Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1

by tracey1270 29.10.13 6:45

Cherry Blossom wrote:On the Telegraph's home page today [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] on the right side is this;

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This takes you to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Madeleine McCann's death 'covered up by parents who faked kidnap', court hears
Madeleine McCann died in an accident in her family's Algarve holiday apartment and her death was covered up by her parents who then concocted a tale of kidnap, a Portuguese court was told.

Now why would the Telegraph bring this out of the archives in their paper today ?

Because more are beginning to see the truth of the lie, Mcann supporters would certainly not print this.

by Seek truth 29.10.13 6:59

Every evidence is being ignored.

The Smiths point to Gerry
The sniffer dogs are ignored
Mrs Fenn (the closest to the scene) mentions she spoke to Gerry after 10.30 outside. Which makes Mr Smith right.
The police were called at 10.40pm but no newspaper here in uk have printed this. They Only print it was 10pm Kate found her missing, and police were called 10.10pm instead.

Stop wasting tax payers money on lies.

by tiny 29.10.13 7:11

This should be on the front page,not tucked inside[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Aoife 29.10.13 7:15

tracey1270 wrote:
Cherry Blossom wrote:On the Telegraph's home page today [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] on the right side is this;

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This takes you to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Madeleine McCann's death 'covered up by parents who faked kidnap', court hears
Madeleine McCann died in an accident in her family's Algarve holiday apartment and her death was covered up by her parents who then concocted a tale of kidnap, a Portuguese court was told.

Now why would the Telegraph bring this out of the archives in their paper today ?
Because more are beginning to see the truth of the lie, Mcann supporters would certainly not print this.

All the newspapers have automated systems that refer back to previous stories related to current ones- you can see it happening at the bottom of this page where there are automatically generated links to other forums on the same site as this.

by Aoife 29.10.13 7:18

Joss wrote:I have a question. If the Smith sighting of Smithman produced an E-Fit picture of him how can that be, when the Smith's didn't see Smithman's face, but M. Smith said he recognized the man after he saw on T.V. the way G. McCann carried one of his children, and from that he recognized the Smithman that could of been the possible abductor? Color me confused.

I have started a thread on exactly this matter. I do not see how the Smiths, given their previous statements, can have made accurate e-fits a year or so later. Who actually gave the information for the e-fits- is something or someone being held back?

by Gillyspot 29.10.13 7:22

Welcome Aoife welcome2

The link shared by Cherry Blossom was to the actual front page of the telegraph (so no "related stories" apply) and the Maddie story is 4th in their "Most Viewed"

The word is getting out. WOW

by Guest 29.10.13 7:25

tracey1270 wrote:
Cherry Blossom wrote:On the Telegraph's home page today [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] on the right side is this;

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This takes you to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Madeleine McCann's death 'covered up by parents who faked kidnap', court hears
Madeleine McCann died in an accident in her family's Algarve holiday apartment and her death was covered up by her parents who then concocted a tale of kidnap, a Portuguese court was told.

Now why would the Telegraph bring this out of the archives in their paper today ?
Because more are beginning to see the truth of the lie, Mcann supporters would certainly not print this.

So right tracy1270,

Agree should be front page tiny, however it's there for reading reminding people of what happened.

It certainly is another WOW gillyspot.

by Joss 29.10.13 8:39

Aoife wrote:
Joss wrote:I have a question. If the Smith sighting of Smithman produced an E-Fit picture of him how can that be, when the Smith's didn't see Smithman's face, but M. Smith said he recognized the man after he saw on T.V. the way G. McCann carried one of his children, and from that he recognized the Smithman that could of been the possible abductor? Color me confused.
I have started a thread on exactly this matter. I do not see how the Smiths, given their previous statements, can have made accurate e-fits a year or so later. Who actually gave the information for the e-fits- is something or someone being held back?

Hi Aoife, Thankyou for letting me know about your Thread. I questioned the Smith sighting because of what i had read on what they actually saw, which was very vague. I can understand they may have noticed a couple of things about the guy they saw like height & build, but because it was dark etc. i don't see how they could of got an accurate e-fit of his face, so how would anyone know who they were really looking for? And this is SY's bombshell in the CW programme? If that's all they have after so long, then its not much, IMO.

by Woburn_exile 29.10.13 9:14

The McCanns didn't cover this up. It has been in the public domain since 2008. It's only the media that didn't report about it to the same extent as they did with the vile tanner woman's sighting. I'm not sure this is not part of a big game to sway public opinion (the thick moronic gullible elements) so SY can start prosecution procedures on this crowd and I am talking all those in the know so to speak. One of them has to have come forward with the truth probably on a plea bargain rather than on a conscience prickle. If only we could return to the days of common sense policing and three well placed questions..

by rustyjames 29.10.13 9:22

Gillyspot wrote:Welcome Aoife

The link shared by Cherry Blossom was to the actual front page of the telegraph (so no "related stories" apply) and the Maddie story is 4th in their "Most Viewed"

The word is getting out. WOW

It's also the second most shared story. Would be interesting to know how many views/shares it takes to get on that list, especially for an old article.

by Sockpuppet 29.10.13 9:34

The Telegraph article is an old one from 12th January 2010. Just thought I would point that out :)

by jozi 29.10.13 9:46

Cherry Blossom wrote:
tracey1270 wrote:
Cherry Blossom wrote:On the Telegraph's home page today [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] on the right side is this;

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This takes you to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Madeleine McCann's death 'covered up by parents who faked kidnap', court hears
Madeleine McCann died in an accident in her family's Algarve holiday apartment and her death was covered up by her parents who then concocted a tale of kidnap, a Portuguese court was told.

Now why would the Telegraph bring this out of the archives in their paper today ?
Because more are beginning to see the truth of the lie, Mcann supporters would certainly not print this.
So right tracy1270,

Agree should be front page tiny, however it's there for reading reminding people of what happened.

It certainly is another WOW gillyspot.

I think this is another WOW moment too !!! After the ST article about evidence held back by the Mcs, this is a little reminder of what its about, just to put it into perspective, mind you.

by bristow 29.10.13 9:46

Sockpuppet wrote:The Telegraph article is an old one from 12th January 2010. Just thought I would point that out :)

Yes, that's why it's not front page.
Good though that it's accessible to people browsing the online Telegraph.

by rainbow1 29.10.13 10:18

Cherry Blossom wrote:On the Telegraph's home page today [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] on the right side is this;

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This takes you to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Madeleine McCann's death 'covered up by parents who faked kidnap', court hears
Madeleine McCann died in an accident in her family's Algarve holiday apartment and her death was covered up by her parents who then concocted a tale of kidnap, a Portuguese court was told.

Now why would the Telegraph bring this out of the archives in their paper today ?

Cherry Blossom
Thanks for posting this and yes it is odd to see this on today's web page. Interesting article and can't imagine this being there even weeks ago. Something is happening in the media circles as once they would have been afraid to present any thing like this .

by Woofer 29.10.13 10:25

Heidi Blake used to work for the Telegraph I believe. She is now part of the Insight Team that wrote the ST article. The Insight Team are a team of investigative journalists that go undercover and expose crimes or seedy goings-on.

by sallypelt 29.10.13 10:35

Have they found the body *thinking out loud*

by nailofwit 29.10.13 10:37

Thanks for posting this and yes it is odd to see this on today's web page. Interesting article and can't imagine this being there even weeks ago. Something is happening in the media circles as once they would have been afraid to present any thing like this .

This is will most likely be your cookies and the telegraph website actually serving you page suggestions based on previous articles you may of read on their and other news organisations websites. When you click a link on website you'll often see the link as something like 'traffic.outbrain.com'

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

'Outbrain is a content recommendation service whose widget offers to help internet publishers increase web traffic at their websites. It does so by presenting them with links to articles and other content. Outbrain uses behavioral targeting to recommend interesting articles, blog posts, photos or videos to a reader, rather than relying on a more basic 'related items' widget.'

by sweetex 29.10.13 10:38

sallypelt wrote:Have they found the body *thinking out loud*

I keep on having the same thought. Especially with Joanna's blog today.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by sallypelt 29.10.13 10:41

sweetex wrote:
sallypelt wrote:Have they found the body *thinking out loud*
I keep on having the same thought. Especially with Joanna's blog today.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Sweetex, the spanner in the works of this case was the absence of a body. With all this sudden printing of the "unthinkable" it's telling me that they have found the missing piece of the jigsaw. But as I've stated, it's only me thinking out loud;)

by KellyLennon 29.10.13 10:57

Update from findmadeleine.com

24TH OCT

Gerry and Kate will not be giving any comments regarding the progress of the investigation unless there is a significant breakthrough.

Would have thought hidden evidence is deemed as significant.

by rainbow1 29.10.13 11:03

nailofwit wrote:

Thanks for posting this and yes it is odd to see this on today's web page. Interesting article and can't imagine this being there even weeks ago. Something is happening in the media circles as once they would have been afraid to present any thing like this .
This is will most likely be your cookies and the telegraph website actually serving you page suggestions based on previous articles you may of read on their and other news organisations websites. When you click a link on website you'll often see the link as something like 'traffic.outbrain.com'

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

'Outbrain is a content recommendation service whose widget offers to help internet publishers increase web traffic at their websites. It does so by presenting them with links to articles and other content. Outbrain uses behavioral targeting to recommend interesting articles, blog posts, photos or videos to a reader, rather than relying on a more basic 'related items' widget.'

nailofwit
Thanks for the explanation. It was just odd as most older articles giving other outcomes to the Madeleine story seemed to have disappeared into thin air about this case when searching the web.

by SchrodingersBody 29.10.13 11:08

added the quote - see below post.

by SchrodingersBody 29.10.13 11:09

KellyLennon wrote:Update from findmadeleine.com

24TH OCT

Gerry and Kate will not be giving any comments regarding the progress of the investigation unless there is a significant breakthrough.

Would have thought hidden evidence is deemed as significant.

and how ironic if that comment is "no comment"

by jozi 29.10.13 11:17

SchrodingersBody wrote:
KellyLennon wrote:Update from findmadeleine.com

24TH OCT

Gerry and Kate will not be giving any comments regarding the progress of the investigation unless there is a significant breakthrough.

Would have thought hidden evidence is deemed as significant.
and how ironic if that comment is "no comment"

Well they never speak only through their paid GOB piece.....Where is he by the way ???

by Praiaaa 29.10.13 11:19

I suspect that people are conveniently absent for half-term...

by KellyLennon 29.10.13 11:28

jozi wrote:
SchrodingersBody wrote:
KellyLennon wrote:Update from findmadeleine.com

24TH OCT

Gerry and Kate will not be giving any comments regarding the progress of the investigation unless there is a significant breakthrough.

Would have thought hidden evidence is deemed as significant.
and how ironic if that comment is "no comment"
Well they never speak only through their paid GOB piece.....Where is he by the way ???

Probably thinking of a completly innocent explanation......

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by sallypelt 29.10.13 11:39

RT @GaeMar01: The 8 employees at #McCann Tappas bar, were **gagged**/injuncted for a year & their contracts were not renewed. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by DurhamGuy1967 29.10.13 11:42

sallypelt wrote:Have they found the body *thinking out loud*

I don't think they could keep that quiet

by Wcr 29.10.13 11:53

Seek truth wrote:Every evidence is being ignored.

The Smiths point to Gerry
The sniffer dogs are ignored
Mrs Fenn (the closest to the scene) mentions she spoke to Gerry after 10.30 outside. Which makes Mr Smith right.
The police were called at 10.40pm but no newspaper here in uk have printed this. They Only print it was 10pm Kate found her missing, and police were called 10.10pm instead.

Stop wasting tax payers money on lies.

Wasn't the first person that G/KM rang (even before the Police) a contact within Sky News?

That seems incredibly strange if true

by Mirage 29.10.13 12:03

sweetex wrote:
sallypelt wrote:Have they found the body *thinking out loud*
I keep on having the same thought. Especially with Joanna's blog today.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I'm beginning to think so. Joanna's blog is very reliable. The only doubt is the judicial secrecy.

WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1