Re: Bernt Stellander interview

by **Silentscope** 03.09.24 17:28

Bernt should check out CMoMM thread ‘Alternative Theorising’ page 16.

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t15192p375-alternative-theorizing?highlight=Podesta+red+shoes#475270

It might help him understand how the Podestas were probably used to get at Hillary Clinton on her Election Campaign. It also explains how the Red Shoe story really started.

No Satanic connotations whatsoever.

Go Brick, Go!

by **PeterMac** 04.09.24 7:53

Cake Lover wrote:I have said previously, they are a horrendous family. Consider what Phatso married; a disgusting pervert.

Bernt Stellander interview - Page 15 Philom10

16/3/2002.
Gerry's DoB is 5/6/68
Philomena is his elder sister so assume 1965

She is therefore 35 or 36 here

Both seem to have been to the same make-up artist. [Circus in town that week?]

by **Bluebagthepirate** 04.09.24 22:27

Is this Tiny Tears?

Bernt Stellander interview - Page 15 2Q==

Asking for a friend.

by **crusader** 07.09.24 9:03

This chap has a lot of followers, he recommends watching the video James English and Bernt.

by Jojo1 07.09.24 17:18

I've said all along that Bernt may well be onto something. It will be interesting to see if Bernts theory plays out. He may be right or may be wrong, but if it grabs the interest of people who have not really followed the case, and directs them to the PJ files and the amazing research of others then surely that is a good thing. So many people still believe the MSM hype instead. Imagine how far researchers would get if there was access to all of the files from everywhere. What we have access to is minimal in comparison. So all theories are valid minus the abduction rhetoric that has been spun.

by Liz Eagles 07.09.24 18:39

I am only halfway through the book. I feel I am being duped. As unpopular as this might be I feel very uncomfortable with the lack of transparency and the tease of things to come.

Sorry to say I disbelieve the motive.

by **Bluebagthepirate** 07.09.24 19:03

Liz Eagles wrote:I am only halfway through the book. I feel I am being duped. As unpopular as this might be I feel very uncomfortable with the lack of transparency and the tease of things to come.

Sorry to say I disbelieve the motive.

Stick with it.

He's long winded but he's not duping.

What motive do you disbelieve?

by Liz Eagles 07.09.24 19:35

Bluebagthepirate wrote:
Liz Eagles wrote:I am only halfway through the book. I feel I am being duped. As unpopular as this might be I feel very uncomfortable with the lack of transparency and the tease of things to come.

Sorry to say I disbelieve the motive.

Stick with it.

He's long winded but he's not duping.

What motive do you disbelieve?

What makes you think or believe he is about to solve the case?

by Cake Lover 07.09.24 19:46

I haven't read the book; I don't understand why the police are not at the suspected burial site? Anything could happen there - it has perhaps already been disturbed. What if there really is a body there? Or, what if a body has been removed?

by Liz Eagles 07.09.24 20:01

Cake Lover wrote:I haven't read the book; I don't understand why the police are not at the suspected burial site? Anything could happen there - it has perhaps already been disturbed. What if there really is a body there? Or, what if a body has been removed?

Why would the Portuguese police do anything on the whim of a Norwegian expat who claims to have contact with someone or other in their ranks? It doesn't make sense.

by Cake Lover 07.09.24 20:10

That's my point; it doesn't. The police don't seem to be - and probably aren't - taking Bernt seriously. But at the same time, neither have they acted to disprove his theory. I find it all quite peculiar.

by Liz Eagles 07.09.24 20:16

Cake Lover wrote:That's my point; it doesn't. The police don't seem to be - and probably aren't - taking Bernt seriously. But at the same time, neither have they acted to disprove his theory. I find it all quite peculiar.

Why would the police take Bernt Stellander's book seriously?

by **crusader** 07.09.24 20:16

We only have Bernt's word that he has got the McCann's on camera visiting the Rocha Negra.
If that is true , it is very significant but only If they are doing something suspicious.
There is no law forbidding them to go there as far as I know.
He really does need to show what he's got, his reason for not doing so, he say's, is to give the McCann's some time, but why do them any favours?
The point of the book is to expose the McCann's isn't it, not give them time to consider what to do.
How much time is he going to give them, I'm afraid the whole thing is losing momentum.
I hope I'm wrong and he will act soon.

by Liz Eagles 07.09.24 20:24

crusader wrote:We only have Bernt's word that he has got the McCann's on camera visiting the Rocha Negra.
If that is true , it is very significant but only If they are doing something suspicious.
There is no law forbidding them to go there as far as I know.
He really does need to show what he's got, his reason for not doing so, he say's, is to give the McCann's some time, but why do them any favours?
The point of the book is to expose the McCann's isn't it, not give them time to consider what to do.
How much time is he going to give them, I'm afraid the whole thing is losing momentum.
I hope I'm wrong and he will act soon.

I am calling bullshit on his claims.

....and after watching him constantly sniffing in interviews I think he needs a dose of Vick.

by Cake Lover 07.09.24 20:30

Liz Eagles asks 'Why would the police take the book seriously'. Exactly. So, they should disprove it then. Do something - announce to the world that it's ridiculous, or that they have looked into the theory and found nothing. They know much more than we do, and if they think Bernt is wrong, they are likely to be correct. As Crusader says, Bernt needs to act soon. This shouldn't be a case of 'tune in for the next instalment in four weeks time'. That's just imo, of course.

by Justice for Maddie 07.09.24 20:34

crusader wrote:We only have Bernt's word that he has got the McCann's on camera visiting the Rocha Negra.
If that is true , it is very significant but only If they are doing something suspicious.
There is no law forbidding them to go there as far as I know.
He really does need to show what he's got, his reason for not doing so, he say's, is to give the McCann's some time, but why do them any favours?
The point of the book is to expose the McCann's isn't it, not give them time to consider what to do.
How much time is he going to give them, I'm afraid the whole thing is losing momentum.
I hope I'm wrong and he will act soon.

Yes, it's time for action/digging.

by **crusader** 07.09.24 20:34

I'm not ready just yet to give up on him, but it does sound like a really well researched novel with a twist at the end.
I have to confess, the part that interests me most is the camping out and cameras on Rocha Negra capturing Golden Nuggetts and the McCann's.

by pinkgladioli 07.09.24 20:37

Liz Eagles wrote:
crusader wrote:We only have Bernt's word that he has got the McCann's on camera visiting the Rocha Negra.
If that is true , it is very significant but only If they are doing something suspicious.
There is no law forbidding them to go there as far as I know.
He really does need to show what he's got, his reason for not doing so, he say's, is to give the McCann's some time, but why do them any favours?
The point of the book is to expose the McCann's isn't it, not give them time to consider what to do.
How much time is he going to give them, I'm afraid the whole thing is losing momentum.
I hope I'm wrong and he will act soon.
I am calling bullshit on his claims.

....and after watching him constantly sniffing in interviews I think he needs a dose of Vick.

At the end of the interview he said that he had been unwell and had been suffering from a sinus infection!

by Liz Eagles 07.09.24 20:39

Cake Lover wrote:Liz Eagles asks 'Why would the police take the book seriously'. Exactly. So, they should disprove it then. Do something - announce to the world that it's ridiculous, or that they have looked into the theory and found nothing. They know much more than we do, and if they think Bernt is wrong, they are likely to be correct. As Crusader says, Bernt needs to act soon. This shouldn't be a case of 'tune in for the next instalment in four weeks time'. That's just imo, of course.

There are lots of books and theories. Are police expected to read them all?

What makes Stellander's book unique enough to prompt a dig or search anywhere?

by Justice for Maddie 07.09.24 20:45

Liz Eagles wrote:
Cake Lover wrote:Liz Eagles asks 'Why would the police take the book seriously'. Exactly. So, they should disprove it then. Do something - announce to the world that it's ridiculous, or that they have looked into the theory and found nothing. They know much more than we do, and if they think Bernt is wrong, they are likely to be correct. As Crusader says, Bernt needs to act soon. This shouldn't be a case of 'tune in for the next instalment in four weeks time'. That's just imo, of course.
There are lots of books and theories. Are police expected to read them all?

What makes Stellander's book unique enough to prompt a dig or search anywhere?

Because he investigated 7 years there and maybe have them on video.

by **Jill Havern** 07.09.24 20:58

Geezus...how many times do we have to say that Bernt took 7 years to investigate and write an 850 page book?

Why does anyone now think he has to work at our pace?

PeterMac has got a very sharp bullshitometer and he would not be investing any time working with Bernt if he didn't think this case had merit.

Liz, for goodness sake...just skip to page 603 and read from there.

by **crusader** 07.09.24 21:06

Was PeterMac working with Bernt for the past 7 years or just since the book came out?

by **Bluebagthepirate** 07.09.24 21:59

Liz Eagles wrote:
Bluebagthepirate wrote:
Liz Eagles wrote:I am only halfway through the book. I feel I am being duped. As unpopular as this might be I feel very uncomfortable with the lack of transparency and the tease of things to come.

Sorry to say I disbelieve the motive.

Stick with it.

He's long winded but he's not duping.

What motive do you disbelieve?
What makes you think or believe he is about to solve the case?

Lots of things.

I'm hoping he can solve it.

I think what he has done (and still doing) is extremely interesting and positive.

Anyway, what motive do you disbelieve?

by **Bluebagthepirate** 07.09.24 22:02

Liz Eagles wrote:
Cake Lover wrote:Liz Eagles asks 'Why would the police take the book seriously'. Exactly. So, they should disprove it then. Do something - announce to the world that it's ridiculous, or that they have looked into the theory and found nothing. They know much more than we do, and if they think Bernt is wrong, they are likely to be correct. As Crusader says, Bernt needs to act soon. This shouldn't be a case of 'tune in for the next instalment in four weeks time'. That's just imo, of course.
There are lots of books and theories. Are police expected to read them all?

What makes Stellander's book unique enough to prompt a dig or search anywhere?

Read it from page 603 and you'll find out.

It's not done and dusted either.

by **Jill Havern** 07.09.24 22:03

crusader wrote:Was PeterMac working with Bernt for the past 7 years or just since the book came out?

Just since the book came out.

Bernt's investigation is not complete...with Peter's help they now have to put pressure on the authorities.

by **crusader** 07.09.24 22:07

Thank you Jill.

by **Jill Havern** 08.09.24 12:46

By the way, I'm just as impatient as you guys are. I desperately want to see the field cam images on the website. I want to see the PJ and dogs searching the sites. I want to see the sites dug. I want to see justice for Madeleine. I want to see the perpetrators of this awful crime brought to justice and for this case to be laid to rest along with this 3-year-old girl who none of us knew yet have devoted almost two decades of our time to learning the truth about what really happened to her.

Can you grasp how much work all that will entail?

BUT, Bernt has to work to his plan. This is his gig and he can't succumb to pressure which would jeopardise all the work he's already done.

There are many things going on, and Peter will tell us when the time is right.

We've all been here for 17 years already, so a little while longer isn't going to hurt us...or Maddie, for that matter, since she was already dead before we even knew her name.

First up, the next podcast with James English where Bernt will divulge new info.

But there is more to come. There is stuff going on behind the scenes that we will know about when the time is right.

I would say to those who have lost interest, or can't read the book because there's too many words...please go and chat on a different thread.

by Honesty 08.09.24 15:22

Jill Havern wrote:
crusader wrote:Was PeterMac working with Bernt for the past 7 years or just since the book came out?

Just since the book came out.

Bernt's investigation is not complete...with Peter's help they now have to put pressure on the authorities.

I am really sorry to say this, and I have hesitated before posting this because I wouldn't like anyone to blow a gasket as it were but I thought Bernt had everything planned out with military precision. I didn't realise his investigation was not complete.

Obviously, investigation might mean the bringing in of the specialist dogs and attempting to dig up the ground in order to find the remains but I'm not entirely clear what Bernt is or isn't doing about this.

Hopefully, Bernt has got all this planned out, has a clear plan of the way forward, all will be revealed in due course and it's only a matter of time before he solves the case.

by pinkgladioli 08.09.24 15:59

In my opinion from reading Bernt book it is clear that his investigation was ongoing and entering a new phase with release of his book and subsequent interview, I take my hat off to him having the tenacity and resilience to investigate for years on his lonesome, it must have been really frustrating for him and hard not being able to share it with the world until the time was right although I personally think it was a very wise choice not to share it until he was ready as the old saying goes Loose lips sinks ships!

by **Jill Havern** 08.09.24 16:15

Bernt's investigation will only be complete when Maddie's remains have been recovered.

Bernt's investigation is therefore not complete because the spots he's identified are yet to be evaluated by the dogs.

So, yes, the dogs need to be brought in next.

First he needs to persuade the PJ to do it themselves.

If not, then he'll do it himself.

Can you imagine the humiliation for the PJ if Bernt brings in his own dogs and media if the dogs alerted to the sites Bernt has identified?

I think serious questions would be asked.

That's my take on it anyway.

Latest topics