Podcasts: Madeleine McCann

by **Jill Havern** 19.06.19 13:19

by Liz Eagles 26.06.19 22:05

Is this the twilight zone?

by **Jill Havern** 28.06.19 12:53

Podcast 11: May 3
What happened to Madeleine McCann that night in Room 5A of the Ocean Club Resort? In its final episode, Maddie explores and tests the theories which attempt to explain how a small three-year-old girl has been missing since 2007.
1:04:14 May 9, 2019 4:13 AM

Podcast 10: Goncalo Amaral
A rare interview with the former Portuguese lead detective opens up new perspective on the cold case, the UK police investigation and where it might be heading.
35:29 Apr 30, 2019 6:47 AM

Podcast 9: A Door Marked Closed
The fight to control the narrative of a wild and explosive story.
47:24 Apr 15, 2019 3:39 AM

Podcast 8: The Missing Calls
Police explore what appears to be unusual activity on Kate and Gerry's mobile phones.
42:57 Apr 8, 2019 6:33 AM

Podcast 7: The Courtroom
Never heard before court audio reveals the battle and consequences of the McCanns’ feud with lead Portuguese detective Goncalo Amaral.
42:38 Apr 1, 2019 5:43 AM

Podcast 6: The DNA
One of the world's leading DNA scientists says he can now answer a critical forensic evidence question which baffled investigators in 2007.
40:39 Mar 25, 2019 3:04 AM

Podcast 5: Eddie and Keela
Two British sniffer dogs arrive in Portugal to hunt for Madeleine. The dogs alert in a number of locations.
41:29 Mar 17, 2019 11:54 PM

Podcast 4: Man with No Face
The investigation continues. A late night encounter on a dark street blows open thinking about the case. Could it hold the key to the Maddie mystery?
41:30 Mar 11, 2019 12:19 AM

Podcast 3: Red Flags
The investigation begins. But Portuguese police have questions about evidence that supports the family's claim Madeleine was abducted.
44:10 Mar 4, 2019 1:27 AM

Podcast 2: They've Taken Her
Madeleine McCann and her family travel to Portugal with a group of friends who will become known as the Tapas 7. On the sixth night, Maddie vanishes.
42:15 Mar 4, 2019 1:01 AM

Podcast 1: Maddie
The Maddie podcast series explores what many believe is the well-known story of Madeleine McCann’s disappearance but this is an investigation of the evidence which could make you question everything you thought you knew about the case.
01:05 Feb 21, 2019 12:36 AM

https://omny.fm/shows/maddie/clips

by Guest 29.06.19 13:07

by **Jill Havern** 30.06.19 11:06

S.1 Ep.2 - Missing Madeleine McCann

An episode of Truth Seeker

Podcasts: Madeleine McCann 1550767668267_300

By Truth Seeker
Truth Seeker is a True Crime Podcast:
This podcast will cover various true crime cases to include missing person and unsolved murders. With hopes that discussing the cases again will help bring up new leads or information to help solve these unsolved cases. Some cases are high profile but my hopes are to cover some less known cases seeking the truth of what happened to these individuals. As the podcast progresses and grows, I will be conducting interviews with individuals directly involved with these cases.
www.truthseeker24.com/

https://anchor.fm/tiana-griffith4/episodes/S-1-Ep-2---Missing-Madeleine-McCann-e4fk66

by **PeterMac** 10.07.19 13:23

SLAMMED :

A diligent follower of this forum has just informed me that I have been SLAMMED.
/Friend-Kate-McCann-slams-retired-police-chief.html

I thought I should try to describe what it feels like.

I hope that makes things clear.

by Guest 10.07.19 14:06

by **sandancer** 10.07.19 17:18

I do hope you weren't caught in any door during the slamming Peter ?

These pesky gusts of wind do travel don't they

All the way from Rothley to Spain ! fly

by Guest 11.07.19 1:43

What's required here is a good quality 'Made in Britain' libel lawyer.

I recommend Messrs Carcass Roticus of Old Pudding Lane, Londinium.

It comes with fringe benefits, discretion and money back guarantee.

Podcasts: Madeleine McCann Romanlaw1

by **PeterMac** 11.07.19 9:14

This saga has produced a vocabulary all of its own.
Furious . . . Whoosh . . . Slammed . . . Disgraced . . . Notoriously . . . Trolling . . . Dossier . . . Ludicrous
it has even brought into general use the legal term "Abducted" instead of the more usual taken, stolen, or kidnapped

There are similar vocabularies used exclusively in only one context.

The only person ever described as "having a real ZEST for life" is a recently and tragically deceased 3 or 4 year old girl.
It is never used for anyone else, and can only be said by a priest who never even knew the child.

There are other phrases which can only be spoken in this context
". . . had the whole of her life in front of her . . ." is a particularly meaningless one.
". . . had the whole of the REST of her life . . ." is more accurate, but a little less punchy or lachrymatory.
Again it is only applied to those under the age of about 15. Beyond that it would begin to sound even more "ludicrous" [qv.].

We are used to the medically unlikely "our hearts GO OUT", and frankly ignore most of the rest.
It is axiomatic that any deceased young person will have been wonderful, highly intelligent, outstanding, bright, happy, sporting, helpful, "caring" [the more recent epithet] and no one begrudges the parents and relatives those memories.
But no one is allowed to be 'Normal'.

We need a completely new set of Clichés [oxymoron alert]

by Guest 11.07.19 10:32

We used to read that "the parents are under sedation", or are "too upset to speak". These days they hold a 'photo call, with prepared speech, as if at an award ceremony. It's repulsive.

by momac 11.07.19 10:39

PeterMac wrote:This saga has produced a vocabulary all of its own.
Furious . . . Whoosh . . . Slammed . . . Disgraced . . . Notoriously . . . Trolling . . . Dossier . . . Ludicrous
it has even brought into general use the legal term "Abducted" instead of the more usual taken, stolen, or kidnapped

There are similar vocabularies used exclusively in only one context.

The only person ever described as "having a real ZEST for life" is a recently and tragically deceased 3 or 4 year old girl.
It is never used for anyone else, and can only be said by a priest who never even knew the child.

There are other phrases which can only be spoken in this context
". . . had the whole of her life in front of her . . ." is a particularly meaningless one.
". . . had the whole of the REST of her life . . ." is more accurate, but a little less punchy or lachrymatory.
Again it is only applied to those under the age of about 15. Beyond that it would begin to sound even more "ludicrous" [qv.].

We are used to the medically unlikely "our hearts GO OUT", and frankly ignore most of the rest.
It is axiomatic that any deceased young person will have been wonderful, highly intelligent, outstanding, bright, happy, sporting, helpful, "caring" [the more recent epithet] and no one begrudges the parents and relatives those memories.
But no one is allowed to be 'Normal'.

We need a completely new set of Clichés [oxymoron alert]

And we also saw a feisty 3 year old so "sporting, helpful and caring" that she jumped into the sea to save a friend's hat, even though it's very unlikely she was even there at the time!

by Guest 11.07.19 12:08

So beautiful, astonishingly bright, and I’d have to say very charismatic. She would shine out of a crowd. So—God forgive me—maybe that’s part of the problem. That special quality. Some ******* picked up on that.
Jon Corner

That's in just one sentence. Not very realistic when talking of a three year old child.

by **PeterMac** 11.07.19 12:53

by Guest 17.08.19 1:49

One year on from the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, the vicar of Praia de Luz Father Haynes Hubbard speaks to Esther Addley

https://static.guim.co.uk/audio/1208505117321/3318/gdn.new.080418.pm.hubbard.mp3

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/audio/2008/apr/18/adddley.mccann

by Guest 07.03.21 20:51

PODCAST: Cold Facts Hot Takes – Madeleine McCann

Posted on March 5, 2021 by Kayla Mayer, Macy Berendsen and Annie Terry

In episode two of Cold Facts Hot Takes, co-hosts Macy Berendsen and Kayla Mayer discuss the Madeleine McCann case and possible theories surrounding her disappearance.

https://www.tommiemedia.com/diversions/podcast-cold-facts-hot-takes-madeleine-mccann/

coffee2

by **PeterMac** 08.03.21 7:37

what utterly pathetically-educated, badly informed DRIVEL from three silly American girl students.

"So starting at er nineteen o'clock, which is, hold on, NINE , I think . . "

is the general level
And they START with. 'disappeared from her bed . . .'

I've emailed them with a link to the e-book
"The war needs a futile gesture, Perkins"

But yet more proof that the Long term Strategy to keep the official story in the public eye
and to actively prevent any other theories being "purported' has been worth every one of the
millions of pounds spent on it

by pdlsleuth1990 08.03.21 13:36

Saves me watching it so. Listened to a recent podcast of the JFK assassination for about 10 minutes, before realising that if they didn't know the name of the Governor sitting in front of Kennedy, the standard of their research is up to much. Whether its YouTube or Podcasts including Madeline's name will get you more hits (minimum hit on youtube seems to be 200,000 views). Must of them are distinctly average, irrespective of whichever side of the fence you are coming from.

by Guest 25.06.21 13:38

by **Silentscope** 05.07.21 17:10

Part 2 of this Podcast is due out on 12 July 21 at 22:00 GMT on YouTube live.

by Guest 06.07.21 1:06

Silentscope wrote:

Part 2 of this Podcast is due out on 12 July 21 at 22:00 GMT on YouTube live.

.
This podcast ^^^ was broadcast in June 2020, the sequel Part 2 was broadcast one year ago in July 2020.

https://www.stitcher.com/show/behind-the-life-with-adam-lambert/episode/behind-the-life-podcast-episode-20-the-disappearance-of-madeleine-mccann-part-2-76138078

It is nothing new.

That aside, the guest Isabelle McFadden, formerly known as the 'Queen of Portugal' and more recently 'Isabelle McFabulous' is a vain fantasist who has been exposed as a pseudo 'expert' on all things McCann related over and over again for a number of years. She likes to think of herself as the 'Queen' of justice in the name of Madeleine McCann - amongst others I hasten to add. She has nothing to offer but vanity and claims of inside contact with the PJ, Operation Grange and any number of other case related units, without a single proof other than her own word.

She has a fan club on twitter which is where her persona belongs, amid all the other pseudo 'experts'.

Leave her there - where she belongs!

There is more evidence based knowledge here on CMOMM than you will ever find on twitter or facebook, without the unnecessary conceit or self aggrandisement!

by **crusader** 06.07.21 8:11

I hadn't seen this Podcast before, I'm glad I watched it, but there was a lot of misinformation there.

This woman is not doing the search for Madeleine any good, the people who interviewed her had no or very little knowledge of the facts and so let her state things as facts without challenging her.

by Guest 06.07.21 12:53

The woman and her devout social media following are a menace to the cause. A clear case of if you shout loud enough people will believe everything you say and that is precisely what Ms McFadden does. Such is her social influence, along with a few stragglers, journalists far and wide take notice - no names mentioned!

I seldom visit twitter or facebook because I find it very tedious and of little or no interest but when I do look in, they are still repeating the same old nonsense (forum myth) that was debunked years ago. Always with the overriding excuse that they might find the missing piece of the jigsaw by poring over the same old myths. It's idleness and hero worship personified yawn

.

If you want to learn about the case, twitter and/or facebook is not the place to be!

One thing for certain, these people play right into team McCanns hand. All the time they can cling on to the 'troll' epithet, they are riding high! For the most part I can't blame the McCanns for taking advantage of these silly people - some of the outrageous things they come out with are spiteful at best, murderous worst.

They wouldn't last five minutes here on CMOMM. The odd one creeps in or lurks from time to time but there is only safety in numbers!

by **Jill Havern** 25.09.21 8:52

The Opperman Report' (podcast)
Thomas Horan : Is Madeleine McCann Alive?

If Madeleine was never abducted, if she died on May 3rd, why was it reported as an abduction?
Despite the absence of a trial, what we have now is a fairly precise version of events from the McCanns themselves, a by-product of their relentless PR. We also know the original lead investigator, Goncalo Amaral’s, counter-narrative, now a legally defensible matter of public record.
The questions that arise from these opposing narratives are dead simple:
Which narrative is more credible?
Which narrator is more credible?
What was the motive behind all the publicity? Neither Madeleine nor her abductor ultimately benefited from the ongoing media barrage, so who did?
True crime maestro, Nick van der Leek, plumbs quagmires of confusion and a thicket of thorny inconsistencies to probe what lies beneath: the psychologies. What is the significance of "doctors" as suspects? Did it matter or mean anything that the McCanns and their cabal of friends in the Algarve were mostly doctors?
Peeling away the gossamer threads, over the course of just four days [April 29th – May 2nd], van der Leek intuits that very little was routine: not the weather, not where meals were eaten, not where or when they slept and not what they did as a family. But what were their routines when it came to other, murkier things, like sleeping patterns, cell phones and sedatives?
Drawing intangibles out of the darkness, van der Leek sews the vexing loose ends from several conflicting stories into a definite - if not definitive - end-result.

2 podcasts

https://player.fm/series/the-opperman-report-2516066/doubt-the-madeleine-mccann-mystery-PErr1Oo8fkcagzrU

https://www.spreaker.com/user/oppermanreport/thomas-horan-is-madeleine-mccann-alive

by Andema83 28.05.22 14:41

Re the podcast mentioned in Jills opening post - well, I have to say, this was an extraordinarily bad show. It's astonishing that they could make 10 (ten) episodes out of really nothing. They never seemed to have taken a cursory look at the PJ files, they spend ours discussing stuff that has never been validated as fact (like the claim that the McCs and their group of friends didn't have their cellphones with them), and Jim Clemente was dwelling for ever on the well-known fact that Goncalo Amaral stayed at the restaurant after having been notified of the disappearance of a British girl from a holiday resort; for the rest of the show (as far as I managed to listen to it), Jim Clemente readily picks up on anything that would confirm his hunch that the McCanns were completely innocent of any wrongdoing, thus defending them, and at one point he ranted seemingly for hours about Pat Brown and why Mark Saunokonoko (to whose Maddie-Podcast they were referring to) took her on his show, he was clearly upset with the fact that Mark Saunokonoko interviewed PB instead of him, Jim Clemente, the *former* FBI profiler. Needless to say that they were all arguing in favor of the McCanns, Laura Richards seem to have tried 'to play devils advocate' at times, but this was practically to no avail, as Jim Clemente dominated the whole conversation, and the American girl who hosted the show was apparently completely clueless.

To summ it up: It's a complete waste of time. How they were able to stretch their flimsy show to ten episodes is a mystery to me.

by Guest 28.05.22 15:37

Andema83 wrote:They never seemed to have taken a cursory look at the PJ files, they spend ours discussing stuff that has never been validated as fact ...

Sounds like twitter/facebook to me - hence my determined avoidance.

bignono

by Andema83 28.05.22 16:06

@Verdi, but Jim Clemente as well as Laura Richards are supposed to be top coppers from the FBI and Scotland Yard or at least *former* crime experts turned media figures, they also made a documentary on the Jonbenet Ramsey murder. Therefore I actually had some expectations of them - maybe wrongfully so, as I said, they seem to be primarily media figures by now.

I fully understand your avoidance though;). Just wanted to set the record straight about this crappy podcast, in case others have the same high expectations as I did.

by Guest 28.05.22 17:21

Sad to say - and astonishing in my view, even the biggest of big resort to twitter and facebook to spread their word.

What is said is indelibly printed in cyberspace for eternity.