McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
Page 3 of 3 • Share
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
Yes, the seas are huge, and filled with things that can and do eat dead flesh to the bone. So nothing will be "floating about" for long.
Sam S- Posts : 86
Activity : 124
Likes received : 36
Join date : 2014-06-17
Location : Scotland
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
I wonder if Mr and Mrs really did receive hundreds of christmas cards from well-wishing supporters, as their regal christmas message implied.plebgate wrote:I wonder if there were any donations in the hundreds of cards they received?
Either way, one could be cynical and surmise that their decision to make reference to said cards was just a tactic, not unlike the "Appeal to the Masses" fallacy. This fallacy is committed by those who seek to justify a belief by the support base behind that belief, rather than dealing with the evidence (or lack thereof) supporting said belief.
I've seen Mr and Mrs use this tactic before, on those rare occasions when a journalist (never a UK one of course) has dared to ask them a mildly difficult question. Their response began with something like "I know that the majority of people in this country are decent people and they'll agree with me when I say... [insert crude rebuttal here]".
It's basically a form of 'peer pressure'. When someone mentions what everyone else thinks as evidence of their version of events, they are appealing to the masses.
AlexBG- Posts : 77
Activity : 96
Likes received : 11
Join date : 2014-10-23
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
AlexBG wrote:When someone mentions what everyone else thinks as evidence of their version of events, they are appealing to the masses.
A lie doesn't become the truth no matter how many people repeat it. A classic example being the feeding of the 5000 with a loaf of bread and a couple of fish
Realist- Posts : 421
Activity : 602
Likes received : 179
Join date : 2014-11-05
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
plebgate wrote:I wonder if there were any donations in the hundreds of cards they received?
If money was enclosed don't expect to hear about it. Maybe even their accountant wasn't told. Kate will probably spend it on another hair highlights ...........
Who's to know what they received or if they gave it over to the Fund or what they did with it.
But mentioning the hundreds of cards even if they made that up is just PR.
Going by the comments on Mirror's F/B probably the hundreds of cards were just hate mails.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
Realist wrote:A lie doesn't become the truth no matter how many people repeat it. A classic example being the feeding of the 5000 with a loaf of bread and a couple of fishAlexBG wrote:When someone mentions what everyone else thinks as evidence of their version of events, they are appealing to the masses.
There is a very good explanation of that particular "miracle", in fact.
In the near East, and I speak of a good friend who hails from Cyprus, a wedding is a celebration not only between the two people, and the two families, but of the two villages concerned.
Everyone is invited to the 'reception'. The near families provide food and drink for the near families, and open barbecues for the rest.
At the wedding of my friend there were 1500 people, - probably - no one counted them
Every family from the surrounding villages bring food and wine, and will remain in their extended family group eating and drinking, and will be visited by the bride and groom who will then pin the money on the bride's gown. And will then dance and drink some more,
At a significant gathering, since each family will have slightly over-catered, there will be a lot of food left over.
It makes perfect sense. It was "true" and you can see it in action to this day. ( In fact it happens in rural Spain . . . )
The 'Spin" was to claim it as a miracle, rather than leave it as something that is perfectly normal and explicable.
Much of the Bible is normal and perfectly explicable as an historical account - even to someone like me.
The loaves and fishes were all that the disciples had thought to bring.
Five loaves of "peasant bread" can be 7 kg - more than enough for a few disciples, and who knows how large were the two fish ?
One of my favourite lunchtime snacks is a a couple of slices of toast, with two small fillets of Anchovy squished over them and some of my own olive
oil with a slice of tomato anbd a bit of sea salt. There is almost a whole tin of anchovies left over !
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
I assume Mr. and Mrs. do get their fair share of Christmas cards each year and lots of "fanmail" throughout the year.
But I wonder, if, on the very deepest level of their being, these members of the public KNOW there is something amiss with regard to this story.
Are they caught up in a sort of mania, such as the behaviour of those who write to and develop relationships with serial killers etc.?
Indeed, is this the same psychological profile of many of the "pro" shills who are so vocal on social media. Do they harbour a sort of "esteem" for the potentially diabolical actions of those they support?
But I wonder, if, on the very deepest level of their being, these members of the public KNOW there is something amiss with regard to this story.
Are they caught up in a sort of mania, such as the behaviour of those who write to and develop relationships with serial killers etc.?
Indeed, is this the same psychological profile of many of the "pro" shills who are so vocal on social media. Do they harbour a sort of "esteem" for the potentially diabolical actions of those they support?
secrets and lies- Posts : 152
Activity : 180
Likes received : 22
Join date : 2013-10-19
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
PeterMac wrote:Realist wrote:A lie doesn't become the truth no matter how many people repeat it. A classic example being the feeding of the 5000 with a loaf of bread and a couple of fishAlexBG wrote:When someone mentions what everyone else thinks as evidence of their version of events, they are appealing to the masses.
There is a very good explanation of that particular "miracle", in fact.
In the near East, and I speak of a good friend who hails from Cyprus, a wedding is a celebration not only between the two people, and the two families, but of the two villages concerned.
Everyone is invited to the 'reception'. The near families provide food and drink for the near families, and open barbecues for the rest.
At the wedding of my friend there were 1500 people, - probably - no one counted them
Every family from the surrounding villages bring food and wine, and will remain in their extended family group eating and drinking, and will be visited by the bride and groom who will then pin the money on the bride's gown. And will then dance and drink some more,
At a significant gathering, since each family will have slightly over-catered, there will be a lot of food left over.
It makes perfect sense. It was "true" and you can see it in action to this day. ( In fact it happens in rural Spain . . . )
The 'Spin" was to claim it as a miracle, rather than leave it as something that is perfectly normal and explicable.
Much of the Bible is normal and perfectly explicable as an historical account - even to someone like me.
The loaves and fishes were all that the disciples had thought to bring.
Five loaves of "peasant bread" can be 7 kg - more than enough for a few disciples, and who knows how large were the two fish ?
One of my favourite lunchtime snacks is a a couple of slices of toast, with two small fillets of Anchovy squished over them and some of my own olive
oil with a slice of tomato anbd a bit of sea salt. There is almost a whole tin of anchovies left over !
You're mixing up two miracles. Nothing to do with a wedding. You're thinking of the water into wine miracle. Too much Christmas pud?
Okeydokey- Posts : 938
Activity : 1013
Likes received : 31
Join date : 2013-10-18
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
secrets and lies wrote:I assume Mr. and Mrs. do get their fair share of Christmas cards each year and lots of "fanmail" throughout the year.
But I wonder, if, on the very deepest level of their being, these members of the public KNOW there is something amiss with regard to this story.
Are they caught up in a sort of mania, such as the behaviour of those who write to and develop relationships with serial killers etc.?
Indeed, is this the same psychological profile of many of the "pro" shills who are so vocal on social media. Do they harbour a sort of "esteem" for the potentially diabolical actions of those they support?
good post .
im sure they certainly will have their fair share of so called fans . Also some will have meerly latched on to the mccanns in hope of their own 5 minutes of fame .
you make a good point about serial killers it is a well known fact that the vile creacture that is the Yorkshire ripper has indeed been inundated with love letters , birthday , christmas cards and presents etc he has even had proposals of marriage and then there are others who have just contacted him not because they idolise him but just to be part of the whole sorry story .
I do wonder what makes some folk tick . The yorkshire ripper is evil personified yet even to this day people still contact him and he does indeed write to several in return .
So I have no doubt the Mccanns have indeed got themselves a possy of fans and hanger ons bizarre as it may seem .
frost- Posts : 210
Activity : 222
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2014-02-26
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
Well, that is a brave accusation, Realist.Realist wrote:A lie doesn't become the truth no matter how many people repeat it. A classic example being the feeding of the 5000 with a loaf of bread and a couple of fish
And PeterMac's explanation I can characterise as ingenious.
I believe in the plain account we have of this event in all the Gospels, in other words, that this was a supernatural miracle performed by Christ, the Eternal Son of God, our Creator.
I wonder if there are credible explanations for the raising of the dead Lazarus after he had been dead for four days (John's Gospel, Chapter 11).
When Christ was challenged by some of the Jews: 'Could not this man, which opened the eyes of the blind, have caused that even this man [Lazarus - T.B.] should not have died' (verse 37), Christ replied: "Take ye away the stone".
And Martha [Lazarus's sister - T.B.] replied: "Lord, by this time he stinketh: for he hath been dead four days".
Cadaver odour was most certainly present, but on this occasion, there was a corpse there as well.
Christ replied (verses 40-43): "Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?"
The people took away the stone.
And, the record says, Christ cried with a loud voice: "Lazarus, come forth".
And then we read (verse 44): 'And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with grave clothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go'.
Verse 45 informs us: 'Then many of the Jews which came to Mary, and had seen the things which Jesus did, believed on him.
Verses 47-53 inform us that, by contrast, the religious leaders of the day convened a special council, and 'took counsel together for to put him to death'.
++++++
And for that matter, what alternative explanation can there possibly be for the fact of Christ's resurrection, three days after a powerful earthquake and three hours of pitch blackness - recorded by the secular world at the time - accompanied His crucifixion?
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Investigator
- Posts : 16926
Activity : 24792
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
In statement analysis, 3 is known as the liars number (Mark McClish) When a guilty person spins a story that is not entirely truthful, when asked for example what time did you last see them, how many were there, what floor etc often they will use the number 3.Tony Bennett wrote:Well, that is a brave accusation, Realist.Realist wrote:A lie doesn't become the truth no matter how many people repeat it. A classic example being the feeding of the 5000 with a loaf of bread and a couple of fish
And PeterMac's explanation I can characterise as ingenious.
I believe in the plain account we have of this event in all the Gospels, in other words, that this was a supernatural miracle performed by Christ, the Eternal Son of God, our Creator.
I wonder if there are credible explanations for the raising of the dead Lazarus after he had been dead for four days (John's Gospel, Chapter 11).
When Christ was challenged by some of the Jews: 'Could not this man, which opened the eyes of the blind, have caused that even this man [Lazarus - T.B.] should not have died' (verse 37), Christ replied: "Take ye away the stone".
And Martha [Lazarus's sister - T.B.] replied: "Lord, by this time he stinketh: for he hath been dead four days".
Cadaver odour was most certainly present, but on this occasion, there was a corpse there as well.
Christ replied (verses 40-43): "Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?"
The people took away the stone.
And, the record says, Christ cried with a loud voice: "Lazarus, come forth".
And then we read (verse 44): 'And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with grave clothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go'.
Verse 45 informs us: 'Then many of the Jews which came to Mary, and had seen the things which Jesus did, believed on him.
Verses 47-53 inform us that, by contrast, the religious leaders of the day convened a special council, and 'took counsel together for to put him to death'.
++++++
And for that matter, what alternative explanation can there possibly be for the fact of Christ's resurrection, three days after a powerful earthquake and three hours of pitch blackness - recorded by the secular world at the time - accompanied His crucifixion?
The exception is when DUI when the subject will often say 2 or just a couple.
In the bible there is an awful lot of the use of the number 3.
Bear in mind the bible has been translanted and rewritten thousands of times to suit whoever was in charge at the time.
Basically the king James bible was a result of King James forcing the Church of England and the Puritans to work togeather to come up with a version that kept both sides happy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version
____________________
The little unremembered acts of kindness and love are the best parts of a person's life.
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
Hobs wrote:In statement analysis, 3 is known as the liars number (Mark McClish). When a guilty person spins a story that is not entirely truthful, when asked for example what time did you last see them, how many were there, what floor etc often they will use the number 3. The exception is when DUI when the subject will often say 2 or just a couple.
REPLY: I bow to your vastly superior knowledge on statement analysis, and so far as '3' being the 'liar's number' (or sometimes '2') is concerned, I'll have to take that on trust for now.
'3' is also recommended by the way as an oratorial technique, e.g. "When we come to power, I promise that we'll do A, B and C" hopefully building up to a round of applause as the speaker finishes point 'C'. Or, for example, Tony Blair's famous three priorities: 'Education, education, education'. Politicians are taught to practise this 'rule of 3'. May be it is also an aid to memory for the speaker.
It is one thing to say: 'Liars often mention things in threes'. I can't disagree, as I don't know enough about the subject.
But it's quite another thing, and a complete non sequitur, to claim: "I know a book with lots of threes in it, therefore it must be full of lies". It doesn't follow at all.
In the Bible there is an awful lot of the use of the number 3.
REPLY: There are indeed several instances of three in the Bible, the Triune God - God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit - being one such example. There is no doubt that some numbers have special significance in the Bible; I believe God is inter alia a brilliant mathematician as well as designer and creator. But arguably other numbers are more common and seem to represent certain things. Examples:
7 is the six days of creation plus one day of rest, also applied in the Old Testamant to the treatment of land and servants; one year in seven, the land was to remain fallow - for rest - and any servants were to be set free after six years and made free of any debts they owed. Additionally after 7 x 7 years, there was to be a special, additional 'jubilee year' in the 50th year - the land therefore remained fallow for 2 years
12 - twelve sons of Jacob to form the twelve tribes of Israel; 12 apostles chosen by Christ
13 - a number which appears to be connected with evil in the Bible and seems to be favoured by occultists
40 - years or days of temptation: 40 years in the wilderness for the Israelites after the Exodus, 40 days of temptation for Christ.
There are other interesting assocations; 8 seems to be associated with resurrection: 8 resurrections occur in the Bible
Bear in mind the Bible has been translated and rewritten thousands of times to suit whoever was in charge at the time.
REPLY: The Bible has never been 're-written'. The Bible, in its many translations worldwide - hundreds if not thousands of languages - is always derived from the original writings of the authors. These have been copied down the centuries. These copies were not entirely error-free, but copying mistakes were rare.
Christians worldwide believe that those who wrote the words of the Bible - in the original Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek - did so under divine direction or 'inspiration, producing a book that is God's Word to mankind, and without error as originally written. And no-one has yet proved any mistake so far as the Bible's historical and prophetic record is concerned; where the Bible deals in verifiable facts, time and again it has proved 100% accurate. Godly men before and after Christ have, we believe, been led by God over the centuries to produce this perfect book. It is sadly the case that some people, for wrong motives, have tried to add to it or subtract from it.
Basically the King James Bible was a result of King James forcing the Church of England and the Puritans to work togeather to come up with a version that kept both sides happy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version
REPLY: That's very true up to a point. King Alfred had translated parts of the Bible. John Wycliffe followed in the 14th century and gave us a very accurate translation. He was up against the Roman Catholic hierarchy of the day, who used a Latin Bible and later, in the 15th century, deemed it a capital offence to have a Bible in the English language.
After his death, they exhumed his body, burnt it, and cast his ashes into the River Soar at Lutterworth, Leicesterhsire - not far from Rothley. Thereby they hoped to extinguish his translation and his writings, but instead they spread to Europe where they were read by the likes of Jan Hus and Martin Luther.
The Reformation followed shortly after the invention of the printing press, and in the 16th century several attempts were made to translate the original Hebrew and Greek texts, notably the translation by William Tyndale. King James did indeed commission a new translation and to his credit, after 7 years' hard work, the Anglicans, Puritans and Catholics etc. agreed on a meticulous translation of the original Scriptures which has very much stood the test of time
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Investigator
- Posts : 16926
Activity : 24792
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
I find the obsession with the number 3 as an indication of a lie quite tedious to explain lies.
Things happen in life. Sometimes they come in two's or three's, even fours or fives!
There is also regional consideration.
I've seen on the forum breakdown of phrases like 'come through', which if you're from a family of Scots doesn't warrant a breakdown, it's regional, it means nothing more than come through the threshold of a door...just as an English person would say 'come in'.
Is the holy trinity now a lie because it was based on the number three?
I'll vote a number two on that theory.
Things happen in life. Sometimes they come in two's or three's, even fours or fives!
There is also regional consideration.
I've seen on the forum breakdown of phrases like 'come through', which if you're from a family of Scots doesn't warrant a breakdown, it's regional, it means nothing more than come through the threshold of a door...just as an English person would say 'come in'.
Is the holy trinity now a lie because it was based on the number three?
I'll vote a number two on that theory.
Liz Eagles- Posts : 11153
Activity : 13562
Likes received : 2218
Join date : 2011-09-03
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
When someone uses the number three in relation to something, it doesn't instantly mean they are being deceptive, it does happen that there were three men or it was three o'clock or there were three items etc, it does mean however that it is noted and investigated further.
Regarding other numbers mention by Tony in regard to the bible, they are not flagged as a liars number.
Three is flagged for the reasons given.
Over decades of interviews, statements etc, it has been noted that three often comes up when someone is being deceptive and they have to choose a number such as number of assailants, the time something did or didn't happen and the like.
A classic example is tha of charlie rogers and her allegedly being stripped and assaulted by three intruders who then daubed graffiti on her basement walls and set fire to the house.
I heard of this case when it broke and caught her initial statement.
it sounded off so i spoke to Peter Hyatt regarding her statement, i was later proven right when she was charged and plead guilty to making the whole thing up.
I disagree the people has not been rewritten.
it has and frequently.
Translations made to suit the current guy in charge, selective retelling of who did what to whom, subtle changes, translations of translations.
The bible is a work of fiction designed to keep the poor majority happy with promises of a better life in heaven, even if their current life is poor and harsh now.
The same goes for every religion, it boils down to individual interpretation and what the reader wants to believe or needs to believe.
Regarding other numbers mention by Tony in regard to the bible, they are not flagged as a liars number.
Three is flagged for the reasons given.
Over decades of interviews, statements etc, it has been noted that three often comes up when someone is being deceptive and they have to choose a number such as number of assailants, the time something did or didn't happen and the like.
A classic example is tha of charlie rogers and her allegedly being stripped and assaulted by three intruders who then daubed graffiti on her basement walls and set fire to the house.
I heard of this case when it broke and caught her initial statement.
it sounded off so i spoke to Peter Hyatt regarding her statement, i was later proven right when she was charged and plead guilty to making the whole thing up.
I disagree the people has not been rewritten.
it has and frequently.
Translations made to suit the current guy in charge, selective retelling of who did what to whom, subtle changes, translations of translations.
The bible is a work of fiction designed to keep the poor majority happy with promises of a better life in heaven, even if their current life is poor and harsh now.
The same goes for every religion, it boils down to individual interpretation and what the reader wants to believe or needs to believe.
____________________
The little unremembered acts of kindness and love are the best parts of a person's life.
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
Tony Bennett wrote:Hobs wrote:In statement analysis, 3 is known as the liars number (Mark McClish). When a guilty person spins a story that is not entirely truthful, when asked for example what time did you last see them, how many were there, what floor etc often they will use the number 3. The exception is when DUI when the subject will often say 2 or just a couple.
REPLY: I bow to your vastly superior knowledge on statement analysis, and so far as '3' being the 'liar's number' (or sometimes '2') is concerned, I'll have to take that on trust for now.
'3' is also recommended by the way as an oratorial technique, e.g. "When we come to power, I promise that we'll do A, B and C" hopefully building up to a round of applause as the speaker finishes point 'C'. Or, for example, Tony Blair's famous three priorities: 'Education, education, education'. Politicians are taught to practise this 'rule of 3'. May be it is also an aid to memory for the speaker.
It is one thing to say: 'Liars often mention things in threes'. I can't disagree, as I don't know enough about the subject.
But it's quite another thing, and a complete non sequitur, to claim: "I know a book with lots of threes in it, therefore it must be full of lies". It doesn't follow at all.
In the Bible there is an awful lot of the use of the number 3.
REPLY: There are indeed several instances of three in the Bible, the Triune God - God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit - being one such example. There is no doubt that some numbers have special significance in the Bible; I believe God is inter alia a brilliant mathematician as well as designer and creator. But arguably other numbers are more common and seem to represent certain things. Examples:
7 is the six days of creation plus one day of rest, also applied in the Old Testamant to the treatment of land and servants; one year in seven, the land was to remain fallow - for rest - and any servants were to be set free after six years and made free of any debts they owed. Additionally after 7 x 7 years, there was to be a special, additional 'jubilee year' in the 50th year - the land therefore remained fallow for 2 years
12 - twelve sons of Jacob to form the twelve tribes of Israel; 12 apostles chosen by Christ
13 - a number which appears to be connected with evil in the Bible and seems to be favoured by occultists
40 - years or days of temptation: 40 years in the wilderness for the Israelites after the Exodus, 40 days of temptation for Christ.
There are other interesting assocations; 8 seems to be associated with resurrection: 8 resurrections occur in the Bible
Bear in mind the Bible has been translated and rewritten thousands of times to suit whoever was in charge at the time.
REPLY: The Bible has never been 're-written'. The Bible, in its many translations worldwide - hundreds if not thousands of languages - is always derived from the original writings of the authors. These have been copied down the centuries. These copies were not entirely error-free, but copying mistakes were rare.
Christians worldwide believe that those who wrote the words of the Bible - in the original Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek - did so under divine direction or 'inspiration, producing a book that is God's Word to mankind, and without error as originally written. And no-one has yet proved any mistake so far as the Bible's historical and prophetic record is concerned; where the Bible deals in verifiable facts, time and again it has proved 100% accurate. Godly men before and after Christ have, we believe, been led by God over the centuries to produce this perfect book. It is sadly the case that some people, for wrong motives, have tried to add to it or subtract from it.
Basically the King James Bible was a result of King James forcing the Church of England and the Puritans to work togeather to come up with a version that kept both sides happy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version
REPLY: That's very true up to a point. King Alfred had translated parts of the Bible. John Wycliffe followed in the 14th century and gave us a very accurate translation. He was up against the Roman Catholic hierarchy of the day, who used a Latin Bible and later, in the 15th century, deemed it a capital offence to have a Bible in the English language.
After his death, they exhumed his body, burnt it, and cast his ashes into the River Soar at Lutterworth, Leicesterhsire - not far from Rothley. Thereby they hoped to extinguish his translation and his writings, but instead they spread to Europe where they were read by the likes of Jan Hus and Martin Luther.
The Reformation followed shortly after the invention of the printing press, and in the 16th century several attempts were made to translate the original Hebrew and Greek texts, notably the translation by William Tyndale. King James did indeed commission a new translation and to his credit, after 7 years' hard work, the Anglicans, Puritans and Catholics etc. agreed on a meticulous translation of the original Scriptures which has very much stood the test of time
Memo to myself, never argue with Anthony Bennett on biblical matters
Realist- Posts : 421
Activity : 602
Likes received : 179
Join date : 2014-11-05
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
your learning
tiny- Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03
Official Find Madeleine facebook page
Summed up the courage to look, and found that this has been posted in the photos section
And I thought how very apt it really was
" />
Sow contempt for professional police officers trying to find your daughter, and you will reap the contempt of decent people.
Try to destroy the lives of others and in turn you may find that people are not sympathetic to you.
Say you wish to 'Kill' a man who was voluntarily giving his time to help you, and you may find others do not wish you well.
When you say you see "hatred' in others, rather then legitimate concern - look at yourselves
When by your actions you cause someone to take their own life -( if that is what happened) - you may find a great many more people turn against you.
And I thought how very apt it really was
" />
Sow contempt for professional police officers trying to find your daughter, and you will reap the contempt of decent people.
Try to destroy the lives of others and in turn you may find that people are not sympathetic to you.
Say you wish to 'Kill' a man who was voluntarily giving his time to help you, and you may find others do not wish you well.
When you say you see "hatred' in others, rather then legitimate concern - look at yourselves
When by your actions you cause someone to take their own life -( if that is what happened) - you may find a great many more people turn against you.
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
PeterMac wrote:Summed up the courage to look, and found that this has been posted in the photos section
And I thought how very apt it really was
" />
Sow contempt for professional police officers trying to find your daughter, and you will reap the contempt of decent people.
Try to destroy the lives of others and in turn you may find that people are not sympathetic to you.
Say you wish to 'Kill' a man who was voluntarily giving his time to help you, and you may find others do not wish you well.
When you say you see "hatred' in others, rather then legitimate concern - look at yourselves
When by your actions you cause someone to take their own life -( if that is what happened) - you may find a great many more people turn against you.
Joss- Posts : 1960
Activity : 2154
Likes received : 196
Join date : 2011-09-19
Re: McCanns' Christmas Message 2014
January 14th 2015 : The OFM Christmas message is still there, i believe the message has once again taken the prime suspects web space on the 'search site'
The prime suspect is one of the luckiest prime suspects ever, his e-fit was just sitting in the McCann s bottom drawer as they couldn't afford to promote him & the man their friend Jane Tanner seen & now every festive season a Christmas tree or a nice wrapped up Christmas present hides his mug shot from inquisitive eyes...alas a poor eliminated father carrying his child back from creche does not have the same luck
Yours,
No Stone Unturned Inc
The prime suspect is one of the luckiest prime suspects ever, his e-fit was just sitting in the McCann s bottom drawer as they couldn't afford to promote him & the man their friend Jane Tanner seen & now every festive season a Christmas tree or a nice wrapped up Christmas present hides his mug shot from inquisitive eyes...alas a poor eliminated father carrying his child back from creche does not have the same luck
Yours,
No Stone Unturned Inc
saltnpepper- Posts : 154
Activity : 154
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2012-04-30
Location : wales
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» McCanns Christmas message
» Carlos Anjos talks about McCanns Christmas message
» "Missing our Madeleine being excited by Christmas' - Kate & Gerry's Christmas message, 2015, in the Daily Express 11 Dec 2015
» Christmas Message from Kate
» Kate and Gerry's Christmas message for Madeleine
» Carlos Anjos talks about McCanns Christmas message
» "Missing our Madeleine being excited by Christmas' - Kate & Gerry's Christmas message, 2015, in the Daily Express 11 Dec 2015
» Christmas Message from Kate
» Kate and Gerry's Christmas message for Madeleine
Page 3 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum