Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:11

ChillyHeat wrote:There simply cannot be spin put out on this revelation....McCanns, your effed. If not by law yet, but by all those around the world whom are seeing you as the definite McScams

Madeleine....It seems Justice is near

Seconded. This is unspinnable info. The best Clarrie can say is Oakley were being critical of the people involved... I bet they were.

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:13

Woofer wrote:You can understand Exton being angry particularly when Halligen didn't pay him.

Oh right! Well he's had his payday now!!

by suzyjohnson 27.10.13 1:13

Woofer wrote:You can understand Exton being angry particularly when Halligen didn't pay him.

Yes you certainly can.

This news, about the report, is good for Amaral and the libel trial isn't it?

by bristow 27.10.13 1:16

suzyjohnson wrote:
Woofer wrote:You can understand Exton being angry particularly when Halligen didn't pay him.
Yes you certainly can.

This news, about the report, is good for Amaral and the libel trial isn't it?

Big time Suzy Johnson, there is no way the Mcs can say his book hindered the search for Madeleine when all the time they were the biggest hinderers!
No wonder they want to become assistants with the opening of the Portuguese investigation!

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:16

What are the implications for the libel trial? Highly significant I would have thought... big grin

by worriedmum 27.10.13 1:17

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:22

worriedmum wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

"I was only taking orders."

"I wasn't carrying a pen at the time and so couldn't be expected to make a note of what the detectives had found."

"It's all ludicrous, though true."

by bristow 27.10.13 1:23

Be sure your sins will find you out is very relevant at this moment in time!

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:25

suzyjohnson wrote:
Woofer wrote:You can understand Exton being angry particularly when Halligen didn't pay him.
Yes you certainly can.

This news, about the report, is good for Amaral and the libel trial isn't it?

That's what I was thinking...how could any judge now find against Amaral on the basis that he had impeded the inquiry when they impeded the inquiry themselves so clearly.

by Guest 27.10.13 1:25

I have deleted my earlier post and the reply, I think I may have misread, as I said rather tired, so will re-read tomorrow.

by bristow 27.10.13 1:30

worriedmum wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

"We only withheld this much information, so don't get cross with me!"

by chillyheat 27.10.13 1:31

So in a week or so, by reading the report.....SY come on CW and say that Tannerman has come forward after 6 years. That's insane. The investigators never mentioned this, so SY are either fabricating or reeling in....

by Guest 27.10.13 1:32

You still up as well Bristow big grin

by chillyheat 27.10.13 1:33

ChillyHeat wrote:So in a week or so, by reading the report.....SY come on CW and say that Tannerman has come forward after 6 years. That's insane. The investigators never mentioned this, so SY are either fabricating or reeling in....

One of the Oakley investigators said last week: “I was absolutely stunned when I watched the programme . . . It most certainly wasn’t a new timeline and it certainly isn’t a new revelation. It is absolute nonsense to suggest either of those things . . . And those E-Fits you saw on Crimewatch are ours,” he said

Like I said....How did SY find this Tannerman after 6 years....Oh, and with the pyjamas too big grin

by worriedmum 27.10.13 1:35

quote''The report, delivered to the McCanns in November 2008, recommended that the revised timeline should be the basis for future investigations and that the Smith E-Fits should be released without delay.'' unquote

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Madeleine McCann - Christmas 2008 Appeal NEW OFFICIAL VIDEO!!!

SPEECHLESS sad1

by sallypelt 27.10.13 1:35

candyfloss wrote:You still up as well Bristow

Me too. I am in bed with my laptop. Something I rarely do, but I've waited over 6 years for this moment, and I am damn well going to savour it Mrs

Mr Murdoch, all is forgiven.

by Guest 27.10.13 1:38

The headlines this week about 'storm of the century' re the weather expected seem to fit this big grin

by worriedmum 27.10.13 1:41

bristow wrote:
suzyjohnson wrote:
Woofer wrote:You can understand Exton being angry particularly when Halligen didn't pay him.
Yes you certainly can.

This news, about the report, is good for Amaral and the libel trial isn't it?
Big time Suzy Johnson, there is no way the Mcs can say his book hindered the search for Madeleine when all the time they were the biggest hinderers!
No wonder they want to become assistants with the opening of the Portuguese investigation!

Do you think they will still want to go to the libel trial?

by sallypelt 27.10.13 1:41

They are talking about the FFS on Twitter, saying there's more to come out.

by notlongnow 27.10.13 1:42

My guessing is they will drop the libel trial and CM will moonwalk quietly off to Brighton.

by sallypelt 27.10.13 1:42

T @DaSteelMan: BREAKING NEWS - @SundayTimesNews drops #McCann BOMBSHELL - Join us: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by bristow 27.10.13 1:43

candyfloss wrote:You still up as well Bristow

Haha yes, you shouldn't have reminded me that the clocks had gone back! big grin

ETA, blimey it's really nearly 3am, I'm going now (hopefully!)
See you in the morning.
Come on candyfloss, we need to be bright and bushy tailed in the morning!

by sallypelt 27.10.13 1:43

@DaSteelMan David Steel now
@ProfilerPatB Amaral has won hands down #McCann

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:45

sallypelt wrote:They are talking about the FFS on Twitter, saying there's more to come out.

FFS? What's that - I only know the rude meaning...

by Guest 27.10.13 1:46

sallypelt wrote:They are talking about the FFS on Twitter, saying there's more to come out.

Sally sorry to be thick, my chin is hitting the desk, brain not working..........what is FFS

by chillyheat 27.10.13 1:46

sallypelt wrote:They are talking about the FFS on Twitter, saying there's more to come out.

Lol.....Bit shy for asking. What is FFS please ?

by suzyjohnson 27.10.13 1:47

bristow wrote:
worriedmum wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
"We only withheld this much information, so don't get cross with me!"

''Please can I have the keys to the church!''

by sallypelt 27.10.13 1:49

ChillyHeat wrote:
sallypelt wrote:They are talking about the FFS on Twitter, saying there's more to come out.
Lol.....Bit shy for asking. What is FFS please ?

I took it to mean forensic society. I am now doubting, but it is past witching hour, and I could be completely wrong duh

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:52

notlongnow wrote:My guessing is they will drop the libel trial and CM will moonwalk quietly off to Brighton.

Let's hope Clarence's hair doesn't catch fire as he moonwalks to Brighton...

by suzyjohnson 27.10.13 1:54

worriedmum wrote:
bristow wrote:
suzyjohnson wrote:
Woofer wrote:You can understand Exton being angry particularly when Halligen didn't pay him.
Yes you certainly can.

This news, about the report, is good for Amaral and the libel trial isn't it?
Big time Suzy Johnson, there is no way the Mcs can say his book hindered the search for Madeleine when all the time they were the biggest hinderers!
No wonder they want to become assistants with the opening of the Portuguese investigation!
Do you think they will still want to go to the libel trial?

Do you think they want to give evidence?

WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1