Why would destroy a million pound luxury villa

Sorry this post may be a bit long, but I found it a more than intriguing subject, to say the least.

Article -Sundat Express 24th May 2009--Bare this date in mind.

MISSED CLUES AT 1, 000,000 VILLA.

Madeleine McCann may have been taken to a luxury villa just 1/2 mile from wher she was abducted Portuguese police were told.

I must add here, K M allegedly said , she had spoken to a local woman who saw a car drive up Rocha Negra at a late hour the night Maddie disappeared, the woman added, she had never seen a car drive up there that late before, I can check on this later.

Sunday Express - Suspicions were raised because of the behaviour of people who rented the villa worth 1 million pounds because, a video camera and pictures of young children were seen there, the Sunday Express has learned.

Our revelations come as West Yorkshire police prepare to fly out to Germany to question 64 year old convicted peadophile Raymond Hewlett, over a sex attack on a young girl 25 years ago.

Retired detectives working for Kate and Gerry McCann are also hoping to interview Hewlett, to ask him directly if he knows anything about Madeleine's abduction.

Hewlett is in intensive care in Germany recovering from an operation for throat cancer, in the last twenty-four hours his conditioned has worsened and there are cocerns he may only have days to live.

So we can assume Hewlett is out of action on the dates of this reports 24th May 2007 and for the forseeable future.

Back to Sunday Express-One theory the McCann's investigators are examining is weather there was a peadophile ring operating in the area two years ago?

One resident who used to meet up with a retired British female detective to walk her dogs on the beach and toldof how both of them were concerned about a couple aged around thirty who rented the villa.

They drove a tatty British-reg small sallon red car, it was one of those vehicles upou would see on a gypsy camp site not going in and out of a very expensive villa, they only came and went in the car, not walking about , which is odd given the location of the villa, as if keeping a low profile.

Another source said after Maddie disappeared search teams combed the sea front area where the villa stands next to a large area of barren land.

I assume this area to be in the via Mar area of Luz backing onto Rocha Negra and the running route of K&G .the target area that was searched by the police.

Back to Sunday Express- Another source said after Maddie disappeared search teams combed the sea front wher the villa stands next to an area of barren land.

An Anglica priest Paul Luckman, owner of Publishers of Potugal News said, that the location and discription of the villa mentioned by your source fits the one that a searcher told me about.

The search told me the villa was empty and told me how they had got inside some weeks after Maddie disappeared, the dog handler said the villa had a room with a kind of amateur studio with video equiptment and cameras with childrens toys and pictures on the wall, he felt it was something to do with peadophiles. He told the police and they seemed to know something about it, but did not take the matter any further.

Sunday Express took him to the villa and he confirmed that it fits the description and location of the one he had told me about, they cannot name the villa for legal reasons and they have been unable to contact the owner.

The British dog walker woman resident said , I know the owner was contacted after they raised concerns with the police.The person was very angry because she said she did'nt know the people who rented it and was annoyed about being contacted by detectives.

Here , the artcle seems to contradicts what a seacher had said earlier about them getting into the villa (The searcher told me the villa was empty and how they had got inside some weeks after Maddie disappeared)

Now the article states,(The day after Maddie disappeared, the couple moved out and were not seen again, There was and older woman in a very expensive car who visited them during thier stay) Article finished.

Taxi driver Antonio Castela says a young girl, who looked like Madeleine got into the back of his taxi with four adults near the spanish border in Algarve, the night after she went missing , the 72-year old said he picked up three men and a woman and a child at 7:50 pm on May 4th 2007 from Monte Gordo about an hours drive from Praia da Luz where Madeleine vanished the night before.He drove them two miles to the Hotel Apolo in Villa Real de Santo Antonio near Faro , where they got into a BLUE METALIC JEEP.

Thought I heard that the woman had blone hair from another source.

So here we have reports of a very fishy goings of a blond woman and man in a luxury villa possibly in the VIA MAR area of Luz at the time Madeleine went missing and a blue jeep connection.

In another earlier post on this forum, I told about a Google Earth Photo site where I had found a strange photograph taken by a German called B.E.R.N.D, on 26th My 2009. A photgraph of the Rocha Negra beach , B.E.R.N.D is complimented on his photo and replys, Yes, and no tourists.

When zooming in on the shot, we see a blonde, pot bellied, skinny legged female watching a guy struggling to carry a large navy blue travel/sports bag along the based of Rocha Negra in ankle deep water toward the black rock face, this on the date 26th May 2007, Could this have been a clean up operation going on in 2009, when all eyes were diverted to Germany.

CASA VIA MAR BY RONWOLHH 24 March 2007.

On the same Google Earth phot- site is a poster called RONWOLHH who happens to take photos of luxury villa, CASA VIA MAR, One modern luxury villa in particular has a large Navy Blue 4x4 jeep or Freelander in the drive.This villa backs onto the Rocha Negra and barren scrubland with easy access to the Rocha Negra cliff and beach.

Google Earth 2007 re- CASA VIA MAR, ONE OF THE LUXURY MILLION POUND VILLAS THAT RONWOLHH COMMENTS "BEAUTIFUL HOUSE FROM WHICH TO  CONTENPLATE DEEBE EXTENSIVE AND BEAUTIFUL" IS STILL STANDING.

GOOGLE EARTH 2011 CASA VIA VILLA IS WOOSHED, NOW IN ITS PLACE LOOKS LIKE INDUSTRIAL TYPE BUILDING AND LOOKS LIKE A BULDING SITE.

By the way B.E.R.N.D'S photograph of that couple on Rocha Negra Beach can also be view linked to RONWOLHH'S villa site. PcTelNet GmbH KurfA1/4rstenstrasse 2 22041 Hamburg-040/257768900 Vertrieb von ComputerHard- Software.J

If I am correct did'nt the Mcs leave Ocean Club on 2nd July 2007 to take up residence in a villa Rua das Flores no 27, VISTA DO MAR?

Its a pity I could not have been allowed to edit my earlier post properly, as the heading demonstrates,

It was a complicated write-up and it would have put more info into it, its a shame as it would be lost on a follow up now.[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

sijm - may I suggest you copy and paste original articles with a link when quoting, instead of retyping everything? It becomes very confusing otherwise and we are not entirely sure who is saying what or whether you are quoting something that had been published or posting your own opinion. Thanks

First time I see this post.

This sounds very interesting.

@oddityfinder on twitter also mentioned a blue 4 x4. Not sure in what context though.

The description is right ( as described in the artcile of the thread starter) , the photographer says it was empty and no tourist on the beach, and if you zoom you do see two people, defently one woman, and the other looks like a man carrying something like a bag..
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Here is the link to where i found the picture.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

And to the photographers page, seems like a respected photographer.. I felt lucky finding the picture after 5 minutes without beeing able to search on a name or date. He has almost 1700 pictures on there !! :D

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I can not find any date for when the picture is taken.

IMO its not G and K. The woman atleast look to fat around the stoomach to be K and the other one to small to be G. I dont think its a bag either, its a bag you hang on the back, rucksack? and looks like a umbrella, the small one you put on your head to protect you against the sun.. The person is not carrying a big blue bag. Its two different things that on distance looks like one big thing..

Moa wrote:The description is right ( as described in the artcile of the thread starter) , the photographer says it was empty and no tourist on the beach, and if you zoom you do see two people, defently one woman, and the other looks like a man carrying something like a bag..
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Here is the link to where i found the picture.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

And to the photographers page, seems like a respected photographer.. I felt lucky finding the picture after 5 minutes without beeing able to search on a name or date. He has almost 1700 pictures on there !! :D

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I can not find any date for when the picture is taken.

IMO its not G and K. The woman atleast look to fat around the stoomach to be K and the other one to small to be G. I dont think its a bag either, its a bag you hang on the back, rucksack? and looks like a umbrella, the small one you put on your head to protect you against the sun.. The person is not carrying a big blue bag. Its two different things that on distance looks like one big thing..

Agree with Moa again. Looks like an parasol and the woman is too out of shape to be KM.

david_uk wrote:

Moa wrote:The description is right ( as described in the artcile of the thread starter) , the photographer says it was empty and no tourist on the beach, and if you zoom you do see two people, defently one woman, and the other looks like a man carrying something like a bag..
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Here is the link to where i found the picture.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

And to the photographers page, seems like a respected photographer.. I felt lucky finding the picture after 5 minutes without beeing able to search on a name or date. He has almost 1700 pictures on there !! :D

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I can not find any date for when the picture is taken.

IMO its not G and K. The woman atleast look to fat around the stoomach to be K and the other one to small to be G. I dont think its a bag either, its a bag you hang on the back, rucksack? and looks like a umbrella, the small one you put on your head to protect you against the sun.. The person is not carrying a big blue bag. Its two different things that on distance looks like one big thing..

Agree with Moa again. Looks like an parasol and the woman is too out of shape to be KM.

TY :) I cant believe people do not see that it is shaped like a parasol / umbrella its round without a doubt imo ! Cant believe thpse who says it not. Its so clear on the original picture... And yes shes to out of shape to be Kate.. And again, why would they take the risk in bright like in a country where EVERYBODY knows who they are.. The may be stupid, but not that stupid...

If you increase the resolution and zoom in it does look more like a back pack or bag. Also the other person looks to be wearing sports shorts and have short dark hair to me.

I couldnt find a date for this on the site. The first comment is from 2009, could the OP explain where the date came from?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

No, it looks like a parasol to me, it may also be that that person is carrying a small child/baby, hence the parasol.
The spacing of the spokes is quite clear to see imo and at high magnification you can actually see rocks through the material.

garyp wrote:If you increase the resolution and zoom in it does look more like a back pack or bag. Also the other person looks to be wearing sports shorts and have short dark hair to me.

I couldnt find a date for this on the site. The first comment is from 2009, could the OP explain where the date came from?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

This picture is not the original one. The original one is very clear and big. The hair is blond, it's not a bag and it's defently not K and G.

The link for the original one is in another thread on here called :police search for body after 60 years.

OK cool just read that thread debate over [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Person on the left is female, the person on the right is a child, much smaller than the person on the left. The item person on the right is holding looks very much like some kind of small surf board.

sonic72 wrote:Person on the left is female, the person on the right is a child, much smaller than the person on the left. The item person on the right is holding looks very much like some kind of small surf board.

I hope you are not talking about the beach photo in this thread ? IF YOU ARE please get some glasses !! And please look at the ORIGINAL photo..

Its a man and a woman ( not K and G ) with a rucksack with a sunparasol wich you CLEARLY can see when you blow up the ORIGINAL photo !

Bumping the original post because I would like to know if this villa can be placed on a map which would also show Rocha Negra, the McCann's apartment . Also tring to clarify when the make-up photo came out in relation to the date of this news story?