Questions you would like to ask DCI Nicola Wall

by worriedmum 23.03.15 15:38

Will you be taking 'everything back to zero'?

by **PeterMac** 23.03.15 16:22

When do you start ?

by Praiaaa 23.03.15 17:50

PeterMac wrote:When do you start ?

by Knitted 23.03.15 17:55

Qu 1: What's more important to you, your career or your ability to ensure justice is served?
Qu 2: Are you trying to ascertain what crime(s) may have occurred, or just considering things that may be relevant only to an abduction scenario?
Qu 3: If the latter (see Qu 2) then why? If it's simply the limited remit for Grange you inherited then do you not think you should challenge it? If you do not think you should challenge it then please tell me why you wanted to join the Police?
Qu 4: If the former (see Qu 2)... do you feel that anyone has possibly tried to influence you, and if so who and how?
Qu 5: What's your personal view on the Eddie and Keela alerts? The Gaspar statements? The evident 'unusual' support awarded to the McCanns? The contradictions in the statements and possibility of 'back fitting' in later statements?
Qu 6: Who do you (really) think did it?
Qu 7: ... I repeat the question "What's more important to you, your career or your ability to ensure justice is served?"

by jeanmonroe 23.03.15 18:45

Is it possible the McCann's, their 'friends' or people they know, were 'involved' in the 'disappearance' of Madeleine McCann?

If, it is your personal 'belief', that it is impossible, that the McCann's, their 'friends' or people they 'know' were 'involved' in the 'disappearance' of Madeleine McCann, then, please state your reasons, and why.

What did you spend the £6,778, of UK taxpayers money, you received TODAY, from the Home Office, to 'fund' OG, on?

Why would your personal 'belief' about the 'disappearance' of a 3 years old child, be more valid than, say, other people's alternative 'beliefs/explanations' to explain 'how she (Madeleine) is not here'?

When you said 'I nick people even before they know they are nicked' was that just 'boastful, bluster or BS'?

How much money has been raised, via the 'Find Madeleine' 'collection box' in the canteen at Belgravia Police station, for the McCann's private Madeleine's 'fund'?

Did KM offer you a discount, if you bought GQWB's for all your entire 38 strong, full time, investigating 'team'?

Are you still a DCI, sworn to serve all London constituents, in the Metropolitan Police or are you, now, 'an elite, exclusive, solely dedicated, Maddie cop'?

And all London 'victims' of 'rape, assault, burglary, robbery, car theft etc.,' can 'fend' for themselves?

YOU'RE a 'Maddie COP'!

Do you prefer 'pizza' or 'paella' when you are in Portugal 'investigating'?

You know FARO is not PDL, don't you?

For once and for all: Was that bloody 'shutter' at apartment, G5A, 'smashed, jemmied, broken, forced' as K&GM told 'relatives' in the UK, on 3rd/4th May 2007?

Can you keep 'secrets or lies' until after you 'retire' ala David Duckenfield, of South Yorkshire Police?

Questions, questions, questions.

Opps, almost forgot, what nail varnish 'brand' do you use?

by Knitted 23.03.15 19:19

jeanmonroe wrote:Snipped (or should that be 'chipped') "Opps, almost forgot, what nail varnish 'brand' do you use?"

I do like your postings :)... Keep them up :D

by jeanmonroe 23.03.15 19:43

Knitted wrote:
jeanmonroe wrote:Snipped (or should that be 'chipped') "Opps, almost forgot, what nail varnish 'brand' do you use?"
I do like your postings :)... Keep them up :D

I've been trying to 'keep 'em up' since 1994!

Going have to invest in some 'push up' bras!......................(soon!)

by Gaggzy 23.03.15 19:46

Did Andy leave you a massive onion which still needs more peeling back?

Do you know your onions?

Do you read this site?

If not, why not?

by jeanmonroe 23.03.15 20:00

Do you know the song 'the WORLD (when you're investigating a child's 'disappearance') is just,..... a GREAT BIG ONION'?

NZ 'Maddie'

Aussie 'Maddie'

Greek 'Maddie'

Irish 'Maddie'

Brazilian 'Maddie'

S African 'Maddie'

Morrocco 'Maddie'

'Gypsy' Maddie' (ANYWHERE, you 'like')

Lanzarote 'Maddie'

You get the 'picture'?

The WORLD'S your 'oyster', when you're desperately 'hunting for/searching for' a 'live', or sadly, as you predecessor at Op Grange, DCI A Redwood, said a 'dead', 'unharmed' Maddie, DCI Wall!

by stumo 23.03.15 20:29

Who is leaning on you?

by Praiaaa 23.03.15 20:37

stumo wrote:Who is leaning on you?

by whatsupdoc 23.03.15 20:38

Some excellent Q's and many serious Q's from Knitted.

If your remit, DCI Wall , is just to find an abductor, and we all know there is NO evidence there was an abductor, what do you do all day to pass the time? Go to the gym?

Why not ask the McCanns why they have told so many lies?

Why has it taken years for the UK to bite the bullet and ask some questions from the McCanns and their tapas friends and get an answer? Does this mean that if somebody is suspected of a crime and doesn't answer any questions,it could go on for ever?

The shutters weren't smashed. Eddie & Keela detected a dead body in 5A, on Kate's clothes and in the hire car the McCanns hired several weeks after Madeleine disappeared.

Kate didn't attend 6 deaths before the holiday wearing her holiday clothes and holding cuddle cat, did she?

The McCanns have formed a private company and made a lot of money from Madeleine's disappearance. Have any other parents of a missing child done that before?

Does ANY of the above make you suspicious that the McCanns might be involved in Madeleine's disappearance?

by G-Unit 23.03.15 22:32

Do you wish you'd never taken Operation Grange on?

by jeanmonroe 23.03.15 22:43

Are you investigating DCI Redwood's 3 1/2 years 'review/~~non~~ investigation'?

by Liz Eagles 23.03.15 22:58

What is the turnover of staff in the dedicated team of detectives assigned to only the case of Madeleine McCann's disappearance?

How many of the original team are still in place?

by Knitted 23.03.15 23:04

aquila wrote:What is the turnover of staff in the dedicated team of detectives assigned to only the case of Madeleine McCann's disappearance?

How many of the original team are still in place?

Good one!!! Even in these austere times! :D

by Liz Eagles 23.03.15 23:13

Should Summers & Swan wish to write another 'definitive' book, will you be giving them a minute of your time?

by **Tony Bennett** 23.03.15 23:31

Dear DCI Nicola Wall,

Here are my eleven questions to you.

Redwood told us he'd submited five International Letters of Requests (ILORs).

1. Can you give us an update?

He had identified 41 priority areas of work.

2. Can you give us an update?

These 41 priority areas of work had generated 287 separate requests.

3. Can you give us an update?

He was looking to check over 11,000 mobile 'phone records and had submitted ILORs to 30 different countries.

4. Can you give us an update?

His team had taken 'over 500 statements'.

5. Can you give us an update?

The process itself has raised 5,569 actions.  

6. Can you give us an update?

He had identified 60 'persons of interest'.

7. Can you give us an update?

Of those 60, he had discounted 22 of them.

8. Can you give us an update?

His team were aware of 530 sex offenders from the UK and elsewhere whose whereabouts were unaccounted for, broken down into high, medium and low priority.

9. Can you give us an update?

Of these, 59 were currently considered high priority; and some of those had also been declared 'persons of interest'.  

10. Can you give us an update?

There had been 26 visits to Portugal at both a strategic and tactical level.

11. Can you give us an update?

It is always so helpful, where it's clear that an organisation doesn't have a clue what it's doing and is getting nowhere and never will, to have these sorts of statistics. We sometimes think of the Met as a thorougly corrupt, discredited force, you know, like covering up child sex offender Ministers and MPs, protecting career criminals, getting payments and preferments for leaking stories to the press, bungling the Stephen Lawrence murder enquiry, covering up top-level corruption in the Daniel Morgan case, and so on.

So the procession of impressive statistics reassures us that, at least, the £10-million-plus spent on the Madeleine McCanm case so far is money well spent.

Redwood was really good at these endless statistics. Probably 10% of the staff were employed just keeping stats.

So do please give us an update when convenient.

Yours hopefully

by Liz Eagles 23.03.15 23:49

Tony Bennett wrote: Dear DCI Nicola Wall,

Here are my eleven questions to you.

Redwood told us he'd submited five International Letters of Requests (ILORs).

1. Can you give us an update?

He had identified 41 priority areas of work.

2. Can you give us an update?

These 41 priority areas of work had generated 287 separate requests.

3. Can you give us an update?

He was looking to check over 11,000 mobile 'phone records and had submitted ILORs to 30 different countries.

4. Can you give us an update?

His team had taken 'over 500 statements'.

5. Can you give us an update?

The process itself has raised 5,569 actions.  

6. Can you give us an update?

He had identified 60 'persons of interest'.

7. Can you give us an update?

Of those 60, he had discounted 22 of them.

8. Can you give us an update?

His team were aware of 530 sex offenders from the UK and elsewhere whose whereabouts were unaccounted for, broken down into high, medium and low priority.

9. Can you give us an update?

Of these, 59 were currently considered high priority; and some of those had also been declared 'persons of interest'.  

10. Can you give us an update?

There had been 26 visits to Portugal at both a strategic and tactical level.

11. Can you give us an update?

It is always so helpful, where it's clear that an organisation doesn't have a clue what it's doing and is getting nowhere and never will, to have these sorts of statistics. We sometimes think of the Met as a thorougly corrupt, discredited force, you know, like covering up child sex offender Ministers and MPs, protecting career criminals, getting payments and preferments for leaking stories to the press, bungling the Stephen Lawrence murder enquiry, covering up top-level corruption in the Daniel Morgan case, and so on.

So the procession of impressive statistics reassures us that, at least, the £10-million-plus spent on the Madeleine McCanm case so far is money well spent.

Redwood was really good at these endless statistics. Probably 10% of the staff were employed just keeping stats.

So do please give us an update when convenient.

Yours hopefully

An outstanding post.

by crystalclear 24.03.15 3:27

What evidence do you have that an alleged"abduction" took place.

What evidence do you have that the Mcanns and freinds are innocent of any wrongdoing.

by Guest 24.03.15 8:06

Why have you not investigated a scenario based on the indications of Martin Grimes' dogs?

by jeanmonroe 24.03.15 10:46

Did DCI Redwood give you the 'exsisting' EVIDENCE, he had, that Madeleine's 'disappearance' was due SOLELY to 'a criminal act carried out by a STRANGER'?

What will you 'spend' the £6,778 of UK taxpayers money, you've received TODAY, via the HO, on, TODAY?

Have you personally asked D Payne, a fellow holidaying friend of the McCanns, in PDL, Portugal, in 2007, about the 'few things' he considers 'relevent and pertinent', to ESTABLISH the 'material truth', about the 'disappearance' of a 3 years old child, from PDL, Portugal, in May 2007?

If NOT, WHY not?

by Gaggzy 24.03.15 16:37

Would you consider ditching the 31 ~~useless~~ coppers currently working under you, and replacing them with 31 people who frequent this forum?

by Guest 24.03.15 16:38

Gaggzy wrote:Would you consider ditching the 31 ~~useless~~ coppers currently working under you, and replacing them with 31 people who frequent this forum?

Brilliant!

by **Nina** 24.03.15 18:52

BlueBag wrote:
Gaggzy wrote:Would you consider ditching the 31 ~~useless~~ coppers currently working under you, and replacing them with 31 people who frequent this forum?
Brilliant!

And I would do it for lunch vouchers and travel expenses.

by worriedmum 14.08.15 11:56

Have you composed a list of inalterable facts which have emerged from your investigation?

by jeanmonroe 14.08.15 12:17

worriedmum wrote:Have you composed a list of inalterable facts which have emerged from your investigation?

WHAT 'investigation'? winkwink

by worriedmum 14.08.15 12:21

jeanmonroe wrote:
worriedmum wrote:Have you composed a list of inalterable facts which have emerged from your investigation?

WHAT 'investigation'?

by worriedmum 29.10.15 0:06

Please could you explain your analysis of the reactions of the blood and cadaver dogs, as recorded by the Portuguese police?

Please could you explain what bearing these recordings have had on your investigation?

by Gaggzy 29.10.15 1:23

worriedmum wrote:Please could you explain your analysis of the reactions of the blood and cadaver dogs, as recorded by the Portuguese police?

Please could you explain what bearing these recordings have had on your investigation?

WHAT investigation? winkwink