Message From The McCanns On Their Official Site

Message From The mccans On Their Official Site

Official Find Madeleine Campaign

Why do we continue?
There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed.
Madeleine is still missing and someone needs to be looking for her.
She is young and vulnerable and needs our help.
We love her dearly and miss her beyond words.

We still need your help in finding Madeleine. Thank you for continuing to stand by our side and most of all, for caring so much about Madeleine.

~FM Webmaster

Another open mouth insert feet moment brought to you by the mccanns's, the parents who just keep giving.

Why do we continue?


Who is the questioned aimed at?
The public or, themselves?


 
There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed. 

On first reading it sounds like a strong statement.however, it isn't.
Qualifiers are words that when removed do not change the meaning of the sentence.

Here we have the addition of the word absolutely which weakens the statement.
A strong statement would be: There is no evidence to suggest Madeleine has been harmed.
Qualifiers weaken the meaning of the sentence.

We know the statement is untrue since we have the reactions of both blood and cadaver dogs, we have body fluids and we also have the fact that Maddie is missing.
What we don't have is evidence of an abduction such as finger, ear or footprints, skin or hair or fibres, DNA from someone unknown to the group.

If a Missing child isn't evidence of harm, then what is their definition of harm?
There is evidence that Maddie has come to harm, unfortunately said evidence indicates a dead Maddie not an abducted live Maddie.

 

Madeleine is still missing and someone needs to be looking for her.


Notice they say someone needs to be looking for her and not the expected WE need to be looking for her or the stronger yet WE ARE STILL LOOKING FOR HER. 
Clearly the someone doesn't include her family, the tapas 7 or their friends in general.
Why the need to distance themselves from looking for their child?
This is unexpected in innocent parents and a red flag.
 

She is young and vulnerable and needs our help. 

Yes she is but apparently our help doesn't include her parents actively searching for her from the moment she went missing.

 
We love her dearly and miss her beyond words. 

Not dearly enough to actually go out actively searching for her from the get go.
Not dearly enough for kate to answer the 48 questions.
Not dearly enough to go back and do a police reconstruction then or now.
Not dearly enough to assist the police rather than suing the ex lead detective who actively searched for her and spent many hours, days and weeks trying to find her or those who harmed her.
They love her dearly for the money she brought in.
 



We still need your help in finding Madeleine.  

Why?

When you had the chance to keep the case open you refused to demand it be kept open.

You hired people who were skilled in money laundering and who were involved in drugs.

You hired con artists and bumbling ex coppers who had no idea how to run a basic missing persons case.

You hired anyone except those who were expert in finding missing persons.

You have never looked for your daughter, instead preferring to sit round the pool making merry or going jogging or on world trips, visiting places where Maddie was not sighted and ignoring those possible places where she might have been.

You sat on e-fits for several years because the e-fits looked just like gerry.

You spent only a tiny proportion of the funds on actual searching , with the vast majority going on the mortgage, legal fees (really? If you are innocent why the need for lawyers?) travelling round the world and suing anyone who disagreed with your version of events.

What you should have said is:



 "WE STILL NEED YOUR HELP TO KEEP US IN THE STYLE TO WHICH WE HAVE BECOME ACCUSTOMED" 



Thank you for continuing to stand by our side and most of all, for caring so much about Madeleine.

In statement analysis, order is important.
It tells us what the subject considers as their priority.
Here we have their priority as us standing by their side supporting them followed by caring so much about Madeleine.
They tell us most of all for caring about Madeleine, yet, put caring about her behind standing by the mccanns side.

What is missing from all their statements  and press releases are messages to Maddie telling them we are searching for her and to be brave and strong, we will find her.

Instead all the talk is about them, how they feel, how victimised they feel when pulled up on the language and behavior.

It is all about them rather than about their daughter.

They don't talk to Maddie or reassure her they will find and rescue her because they know she is dead.

They themselves have told us she is long dead.

They don't talk to her because they know she will never see or hear or read it.

Corpses are beyond the reach of communication.


http://tania-cadogan.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/message-from-mccans-on-their-official.html

Sterling post, Hobs   

Thank you Hobs, as always very enlightening.

I just feel so sad and angry for the poor child when reading your last two sections.  So, SO, angry with the parents.

Someone just has to be on poor Madeleine's side, as the people that should be most concerned appear so detached and unfeeling.  All imo of course.

I think there's a couple of people feeling some pressure.

Hobs, your posts are always spot on.

Beanie wrote:Hobs, your posts are always spot on.

hear, hear

MRNOODLES wrote:I think there's a couple of people feeling some pressure.

I am not in anyway a vindictive person, but when I witness the lies from the McCanns own mouths it is very hard for me not to agree with you, it is of their own making.

I've never understand how the belief that Madeleine 'has not been harmed' can be compatible with the idea, also expressed by the McCanns that she has fallen into the hands of a paedophile or even a ring of paedophiles?  Doesn't sound harmless to me ...

galena

I have always wondered what happened to the kind elderly couple that went into the apartment to soothe Madeleine when she was crying, and subsequently took her, but not the twins of course.

Hobs wrote:Message From The mccans On Their Official Site

Official Find Madeleine Campaign

Why do we continue?
There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed.
Madeleine is still missing and someone needs to be looking for her.
She is young and vulnerable and needs our help.
We love her dearly and miss her beyond words.

We still need your help in finding Madeleine. Thank you for continuing to stand by our side and most of all, for caring so much about Madeleine.

~FM Webmaster

From an abduction perspective:

• In 74 percent of the missing children homicide cases studied, the child murder victim was female and the average age was 11 years old.
  
• In 44 percent of the cases studied, the victims and killers were strangers, but in 42 percent of the cases, the victims and killers were friends or acquaintances.
  
• Almost two-thirds of the killers in these cases have prior arrests for violent crimes, with slightly more than half of those prior crimes committed against children.
  
• The primary motive for the child abduction killer in the cases studied was sexual assault.
  
• In nearly 60 percent of the cases studied, more than two hours passed between the time someone realized the child was missing and the time police were notified.
  
• In 76 percent of the missing children homicide cases studied, the child was dead within three hours of the abduction–and in 88.5 percent of the cases the child was dead within 24 hours.
  

Source: "Criminal Division of the Washington State Attorney General's Office"


There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed???

galena wrote:I've never understand how the belief that Madeleine 'has not been harmed' can be compatible with the idea, also expressed by the McCanns that she has fallen into the hands of a paedophile or even a ring of paedophiles?  Doesn't sound harmless to me ...

If you follow their logic, they don't believe that paedophiles do any harm.
I wonder if they realize the message they're continuing to send with that statement.

The almost constant reiteration of "there's no evidence she's been harmed" line suggests to me that they know she died quickly, that she didn't suffer. It's a very "knowing" statement for a couple who purportedly have no idea whatsoever about what happened to their daughter.

Although they lie, I think there are crumbs of subconscious truth in their comments

Is this a subliminal message from Kate and the BBC ?
Look at the second song in the playlist and subsequently every other song. 2nd 4th 6th and so on. Sorry if its off topic


On Mothering Sunday, Aled says Good Morning Sunday to Kate McCann, mother of missing child Madeleine McCann, who has found comfort from her Roman Catholic faith since her daughter's disappearance. Becky Silver discusses the news of the week from a faith perspective, and gives the Moment of Reflection

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00rdsnx

Mod please delete if Im seeing something that others might not  

bubblewrap wrote:Is this a subliminal message from Kate and the BBC ?
Look at the second song in the playlist and subsequently every other song. 2nd 4th 6th and so on. Sorry if its off topic


On Mothering Sunday, Aled says Good Morning Sunday to Kate McCann, mother of missing child Madeleine McCann, who has found comfort from her Roman Catholic faith since her daughter's disappearance. Becky Silver discusses the news of the week from a faith perspective, and gives the Moment of Reflection

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00rdsnx

Mod please delete if Im seeing something that others might not  

Why would the BBC want to send out a subliminal message about the McCann's?

Hicks wrote:

bubblewrap wrote:Is this a subliminal message from Kate and the BBC ?
Look at the second song in the playlist and subsequently every other song. 2nd 4th 6th and so on. Sorry if its off topic


On Mothering Sunday, Aled says Good Morning Sunday to Kate McCann, mother of missing child Madeleine McCann, who has found comfort from her Roman Catholic faith since her daughter's disappearance. Becky Silver discusses the news of the week from a faith perspective, and gives the Moment of Reflection

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00rdsnx

Mod please delete if Im seeing something that others might not  

Why would the BBC want to send out a subliminal message about the McCann's?

Maybe I see the article a different way. In answer to your question though, the BBC are a bunch of sick paedophile protectors, and in tow Kate would also be having a laugh at the listeners too. Sorry. They are all in it for a laugh or two
IMO

canada12 wrote:

galena wrote:I've never understand how the belief that Madeleine 'has not been harmed' can be compatible with the idea, also expressed by the McCanns that she has fallen into the hands of a paedophile or even a ring of paedophiles?  Doesn't sound harmless to me ...

If you follow their logic, they don't believe that paedophiles do any harm.
I wonder if they realize the message they're continuing to send with that statement.

Horrible, isn't it?

missbeetle wrote:

canada12 wrote:

galena wrote:I've never understand how the belief that Madeleine 'has not been harmed' can be compatible with the idea, also expressed by the McCanns that she has fallen into the hands of a paedophile or even a ring of paedophiles?  Doesn't sound harmless to me ...

If you follow their logic, they don't believe that paedophiles do any harm.
I wonder if they realize the message they're continuing to send with that statement.

Horrible, isn't it?

Agree, but Kate was more than happy to be explicit about what she imagined could be happening to Madeleine in her book, perhaps she just moved on!