Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.

by Guest 26.08.15 21:35

Marian Greaves wrote:thanks for that link blue bag, i didn't realise that pic was in the press so early, i can't find a date it was given to the pj in the files, do you know if they just gave it to the british msm and ceop and not the pj?

"On May 9th 2007 back in the UK, Philomena McCann sends this photo as part of the 'e-poster' campaign"

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by **Tony Bennett** 29.08.15 12:42

BlueBag wrote:Don't worry.. people are having daily conversations with him.

Unfortunately after having been promised updates we are still waiting.

I nearly didn't write this as it would only push it back to the top of the forum.. what the hell.

Most people figured it out after a while.

I did some research on the Sandy Hook shootings the other day.

Some of those who suggest that Sandy Hook was not all that it seemed to be were referring to three or four fund-raising websites that appeared to have been created two or three days before the actual shootings.

On the face of it, this looked like very good evidence of a conspiracy.

But then I found this comment, by 'saluk', which seems to be very relevant to our discussions on Wayback and that CEOP page:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

saluk | [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] | [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

QUOTE

As someone who works in the web, the dates really are not reliable. As others have pointed out, most pages are not created from scratch but use existing content and modify it. Many blog systems have bugs and it actually can be a chore to make sure that they have the correct date with the content written. And the google cache date is the date google visited that IP address – not the date google read the content that you see in the description. Sometimes this will line up, and sometimes it wont, but it’s not reliable.

If you want to dig into this conspiracy, you will have to do better than web page dates. You may think it’s unbelievable that so many of the fundraising pages dates are wrong.

From me I would be more surprised if none of them were wrong. Honestly, if there were a conspiracy and these pages were set up beforehand – don’t you think the cover-up operation would have been clever enough to make sure dates for cover-up pages were correct? That would be the FIRST thing you would want to make sure is right. That the date comes after the event.

If only ONE of these pages had a weird date, that would be much more curious than most of them.

Look elsewhere

UNQUOTE

by Joss 01.09.15 15:02

Tony Bennett wrote:
BlueBag wrote:Don't worry.. people are having daily conversations with him.

Unfortunately after having been promised updates we are still waiting.

I nearly didn't write this as it would only push it back to the top of the forum.. what the hell.

Most people figured it out after a while.
I did some research on the Sandy Hook shootings the other day.

Some of those who suggest that Sandy Hook was not all that it seemed to be were referring to three or four fund-raising websites that appeared to have been created two or three days before the actual shootings.

On the face of it, this looked like very good evidence of a conspiracy.

But then I found this comment, by 'saluk', which seems to be very relevant to our discussions on Wayback and that CEOP page:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

saluk | [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] | [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

QUOTE

As someone who works in the web, the dates really are not reliable. As others have pointed out, most pages are not created from scratch but use existing content and modify it. Many blog systems have bugs and it actually can be a chore to make sure that they have the correct date with the content written. And the google cache date is the date google visited that IP address – not the date google read the content that you see in the description. Sometimes this will line up, and sometimes it wont, but it’s not reliable.

If you want to dig into this conspiracy, you will have to do better than web page dates. You may think it’s unbelievable that so many of the fundraising pages dates are wrong.

From me I would be more surprised if none of them were wrong. Honestly, if there were a conspiracy and these pages were set up beforehand – don’t you think the cover-up operation would have been clever enough to make sure dates for cover-up pages were correct? That would be the FIRST thing you would want to make sure is right. That the date comes after the event.

If only ONE of these pages had a weird date, that would be much more curious than most of them.

Look elsewhere

UNQUOTE

From what i have read about the Sandy Hook event there was more to it than just what is mentioned here about dates. I think the biggest hoax i have seen evidence for is the Boston bombing, and there is some very good info. about it on a few sites around the internet. But i guess people believe what they want to believe.