so much other invaluable information on her site for over 6 years, and AnnaEsse for the translation, which I have amended very slightly in one or two places for readability)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SNIPPED
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Surely that is not a translation of a PJ report?
There is no page number or a link to a jpg file and I can't find it in the index.
Sourdough- Posts : 5
Activity : 5
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-01-13
Re: On 8 May 2007, the PJ filed a report, saying they were barking up the wrong tree....400 WEEKS LATER, is DCI Nicola Wall of Operation Grange STILL barking up the wrong tree?
by Tony Bennett 14.01.15 19:46
I must admit I was in some doubt when I posted this item as to whether it was an official document in the case.Sourdough wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Surely that is not a translation of a PJ report?
There is no page number or a link to a jpg file and I can't find it in the index.
I thought it was, because it carries the title on it (at the top, left):
1-Processo 1a
(click on the above link)
Does anyone else know for sure?
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Investigator
- Posts : 16926
Activity : 24792
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Similar topics» LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE
» Met Police (Operation Grange) - Bollocks or not bollocks?
» *** Days from its closure, Operation Grange is extended by £100.000 and 6 more months - 18.9.2016 *** (was: There are just 15 days left to the closure of Operation Grange)
» Faith in Op Grange
» DCI Nicola Wall
» Met Police (Operation Grange) - Bollocks or not bollocks?
» *** Days from its closure, Operation Grange is extended by £100.000 and 6 more months - 18.9.2016 *** (was: There are just 15 days left to the closure of Operation Grange)
» Faith in Op Grange
» DCI Nicola Wall
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: 'Operation Grange' set up by ex-Prime Minister David Cameron
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
