3 Prime Suspects Identified

Pershing36 wrote:

Loving Mom wrote:

Pershing36 wrote:I don't feel confident about starting a new thread for this.  

Breaking news at this point is the missing little boy in the UK Mikaeel Kubar's body has been recovered from the Fife and his mother detained. I have posted this because I have kept hearing things about his disappearance from his bedroom and people saying 'he has been abducted like Maddy'.

The sad truth is it appears far from that at this moment.

FYI, Pershing, If you go to the home page and click where it says View Posts since last Visit (left hand side a bit below FORUM) you will most likely see there is a topic called MISSING BOY (3) Edin...  

Pardon me,

Keep missing things since I had my eye operation.

mysterion wrote:With the way the tragic Mikaeel case is progressing, I don`t believe that SY can sustain the abduction scenario any longer. This high profile case will draw obvious comparisons with the McCann case. I can see a strategic review coming up. Let`s hope so.

aiyoyo wrote:Isnt it just incredulous that Mccanns knew about contents of ILOR and operational matter, when Portuguese have yet to confirm receipt of such ILOR, nor have MET leaked operational matter !

russiandoll wrote:Hosted by The Pat Brown Criminal Profiling Agency

Friday, January 17, 2014

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

SY: Burglar One, where were you the night of May 3, 2007 when Madeleine McCann disappeared?
B1: Dude, that was six years ago. Beats me.
SY: Well, we have you on your phone in Praia da Luz.
B1: Okay, then, I was in Praia da Luz.
SY: Were you in the McCann's apartment?
B1: No.
SY: Were you burglarizing apartments in the area that night?
B1: No.
SY: You made a bunch of phone calls to your two burglar friends late that evening.
B1: Yeah, so? Probably we were trying to decide which pub to meet up at.
SY: I don't think that was it. I think you had kidnapped Madeleine McCann and needed help dealing with the child.
B1: What have you been smoking? What is a burglar going to do with a child? Our fence isn't going to give us money for her. And no stuff was even taken from that apartment.
SY: We think you killed the child accidentally because she saw you and then, in a panic, you took her with you. You didn't get around to stealing anything but Madeleine's body.
B1: Are you actually serious? Like a three-year-old seeing me in the dark will be able to pick me out of a lineup. You have got to be kidding! Like I would prefer a murder charge over just getting the hell out of there.
SY: Well, we have evidence you took her.
BI: Oh, please. How dumb do you think I am? I read the police reports on this case. They are online. The only evidence you have from the apartment is the fact your British dogs found that someone lay dead in the apartment for a couple of hours and, if that is so, no burglar had anything to do with it.
SY: Well, we don't believe our dogs. We believe the McCanns.
B1; But, they have lied about stuff and changed their story a bunch of times.
SY; Yeah, well, that doesn't matter. What matters is your two burglar friends have told me you were the one who actually kidnapped the child.
B1: Oh, yeah? I doubt that, because after the McCanns leaked to the media that Scotland Yard wanted to arrest us, we got together and had some beers and a good laugh over what we were all going to say in the upcoming surprise interrogations.
SY; Well, yeah.....um....yeah....well, don't leave town. We might want to talk to you again.


Transcript of Burglar Two: Same as the first

Transcript of Burglar Three: Same as the first


These transcripts brought to you by Bollux Media and


Criminal Profiler Pat Brown

lj wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:Isnt it just incredulous that Mccanns knew about contents of ILOR and operational matter, when Portuguese have yet to confirm receipt of such ILOR, nor have MET leaked operational matter !

Indeed. Unbelievable and another time proof that the SY is not after him.

jozi wrote:

Pershing36 wrote:

marconi wrote:I think that the media in the UK are preparing the public for a terrible schock.
They are insisting on the burglars till suddenly the police come up with the truth, which will not be a surprise, I presume. More than 3000 reacted on the e-fits, the Yard must know what people's judment is.
Vox populi, vox Dei.
I continue believing that things are going well, no whitewash.
The McCanns are nowhere to be found.
We have to wait but not much longer, I  hope.

On the other hand they could be testing the PJ and the Portuguese Government to see if they will back them up on their Patsy. They can also see if the general public will be suckered into it which I think a few will and the rest will just be happy the case is closed. 

If these are simply burglars they will be no loss to anyone.

I tend to agree with you perishing 36", hoping I'm wrong but from where I am standing SY are just making a fool of themselves such stupid concepts " Tractor man and Burglars " just not right, get on and investigate properly. Pull in the Tapas and the Mcs and re interview them and then we will know you are at least trying to do the right thing here !!!

aquila wrote:

lj wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:Isnt it just incredulous that Mccanns knew about contents of ILOR and operational matter, when Portuguese have yet to confirm receipt of such ILOR, nor have MET leaked operational matter !

Indeed. Unbelievable and another time proof that the SY is not after him.

It must be really hard to be a PR person, an ex-government media monitor, a spokesperson (angel of death) for every tragedy that needs a positive spin and then find oneself a political candidate in a part of England that is largely gay. That's a hell of a lot of juggling even for a seasoned spinmeister.

I'm obviously not referring to anyone in particular....just a fictional character that if I had the imagination I'd invent and write about.  

Pershing36 wrote:I don't feel confident about starting a new thread for this.  

Breaking news at this point is the missing little boy in the UK Mikaeel Kubar's body has been recovered from the Fife and his mother detained. I have posted this because I have kept hearing things about his disappearance from his bedroom and people saying 'he has been abducted like Maddy'.

The sad truth is it appears far from that at this moment.

Clay Regazzoni wrote:

mysterion wrote:With the way the tragic Mikaeel case is progressing, I don`t believe that SY can sustain the abduction scenario any longer. This high profile case will draw obvious comparisons with the McCann case. I can see a strategic review coming up. Let`s hope so.

I've seen people speculate on here before that it will be something out of the blue but tangential that will "crack" the McCann case. These events do make it ever harder to justify the current direction of the investigation, that's for sure.

Doug D wrote:Aiyoyo:

‘Isnt it just incredulous that Mccanns knew about contents of ILOR and operational matter....’

Have I missed something somewhere? Isn't the alleged contents of the ILOR not just pink droppings? 

NickE wrote:I read a Tweet from "JillyCL" that McCann´s,was,and IS prime suspects on Portugal. 
Correct or????

mysterion wrote:Maybe it is time for Police Scotland to take over from SY. They seem to have a broader approach to analysing senarios and identifying culprits. I new approach might produce a surprising result.

jeanmonroe wrote:
The careers 'advisor' at my old school says, strangely, that 'professional child abductor' is not listed as 'a future career choice/path'!

PeterMac wrote:

jeanmonroe wrote:
The careers 'advisor' at my old school says, strangely, that 'professional child abductor' is not listed as 'a future career choice/path'!

You have to be an Associate of the Royal Imperial College of Abductors to call yourself "professional".    ARICA
With Fellowship and full Membership - FRICA and MRICA following after suitable practical experience under proper supervision by a pupil master, and the carrying out of at least five successful abductions.
There is a similar but in some ways a rival College, the Royal Imperial College of Burglars which is allowed by Charter to admit people to their ranks. Thus ARICB, FRICB and MRICB

In the same way that Solicitors may not be members of the English Bar, and vice versa, it is not possible for one person to be affiliated to both Colleges at the same time,
and indeed the professional code strictly forbids Burglars from Abducting, or Abductors from taking valuables.
Only in this way are professional standards maintained.
It is however permissible, as in the law, for a Burglar and an Abductor to act together, provided that their respective roles are clearly understood.
I hope this makes things clear.

PeterMac wrote: [...]
It is however permissible, as in the law, for a Burglar and an Abductor to act together, provided that their respective roles are clearly understood.
I hope this makes things clear.

marconi wrote:The McCanns were immediately protected by ambassador, consul, Brown, Blair, the media.
A completely different story. My theory is that if  Madeleine would have disappeared in Rothley, the parents would be now behind bars, no consul, no ambassador , no media circus,unless Labour would have put pressure on the police in England.
Besides, Mikaeel was not exactly white and that makes the difference too.

PeterMac wrote:

jeanmonroe wrote:
The careers 'advisor' at my old school says, strangely, that 'professional child abductor' is not listed as 'a future career choice/path'!

You have to be an Associate of the Royal Imperial College of Abductors to call yourself "professional".    ARICA
With Fellowship and full Membership - FRICA and MRICA following after suitable practical experience under proper supervision by a pupil master, and the carrying out of at least five successful abductions.
There is a similar but in some ways a rival College, the Royal Imperial College of Burglars which is allowed by Charter to admit people to their ranks. Thus ARICB, FRICB and MRICB

In the same way that Solicitors may not be members of the English Bar, and vice versa, it is not possible for one person to be affiliated to both Colleges at the same time,
and indeed the professional code strictly forbids Burglars from Abducting, or Abductors from taking valuables.
Only in this way are professional standards maintained.
It is however permissible, as in the law, for a Burglar and an Abductor to act together, provided that their respective roles are clearly understood.
I hope this makes things clear.

aiyoyo wrote:

marconi wrote:The McCanns were immediately protected by ambassador, consul, Brown, Blair, the media.
A completely different story. My theory is that if  Madeleine would have disappeared in Rothley, the parents would be now behind bars, no consul, no ambassador , no media circus,unless Labour would have put pressure on the police in England.
Besides, Mikaeel was not exactly white and that makes the difference too.

I don't believe Mikaeel race makes any difference.  
Show respect for Mikaeel FFS, he's a child like any others.
No need to whip up racism hysteria.
The community regardless of race, language, or religion were involved in the search.
The Police brilliant handling of the case and its officers heart wrenching reaction when body was found show no discrimination.

The biggest difference is Mikaeel's mum did not court or manipulate the press.
Did not cry crocodile tears on TV - "Lying Game - Crimes that fooled the Nation" ?
Did not reach out to Prime Ministers
Did not abuse friends and connections
Did not beg for money by putting up collection boxes
Did not hire  "professional" mouthpiece
Did not set up fighting Fund
Did not hire the most expensive lawyers in the land

You've got to grant the Mccanns their cunningness of character to have the foresight to cover all grounds against eventuality of arrest.
The Mccanns are sly manipulative pair who abused friendship and connections to meet their end; and proved they've become professional at lying.
Their propensity to lie knows no bound, as evidenced when they refused to take down Tannerman despite Police having eliminated him.
They got the extent of help because they courted it from the outset that set in motion the chain of help, not because of who they are, but what they are.

Newintown wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:

marconi wrote:The McCanns were immediately protected by ambassador, consul, Brown, Blair, the media.
A completely different story. My theory is that if  Madeleine would have disappeared in Rothley, the parents would be now behind bars, no consul, no ambassador , no media circus,unless Labour would have put pressure on the police in England.
Besides, Mikaeel was not exactly white and that makes the difference too.

I don't believe Mikaeel race makes any difference.  
Show respect for Mikaeel FFS, he's a child like any others.
No need to whip up racism hysteria.
The community regardless of race, language, or religion were involved in the search.
The Police brilliant handling of the case and its officers heart wrenching reaction when body was found show no discrimination.

The biggest difference is Mikaeel's mum did not court or manipulate the press.
Did not cry crocodile tears on TV - "Lying Game - Crimes that fooled the Nation" ?
Did not reach out to Prime Ministers
Did not abuse friends and connections
Did not beg for money by putting up collection boxes
Did not hire  "professional" mouthpiece
Did not set up fighting Fund
Did not hire the most expensive lawyers in the land

You've got to grant the Mccanns their cunningness of character to have the foresight to cover all grounds against eventuality of arrest.
The Mccanns are sly manipulative pair who abused friendship and connections to meet their end; and proved they've become professional at lying.
Their propensity to lie knows no bound, as evidenced when they refused to take down Tannerman despite Police having eliminated him.
They got the extent of help because they courted it from the outset that set in motion the chain of help, not because of who they are, but what they are.

re: the sentences in red: No doubt all the police forces around the World have learnt from the circus the McCanns created with regard to a missing child - the police have learnt a lesson and that is not to let the obvious "suspects" run the police investigation and manipulate the press to their own advantage, IMO.

The police in this incident seemed to have taken control from the outset and did not let things get out of hand with regard to media speculation and family spokespersons saying whatever they wanted in front of "hunger for stories" journalists.

jeanmonroe wrote:You've got to grant the Mccanns their cunningness of character to have the foresight to cover all grounds against eventuality of arrest.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Not quite all the grounds, i suggest.

They didn't forsee the OC manager and PJ saying 'the shutters weren't tampered with' and had to change 'entry through unlocked patio door then'

They didn't forsee the PJ releasing the 'files' into the public domain almost at the same time they got them.

They didn't forsee their 'lies' being ruthlessly highlighted by people only interested in justice for Madeleine.

They didn't forsee forums springing  up dedicated to 'helping' them to try to find out what happened to their daughter.

They didn't forsee that all of the people, all of the time, would NOT believe every word they uttered.