Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Reference :: WaybackMachine / CEOP shows Maddie missing on 30 April
Page 1 of 28 • Share
Page 1 of 28 • 1, 2, 3 ... 14 ... 28
Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
____________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MAGA [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MBGA
A wise man once said:
"Be careful who you let on to your ship,
because some people will sink the whole ship
just because they can't be the Captain."
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
@Bluebag; this does not prove the McCann. html was not in existence on 30/04
HKP- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
It proves that WBM was in error.HKP wrote:@Bluebag; this does not prove the McCann. html was not in existence on 30/04
Or do you disagree?
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
@Bluebag. It possibly proves there was some sort of error on that particular page. It does not prove there was some sort of error on the McCann. html page. Do you agree?
HKP- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
Oh.. hang on...HKP wrote:@Bluebag. It possibly proves there was some sort of error on that particular page. It does not prove there was some sort of error on the McCann. html page. Do you agree?
People were saying the WBM never makes mistakes... legal... business.... blah.. blah..
So now you must know it does - unless you like calling black white.
So we have one anachronistic page that is a 100% error... but you want to say that the other directly related anachronistic page is not an error...
Whatever.
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
Is it not very odd that an error occurs uniquely and only and exclusively and sui generis on a page associated with the McCanns ?
Or do we now accept that in our Universe this is what happens.
Or do we now accept that in our Universe this is what happens.
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
PM, how cynical of youPeterMac wrote:Is it not very odd that an error occurs uniquely and only and exclusively and sui generis on a page associated with the McCanns ?
Or do we now accept that in our Universe this is what happens.
- Of course it's a coincidence that the dogs, who are more accurate than a calculator, gave "false readings" in the McCann's apartment and the underground parking site in PdL
- The inconsistencies in the ummm, uhh, you know, we uhh, statements are figments of our imagination.
- Gerry having his "wallet stolen" but he can't quite remember where. Here is a quote from the provided link:
"Gerry McCann admitted having credit cards, saying they went missing after his wallet was stolen. He gave two different places where his wallet was stolen: Waterloo Station - or ‘near Downing Street’."
I won't list the other "concidences" as they have been debated over and over and ovzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
sallypelt- Posts : 4004
Activity : 5319
Likes received : 961
Join date : 2012-11-10
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
Sorry BB, but it proves nothing.
It shows a WBM capture page of 30th April 2007 with a couple of news items dated October 2007 that have been retrieved into the page.
Clearly this cannot be ‘correct’ as such, but without getting inside WBM’s computer, I don’t think we will ever know quite how it has created this ‘retrieved’ page, although people have come up with various suggestions, using bits of coding that have been accessed.
Nobody has yet come up with a robust and convincing argument or explanation either way as to why and how this has happened, whether it is a ‘glitch’ in the capturing system, the retrieval system, or just ‘how WBM does it’.
The responses seen from WBM themselves do not make sense.
The arguments that a seemingly ‘orphan’ page cannot be captured have been shown to be incorrect, although quite how and when the following page was captured we just do not know for certain:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
What we do know about this is that WBM archived this with a date stamp of 30th April 2007 at 11.58.03 and has now tried to wriggle out of this with unconvincing excuses and nonsensical explanations.
Your opinion that the first page is an error and therefore the second page, time stamped the same is therefore also an error is fine and may well end up to be the accepted case, but at this moment in time is far from the ‘fact’ that you keep espousing.
‘Stevo’ does not seem to have given up on it, although suggests that we will never get to the bottom of it.
It will be interesting to hear from him when he does get round to posting on here.
It shows a WBM capture page of 30th April 2007 with a couple of news items dated October 2007 that have been retrieved into the page.
Clearly this cannot be ‘correct’ as such, but without getting inside WBM’s computer, I don’t think we will ever know quite how it has created this ‘retrieved’ page, although people have come up with various suggestions, using bits of coding that have been accessed.
Nobody has yet come up with a robust and convincing argument or explanation either way as to why and how this has happened, whether it is a ‘glitch’ in the capturing system, the retrieval system, or just ‘how WBM does it’.
The responses seen from WBM themselves do not make sense.
The arguments that a seemingly ‘orphan’ page cannot be captured have been shown to be incorrect, although quite how and when the following page was captured we just do not know for certain:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
What we do know about this is that WBM archived this with a date stamp of 30th April 2007 at 11.58.03 and has now tried to wriggle out of this with unconvincing excuses and nonsensical explanations.
Your opinion that the first page is an error and therefore the second page, time stamped the same is therefore also an error is fine and may well end up to be the accepted case, but at this moment in time is far from the ‘fact’ that you keep espousing.
‘Stevo’ does not seem to have given up on it, although suggests that we will never get to the bottom of it.
It will be interesting to hear from him when he does get round to posting on here.
Doug D- Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
More evidence of this simply being a wayback screwup. Non McCann related Press Release dated 18/06/07 in an April 30th 2007 archive.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] from here https://archive.is/www.ceop.gov.uk
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] from here https://archive.is/www.ceop.gov.uk
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Syn- Posts : 109
Activity : 110
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2015-06-20
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
Do we have a list of everything that is in the 30/04 11:58:03 index?
HKP- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
We have no idea of the scale of the problem.PeterMac wrote:Is it not very odd that an error occurs uniquely and only and exclusively and sui generis on a page associated with the McCanns ?
Or do we now accept that in our Universe this is what happens.
You can't say "only".
Steve Marsden spotted this one because he was looking at CEOP web pages and noticed the anomaly.
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
Steve said it was "probably a mistake" in about his third post in the Facebook thread.Doug D wrote:‘Stevo’ does not seem to have given up on it, although suggests that we will never get to the bottom of it.
It will be interesting to hear from him when he does get round to posting on here.
And this DOES prove the WBM was in error even though people were insisting WBM couldn't possibly make errors.
How hard is it for people to admit even that?
But it's a provable fact not an opinion.
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
@bluebag. So you're now backing up your claim with Stevo's "probably a mistake" statement. Didn't you claim to probably be the most experienced IT person on this forum, only to be corrected. Probables are not definitive enough, Carlesberg probably make exceedingly good cakes, or is that Mr Kipling?
HKP- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
???HKP wrote:@bluebag. So you're now backing up your claim with Stevo's "probably a mistake" statement. Didn't you claim to probably be the most experienced IT person on this forum, only to be corrected. Probables are not definitive enough, Carlesberg probably make exceedingly good cakes, or is that Mr Kipling?
No.
How desperate are you?
If anyone here has more than 34 years writing software and dealing with computer problems on a daily basis for a full time living on this forum I tip my hat to them.
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
@bluebag. There's certainly someone desperate on this thread and it's not me. Please tip your hat to macdonut who called you out at 9.58 am yesterday.
Anyways anything more to add than it's a fact and Stevo probably thinks the same?
Anyways anything more to add than it's a fact and Stevo probably thinks the same?
HKP- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
Which thread was that?HKP wrote:@bluebag. There's certainly someone desperate on this thread and it's not me. Please tip your hat to macdonut who called you out at 9.58 am yesterday.
Anyways anything more to add than it's a fact and Stevo probably thinks the same?
This will be interesting.
Yes and I'm afraid you saying I was using Steve Marsdens "It's probably a mistake" as some kind of proof is you clutching at straws.
The facts speak for themselves on their own.
I was just pointing you at the Facebook tread which I think most people haven't bothered to read.
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
BlueBag wrote:Which thread was that?HKP wrote:@bluebag. There's certainly someone desperate on this thread and it's not me. Please tip your hat to macdonut who called you out at 9.58 am yesterday.
Anyways anything more to add than it's a fact and Stevo probably thinks the same?
This will be interesting.
Yes and I'm afraid you saying I was using Steve Marsdens "It's probably a mistake" as some kind of proof is you clutching at straws.
The facts speak for themselves on their own.
I was just pointing you at the Facebook tread which I think most people haven't bothered to read.
macdonut wrote:BlueBag wrote:Wow... I think we have our own Madeleine "no planes".
I've contained myself for a few days but enough is enough, I can't let this ride.
It is a FACT the WBM was in error over an October 2007 page appearing under April 30th 2007.
Don't ask me ask Steve Marsden.
FACT.
F.. A.. C.. T...
Check his Facebook thread.
F.. A.. C.. T...
WBM was IN ERROR.
No one can possibly argue that the WBM is not on error, it's was there for all to see from the horses mouth.
No one.
And that absolutely puts the other data with the same time stamp in doubt.
Absolutely without a shadow of a doubt.. it is doubtful data.. more.. it is almost certainly in error for the same reason.
If you want to carry on making this forum look irrational and illogical then carry on, someone somewhere will use it against us I'm sure.
Any BS about comparing "apples" and "oranges" is just that.
This is apples and apples off the same 20070430 115803 tree.
I feel really strongly about this because I am probably the most experienced IT person on this forum.
Anyone been programming and working as an IT consultant since 1981?
I am a java programming expert (among many other branches of IT expertise) and I don't say that lightly.
As it happens, you're NOT the most experienced IT person on this forum. However, I'm not sure what the relevance of that is.
I do agree with you that this is almost certainly a mistake in the archiving on the Wayback Machine. My experience and the fact that there are a number of anomolies (like October news on a May Archive) shows that it's not infallible.
However, this is far too important a point, with wide reaching consequences, to just let drop because it looks like an error. I fully support TB and others as they push the point with the web archive and we need to get an explanation for why this happened that's acceptable to all.
I would only say though that, in my opinion, this WILL turn out to be an error and we should just be careful about jumping to any conclusions or stating anything as fact until we do know what happened.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Mike- Posts : 163
Activity : 174
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2009-11-25
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
I tip my hat to macdonut if he has been at it longer than 34 years (they were dark days in a galaxy far away).
But hey.... look!!!!
macdonut agrees with me (in the main) based on his experience.
Which I knew anyway because macdonut said the same on page 2 of the original thread.
But hey.... look!!!!
macdonut agrees with me (in the main) based on his experience.
Which I knew anyway because macdonut said the same on page 2 of the original thread.
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
@bluebag. You made the claim on the original thread which was then countered as stated. I'm not the one using capital letters to write facts and just pointing to Stevo's page. Have a look for his "I've been using Wayback for years" statement. Your constant mantra of 'it's a fact' with little substance is boring, I'm ducking out until some interesting info. is posted.
HKP- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
The claim that I am probably the most experienced it person on the forum?HKP wrote:@bluebag. You made the claim on the original thread which was then countered as stated. I'm not the one using capital letters to write facts and just pointing to Stevo's page. Have a look for his "I've been using Wayback for years" statement. Your constant mantra of 'it's a fact' with little substance is boring, I'm ducking out until some interesting info. is posted.
That's some claim I made.
Score one to you.. maybe... oh wait...
And it is a fact the WBM was in error.
Look at the screen shot in the first post of this thread.
Cheers.
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
The wayback machine was screwed for this page.Get'emGonçalo wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
This is a fact.
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
Do you agree with macdonut that "this WILL turn out to be an error"?HKP wrote:@bluebag. You made the claim on the original thread which was then countered as stated. I'm not the one using capital letters to write facts and just pointing to Stevo's page. Have a look for his "I've been using Wayback for years" statement. Your constant mantra of 'it's a fact' with little substance is boring, I'm ducking out until some interesting info. is posted.
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
Error or not, don´t we have the answer in this file, "$Usnjrnl" on their server?BlueBag wrote:It proves that WBM was in error.HKP wrote:@Bluebag; this does not prove the McCann. html was not in existence on 30/04
Or do you disagree?
____________________
Goncalo Amaral: "Then there's the window we found Kate's finger prints.
She said she had never touched that window and the cleaning lady assured that she had cleaned it on the previous day....it doesn't add up"
NickE- Posts : 1405
Activity : 2152
Likes received : 499
Join date : 2013-10-27
Age : 49
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
@bluebag. I don't know if this WILL turn out to be an error, I don't work for Archive.org, you should maybe have a look at the way that the Wayback recreates the pages it displays, there's plenty there to discuss.
@NickE. Can you expand on that please.
@NickE. Can you expand on that please.
HKP- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
@bluebag. You never answered my question; do you agree that the McCann.html could have been in existence 30/04 despite the question mark over the main Ceop page?
HKP- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
NickE
The answer is probably there - but what's the chances archive.org will open it up for scrutiny to the general populace?
BlueBag
Don't want to get in the middle of yours and HKP's mano a mano but I thought you were an expert?
The answer is probably there - but what's the chances archive.org will open it up for scrutiny to the general populace?
BlueBag
Don't want to get in the middle of yours and HKP's mano a mano but I thought you were an expert?
Skyrocket1- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
With the related evidence alongside it of the October page I would day no, my experience tells me that the WBM machine had an error that affected all the pages time stamped 20070430 115803.HKP wrote:@bluebag. You never answered my question; do you agree that the McCann.html could have been in existence 30/04 despite the question mark over the main Ceop page?
The alternative is that a process running on or after 23rd October decided to put the October page in an already existing folder WITH THAT TIME STAMP and it ignored timestamps before and after. I don't see the program logic that would do that.
I also alongside all this I don't believe CEOP would have had a Find Madeleine poster made before 11:58:03 on April 30th 2007.
Madeleine was photographed by the pool in the afternoon of the day before.
For something to happened involving blood and cadaverine and then CEOP having a poster ready for 11:58:03 next day beggars belief.
Also the phone records do not support anything for those hours either.
The bigger picture just does not support the idea.
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
HKP wrote:@bluebag. I don't know if this WILL turn out to be an error, I don't work for Archive.org, you should maybe have a look at the way that the Wayback recreates the pages it displays, there's plenty there to discuss.
@NickE. Can you expand on that please.
What is the $UsnJrnl File?
According to the book [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], the change journal “is a file that records when changes are made to files and directories”. The change journal is located at $Extend\$UsnJrnl and the actual journal entries are stored in the $UsnJrnl:$J alternate data stream. The book details the information contained in each entry:
- Time of change
- Reason for the change
- File/directory’s name
- File/directory’s attributes
- File/directory’s MFT record number
- File record number of the file’s parent directory
- Security ID
- Update Sequence Number of the record
- Information about the source of the change
____________________
Goncalo Amaral: "Then there's the window we found Kate's finger prints.
She said she had never touched that window and the cleaning lady assured that she had cleaned it on the previous day....it doesn't add up"
NickE- Posts : 1405
Activity : 2152
Likes received : 499
Join date : 2013-10-27
Age : 49
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
I am 34 years experienced with the many and varied problems that computers generate on a whole host of computer applications - I wrote a lot of them myself.Skyrocket1 wrote:BlueBag
Don't want to get in the middle of yours and HKP's mano a mano but I thought you were an expert?
I have also written a web page scraper in my time for three different applications (ahem.. One being the Racing Post and the other The Tote for a glorious horse racing system that didn't make me any money... the other was for information from banking web pages).
I do know what I'm talking about and I recognise the symptoms here.
"Computer filed something with wrong date problem".
Guest- Guest
Re: Steve Marsden's WBM screenshot: The CEOP Home page for April 30, 2007 also refers to Missing Madeleine.
@NickE. Thanks, that would certainly add to the debate (no doubt start another one!)
@Bluebag. If thats your considered opinion then fine, mines is that there is no evidence that mccann.html was not in existence on or prior to 30/04 (it was only ‘found‘ by Wayback 30/04). The Ceop home page I have little interest in
@Bluebag. If thats your considered opinion then fine, mines is that there is no evidence that mccann.html was not in existence on or prior to 30/04 (it was only ‘found‘ by Wayback 30/04). The Ceop home page I have little interest in
HKP- Guest
Page 1 of 28 • 1, 2, 3 ... 14 ... 28
Similar topics
» Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"
» The McCanns family trip to Sagres 30th April
» How Maddie's creche attendance was "arranged"
» Shortly after Madeleine was reported missing, in June 2007, Gerry announced, “We want a big event to raise awareness that she is still missing. It wouldn’t be a one-year anniversary, it will be sooner than that”
» Was Madeleine seen after Sunday?
» The McCanns family trip to Sagres 30th April
» How Maddie's creche attendance was "arranged"
» Shortly after Madeleine was reported missing, in June 2007, Gerry announced, “We want a big event to raise awareness that she is still missing. It wouldn’t be a one-year anniversary, it will be sooner than that”
» Was Madeleine seen after Sunday?
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Reference :: WaybackMachine / CEOP shows Maddie missing on 30 April
Page 1 of 28
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum