The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Mm11

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Regist10
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Mm11

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Regist10

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Jill Havern 25.09.21 12:10

Ok, so this is from my own blog, but I just wanted to post a few letters I sent to University Hospitals Leicester and the GMC way back in 2008

I can laugh about them now, but at the time I was well cheesed off with them I can tell you   big grin

Dear Ms Wright

I am wondering when you will be removing all reference to Gerry McCann on your hospital online noticeboard. It is now apparent from the Portuguese police files that the blood and death scent from Madeleine was found in their holiday apartment aswell as on Kate's clothes and bible, behind the sofa and in the corner next to the parents wardrobe - and even on an item of Maddie's clothing and in the spare wheel well of the car they rented out 25 days after Maddie 'went missing'. The Portuguese police say there was no abduction and it would seem that the Fund they started within a week or so of Maddie going missing is fraudulent.

During this time, Gerry McCann was made an arguido which meant he was the prime suspect in his own daughter's disappearance and yet he was allowed to continue to work for the NHS and still does. This in itself is obscene.

Maddie has been made a mockery of by her parents, which is endorsed by University Hospitals Leicester, and I think it is fitting in her memory to remove all the farcical references to releasing balloons of hope because it is extremely upsetting for those who have followed this scam from the beginning to know that people are still trying to pull the wool over our eyes with continued reference to Maddie still being missing when there is evidence she died in their apartment.

The link on your website goes directly to the McCanns website where you are greeted with a Paypal button where people are invited to donate and you will know that the McCanns have used some of this publicly donated money to pay their mortgage.

There is also a link to a direct telephone number to Metodo 3, and you will probably know that one PI on the McCann case is now in jail, convicted of smugglng a large quantity of Cocaine and another in custody charged with Extortion and Attempted Murder.

It is not right that a public service should be linking directly to a fraudulent fund that has been set up by 2 of your doctors - Gerry McCann and Doug Skehan. I have also written to Leicestershire Constabulary as they also link directly to a fraudulent fund, which is unlawful.

I look forward to your response.

Thank you.

Jill Havern

Links:
Letter sent to melanie.wright@uhl-tr.nhs.uk


Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Reply_10



My second letter of complaint:

Dear Mr Wightman

Thank you for your unsatisfactory reply which you have noted but dismissed in its entirety.

I admire your loyalty towards being committed to supporting your staff. However, whilst there remains any form of doubt about the McCanns, do you not think it is a duty to protect the public from potential Fraud?

Whilst you may disagree with the points I make, I make them from the Final Report of the Portuguese Police who have investigated this case and have concluded that Maddie died in the apartment, which makes the McCanns fund fraudulent. It is, therefore, of public concern that your website links directly to the McCanns website where people, who are not aware of the Portuguese Police Final Report, are invited to donate to a Fund which cannot possibly locate Madeleine given that she is dead. We all know that the McCanns have used this public money to pay their mortgage. Is this what you are supporting? You are supporting a fraudulent Fund that pays their mortgage? If you intend to keep misleading the public with your support of the McCanns by using a public hospital online noticeboard, should you not at least put a disclaimer on your site telling people that their donations might be used for mortgage payments?

Given the nature of the evidence found in the McCanns apartment and hire car, might I ask in what way you are committed to finding Madeleine given that the sniffer dogs detected not only blood, but death?

Regardless of how many people at the Leicester hospitals know the McCanns personally, it is not acceptable to deliberately mislead members of the public just because the McCanns say they are innocent. The police do not say they are innocent. I would rather believe the police, who have spent over a year investigating them, than the McCanns who deliberately neglected their children, and put them in obvious danger, for the sake of a tapas meal. That, in itself, should require you to take all mention of their fraudulent fund off your hospital online noticeboard. It is ethically and morally proper to do so.

I will now go even further to ask if you think it is important to support your patients and protect them from any kind of risk, particularly where negligence is involved?

Dr Gerry McCann, and even Dr David Payne who also works at LRI, are guilty of child neglect at the very least - the entire group of doctors left their children unattended every night of their holiday. The McCanns sedated their children so they could go out drinking. This is abuse aswell as negligence. Negligence so serious that Madeleine is believed to be dead, based on the evidence of two British sniffer dogs. You will know that the sniffer dogs detected the scent of death in the McCanns apartment and in the car they hired 25 days later.

Should patients be subjected to treatment from doctors who admit negligence? Indeed, should patients be allowed to be in contact with a doctor who is believed to be involved in the death of his daughter and concealment of her body? Should a patient also be subjected to treatment by Dr David Payne who is suspected of paedophilia, as given in a witness statement to the Portuguese police?

What Rights have your patients got when you decide that they can be treated by doctors such as these, simply because you know the family? Yes, the case has been shelved pending further evidence - but the McCanns have NOT been cleared of any involvement. Mr Amaral stated quite clearly: "It is not a declaration of innocence" that the case has been shelved pending further enquiries. He made this statement shortly after he was removed from the investigation by Gordon Brown, due to pressure from the McCanns. Why would an innocent parent ask for the removal of the chief investigator who was close to finding their daughter?

Shouldn't Drs McCann and Payne be suspended, until the case is officially resolved, for the safety of your patients? You may argue that you feel your patients are safe with Dr McCann, but his daughter wasn't was she?

Indeed, it was felt that Dr Harold Shipman's patients were safe with him and look what happened there. Then there are other doctors whose patients were not safe - Dr Colin Norris, Nurse Beverley Allitt, etc.

Why is the NHS blatantly allowing such a risk towards their patients? Kate McCann said she was in contact with 6 dead bodies shortly before she went on holiday. That's quite an alarming number of dead bodies, for a GP, given that she only worked one-and-a-half days per week.

Why are these doctors allowed to continue to work within the NHS just because you know the family and choose to disagree with the points I make that are taken from an official police report? It's hardly a very good reason to subject your patients to potential risk and fraud.

I would be grateful for your views because, as a member of the public, I feel I have a right to know what is happening within a public service that I contribute towards with my tax, and your response that you will continue to mislead the public because you know the family is not a good enough answer.

I appreciate that this is an awkward situation for you, but there is no 'arguido' status at the moment and therefore no restriction on freedom of speech about the investigation - but I feel the consequences regarding the risk to your patients and the general public, and the abuse of power surrounding this sinister case, must be addressed.

Jill Havern

More to follow. Possibly  big grin

I used to love my blog back in the day   oh go on

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer

Posts : 24726
Activity : 37312
Likes received : 7632
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Cammerigal likes this post

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Jill Havern 25.09.21 12:42

Most of the links now longer work unfortunately as this was back in 2008

Dear Mr Wightman, Director of Communications and External Affairs

I refer to the email I sent you on 29 September, which you have neither acknowledged nor responded to. My initial enquiries were sent two months ago, by email then regular mail, to Melanie Wright, your Communications Manager, who also failed to acknowledge or respond. To date, I have to say I am not impressed with your Communications and External Affairs Department, particularly when my enquiry involves the serious issue of possible fraud and negligence within your hospital.

I would like to give you a little background information about myself in order that you may understand why I am particularly concerned about fraud and negligence within your hospital. In 2003, my new husband was deliberately misdiagnosed as inoperable and terminally ill by Sir Professor Peter Bell and given 1-2 years to live. I say deliberately misdiagnosed because after a very lengthy, time-consuming, fight with the NHS I discovered that my new husband was not, in fact, inoperable and, after fourteen months, I was able to prise information out of Sir Professor Peter Bell in order that my husband could have a life saving operation with Professor Robert Bonser at the Queen Elisabeth Hospital, two miles from my house, here in Birmingham. Four years later, he remains fit and well which proves he was not inoperable. However, the trauma we endured because of the deliberate negligence from your hospital and trying to save his life, destroyed our marriage. You will appreciate that I take this issue seriously. In fact, so seriously, that because of the lack of response about this negligence from your hospital, I wrote to the Prime Minister - who also didn't care less. But then why would he, when he is the one who sets the targets for the hospitals to meet? So I wrote a book about this scandal and created a website to help raise awareness. On that website I have published the complete details of the negligence we experienced at the hands of Sir Professor Peter Bell of Leicester Royal Infirmary and I have published evidence. That website is here.

It was apparent that my husband was a victim of the Postcode Lottery and that Sir Professor Peter Bell decided to save money for your hospital by denying him a life saving operation - and failed to use NHS guidelines to refer him to a specialist who could perform the life saving operation. At the time, I was mortified to realise this, but now it is apparent that denying treatment is common practice within the NHS as a whole. To that effect, I have also created another website about the Postcode Lottery which is here. I notice that the scandal of negligence continues at your hospital with the recent case of Lynda Greatorex, a member of your own staff, who died due to a catalogue of medical blunders. Article here.

So, now we have a case of, not only negligence towards your patients but also to your own member of staff. And, of course, there is the negligence caused by a member of your staff, Dr Gerry McCann, that resulted in the 'disappearance' of his daughter who the Portuguese police believe is dead due to the findings of two British sniffer dogs. In fact, they go further to say they believe Maddie died in the McCanns apartment and the parents concealed her body. I'm sure you can appreciate how serious this matter is, particularly as the Fund the McCanns have set up can only be considered to be fraudulent. A fund that you stated in your email, you will continue to support. I have asked you to, at least, put a disclaimer on the UHL website to alert members of the general public to the fact that their donations could be, once again, used to pay the McCanns mortgage. I see this has not been done. Can you explain why? You will appreciate that as a consultant Cardiologist, Dr McCann earns a great deal of money, particularly as he also works in the private sector at Spire Hospital, and you might also appreciate that some of the donations to this fraudulent fund have come from pensioners and schoolchildren who would not have realised their pensions or pocket money would be used to benefit the parents rather than Madeleine who they claim to be seeking.

In your email you also claim that "Many people in Leicester's Hospital who know the family would disagree with the points I make", even though those points were made from an official police report. You go on to say that "we remain committed to supporting our staff and finding Madeleine".

Having seen my husband a victim of negligence and the Postcode Lottery at your hospital, I created a further website solely for helping to raise awareness of Madeleine McCanns plight. But once the Portuguese police shelved the case and concluded that Madeleine was, in fact, dead, it put a completely different perspective on her case. It would seem that Maddie's plight has now been divided into two 'camps' - Team McCann and Team Maddie.

Team McCann continue to raise money, even with chain email letters from Dr McCanns sister, Philomena McCann who directs people to the 'official Madeleine site' where we are invited to donate - whilst Team Maddie, on the other hand, continue to pursue the truth of what happened to her.

Your use of the word "we" suggests you speak on behalf of other people, and for the sake of argument I will refer to them as 'Team McCann supporters' and assume you are their spokesperson as you have said "we" continue to support them.

I have had the misfortune of having my websites visited by 'Team McCann supporters' who operate from a forum called "Madeleine McCann: Missing but not forgotten". On first viewing you could be forgiven for thinking this is a forum that is helping to find Madeleine, as you suggest in your email. However, upon further inspection, it is clear that they are primarily there to disrupt other forums and websites by bragging about how many times they've been banned for creating havoc. In fact, I noticed a message directed to myself from a 'Team McCann supporter' who, having seen my website, said that he hoped I would end up on a hospital trolley for 48 hours. Indeed, they regard me as a 'nutter' for being concerned and outspoken about victims of the Postcode Lottery and the NHS Death Row, which includes children and babies.

From what you said in your email, that you continue to support Dr McCann, are you saying that you not only condone fraud and negligence, but also abuse of this nature from 'Team McCann supporters'?

In a nutshell, the plight of Madeleine McCann boils down to her, and her two-year-old siblings, having been abandoned, neglected, possibly sedated, possibly died from an accident, possibly her body was concealed by her parents who then laid the blame for her disappearance on Robert Murat, the David Payne lookalike, who has since been vindicated and compensated. We have a bizarre family who have turned Maddie's disappearance into a money making circus, aided and abetted by Leicester hospital that Dr McCann works for, and a whole host of 'Team McCann supporters' who disrupt and abuse anyone who asks valid questions about the disappearance of this innocent little three year old girl whose mystery is being covered up by the government, police, media and NHS. The whole affair is extremely sinister, which keeps many people gripped to finding any information about Maddie. And, of course, you continue to employ Dr McCann despite all the suspicions surrounding him - aswell as the suspicions surrounding Dr David Payne.

I anticipate that you may be having problems responding to my emails, so I invite you to read the evidence I have accummulated on my website. You will also be able to see that I am publishing our letters on my website to raise awareness of the ignorance I keep experiencing from the NHS. You will also be able to see from the Live Traffic Feed that people from all around the world are concerned about this case and are asking questions that we feel only people in authority, such as yourself, can answer.

I'm sure you appreciate that Madeleine's investigation has only been shelved, and can be re-opened at any time, and could eventually lead to a trial. If they are found guilty, how will you address the part you have played in the crime of supporting a fraudulent fund on your hospital website when you have been alerted to the problem?

There is something extremely sad about a little girl who is being denied justice and the blatant efforts of her parents who seek to escape justice at all costs, together with their obvious reluctance to talk about this case since having their 'arguido' status removed.

If you feel unable to help me with my concerns, please supply me with details of a person within UHL who I can write to. After all, there's not much point in having a complaints system if I can't be allowed to use it. I have come to realise that any such complaint is treated like 'pass the parcel' in the NHS and that no one relishes the idea of having to respond, despite having a responsibility to do so, but as you will see from my websites I have been trying to obtain answers from UHL and the NHS for over five years now and I don't give up easily, especially when there is a little girl at the heart of the issue.


Jill Havern



The suspicions surrounding David Payne: here, here and here




Now you see why CMOMM was created....
More to follow. Possibly.

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer

Posts : 24726
Activity : 37312
Likes received : 7632
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Guest 25.09.21 15:51

Well done, those letters are excellent. I came late to this forum, so I'm pleased to have some knowledge of what went on earlier. I think the letters are as fitting today as they were when your wrote them. Your husband's treatment was deplorable.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Jill Havern 25.09.21 16:35

Dear Sir

I wish to refer to you the matter of two registered doctors who have had serious allegations made against them in sworn statements to the Leicestershire Constabulary. The doctors in question are Dr Gerry McCann of Glenfield Hospital and Dr David Payne of Leicester Royal Infirmary.

Regarding Dr Gerry Mccann:

You will be aware that the Portuguese Police used two British sniffer dogs to search for his daughter, Madeleine McCann and they detected blood and the scent of death in the McCanns holiday apartment - namely, under some floor tiles, on the wall and behind the sofa, in an area by the McCanns wardrobe, on Kate and Madeleine's clothes, on Kate's bible, and in the boot of the car they hired 23 days later. Given that the Portuguese Police believe Madeleine died in the McCanns apartment must mean that the Fund they created to search for Madeleine is fraudulent. You will be aware that this public money was given in good faith by pensioners and school children to aid the search for Madeleine before it became public knowledge that Madeleine is believed to be dead. You will also know that the McCanns have used this public money to pay their mortgage. Please can you explain why UHL continues to have a direct link to the McCanns website where members of the public are invited to donate to a fraudulent fund?

You will also be aware that Dr Gerry McCann was made 'arguido' (official suspect) in the disappearance of his own daughter due to the evidence of the two British sniffer dogs and the DNA that was collected at the crime scene which confirmed that no abduction had taken place and that it had been staged. Please can you tell me why Dr Gerry McCann is allowed to continue to work within the NHS given that he is a suspect in the death of his daughter, the concealment of her body, the staging of an abduction, the framing of an innocent man, Robert Murat, and the creation of a fraudulent fund. You will know that, despite these very serious allegatios, the case has been shelved pending further evidence, but this does not mean the McCanns have been cleared of any involvement as the case can be re-opened at any time.

Regarding Dr Gerry McCann and Dr David Payne:

You will also be aware that a social worker named Yvonne Warren Martin and 2 doctors gave sworn witness statements to the Leicestershire Police which stated that they witnessed 'lewd and inappropriate' gestures between Gerry McCann and David Payne regarding David Payne's daughter and Madeleine McCann, on two separate occasions.

Please can you confirm that you checked this with Leicestershire Constabularly and can reassure members of the public that the NHS is not permitting two potential paedophiles to continue to work at UHL. You will know that under the Portuguese Judicial system that a lifting of secrecy allowed details of the investigation to be released to the general public. I believe that serious allegations such as these against practising doctors should be investigated by both the NHS and the General Medical Council, which is why I am writing to you. As far as I am aware, the Leicestershire Police have not made public the results of their investigation following the witness statements. I am sure that both the NHS and the General Medical Council would wish to satisfy themselves that the matter has been thoroughly investigated and that the two parties would ensure that the correct action was taken as a result.

There is a significant public interest in this case, not least because Dr McCann and Dr Payne are employees of the NHS. It is therefore important that the public can be assured that both the NHS and the GMC have fulfilled their obligations to uphold the high standards that the public expect of them. In this respect I believe that the two institutions should confirm that this matter has been dealt with appropriately.

I have previously directed my complaint to Mark Wightman, the Director of Communications at UHL, but he failed to give a satisfactory reply saying only that he will continue to support the McCanns. I feel this is wrong given the nature of the serious allegations which involves the death of a child, suspicion of paedophilic gestures witnessed by two doctors, and fraud.

In closure, I would quote the Chief Medical Officer, Sir Liam Donaldson. "I represent the Government, for which I work, the medical profession, which I try to listen to, and the public. My moral principle is that if ever there is a conflict it is the public who wins."

I would be very grateful to receive your prompt response to this complaint.

Jill Havern


Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Dr_col10


More to follow. Possibly.

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer

Posts : 24726
Activity : 37312
Likes received : 7632
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Jill Havern 25.09.21 20:15

Dear Dr Cole

Thank you for your email.

I note you state "the Trust has taken all appropriate measures to ensure that the public and patients are not put at any additional risk".

I am pleased you have acknowledged that there is some risk, as you have stated people are not put at any "additional" risk. Please can you confirm what measures you have taken? Please can you also confirm what risks you are aware of.

You also state that you are not aware of any fraudulent activity. I believe this statement is naive because the Portuguese police have released their findings of the investigation on a DVD, which is easily available, and on that DVD it clearly shows the evidence of two British sniffer dogs which detected the scent of Maddie's death in the McCanns apartment and hire car. Given that the police believe Maddie is dead and the fund was set up to find a 'live' Madeleine, would confirm that the Fund is, in fact, fraudulent. How can they find a 'live' Madeleine when she is dead? Why are they continuing to appeal for public money in this case? And why is UHL endorsing this fraudulent fund and encouraging members of the public to donate to this fraudulent fund?

If you haven't seen the DVD video of the British sniffer dogs, it is here on my website where I am also publishing all correspondence with UHL and the GMC. You will find evidence from the Portuguese police DVD etc.

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.com/

Jill Havern




Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Cole_u10

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer

Posts : 24726
Activity : 37312
Likes received : 7632
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Jill Havern 25.09.21 20:41

Medical Director, Dr Allan Cole, UHL Trust quickly adopts a Pact of Silence

24 October 2008

Dear Dr Cole

Thank you for passing my concerns to your Legal Affairs department.

It is unfortunate that I apparently misinterpreted your comment about 'risk' and I assume you will say I have misinterpreted your statement that you do not consider the employment of these two doctors to carry any more risk than any other healthcare professional in the Trust.

From your statement that these two doctors pose no more risk than any other healthcare professional could be construed that ALL healthcare professionals have some skeletons in their closet of this nature. I could mention Harold Shipman, Beverly Allit, Colin Norris or even your own doctor who killed a member of your own staff http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/news/Hospital-apologises-blunders/article-343750-detail/article.html.

The issues I have outlined in my concerns which you, as Medical Director, will not help me with, relates to two doctors at your hospital - one who is believed to be involved in the demise and concealment of his own daughter, involved in staging an abduction, framing an innocent man and creating a fraudulent fund. The other doctor, David Payne, has been reported to Leicestershire police, as has Gerry McCann, for making sexual remarks and lewd gestures about their own children. This report was made to the police by two doctors and is available on the files that the Portuguese police has released into the public domain. Either the other two doctors who reported McCann and Payne are liars or they aren't. If they are liars then they have abused their position of trust by lying to the police. If they are not liars then their allegations about McCann and Payne must be true and McCann and Payne have broken their position of trust. Doctors are supposed to be amongst the professionals the public are supposed to trust.

Either way you look at it there is a group of doctors in the NHS who have broken their strict Code of Conduct and position of trust and have brought the NHS into disrepute - this can only get worse. Further, the UHL/NHS condones this appalling behaviour by continuing to employ these doctors, whilst they're still under suspicion, and also they condone negligence and fraud by linking the official hospital website directly to the fraudulent Fund. This is a matter of public concern which you are washing your hands of. Indeed, your stubborness to retain the link to the fraudulent fund endorses your commitment to fraud.

There is also the matter that the McCanns have publicly admitted that they left all their children alone every night in an unlocked apartment until the worst happened, despite Kate McCanns admission in The Sun newspaper that she had a bad feeling about the holiday and felt her family was being watched. Despite those feelings they still abandoned their children. In fact, all the other doctors did the same - you will be aware that one child was vomiting. I believe she was just a baby. The parents say they were checking their children every 30 minutes but, as doctors, they will know that a fatal incident can occur in less time than this, particularly a baby who is vomiting. This is gross negligence that the NHS is condoning. If these doctors can treat their own children in this horrendous manner, what hope is there for their patients? Are you saying that, because you have put measures in place, which you won't disclose, that their patients would be treated better than their own children? The scandal of the Postcode Lottery would dispute that and it just so happens I have a blog about that too http://nhspostcodelottery.blogspot.com/.

You may well ask why I feel so outraged about the state of the NHS. Well, my former husband, xxxx xxxxxxxx, was deliberately misdiagnosed by Sir Professor Peter Bell of Leicester Royal Infirmary and I have a blog about that too http://nhsdeathrow.blogspot.com/. In fact, I wrote a book about it. He was sent home to die by a Knighted professor which ultimately turned out to be criminally wrong. This saga ruined our marriage and livelihoods and was not addressed by the NHS or Healthcare Commission or the Ombudsman, so I am well aware of how everyone closes ranks to protect each other as you are doing now.

As with this complaint, that one also got nowhere despite a persons life being at the heart of the issue - but then this complaint also has a person at its heart, a person called Madeleine McCann who was only three years old. It is one matter to cover up the negligence of a 52 year old, but a three year old is something else. When a child is denied justice then it is time to act. A crime against a child is the worst possible scenario, particularly when that crime is committed by her own parents, which is why so many people are seeking the truth. Despite threats from lawyers we will not give up. 

The truth of what happened to Madeleine McCann will eventually come out. There are many people, including myself, who are shocked and outraged about what happened to her, and the obvious intention to prevent the truth being known. You will know that the Portuguese Chief Inspector, Gonçalo Amaral, who was removed from the investigation by Gordon Brown, has written a book and is making a documentary. It is only a matter of time before it becomes public knowledge here in the UK and the NHS will not be able to say they were unaware of the circumstances surrounding the tragic demise of this little girl who no longer has a voice. The people who are protecting the McCanns have Maddie's blood on their hands and you should all be ashamed or your Pact of Silence and your threats of sending valid concerns to your legal affairs department.

The NHS is funded by the taxpayer, of which I am one, and this is a matter of public concern and I would like some answers please.

Jill Havern

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer

Posts : 24726
Activity : 37312
Likes received : 7632
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Guest 25.09.21 20:56

Any hospital worth its salt would have dropped all of these doctors. I don't like to think about what, as well as whom, they are protecting.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Jill Havern 25.09.21 21:07

It just goes to show the level of protection this pair have - the police, the media, the government, the NHS, the GMC...they're all in it together as Ms Brookes once said.

I really must update this soon cos there's a lot missing.

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC 24225210

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer

Posts : 24726
Activity : 37312
Likes received : 7632
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Jill Havern 26.09.21 12:02

Nothing seems to have changed...

An old article from February 2000.

General Medical Council and the scandal link to masons in NHS

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Shipman

Leaders of Britain's ruling medical body, the General Medical Council, will be questioned by MPs about possible links between Freemasons in the medical profession and a series of medical scandals.

There are concerns within Whitehall that the GMC may have been slow to act against doctors because of a Freemason network within the NHS.

The GMC, which came under fire for its failure to clamp down on failing doctors after the Bristol baby deaths and the Shipman serial killings, will be asked to disclose details of its own voluntary register, when its leaders go before the Commons select committee on health this week.

Rumours about Freemasonry in the medical profession have been circulating in Whitehall since the Bristol baby deaths scandal, and ministers are anxious to ensure there has been no cover-up.

There are an estimated 8,000 masonic lodges in England and Wales. A number of leading hospitals, including the Royal London, have lodges, but exact figures are elusive and few doctors openly admit to being masons.

MPs were astonished to discover that the GMC had a voluntary register for "conflicts of interest" which has not been made public. Howard Stoate, the Labour MP and GP, said he would be challenging the GMC to disclose the register.

He said: "It should be made public. It's entirely a matter for doctors to decide what to declare on the register. It's secretive; that's outrageous."

Alan Milburn, the Health Secretary, has privately made plain he wants the GMC to carry out a shake-up of its disciplinary procedures to regain the public confidence that was shattered by the disclosures in the Shipman case.

He was furious that Shipman was allowed to continue as a GP throughout the trial and was only struck off by the GMC after the guilty verdict of the jury. Mr Milburn has told the GMC it has the power to suspend GPs when they are under police investigation, but the GMC is prevaricating.

"Ministers are losing patience with the GMC," said a Whitehall source. The health committee, chaired by Labour MP David Hinchliffe, has called GMC leaders to give evidence at an emergency hearing on its plans for reform.

The GMC announced it would be carrying out its own review, leading to possible reforms in the wake of the Shipman case. Ministers demanded that as a minimum they wanted a majority of laymen on the Council, but its president, Sir Donald Irvine, a retired family doctor, said he was against such a move.

David Mellor, the former Tory health minister, called for the whole GMC to be sacked. The Council has 54 seats for doctors who are elected for a five-year term by doctors. There are 25 lay members appointed by the Department of Health, and 25 by the universities and royal colleges.

The British Medical Association said ministers should fully consult the medical profession before moving towards political overseeing of the GMC.

In its statement, the GMC accepted the need for reform. "We know that to maintain public trust and guarantee that the GMC is doing the best job possible of protecting patients, changes need to be made to the way in which we operate. We have already identified some of those changes and are working urgently to put them in place."

By Colin Brown
Sunday, 27 February 2000

Source: The Independent  (link no longer works)


Seven years later, when Madeleine died, nothing had changed.

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer

Posts : 24726
Activity : 37312
Likes received : 7632
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

crusader likes this post

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by crusader 26.09.21 13:08

@CaKeLoveR wrote..

Any hospital worth its salt would have dropped all of these doctors. I don't like to think about what, as well as whom, they are protecting.


^^^ exactly, all watching one another's back's
crusader
crusader

Posts : 2422
Activity : 2691
Likes received : 259
Join date : 2019-03-12

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Verdi 26.09.21 15:14

Over and above all other considerations, protect your NHS - so say the prime minister incumbent.

Cardiac unit nears ‘collapse’ in row over ‘malpractice’

St George’s Hospital in London was accused of failures that led to 67 deaths. As a coroner casts doubt on the claims, confused families are left in the middle


Katie Gibbons
Saturday September 25 2021, 12.01am BST, The Times

leading NHS cardiac unit is on the brink of “collapse” after a contested review that blamed surgeons for the deaths of more than 60 patients, according to a letter seen by The Times.

St George’s Hospital in London, once an international hub for cardiac surgery and research, is operating at a third of its former capacity because of staff departures and restrictions on surgical practice, a group of cardiac anaesthetists said.

The letter accuses St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust of fostering a risk-averse culture that means doctors can no longer provide their patients with the best care available. A review published in March 2020 found that clinical malpractice had led to the deaths of 67 seriously ill patients.

However, at 26 inquests heard so far involving the cases flagged in the review, the senior coroner has discredited the findings that the deaths were avoidable. Dr Fiona Wilcox concluded that the patients were treated appropriately and that no blame for their deaths was to be attached to the surgeons.

She apologised to their families for the distress caused and in one hearing criticised the “limited” review process that gave a “cursory” three to four hours of assessment for each “complex case”.

Despite this, the trust has offered potentially millions of pounds in compensation to confused families, whose loved ones’ deaths are the subject of ongoing debate.

The Independent Mortality Review of Cardiac Surgery was commissioned by NHS England and led by Michael Lewis, a cardiac surgeon in Sussex.

At the recent inquest into the death of an elderly patient, Wilcox said she made a “finding of fact” that the review carried out by Lewis’s team “was limited by lack of information and evidence”.

She added: “An examination of records of three to four hours compared to the extensive time that this court has spent examining this case both in and out of court is relatively cursory for a complex case.”

Calling the process “less than perfect”, she criticised the review team “throughout this case and the others”, for not interviewing any of the clinicians involved in the patient’s care.

She concluded that the death review published in the report did not “reflect the care” the patient had received, adding: “When I look at this case in the round I find that failures identified in the review have, once more, not been found. After the consideration of extensive evidence by this court, I find that the review is limited by several factors. First of all, simply not having correct information.”

She added: “The review, in error, identified factors which might have changed the outcome and then [went] on to conclude [that] factors which may have affected the outcome definitely contributed to the death. That is a fundamental logical inconsistency in this review ... I am concerned about that.”

Lewis defended his team’s review process but admitted they were limited by the information received. “Essentially our job was to try to build a narrative from the records that were available to identify what had happened to the patients during this journey through their care and in the hospital,” he told the inquest. “The process has been recommended by the Royal College of Physicians as a process for examining exactly what we’re describing.” He later added: “We just wanted to help the clinical teams.”

In the wake of the mortality alerts, two expert heart surgeons at St George’s were temporarily suspended and had restrictions placed on their practice. The trust paid out almost £1 million in legal fees during the dispute with the surgeons. There is now only one consultant on the cardiac surgery unit cleared to operate on higher-risk patients, according to the letter seen by The Times.

At least seven highly skilled cardiac consultants have left for other hospitals or to join the private sector since the report was published. Staff called an emergency meeting with senior management in May. On September 10 Jacqueline Totterdell, the trust’s chief executive, received a warning from consultants that there had been “no visible change or progress” to “improve the situation for cardiac surgery on the shop floor”.

The letter, signed by 13 cardiac anaesthetists, continues: “The damaged reputation, the ongoing uncertainty and lack of effective strategy have led to a substantial retention and recruitment crisis ... the service will collapse unless there is real improvement.”

They warn that “without immediate action” there will be “further deterioration of the cardiac surgery services”, which will “become a risk for patients”.

The Times spoke to several consultants anonymously about the unit, which has gone from treating 90 cases a month to 30. As cardiac departments across the country return to pre-pandemic levels of activity, St George’s remains on the brink of collapse, they said.

“I have cases where I believe patients have suffered because of the consequences of the report. This risk-averse behaviour means the patient ends up having an easier procedure, where the surgeon is less responsible,” said one consultant. Another described a situation where an extremely ill patient was left on the ward for two weeks needing surgery because of a lack of capacity.

One surgeon whose cases were part of the Lewis review said: “I’ve been tarnished, but I refuse to be pushed out.”

A spokesman for St George’s said: “Restrictions on planned cardiac surgery have been lifted and cardiac surgery at St George’s is safe with outcomes on par with other centres nationally.” The trust said its actions to improve the quality, leadership and culture in the cardiac surgery unit were recognised by the Care Quality Commission in 2019.

A spokesperson for the NHS in London said: “Following the report, enhanced oversight of the cardiac surgery unit continues with a package of support measures in place to ensure improvements are made, and the Care Quality Commission has found that improvements have been made by the hospital’s senior leadership team.”

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/cardiac-unit-nears-collapse-in-row-over-malpractice-zj58f8z2k
--------------------------

It's all in line with the prehistoric Hypocritical Hippocratic Oath.

'Thou shalt not grass on thine fellow physician.'

____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi
Verdi
Forum Manager
Forum Manager

Posts : 27278
Activity : 34372
Likes received : 5906
Join date : 2015-02-02

crusader likes this post

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Jill Havern 27.09.21 8:14

Nurse struck off by General Medical Council for filming neglect of patients wins appeal

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Margaret+haywood
A nurse who was struck off the register for secretly filming care for the elderly at a Brighton hospital has won her battle to return to work.

The High Court approved a settlement between Margaret Haywood and the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC).

The striking-off order imposed in April this year will be replaced with a one-year caution, which means she can now work as a nurse.

Ms Haywood filmed at the Royal Sussex Hospital for a BBC Panorama programme.

Footage from Ms Haywood's filming was broadcast in July 2005 and showed examples of neglect, including an elderly patient sitting in clothes he had soiled the night before.

The Nursing and Midwifery Council found her guilty of misconduct during a fitness to practise hearing and she appealed in May.

Ms Haywood, from Liverpool, said she was delighted with the verdict.

"Losing my registration after 25 years as a nurse was devastating," she said.

"I have been overwhelmed and humbled by the patient and public interest in my case and would like to thank everyone who has supported me, including the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) for running my appeal.

Full article BBC News




Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Gerry+at+work+1

Some medical staff are struck off for secretly filming neglect and abuse in the NHS.

But Dr Gerry McCann, who is suspected of neglect and concealment of his own child's body, has the approval of the NHS to film an innocent patient for his own PR stunt.

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer

Posts : 24726
Activity : 37312
Likes received : 7632
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Cammerigal likes this post

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Jill Havern 27.09.21 8:31

Doctors with major convictions still treating patients


Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Gmc2

THOUSANDS of patients are being treated by doctors convicted of serious crimes or punished for appallingly non-professional conduct.

The Sunday Express examined hundreds of files and uncovered scores of medics who are allowed to practise in spite of committing shocking offences.

Under the law all cautions and convictions given to doctors have to be examined by their governing body, the General Medical Council.

However, in many cases the GMC allows the disgraced medics to continue practising, while issuing a warning or temporary suspension.

A small number of court cases hits the headlines. Others, including cases of assault, drink driving, drug abuse and domestic violence, remain unpublicised and can only be found in the archives of the GMC website.

The Sunday Express examined details of misconduct hearings over the last year and our inquiries uncovered:

Two doctors allowed to work after manslaughter convictions.

An anaesthetist who watched a movie, read a newspaper and fell asleep during surgery.

A medic responsible for a hit-and-run car crash who was suspended for just nine months.

A doctor who punched a woman in the face who was suspended for three months.

A physician who failed to report his concerns about morphine doses administered by the serial killer Dr Harold Shipman.

Our investigation comes two years after the Shipman inquiry called for a radical overhaul of the GMC, which was accused of “looking after its own” and doing too little to protect patients.

Dame Janet Smith, who led the Shipman inquiry, recommended that the GMC no longer has sole responsibility for assessing doctors’ fitness to practise. The GMC says it has made wholesale changes, but our research indicates the reforms have not gone far enough.

In a previous interview Dame Janet said: “I am by no means convinced that new GMC procedures will protect patients.”

Magda Taylor, of patients’ group The Informed Parent, said: “Why would I want to go and see a doctor if he was a drug addict, done for manslaughter or had beaten someone up?"

Source: Daily Express

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer

Posts : 24726
Activity : 37312
Likes received : 7632
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Jill Havern 27.09.21 9:57

Another letter to the GMC from 2008 (I was rattling cages before the creation of this forum big grin ):


Dear Sir

This query refers to Dr Muhammad Siddiq, The head of the Islamic Medical Association (IMA), who has recently been banned for a year by the GMC for writing a 'spoof' letter to a GP's magazine whilst suffering from intense stress.

I found the details on the BBC News site http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/7707132.stm

Not wishing to condone any inappropriate behaviour by doctors which could undermine public confidence in the GMC or NHS or, indeed, put patients' lives at risk, I wonder if you could please clarify a point in your email to me dated 28 October whereby you stated that the GMC defends doctors Right to Work, particularly when they are suspected of serial child neglect, which led to the disappearance of one of their own children for 18 months (so far) and also the inappropriate and lewd behaviour towards their own children as reported to the police by two doctors and a social worker?

Please can you confirm that writing a 'spoof' letter to a GP's magazine which, presumably, only doctors can read, is considered more worthy of suspension from the medical profession by the GMC than, say, child neglect, staging an abduction, perverting the course of justice, framing an innocent man, or creating a fraudulent fund after British sniffer dogs detected death scent in the childs parent's own apartment and car?

In your email you stated: "Dr McCann’s actions following the disappearance of his daughter are not a matter which is related to his professional capability and fitness to practise. We are therefore unable to take action on your concerns."

In comparison, please can you explain how Mr Siddiq's professional capability, in performing circumcisions and other minor surgery, was affected by the writing of a 'spoof' letter to a GP's magazine, to such an extent that he was banned from his profession without due regard for his Right to Work?

I understand from the BBC News website that Mr Siddiq claimed he could not get a fair hearing, whereas the GMC seem wholly determined not to allow Drs McCann and Payne any hearing at all to establish their fitness to practise or to prevent the GMC/NHS from suffering disrepute regardless of how the public's confidence is affected by their inappropriate behaviour.

I also understand that Mr Andrew Popat chaired that meeting and I wonder if you could now refer my complaint to him as it would seem that neither you, nor the Leicestershire Police, seem willing to answer my very valid concerns.

I believe I have mentioned before that I am publishing all our correspondence on my website and I can inform you that I am contacted by many members of the public including, doctors and nurses, who are outraged at the lack of performance, and discrimination, by the GMC and NHS in this matter.

It does rather seem that the GMC has failed to take Alan Milburn's advice, eight years' ago, where he said he wanted the GMC to carry out a shake-up of its disciplinary procedures to regain the public confidence that was shattered by the disclosures in the Shipman case."

I look forward to hearing from you.

Jill Havern

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer

Posts : 24726
Activity : 37312
Likes received : 7632
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Empty Re: Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC

Post by Jill Havern 27.09.21 10:11

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Roisin%2Bhamilton
Dr Roisin Hamilton from Bearsden was almost five times over the limit when she drove her car over the Jubilee Park in Armagh and now faces being struck off at a tribunal in Manchester.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7127227/Drunken-NHS-doctor-bit-policeman-attacked-husband-faces-struck-off.html
-------------

But if you're a pair of NHS doctors who have concealed your daughter's corpse, staged an abduction, transported her body in a hire car to god knows where; lied under oath; refused to co-operate with an official Police investigation; generated millions of pounds in public donations through a fraudulent 'Find Madeleine' Fund which, in turn, has cost UK taxpayers £12million for a scam investigation then you get elevated to 'celebrity' status, employed as an Ambassador for Missing people' and get to shake hands with the Prime Minister and Royalty.

Abuse of Power blog: Letters to UHL and GMC Theresa%2Bmay

____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
NEW CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern
Jill Havern
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
Forum Owner & Chief Faffer

Posts : 24726
Activity : 37312
Likes received : 7632
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum