Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be

The actor in the R. White's fab ad was Elvis Costello's dad.

According to the Telephone Directory in Braunschweig there is only one Person matching Ralf H, and he is not 56 Years old.

The Braunschweiger Zeitung lists may Police Missions today under its Bluelight section. 

This is not one of them!

But did he own a campervan?

You will have to ask Jon that one!

Drat, just when I thought it was getting interesting again.

According to the original Report in the Sun this all happened last Wednesday!

Source: https://www.the-sun.com/news/10760601/hunt-madeleine-mccann-christian-b-pal/

Jon Clarke is Credited along with Rainer Burkard for the Story and Photo of Ralph H as well as the Photo of the Property.

I bet you will 

Maybe because Ralph H is a figment of Jon Clarke's rampant Imagination?

sharonl wrote:"10 armed police officers in riot gear were seen outside Ralph H's home"

  Why??????????
 
This man is only a witness (pretendy, I know) who may be able to help, why the drama  

They've been told he he's trying to dispose of a poosh chair.

Deine Suchanfrage "Mittwoch 6 März SEK Einsatz in Kennelblick Braunschweig" stimmt mit keinem Nachrichtenergebnis überein.

No Results in the News for any SWAT Mission in Braunschweig last Wednesday.

Reverse Image searches on several Sites all have no matches.

Probably another Google Street View ripoff?

sharonl wrote:Jon Clarke should give up journalism and write kids adventure books, he may have been quite good at that.  You have to admit, he does have an imagination that would would appeal to kids.

Give up journalism ! 

When did he actually do any ?

HCW confirms it is 'Fake News'!


The "Sun" report definitely has it all. 
The tabloid also quotes the Braunschweig public prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters: "He's a neighbour who might be interesting to talk to," he is said to have told the Sun. 
When asked by News38, the whole thing sounded somewhat different. Wolters emphasised that he had not said that to the Sun. 
As always, the Braunschweig public prosecutor's office does not comment on its investigations into the Maddie case, Wolters said. But he added: "Irrespective of this, I am not aware of any operation. I can rule out the possibility that there are currently any high-profile operations in the Maddie case.


Source: https://www.news38.de/braunschweig/article300333821/braunschweig-maddie-mccann-christian-brueckner-kennelblick-sun-news.html

WITNESS TELLS THE TRUTH - EXCLUSIVE ! ! ! !  

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13196467/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-returns-court.html


Under cross examination from Brueckner's lawyer Friedrich Fulscher, Post said he had given media interviews on his relationship with the man German police say is the 'prime suspect' for 'snatching and murdering Madeleine.'
But he added: 'I didn't say it was him but I can indeed say that I think it could be him but these are assumptions based on no evidence.'
****
Precisely.  In a nutshell.   The entire case is summed up. I hope Clarke was in court and can write this up in the OP.

So it could have been Eggman after all.

Rabbit teeth like the Easter Bunny?
Eggface like in Jane Tanners drawing?

Obviously a conclusive identification then?

From: KAI FELDHAUS
14/03/2024 - 8:43 pm

Braunschweig - Day four in the trial against Christian Brückner (47), and again there was a ruckus. Now the prosecutors are back at it!

The two prosecutors responded to motions from the defence, and made serious accusations against the lawyers of the man who allegedly abducted and murdered little Maddie McCann (then 3) in 2007.

Defence lawyer Dr Friedrich Fülscher (39) had requested that two texts written by the accused and found on a USB stick during a search in 2016 not be admitted as evidence. The reason for the search has alledgedly been faked in order to find evidence in the Inga case. 
In addition, the files had only been created four days after the USB stick was seized.

According to senior public prosecutor Vanessa Beyse, the search was necessary: There had been a stench of decay on the defendant's property. The police officers did not know whether they would find human or animal remains.

In fact, they dug up Brückner's dead dog - and a Lidl bag with data carriers containing child pornography and the controversial texts. "Undoubtedly pure coincidence," says Beyse.

The public prosecutor's office requested that all motions by defence lawyers Dr Fülscher (r.) and Prof. Bock (l.) be rejected.

The accusation that the text file was only created after the seizure really got the prosecutor annoyed.

The defence "seriously believes that some officer had invented the story after the seizure and stored it on the USB stick". 

In fact, Brückner had already had the text, in which a first-person narrator describes how he abducted his mother and daughter and abused them in the most disgusting way, in his email inbox years earlier. The defence's accusation is a "deliberately defamatory and slanderous allegation against state investigating authorities".

For his part, Brückner's defence lawyer Dr Friedrich Fülscher (39) rejected the accusation that he had accused police officers of having written the text. He was concerned with the date the file was created, not the text itself.

There was also an explosive response to a second motion by the defence.

The defence wanted to hear an expert witness who questioned an expert opinion from 2019.

In it, a hair on the bed of the raped American Diana M. (then 72) was attributed to the defendant, which earned him seven years in prison. The public prosecutor refused to question the witness - and quoted from the testimony of an ex-con who was in prison with Brückner. He claimed that Brückner had bragged in prison about two rapes he had committed in Portugal. One of them was a woman aged around 70.

The prosecutors also rejected two further motions by the defence.

An ex-BKA officer who claims to have bugged Brückner's cell and Senior Public Prosecutor Beyse herself were not to be heard as witnesses, according to Public Prosecutor Ute Lindemann. Both matters had nothing to do with the current trial - but with the investigations into the Maddie case. With the motion, the defence "only wants to find out whether there were investigative measures in other proceedings, the results of which the defence would like to know", said public prosecutor Ute Lindemann.

The court must now decide on the motions. The trial will continue on 3 April and should last until the end of June. As a precautionary measure, Judge Uta Inse Engemann asked all parties involved to name available dates by the end of October.

Source: https://www.bild.de/regional/niedersachsen/regional/maddie-verdaechtiger-gestand-er-im-knast-zwei-vergewaltigungen-87520284.bild.html

So how then did Brückners Email Text from Years earlier get put on a USB Stick four days AFTER it was dug out of the Dogs grave?

Rob Pattinson (Sun Reporter) now manages to find 'Ralph H' who comes out of the House and threatens to give him a Slap if he does not stop Filming his property and trying to Interview him. He told the Reporter that he cannot just make Pictures of something and he will be getting no Information from him.

'Ralph H' apparrently has no idea what this is all about?

Source: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/26725791/ralph-h-madeleine-mccann-christian-b/

Why did the Sun not just tell BKA/SWAT he was at Home now?

Braunschweig public Prosecutor's Office: Reports lack any basis

When asked about the "Sun" report, Braunschweig's senior public prosecutor Christian Wolters told our newspaper: "We are still not commenting on our investigations, but there have been no searches." Reports of a house or property being surrounded "have no basis whatsoever".

Source: https://www.braunschweiger-zeitung.de/braunschweig/article241894200/Fall-Maddie-Staatsanwaltschaft-dementiert-Durchsuchung-in-Braunschweig.html

Can we track back the Sun article to our usual suspect ?  
The ludicrous detail, - all of it wrong in normal policing terms - might let us guess who it was.

It's turned into a complete circus, I would love to know who's making mischief.

PeterMac wrote:Can we track back the Sun article to our usual suspect ?  
The ludicrous detail, - all of it wrong in normal policing terms - might let us guess who it was.

The Trio Rainer Burkard, Jon Clarke and Rob Pattinson are jointly responsible.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/10760601/hunt-madeleine-mccann-christian-b-pal/

The owner of the House seen in the Video is recommended to contact the Police himself and have the Journalists charged under the Laws of GDPR, Trespass and Harassment. The Sun finds itself liable under its own Editors Codes of Practise.

1. Accuracy

i) The press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not supported by the text.

ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and — where appropriate — an apology published. In cases involving IPSO, due prominence should be as required by the regulator.

2. *Privacy

i) Everyone is entitled to respect for their private and family life, home, physical and mental health, and correspondence, including digital communications.

ii) Editors will be expected to justify intrusions into any individual's private life without consent. In considering an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy, account will be taken of the complainant's own public disclosures of information and the extent to which the material complained about is already in the public domain or will become so.

iii) It is unacceptable to photograph individuals, without their consent, in public or private places where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.

https://www.editorscode.org.uk/the_code.php