Permission given to interview suspects

by Sceptic 06.06.14 14:58

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Sceptic 06.06.14 15:03

Sceptic wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

They include three suspected burglars WHO LIVE CLOSE TO THE WASTELAND in Praia da Luz currently being searched by British teams.
The men, convicted drug dealers, were traced from phone records WHICH PLACED THEM IN THE AREA at the time Madeleine vanished.

Excuse me but would they be in the area coz they effin live there ffs - Where do they get this info from

by nglfi 06.06.14 15:23

What does 'suspected burglar' even mean? Are these people who have been arrested for burglaries but released without charge? And is this a burgling of apartment 5a or somewhere else? Bearing in mind, as we all know, 'nothing of value was taken'. I wonder if these people may be questioned as witnesses rather than suspects.

by **PeterMac** 06.06.14 15:26

It is reminiscent of the Goon show sketch
Seagoon: What are you doing down here?
Eccles: Everybody's got to be somewhere!

Even burglars and drug dealers live somewhere.

by Cristobell 06.06.14 15:28

The questioning won't begin until after the digs, so at least they have time to prepare.

by riskybuisness 06.06.14 15:34

Kate and Gerry are buoyed up by this latest development. While they don’t want to build up their hopes too high they are feeling optimistic.

I think they are on drugs now!! how in hells name can they be "buoyed up" and "optimistic" - I would be going insane right now if this was bout any of my girls.

by endgame 06.06.14 15:35

Sceptic wrote:
Sceptic wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

They include three suspected burglars WHO LIVE CLOSE TO THE WASTELAND in Praia da Luz currently being searched by British teams.
The men, convicted drug dealers, were traced from phone records WHICH PLACED THEM IN THE AREA at the time Madeleine vanished.

Excuse me but would they be in the area coz they effin live there ffs - Where do they get this info from

The problem is Sceptic that if this is true and taken in connection with the CdM story this morning, it gives us an insight into what SY are actually doing as opposed to the million and one theories that appear here daily. It also shows that the Portuguese are allowing them to do it. Scoff at it all you like, you cannot disregard the strong possibility that this is the investigation that is actually taking place. It's not a diversion. It's not a game to catch the Mcs. This, in fact, is all there is.

by nglfi 06.06.14 15:35

Interesting about the DNA tests being done on clothing recovered though. I wonder what clothing? Or is that little tidbit rubbish likeithe rest of the article!

by Sceptic 06.06.14 15:40

riskybuisness wrote:Kate and Gerry are buoyed up by this latest development. While they don’t want to build up their hopes too high they are feeling optimistic.

I think they are on drugs now!! how in hells name can they be "buoyed up" and "optimistic" - I would be going insane right now if this was bout any of my girls.

Did you not Know that burglars and drug dealers, after they abduct small children they lovingly bring them up in beautiful surroundings as if they are there own flesh and blood

by frost 06.06.14 15:55

Am I being a bit thick here if these 3 men are convicted drug dealers then wouldn't odds on favourite be that if they were in the area that night they were conducting drug deals and since when has a drug dealer decided to change to burglary for the night instead of drug dealing ? oh never mind the £1000 worth of drugs ive got in my back pocket I know ill go nick a dvd player yep I should get at least a fiver or a tenner for that !!

And as for a burglar being involved in Madeleines disappearance im sorry but anyone doing a burglary and accidentally killing someone in the process would not hang around and then take the body with them and bury it somewhere they would hotfoot their sorry little backsides out of there so damn fast theyd be gone before the dust settled .

by noddy100 06.06.14 15:57

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by whatliesbehindthesofa 06.06.14 15:58

Sceptic wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Daily Mirror. Treat with suspicion.

by SchrodingersBody 06.06.14 16:13

frost wrote:Am I being a bit thick here if these 3 men are convicted drug dealers then wouldn't odds on favourite be that if they were in the area that night they were conducting drug deals and since when has a drug dealer decided to change to burglary for the night instead of drug dealing ? oh never mind the £1000 worth of drugs ive got in my back pocket I know ill go nick a dvd player yep I should get at least a fiver or a tenner for that !!

And as for a burglar being involved in Madeleines disappearance im sorry but anyone doing a burglary and accidentally killing someone in the process would not hang around and then take the body with them and bury it somewhere they would hotfoot their sorry little backsides out of there so damn fast theyd be gone before the dust settled .

Any be so lucky that they burgle an apartment where they managed to acheive an hour and a halfs worth of stuff in about 30 seconds, and also get an apartment where lady of the house likes to clean up so much she clears all forensic trace of their victim.
Cant help but think they should have put the lottery on instead with their luck.

by missmar1 06.06.14 16:15

endgame wrote:
Sceptic wrote:
Sceptic wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

They include three suspected burglars WHO LIVE CLOSE TO THE WASTELAND in Praia da Luz currently being searched by British teams.
The men, convicted drug dealers, were traced from phone records WHICH PLACED THEM IN THE AREA at the time Madeleine vanished.

Excuse me but would they be in the area coz they effin live there ffs - Where do they get this info from
The problem is Sceptic that if this is true and taken in connection with the CdM story this morning, it gives us an insight into what SY are actually doing as opposed to the million and one theories that appear here daily. It also shows that the Portuguese are allowing them to do it. Scoff at it all you like, you cannot disregard the strong possibility that this is the investigation that is actually taking place. It's not a diversion. It's not a game to catch the Mcs. This, in fact, is all there is.

I cannot get my head around why the Portuguise would allow their country to be used in this way if they believe SY are not looking for evidence that could point to the Mccann's possible involvement in Madeleine's disappearance ? Surely, the people and businesses of Portugal will suffer if these digs are for nothing ?

Or is it possible ( sounds far fetched I know ) that a deal has been made and the powers that be in Portugal have allowed SY over to dig at the height of tourist season because in the long run, Portugal will be re-imbursed for the up-heaval and losses it will have suffered because of this case ?

by Hicks 06.06.14 16:16

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].

If, and it's a big IF, this is true then get the paint brushes out folks because there is a big whitewash coming up.

by Sceptic 06.06.14 16:19

Hicks wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].

If, and it's a big IF, this is true then get the paint brushes out folks because there is a big whitewash coming up.

So the inorganic material undergoing testing is a male sock I wonder if it belongs to a team mccann puppet

by missmar1 06.06.14 16:23

Hicks wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].

If, and it's a big IF, this is true then get the paint brushes out folks because there is a big whitewash coming up.

Now I am really disillusioned .

by Markus 2 06.06.14 16:25

Local reports suggested ‘non organic’ material had been found, possibly an adult male’s sock.

Read more: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Follow us: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] | [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
How pathetic having a good laugh at everyone I should think, all week and a sock, brilliant work lol!

by Guest 06.06.14 16:28

Markus 2 wrote:Local reports suggested ‘non organic’ material had been found, possibly an adult male’s sock.

Read more: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Follow us: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] | [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
How pathetic having a good laugh at everyone I should think, all week and a sock, brilliant work

Yeah let's all believe everything the DailyMail and the Mirror say after seven years of them printing the same rubbish.

by Hicks 06.06.14 16:30

When I heard Andy Redwood say the words....' no, the parents are not people of interest' I had this sinking feeling. As the investigation then was wide open-so to speak- how could he so sure ?

I'll make a prediction that the digging will have produced material that 'could' have come from clothing Madeleine was reporting to be wearing at the time of her disappearance. I also have a feeling that the find will be deemed 'inconclusive', just like all the other collected material sent for analysis. Call me a cynic if you like!

by gbwales 06.06.14 16:34

In neither of those articles is there anything remotely like a genuine confirmation or statement.

Surely such interviews would have been necessary to be requested in ILORs, and the only accepted ones are with respect to the dig....?

Am wondering if this is the paper's playing up as they're not being told anything...?

Certainly treating with a large does of scepticism.

by Guest 06.06.14 16:34

MarcoG wrote:
Markus 2 wrote:Local reports suggested ‘non organic’ material had been found, possibly an adult male’s sock.

Read more: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Follow us: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] | [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
How pathetic having a good laugh at everyone I should think, all week and a sock, brilliant work
Yeah let's all believe everything the DailyMail and the Mirror say after seven years of them printing the same rubbish.

I wonder if I could get SY's finest round to my house to find all those odd socks I lose in the wash......

by Markus 2 06.06.14 16:39

Stewie wrote:
MarcoG wrote:
Markus 2 wrote:Local reports suggested ‘non organic’ material had been found, possibly an adult male’s sock.

Read more: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Follow us: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] | [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
How pathetic having a good laugh at everyone I should think, all week and a sock, brilliant work
Yeah let's all believe everything the DailyMail and the Mirror say after seven years of them printing the same rubbish.

I wonder if I could get SY's finest round to my house to find all those odd socks I lose in the wash......

I know what you mean, it would be worth paying millions to find those missing socks .

by Guest 06.06.14 16:41

I refuse to believe anything that I read in the press, especially rubbish newspapers like these ( and C da M is no better). They are not being briefed by either the PJ or SY so are making it up as they go along as gb wales has said. Thrashing around in the dark to sell papers.

by Guest 06.06.14 16:41

Hicks wrote:When I heard Andy Redwood say the words....' no, the parents are not people of interest' I had this sinking feeling. As the investigation then was wide open-so to speak- how could he so sure ?

I'll make a prediction that the digging will have produced material that 'could' have come from clothing Madeleine was reporting to be wearing at the time of her disappearance. I also have a feeling that the find will be deemed 'inconclusive', just like all the other collected material sent for analysis. Call me a cynic if you like!

When you declare someone a suspect, you bind yourself to restrictions of time, you'll have to find enough evidence within a reasonable period to go on with that, and to restrictions in the investigation itself, like you can't question the person as a witness anymore.
So. Why would you call someone a person of interest, when at that point in time you're not sure you'll be able to prosecute, or when.

by Guest 06.06.14 16:42

Stewie wrote:
MarcoG wrote:
Markus 2 wrote:Local reports suggested ‘non organic’ material had been found, possibly an adult male’s sock.

Read more: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Follow us: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] | [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
How pathetic having a good laugh at everyone I should think, all week and a sock, brilliant work
Yeah let's all believe everything the DailyMail and the Mirror say after seven years of them printing the same rubbish.

I wonder if I could get SY's finest round to my house to find all those odd socks I lose in the wash......

Buy the Mirror and the DailyMail, find all the answers you need in life, and just stop wondering.

by nglfi 06.06.14 16:50

Let's just say for argument's sake that a male sock has been found, and the DNA on it matches a suspected burglar/paedo/bin man/whatever, what exactly does that prove? Diddly squat. Without a body or anything of Madeleine's even in that area (and even if something of hers was found! ) , it proves nothing. So someone threw away an old sock in a wasteland area? Am I missing something?

by Daryl Dixon 06.06.14 16:51

If this was a burglary gone wrong and a child accidentally killed, why would the burglar carry the body round the streets? Why not put her back in bed with cuddlecat and no-one would have been any the wiser until the morning.

by jeanmonroe 06.06.14 16:51

They include three suspected burglars WHO LIVE CLOSE TO THE WASTELAND ................
-----------------------------------------------------

Fcuking 'Mad Max' innit?

Get Gibson in to 'search' the 'wasteland' right NOW, i say!

"Please, pretty please, stay exactly where you are in PDL till we get around to interviewing you, AFTER we finish our 'digs'" said the UK's elite DCI leading the UK 'investigation'

by Hopespringseternal 06.06.14 17:35

Perhaps the PJ are utterly cheesed off with it all and figure they might as well let SY interview these folk as they are sure they have no involvement. At least that way SY and the papers cannot say their not solving the case was down to obstruction by the PJ.