only in America, latest blog + Hobs blog: Thanks for nothing

Interesting reading of the latest blog from onlyinamerica,2 November 2015 and family statements?

http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2015/11/what-have-mccanns-to-be-thankfull-for.html

http://tania-cadogan.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/giving-thanks-for-nothing-courtesy-of.html#comment-form

Any chance you can separate the two?  I'd hate to think of the Hobbs being tarred with the same brush as the other foul mouthed object - a prominent element of the campaign to discredit CMOMM.

@Verdi wrote:Any chance you can separate the two?  I'd hate to think of the Hobbs being tarred with the same brush as the other foul mouthed object - a prominent element of the campaign to discredit CMOMM.

I put the links there, Verdi, as willowthewisp didn't post any links at all. The 'Onlyinamerica' blog actually linked to Hobs's post within that article.

@Get'emGonçalo wrote:

@Verdi wrote:Any chance you can separate the two?  I'd hate to think of the Hobbs being tarred with the same brush as the other foul mouthed object - a prominent element of the campaign to discredit CMOMM.

I put the links there, Verdi, as willowthewisp didn't post any links at all. The 'Onlyinamerica' blog actually linked to Hobs's post within that article.

Hi Getemgoncalo,
I am not that savvy with a computer and did not know how to post a link?
Also what are your thoughts on the possible connection of "Operation Grange" and the gofundme for Mr.Amaral also scaled down?

@Get'emGonçalo wrote:

@Verdi wrote:Any chance you can separate the two?  I'd hate to think of the Hobbs being tarred with the same brush as the other foul mouthed object - a prominent element of the campaign to discredit CMOMM.

I put the links there, Verdi, as willowthewisp didn't post any links at all. The 'Onlyinamerica' blog actually linked to Hobs's post within that article.

My apologies!     The onlyinamerica blogger is like red rag to a bull to me so I avoid it like the plague.  How pernickety can you get?

There is a simple problem I have with a singular view on forensic linguistics. Not everything that is said can be carved up and shown to prove something or other. To give an example, much was made of either Gerry or Kate saying 'come through' - a whole load of stuff was posted about the link between the term 'come through' and linked to doctors using such a term giving a totally different meaning. Now 'come through' is pretty ordinary dialect. My own mother (a Scot) used it - it's Scottish vernacular. It's ordinary and nothing more than that.

There are so many apparent lies/discrepencies in the statements given by the Tapas crew to demonstrate something is obviously not right and worth questioning. What's not worth questioning is dialect discrepency to prove a point.

Just my opinion.

Mccann parents thanking the police is just to make them look legit. They're not going to start criticising the police when that could end up biting them on the bum.